Great, another so-called conservative that cares more about licking Israel’s ass than they do about reversing the decay of Western civilization.
I generally like The Bee and I get that he’s probably trolling but this is just unnecessary faggy cringe shit. It reminds me of Sargon posting gay interracial porn to “own” the alt-right.
Stick to tricking retards and making boomers laugh on Facebook, Joel.
you'd think that any grown man who finds that his best argument is extremist, deliberately disgusting shock pornography would start rethinking his entire worldview, but if that was the case we wouldn't live in clown world anymore.
He's been all in on human trafficking on the southern border for a long while. Project Veritas should really do a "follow the money" exposé on him someday.
Because as we know, the best thing to do when you position yourself as a Christian Right Wing website is to openly attack multiple things that group holds sacred and mock them just like the people they came to you seeking refuge from.
It doesn't matter if these are him trolling or not. It says enough about him as a person to be held against him.
Who were white as snow at the time. Their ethnicity only became swarthy after a few centuries of systemic rape from mud slime invasions. Same thing with Spain and southern Italy.
That's why I always laugh when liberals say Christ was arabic. Arabs didn't exist in those areas back then, their race migrated there from India centuries later.
That said, Jews didn't have fuckall to do with Western Civilization besides spending two millennia trying to undermine it.
Their ethnicity only became swarthy after a few centuries of systemic rape from mud slime invasions. Same thing with Spain and southern Italy.
That's not how things work. The invaders were in all those cases a tiny minority of the population. And in Spain, even Islamic converts to Christianity were eventually expelled from the country, because they were (fairly) suspected of being crypto-Muslims.
That's why I always laugh when liberals say Christ was arabic. Arabs didn't exist in those areas back then, their race migrated there from India centuries later.
"Christ was an Arab" is about as retarded a claim as "the Arabs came from India".
Obviously, he was ethnically a Jew, which I'm not sure suits you better.
That said, Jews didn't have fuckall to do with Western Civilization besides spending two millennia trying to undermine it.
Yeah, damn that Jesus, St. Paul, St. Peter, and the rest of them.
I did have a reply. I asked you whether you enjoy gaslighting people or if it's just habitual.
Unfortunately for you, people here aren't as stupid as you would like. You're actually here expecting them to believe that just because arabs live in the area now, that that's always how it has been. This despite clear historical records about their misbegotten race only controlling it at all right now through centuries of conflict.
Your lie isn't just transparent and obvious to any observer, it's so much so that it's almost insulting.
So I asked why you're here trying to gaslight people.
And as I knew, you have absolutely nothing to say in defense of your preposterous claims that the Arabs came from India. No, not the peninsula named after them, INDIA. How little do you have to know about history and geography to say that?
I did have a reply. I asked you whether you enjoy gaslighting people or if it's just habitual.
That's not a reply. You were unable to address the actual substance, but then again, that is your usual.
You're actually here expecting them to believe that just because arabs live in the area now, that that's always how it has been.
Oh wow, I thought you were a tiny bit retarded. Looks like you are a major league retard. I confirmed that Jesus was not an Arab, which you were apparently too stupid to get. In fact, I called it as stupid as your claim that Arabs come from India.
Which is very, very, very stupid.
This despite clear historical records about their misbegotten race only controlling it at all right now through centuries of conflict.
No, dimwit. I'm actually from that area. I know Arabs came from the outside. But they sure as hell did not come from INDIA. You absolute dumbass. You'd actually get a 50/50 question wrong: "Where do Arabs come from?" A. Arabia B. India
It's interesting to see you pretend to ignorance after the sub has had like three discussions about why on earth you still insist on using Reddit's rules.
Bad. He's a grifter faggot who trolls both sides for money while claiming to be a conservative and actual conservatives lap it up. They even promotehis shit for money themselves. Candace Owens is a friend of his, doxer bitch.
Fuck babylonbee. No different from cnn now. Hopefully the left destroys the bee. Bee being destroyed would be fair trade for joel calling for genocide of Whites through racemixing while hes sucking israels balls
I'm feeling pretty devastated right now tbh. I sensed the Bee had a pro-Israel slant during the Hamas incident, but thought they could come around eventually.
