Unfortunately, most men are led around by their dicks, and thus we are eternally doomed by simps to repeat this cycle of suffering.
It's worse than that. Most men are not only led around by their dicks, but they actively advocate for being led around by their dicks even more. How many posts in this forum are about:
"Oh no, they made this female character less attractive" (i.e. I can't wank to my fantasies about a video game character any more, the horror!)
"Oh no, someone is making pornography less accessible" (i.e. It will be harder to find material that overstimulates my sex drive and makes me more of a slave to sex, the horror!)
Until men learn to stop being slaves to their passions, and reject media that helps enslave them, women and feminists (i.e. most women) will continue leading men around by their dicks.
You are right, but your conclusions for your examples are wrong.
I don't even play the games where these women have been uglified, but I can understand and I support the outrage. Why? Because as I've mentioned a few times before, it's not just about the uglification of the women, it's the intent.
But, again, you are right that way too many men are led around by the knob (it's how the human race sustains its existence). The problem is when men are unwilling to forfeit those urges to do the right thing; to tear down disruptive institutions, or to abandon irrational civic policies.
It's how we end up with people being arrested for posting "mean" things online, or calling some wench a "lesbian" (even if it's true), or laws that protect the delusions of those who deny basic reality.
It's also frustrating seeing a lot of men defend elements of wokeness that adhere to their own fetishes. That's one of the major reasons why faggotry keeps spreading. You have a lot of knobheads who will enable it because "lesbians are hot guys!".
I had a few encounters over the last several years where some coomers unironically said, "I'm fine with them making the LGBT content canon because it's already like that in the porn I watch". I had no response because what else is there to say?
This issue has extended from entertainment media all the way into politics. And as others have mentioned throughout this thread, a lot of it could have been prevented if men thought with their right head and simply said, "No!".
The point I'm making is there are far bigger things to worry about that "uglification of women" in media. Yet that is what many men care about enough to make a big fuss over. Why? Because they are so brainwashed to think that sex is the most important thing in life, that they will fight tooth and nail to access sex in some form. Men need to devote their time to actual standing up for what actually matters in society - actual morality - not a quick fix like a junkie.
The point I'm making is there are far bigger things to worry about that "uglification of women" in media.
Media is as important as politics, because media affects culture, and culture affects politics.
Do you know why there are so many people who accept Leftist agitprop? Because it's pushed heavily across all of their consumable media. If you accept it in media, you accept it in politics.
Men need to devote their time to actual standing up for what actually matters in society - actual morality - not a quick fix like a junkie.
I agree, to an extent, but you need to combat it on all fronts, not just at the polls. Because that's exactly how the polls are affected -- just like the overt promotion of abortion across media, television, literature, and advertising has convinced people it's good, so they vote for politicians who support abortion... why? Because media told them so.
Either the whole point of that post went over your head or you're intentionally acting obtuse so nobody can debate you on the facts. (i.e. If I just expel verbal diarrhea instead of making a concrete argument they can't refute it!) (this is how your game works, right?)
? My comment stands on it's own. I don't give a shit about some lame Reddit thread that you linked to; my comment was a general statement based on obvious observations that any fool could make by themselves (yes, I am a fool, no doubt).
Although, the fact that you care shows how easily you are manipulated "OMG! Some wanker on Reddit said something stupid! I must adopt the opposite position because my idea of right and and wrong is: Leftist on reddit = wrong; opposite of leftist on reddit = right."
In contrast to you, I will stand by my positions when I am basing them on my morality regardless of whether some idiot on Reddit happens to have the same opinion or not.
It's worse than that. Most men are not only led around by their dicks, but they actively advocate for being led around by their dicks even more. How many posts in this forum are about:
"Oh no, they made this female character less attractive" (i.e. I can't wank to my fantasies about a video game character any more, the horror!)
"Oh no, someone is making pornography less accessible" (i.e. It will be harder to find material that overstimulates my sex drive and makes me more of a slave to sex, the horror!)
Until men learn to stop being slaves to their passions, and reject media that helps enslave them, women and feminists (i.e. most women) will continue leading men around by their dicks.
You are right, but your conclusions for your examples are wrong.
I don't even play the games where these women have been uglified, but I can understand and I support the outrage. Why? Because as I've mentioned a few times before, it's not just about the uglification of the women, it's the intent.
But, again, you are right that way too many men are led around by the knob (it's how the human race sustains its existence). The problem is when men are unwilling to forfeit those urges to do the right thing; to tear down disruptive institutions, or to abandon irrational civic policies.
It's how we end up with people being arrested for posting "mean" things online, or calling some wench a "lesbian" (even if it's true), or laws that protect the delusions of those who deny basic reality.
It's also frustrating seeing a lot of men defend elements of wokeness that adhere to their own fetishes. That's one of the major reasons why faggotry keeps spreading. You have a lot of knobheads who will enable it because "lesbians are hot guys!".
I had a few encounters over the last several years where some coomers unironically said, "I'm fine with them making the LGBT content canon because it's already like that in the porn I watch". I had no response because what else is there to say?
This issue has extended from entertainment media all the way into politics. And as others have mentioned throughout this thread, a lot of it could have been prevented if men thought with their right head and simply said, "No!".
The point I'm making is there are far bigger things to worry about that "uglification of women" in media. Yet that is what many men care about enough to make a big fuss over. Why? Because they are so brainwashed to think that sex is the most important thing in life, that they will fight tooth and nail to access sex in some form. Men need to devote their time to actual standing up for what actually matters in society - actual morality - not a quick fix like a junkie.
Media is as important as politics, because media affects culture, and culture affects politics.
Do you know why there are so many people who accept Leftist agitprop? Because it's pushed heavily across all of their consumable media. If you accept it in media, you accept it in politics.
I agree, to an extent, but you need to combat it on all fronts, not just at the polls. Because that's exactly how the polls are affected -- just like the overt promotion of abortion across media, television, literature, and advertising has convinced people it's good, so they vote for politicians who support abortion... why? Because media told them so.
Oh my god it took less than 24 fucking hours for someone to pick up the idiot ball.
Either the whole point of that post went over your head or you're intentionally acting obtuse so nobody can debate you on the facts. (i.e. If I just expel verbal diarrhea instead of making a concrete argument they can't refute it!) (this is how your game works, right?)
Eat a bag.
? My comment stands on it's own. I don't give a shit about some lame Reddit thread that you linked to; my comment was a general statement based on obvious observations that any fool could make by themselves (yes, I am a fool, no doubt).
Although, the fact that you care shows how easily you are manipulated "OMG! Some wanker on Reddit said something stupid! I must adopt the opposite position because my idea of right and and wrong is: Leftist on reddit = wrong; opposite of leftist on reddit = right."
In contrast to you, I will stand by my positions when I am basing them on my morality regardless of whether some idiot on Reddit happens to have the same opinion or not.