TheImp1 and Stormfront Are Neck and Neck...
(media.communities.win)
Comments (54)
sorted by:
Siri, show me a list of the most influential feminists in history, sorted by ethnicity…
Siri, show me who, from the shadows, funded feminists, their campaigns and feminist-forward politicians.
Simone de Beauvoir, Mary Wollestonecraft, Virginia Woolf, Emmeline Pankhurst, Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Mary Ann M'Clintock,Paula Wright Davis, Lydia Maria Child, Frances Wright, Abby Kelly, Rebecca Latimer Felton, Ernestine Rose, Lucretia Coffin Mott, Adrienne Rich, Margaret Fuller, Lucy Stone, Marilyn French, Evelyn Reed, Alexandra Kollontai, Catharine MacKinnon, Valerie Solanas, Marilyn Frye, Juliet Mitchell, bell hooks, Kate Millett, Sally Miller Gearhart, Camille Paglia, Sheila Jeffrey's, Julie Bindel. . . .
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: Doesn't get to that point, just dances towards it.
is it always the same guy reporting?
Some butthurt kike kvetching about freedom of speech.
I actually believe there's immense overlap between jews and feminism which is why there's so much competing thought regarding the two as root causes for our problems.
Otto Weininger explains it the best in his book Sex and Character. He essentially suggests that jews are innately a feminine race. He also equates the pure femininity to most of the problems people have regarding jews and women and society at large.
Notice how white/patriarchy was put together as one? Why wasn't jew/feminism put together as one? Well, it should be because the two go hand-in-hand like whites and patriarchy. That's because white people are innately a patriarchal and masculine dominant race, whereas the jews are innately a feminine and female dominant or gynocratic race.
Thus when you have jews in power, they naturally create a more gynocentric society because that's what their nature pulls them toward. So if you're a white person in society, you feel omg it's feminism and women destroying everything because now the jews who have all the power have created a feminized society that aligns with jewish nature; however, it's jewish people who've utilized the brunt of their power, mostly accumulated since the 19th century, to push society toward this end.
So the answer unironically is jew/feminism. They go hand-in-hand.
I think it is due to the matrilineal descent of Judaism, it makes Jewish women the ultimate arbiters of who is and isn't a jew.
You have to account for the historical development of liberalism as well. Feminism birthed from liberalism. In the post-war West, Jews have heavily relied on liberalism, hence the overlap and parallels.
Yeah, there's an interesting theory to that I once heard by some PhD genealogist or whatever the science is...
Basically, he believed that people essentially have a beta/alpha, weak/strong or whatever other duality you wanted to use "gene" that guided their predisposition towards acting in certain ways. Throughout most of history, people with the strong gene had dominance in society because the people with the weak gene (especially men), died off due to harsher living conditions, working conditions and resource distributions that tended to favor strong over weak.
With modern technology, especially in the areas of sanitation and medicine as well as general economic leading to less harsh conditions, the humans with the beta gene started gaining more prominence in society. The beta/weak gene always outnumbered the strong one if you tracked overall births but the harsh living conditions always kept a check on the beta population. Now that check was beginning to be removed and today we see no check in place with anyone with any disability being taken care of by the State. This rise in beta people is why led to the rise in liberalism because liberalism is inherently a beta ideology.
Now others have tried to frame this before as slave moraliry people vs. master morality people like Nietzsche or perhaps discussing the bourgeoisie and proletariat or the merchant caste, warrior caste and slave caste etc... But no one truly discusses why there's such a prominence for the weaker castes today and I liked the idea that it's because of how much easier life is. This is most definitely another dynamic that has been at play for sure. You can see how in pourer countries, all this "woke" nonsense is cared about very little.
Liberalism is an individualist, minoritarian ideology. It's promoted by the ruling class to morally justify their rule. In order to retain legitimacy, it has to simulate the extension of individual rights to others. Hence, it spawns movements to do things like expand suffrage, including women's suffrage.