This is irredeemable.
This is a fundamental problem with the concept of "white" because it's an Americanized re-classification of what would simply be Anglo-Saxon. But because the American colonies weren't simply Anglo-Saxon, this term didn't make sense, and there was fear of German colonization by former Hessians, and later French revolutionary ideas, as well as an opposition to English Liberalism which was so weak willed it really didn't make a fuss about Parliament's abuses to American colonists. So, in the end, the weird concept of "white" was created.
If we simply use the concept of european as a stand-in for white, it's obvious that the Irish are white. Many Americans seemed to accept this idea that the Irish were, at most, a kind of lesser white race of degenerates, but no one really said they were "not white". That only emerged with Socialists claiming that the Irish weren't white, because they basically weren't Anglo-Saxon, which was the stand-in they were making.
Fundamentally, the problem here is that the American concept of race is a very broad abstract category of people that don't even share nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, values, culture, or even geographical continuity. But Progressive racial doctrine of the 20th century, desperately claimed that there had to be. So, we get this bastardized standard.
I don't even blame some racialists on 4chan claiming Americans are too much of an admixture to even qualify as white anymore. Certainly American blacks can't really be classified as "African" at this point on a purely genetic standpoint. Fundamentally, the "white" abstraction, in it's American conceptualization is too Ameri-centric to actually be universalized into something usable.
It's up to European nationalists if they want to embrace pan-Europeanism or not. In America, the European ancestries are very mixed so "white" makes plenty of sense, generally speaking.
Someone help me through the "Israel has a right to exist" argument. Don't all countries have a right to exist? Seems kind of seperate to the behavior of banks, media, academia, high schools, hollywood, social media, various american subsidiary nations, and credit cards. We know all of those are left leaning and pro Israel, but that doesn't actually diminish the argument itself. Is this another MLK "say its about character but always judge by color of skin" thing?
No, but the idea that interracial marriage is a good thing as is the slow melt towards all being the same vague "American" slop instead of distinctive groups is. Which means the "by force" is all the difference is, a distinction that can be a slight exaggeration on his actual views to piss off the "groypers."
No, but the idea that interracial marriage is a good thing as is the slow melt towards all being the same vague "American" slop instead of distinctive groups is
I hope not. How come the people who advocate for 'diversity' want everyone to have the exact same color skin and hair?
Because people who are tribalistic to a fault spend your entire life preaching how evil the very idea of differences between people is (only applies for whites, who exist to get diluted), which eventually manages to infect even those who recognize it.
That's why somehow the "literally illegal aliens" question still schisms the Right, because "well, but they work hard and are super Catholic so they should be allowed to stay!" is somehow a very parroted viewpoint. Heck outside of niche forums like this, the very word "segregation" gets you attacked.
JoelBerry does while he gargles israels balls. How else do you explain him calling for Whites to be ethnically cleansed but saying he wants israel to not be mixed?
What are his actual beliefs then? Supporting mass immigration into the US, Israel as Jewish ethnostate, and general Jewish supremacy are standard conservative and GOP views.
It's the belief that Jews are superior to gentiles or deserve preferential treatment and also actions that give preferential treatment to Jews.
Example: "The Republican party is a Jewish supremacist party because it expresses and provides support for an ethnostate for Jews and not white gentiles."
It's the belief that Jews are superior to gentiles or deserve preferential treatment
So no one.
Example: "The Republican party is a Jewish supremacist party because it expresses and provides support for an ethnostate for Jews and not white gentiles."
It supports no Jewish ethnostate, and 'white gentiles' are not a group. I don't support a state for 'white gentiles', but I do support one for the French, Germans, Polish, etc.
Republicans and conservatives such as Joel consistently are supportive of Jewish identity politics and consistently hostile to pro-white American idpol so you are wrong.
It supports no Jewish ethnostate, and 'white gentiles' are not a group. I don't support a state for 'white gentiles', but I do support one for the French, Germans, Polish, etc.
