I think technically it falls under the 5th unless you can convince the judge and jury that the aliens are soldiers of the government. If you can't, then it's a takings case.
All of them are military age males, it's not a stretch of the imagination. Will be fun watching the US government arguing that this doesn't violate 3A because they are an invading army from outside America and the 3rd only covers the US military.
Like I say, you'd need a very good judge for it to work. The feds would fall back on the "refugees and asylum seekers" BS, and most judges would defer to the fed witnesses.
They are subsidizing this so the hotels will make bank off of tax dollars.
Adams’s plan—to offer profitable city contracts to hotels all over the Empire State in exchange for housing the migrants
As always, never forget that Republicans held the Presidency and both houses of Congress as recently as 2017, yet here we are. They want this to happen just as much as the Dems do.
On the other side of the political spectrum, however, McMahon can continue to appease corporate interests that would stand to benefit from the influx of cheap labor for the county’s many farms, strip malls, and fulfillment centers.
“There are residents who are suffering right now because of economic challenges. They have spare rooms,” he added.
“We can take that $4.2 billion — $4.3 maybe now — that we anticipate we have to spend and we can put it back in the pockets of everyday, everyday houses of worship instead of putting it in the pockets of corporations,” he said. “We should be recycling our own dollars.”
Is this guy fucking insane? $4.3 BILLION to house a few illegals being sent to NYC?
This might be the new grift for Democrats. "I need billions to house these illegals sent to me from Texas."
Ay, fuggin raysis cracka motherfugga, you tryin to say sumtin? Dint you know dat New Yawk was bilt by de kangz? Dis jus de kangz habbin wat is dayuz. Sheeeit.
Awesome. Let's Uber a couple dozen to Gracie Mansion or wherever CreepyEric is hiding. Then we'll go down the voter registration rolls and send a couple to everyone with a (D)umbass next to their name.
So many people here are so eager to "own the libs" that they're willing to set their own country on fire to do it.
Invaders should be shot and their bodies thrown in a ditch for the vultures to eat. Anything less is tantamount to treason and that includes advocacy for putting them in the homes of leftists.
I've encountered a number of posters here who think it's a great thing to ship invaders further into the country so long as they get dumped on the doorsteps of liberal cities/politicians.
I'd make any homes that were awarded in family court or bought with alimony or child support eligible for this "program". They weren't legitimately purchased in the first place so I'm fine with stealing them and using them for other purposes.
I'm sure they will. That's why I'm in favor of making their lives a living hell. The only difference we have on that count is that I would exempt women who vote Republican.
I hate to sound like Imp, but most women are so self absorbed and allergic to introspection that they won't ever go "hey, that thing I did was stupid, let me undo it". If you put a dozen rapey illegals in every New Yawk danger hair's home, six months from now Salon would have articles like "I get paid to get laid, thanks to Mayor Adams!"
Its hard to learn a lesson when the moment things get tough you can just turn on a few tears and turn to daddy (actual, husband or government) to fix it for you.
It's not even a particularly useful lesson to learn anyway. What are they going to do once they learn that lesson? Vote for the other party with the same immigration policies?
The danger hair will share articles with you titled "How Trump Administration Policies Steeped in Patriarchal White Supremacy Led to New York's Migrant Crisis".
I'm 100% for it, as long as they're all sent to the homes of people who voted for this dipshit.
I'd love to see the Third Amendment violation lawsuit.
I'd add the Fifth Amendment as well. It's impossible to argue that this isn't a deprivation of property without due process.
I was about to say that this whole idea seems unconstitutional, not that the left cares.
at least the newyawkas can exercise their 2nd amendment against these invaders... oh...
bus pulls up to a Harlem ghetto, hundreds of illegals pile off
"Ey, mano! Huwere ees my free howwsse?"
doubt any illegals want to live in a gay house hold.
I think he's talking about people who volunteer for this, so kinda. He's talking about paying people like AirBNB.