And it sounds like a great deal to people who actually have very limited individual sovereignty, ironically. That's why weak people like liberalism because it's in theory, giving them "power" when they actually have no power or deserve no power either.
But you are correct, the ruling class uses it to justify their rule but only weak people would buy such a justification.
People will buy the justification as long as their lives are stable or even better, improving. That's stalling now.
An ideology's legitimacy stems from its perceived ability to handle crisis. Liberalism isn't doing that well anymore so it is beginning to lose credibility. Since it has no answers, it can only cling to legitimacy by silencing its critics, violating its own stated principles in the process and thus getting stuck in a feedback loop of a credibility death spiral.
Liberalism is based in the teachings of Jesus Christ and was always intended to keep governments from interfering with the personal relationship between each human and God.
It fails when people prioritize liberalism over the Word.
For example, feminism runs counter to scripture and so should never have been allowed under Liberalism. Same with gay marriage, the whole tranny thing, even allowing pornography as "speech".
Everyone always forgets that Liberalism is only justified by the fact that God created us in his image and we each have a personal covenant with him.
If we're working in an atheistic "we're all mechanistic automatons" framework, Liberalism makes no sense because we're no different from anyone else and should all be forced to bend to the most powerful authority.
Similar for Muslim and Judaic religions; they're tribal and believe they are special to God bjt everyone else is a slave; neither should be tolerated in a Liberal society.
Liberalism isn't failing because it's a weak ideology, it's failing (just like every other ideology these days) because everyone has the idea that God is obsolete.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: Liberals aren't an identity group.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: "Beta" genetics could actually be a violation, but I don't think there's enough here to say that having "beta" genetics makes you a moral inferior.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks.
Comment Approved: Nope. Doesn't even come close.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed: Yes, calling jews inherently evil as a cabal of satan worshipers crosses the line.
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity attacks.
Saying jews are genetically evil violates this rule.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed: I find this level of sophistication and eloquence in jew hatred to be comical, but still a violation of the rules. Perchance it should be taken somewhere else?
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: Same as before, doesn't cross the line.
he should have separated feminism and wokism. Wokism threw actual feminists under the bus.
Woke is the ungrateful offspring of Feminists. Keeping them in the same family is fitting.
All femism is evil cancer. Fuck feminism and all feminist vermin. It was always designed to demonize Men and is female supremacist movement with roots in communism. It wqs made to fuck over men. Affirmative action and crt comes from feminist cancer
May be. But Feminism doesn't have to be good for someone to recognize when feminists are thrown under the bus. Getting a taste of their own medicine has even caused a few to sober up and actually come to respect their previous opponents.
Would have made the poll more interesting if he separated the two IMO.
Just like how feminism threw actual women under the bus.
They're not so different than the trannies and BLMers, which is probably why they hate each other.
Indeed. The women pinning chicken feathers to war vets to note they're cowards for not successfully dying for the womens' profits have very little to do with the Wokist ideology, aside from being a warmongering nature.
gee, if they'd said "jews/feminism/wokism" it woulda gotten 90% and then derewige1 woulda been clear ahead! right?
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: I don't see how.
1 and 3 are both true, but 1 is a result of 3
Post Reported for:
I don't see how.
Don't put Imp's name in the title please. It's not 'negative' in this case, but just refer to it as MGTOW or something.
I wouldn't have lumped in woke with feminism specifically but I think I understand why he would have thought to do so. Woke activists protest against civil liberties, until them only feminists did that
SamePicture.jpg
Is CRP's dumb ass still in Ukraine?
Which is weird as, it's Twitter, I'd have assumed the bots where for the other two but they are really low.
The pole is among this guys followers? Maybe he has a right wing following or maybe lots of muslims, I assume muslims hate both feminism and jews.
Don't use twitter so you can lock polls to followers only? As that would explain it, even non Muslims normal people can understand the dislike of feminism id you talk to people privately.
I'm not a twitter user but I assume at least has more visibility among the followers
For sure only a fraction of users will see this poll, and it's not a random sample.
Notice harder, boys!