The French, Germans, and Polish are all white gentiles. What are white Americans then? I think this is the third time I've asked you about us. Keep dodging. It really helps your credibility.
Republicans and conservatives such as Joel consistently are supportive of Jewish identity politics and consistently hostile to pro-white American idpol so you are wrong.
Nah, you love to spin the term 'identity politics'.
The French, Germans, and Polish are all white gentiles.
They're something beyond that. Their countries are not based on being white gentiles, but on being French, German and Polish.
What are white Americans then?
Mutts without a culture.
No offense.
I think this is the third time I've asked you about us. Keep dodging. It really helps your credibility.
There's nothing to dodge. America was multiracial from the very beginning. Just like other new world countries.
Nah, you love to spin the term 'identity politics'.
Are the Republican Jewish Congress, AIPAC, etc. not identity politics? They seek to specifically advance the interests of Jews, an identity, and Israel, a state built around a Jewish identity. Is the belief that Jews are God's chose people not identity politics? It's a claim to supremacy based upon ancestry. It's "we wuz kangz" for Jews. You're just playing shell games with the definition of identity politics.
They're something beyond that. Their countries are not based on being white gentiles, but on being French, German and Polish.
Sure, and conservative and Republicans would not be supportive of efforts to maintain the respective majorities of those countries either.
Mutts without a culture. No offense.
No worries, a dune coon could never offend me. What's the implication of white Americans being "mutts" ? Flesh this out. The function of your behavior is support of our dispossession and disenfranchisement via promotion of the idea that we aren't a legitimate group and therefore cannot express a group-level self-interest.
I'm also curious as to how you arrived at the conclusion that white Americans are mutts but Jews aren't. Jews include mixtures of everything from European to Ethiopian ancestry. Within America, according to your logic, a gentile of French and German mixed ancestry is a mutt, but adding Jewish ancestry somehow would make them less of a mutt. Weird.
There's nothing to dodge. America was multiracial from the very beginning. Just like other new world countries.
It's been around 80% white until recently and even had immigration restrictions to maintain that until the 1960s. It's really strange how you are using America's history to argue in favor of deviating from its historical demographic make up and immigration laws. I also don't see why I should care that much about America's history anyway. It doesn't preclude us from doing what's in our interest. Again, you need to flesh this out. "America has a history of being multi-racial therefore..." what exactly?
Great, another so-called conservative that cares more about licking Israel’s ass than they do about reversing the decay of Western civilization.
I generally like The Bee and I get that he’s probably trolling but this is just unnecessary faggy cringe shit. It reminds me of Sargon posting gay interracial porn to “own” the alt-right.
Stick to tricking retards and making boomers laugh on Facebook, Joel.
He's not trolling. The majority of Reagan-style dignity boomers genuinely think like he does.
you'd think that any grown man who finds that his best argument is extremist, deliberately disgusting shock pornography would start rethinking his entire worldview, but if that was the case we wouldn't live in clown world anymore.
He's been all in on human trafficking on the southern border for a long while. Project Veritas should really do a "follow the money" exposé on him someday.
Because as we know, the best thing to do when you position yourself as a Christian Right Wing website is to openly attack multiple things that group holds sacred and mock them just like the people they came to you seeking refuge from.
It doesn't matter if these are him trolling or not. It says enough about him as a person to be held against him.
Who were white as snow at the time. Their ethnicity only became swarthy after a few centuries of systemic rape from mud slime invasions. Same thing with Spain and southern Italy.
That's why I always laugh when liberals say Christ was arabic. Arabs didn't exist in those areas back then, their race migrated there from India centuries later.
That said, Jews didn't have fuckall to do with Western Civilization besides spending two millennia trying to undermine it.
That's not how things work. The invaders were in all those cases a tiny minority of the population. And in Spain, even Islamic converts to Christianity were eventually expelled from the country, because they were (fairly) suspected of being crypto-Muslims.
"Christ was an Arab" is about as retarded a claim as "the Arabs came from India".
Obviously, he was ethnically a Jew, which I'm not sure suits you better.
Yeah, damn that Jesus, St. Paul, St. Peter, and the rest of them.