Life’s so hard when you have to deal with the problems you voted for.
suddenly the third amendment wakes up out of its deep slumber
I was thinking the same thing. That goes way back to revolutionary war days
I think technically it falls under the 5th unless you can convince the judge and jury that the aliens are soldiers of the government. If you can't, then it's a takings case.
All of them are military age males, it's not a stretch of the imagination. Will be fun watching the US government arguing that this doesn't violate 3A because they are an invading army from outside America and the 3rd only covers the US military.
Like I say, you'd need a very good judge for it to work. The feds would fall back on the "refugees and asylum seekers" BS, and most judges would defer to the fed witnesses.
They have also kicked Americans out of hotel that allows long-term stays (de-facto apartments basically) to make room for the aliens.
They are subsidizing this so the hotels will make bank off of tax dollars.
As always, never forget that Republicans held the Presidency and both houses of Congress as recently as 2017, yet here we are. They want this to happen just as much as the Dems do.
The governments seem to prefer renting out entire buildings to using available space.
Is this guy fucking insane? $4.3 BILLION to house a few illegals being sent to NYC?
This might be the new grift for Democrats. "I need billions to house these illegals sent to me from Texas."
I like how he paints it as "putting money back in the pockets of Americans" when really it's paying someone to turn their house into a fucking hotel.
I watched a video of a guy at a pro "refugee" march in the UK asking attendees if they would house any of them. The responses were as expected.
Good! This is the only way to stop the liberals calling for more genocidal replacement- make them pay for it.
They love it now because the burden is borne by working class people in red states.
It always is through federal bailouts, which are paid for by inflation and borrowing.
Hey, why do the illegals living in private residences have such a high rate of deadly accidents?
Lol do it.
If you think homicides in NYC are bad now, imagine once these people get forced together.
Always impressed by the diversity of the people standing behind him...
Ay, fuggin raysis cracka motherfugga, you tryin to say sumtin? Dint you know dat New Yawk was bilt by de kangz? Dis jus de kangz habbin wat is dayuz. Sheeeit.
Awesome. Let's Uber a couple dozen to Gracie Mansion or wherever CreepyEric is hiding. Then we'll go down the voter registration rolls and send a couple to everyone with a (D)umbass next to their name.
We can solve this problem, guys!
So many people here are so eager to "own the libs" that they're willing to set their own country on fire to do it.
Invaders should be shot and their bodies thrown in a ditch for the vultures to eat. Anything less is tantamount to treason and that includes advocacy for putting them in the homes of leftists.
So I agree about the invaders, but how are people around here willing to set the country on fire?
100% of the globalists are
I've encountered a number of posters here who think it's a great thing to ship invaders further into the country so long as they get dumped on the doorsteps of liberal cities/politicians.
Good, lets start with his
"What? You all have rooms, don't you?"
This should be a rallying cry for all border states to start flooding New York City with illegal immigrants.
LOLOLOLOL
All major cities should be their own city-states at this point.
Single women are the majority of homeowners.
Do it.
I'd make any homes that were awarded in family court or bought with alimony or child support eligible for this "program". They weren't legitimately purchased in the first place so I'm fine with stealing them and using them for other purposes.
Women would still spite vote Democrat even if this happened.
I'm sure they will. That's why I'm in favor of making their lives a living hell. The only difference we have on that count is that I would exempt women who vote Republican.
I hate to sound like Imp, but most women are so self absorbed and allergic to introspection that they won't ever go "hey, that thing I did was stupid, let me undo it". If you put a dozen rapey illegals in every New Yawk danger hair's home, six months from now Salon would have articles like "I get paid to get laid, thanks to Mayor Adams!"
Its hard to learn a lesson when the moment things get tough you can just turn on a few tears and turn to daddy (actual, husband or government) to fix it for you.
It's not even a particularly useful lesson to learn anyway. What are they going to do once they learn that lesson? Vote for the other party with the same immigration policies?
The danger hair will share articles with you titled "How Trump Administration Policies Steeped in Patriarchal White Supremacy Led to New York's Migrant Crisis".
Rent. Free.