Do you enjoy constantly trying to gaslight people or is it a habitual thing?
You are unable to come up with a reply?
Such a shame. I was looking forward to you telling me that Arabs definitely come from India.
I did have a reply. I asked you whether you enjoy gaslighting people or if it's just habitual.
Unfortunately for you, people here aren't as stupid as you would like. You're actually here expecting them to believe that just because arabs live in the area now, that that's always how it has been. This despite clear historical records about their misbegotten race only controlling it at all right now through centuries of conflict.
Your lie isn't just transparent and obvious to any observer, it's so much so that it's almost insulting.
So I asked why you're here trying to gaslight people.
You won't answer of course. For obvious reasons.
And as I knew, you have absolutely nothing to say in defense of your preposterous claims that the Arabs came from India. No, not the peninsula named after them, INDIA. How little do you have to know about history and geography to say that?
That's not a reply. You were unable to address the actual substance, but then again, that is your usual.
Oh wow, I thought you were a tiny bit retarded. Looks like you are a major league retard. I confirmed that Jesus was not an Arab, which you were apparently too stupid to get. In fact, I called it as stupid as your claim that Arabs come from India.
Which is very, very, very stupid.
No, dimwit. I'm actually from that area. I know Arabs came from the outside. But they sure as hell did not come from INDIA. You absolute dumbass. You'd actually get a 50/50 question wrong: "Where do Arabs come from?" A. Arabia B. India
Any reason I should?
Joel Berry, is that you?
Tell me how the Bad Post hurt you.
Did you also think that the Arabs came from... India?
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Stop using slurs at users. There's a few acceptable ones, but be civil.
nobody asked for that rule
Somebody did, and it's pretty easy to guess who.
No one did ask for that rule, what are you talking about?
It's interesting to see you pretend to ignorance after the sub has had like three discussions about why on earth you still insist on using Reddit's rules.
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Comment Approved: Calling Mods "faggots" is explicitly allowed.
Who let the retards out?
Go back to reddit groomer
The Romans even took a moment here and there to answer a few jewish questions.
Well, St. Paul did make a tiny contribution.
Every time, no exceptions.
Something, something, half-finished job.
Bad. He's a grifter faggot who trolls both sides for money while claiming to be a conservative and actual conservatives lap it up. They even promotehis shit for money themselves. Candace Owens is a friend of his, doxer bitch.
These tweets explain a lot about why the Daily Wire likes the Bee so much.
bad, very bad
Because he doesn't hate the Jews?
This is the opposite of hating jews. Dude is clearly a Jewish supremacist
Because he openly called for ethnic clensing of Whites through forced racemixing whilehe gargling israels balls and saying he wants Whites removed
right on the nose
Fuck babylonbee. No different from cnn now. Hopefully the left destroys the bee. Bee being destroyed would be fair trade for joel calling for genocide of Whites through racemixing while hes sucking israels balls
Y'know, the Jews might be God's chosen people, but that didn't stop Him from actively having foreign powers conquer them whenever they went astray.
Just sayin'.
The one thing Stormfags, normal people, and orthodox Jews will all agree on.
Nice ratios.
In the literal sense of the word, he is a genocidal maniac
https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml
Yes, all journalist.
just blocked the bee in my hosts file. Goodbye, Jew-worshipping faggots.
You don't fucking say.
The guy is an out racial supremacist but is pretending to be better on the basis that the people he dislikes are racial supremacist
I'm feeling pretty devastated right now tbh. I sensed the Bee had a pro-Israel slant during the Hamas incident, but thought they could come around eventually.
This is irredeemable.
Greeks aren't white?
This is a fundamental problem with the concept of "white" because it's an Americanized re-classification of what would simply be Anglo-Saxon. But because the American colonies weren't simply Anglo-Saxon, this term didn't make sense, and there was fear of German colonization by former Hessians, and later French revolutionary ideas, as well as an opposition to English Liberalism which was so weak willed it really didn't make a fuss about Parliament's abuses to American colonists. So, in the end, the weird concept of "white" was created.
If we simply use the concept of european as a stand-in for white, it's obvious that the Irish are white. Many Americans seemed to accept this idea that the Irish were, at most, a kind of lesser white race of degenerates, but no one really said they were "not white". That only emerged with Socialists claiming that the Irish weren't white, because they basically weren't Anglo-Saxon, which was the stand-in they were making.
Fundamentally, the problem here is that the American concept of race is a very broad abstract category of people that don't even share nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, values, culture, or even geographical continuity. But Progressive racial doctrine of the 20th century, desperately claimed that there had to be. So, we get this bastardized standard.
I don't even blame some racialists on 4chan claiming Americans are too much of an admixture to even qualify as white anymore. Certainly American blacks can't really be classified as "African" at this point on a purely genetic standpoint. Fundamentally, the "white" abstraction, in it's American conceptualization is too Ameri-centric to actually be universalized into something usable.
It's up to European nationalists if they want to embrace pan-Europeanism or not. In America, the European ancestries are very mixed so "white" makes plenty of sense, generally speaking.
Noel Ignatiev started that crap.
Let me try to clear this up.
If you are alive today, you have been "chosen".
When you're dead, you're no longer chosen.
Real bored with the religious caste system we have to suffer through in this reality.
Reminder that progressivism is merely puritan Protestantism.
I agree with the left for once, babylon bee needs to be cancelled if it calls for White genocide like this. Fuck race mixing. Race mix israel instead
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
The only way this post would violate Rule 12 is if these were faked. If they are not faked, then this is not Rule 12.
Someone help me through the "Israel has a right to exist" argument. Don't all countries have a right to exist? Seems kind of seperate to the behavior of banks, media, academia, high schools, hollywood, social media, various american subsidiary nations, and credit cards. We know all of those are left leaning and pro Israel, but that doesn't actually diminish the argument itself. Is this another MLK "say its about character but always judge by color of skin" thing?
Someone from a satire website making jokes? No, that's impossible, he must be 100% serious with everything he says!
So easy to corner them. They can lie to your face about everything until you ask them to apply the same standard to themselves.
It's obviously a joke, but it's still disgusting all the same.
In order for these to work as jokes, they need to be obviously absurd instead of a common view point for someone in his party to take.
Unless the entire joke is "HA HA I WAS ONLY PRETENDING TO BE RETARDED" which is even more pathetic.
Not sure anyone in the GOP supports forced interracial marriage.
No, but the idea that interracial marriage is a good thing as is the slow melt towards all being the same vague "American" slop instead of distinctive groups is. Which means the "by force" is all the difference is, a distinction that can be a slight exaggeration on his actual views to piss off the "groypers."
I hope not. How come the people who advocate for 'diversity' want everyone to have the exact same color skin and hair?
Because people who are tribalistic to a fault spend your entire life preaching how evil the very idea of differences between people is (only applies for whites, who exist to get diluted), which eventually manages to infect even those who recognize it.
That's why somehow the "literally illegal aliens" question still schisms the Right, because "well, but they work hard and are super Catholic so they should be allowed to stay!" is somehow a very parroted viewpoint. Heck outside of niche forums like this, the very word "segregation" gets you attacked.
JoelBerry does while he gargles israels balls. How else do you explain him calling for Whites to be ethnically cleansed but saying he wants israel to not be mixed?
What are his actual beliefs then? Supporting mass immigration into the US, Israel as Jewish ethnostate, and general Jewish supremacy are standard conservative and GOP views.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods.
I'm not sure what the intentional disinformation is supposed to be. At most I see opinions.
Oy vey
Still not disinfo.
What is Jewish supremacy?
It's the belief that Jews are superior to gentiles or deserve preferential treatment and also actions that give preferential treatment to Jews.
Example: "The Republican party is a Jewish supremacist party because it expresses and provides support for an ethnostate for Jews and not white gentiles."
Example2: Joel Berry
So no one.
It supports no Jewish ethnostate, and 'white gentiles' are not a group. I don't support a state for 'white gentiles', but I do support one for the French, Germans, Polish, etc.
Please explain.
Republicans and conservatives such as Joel consistently are supportive of Jewish identity politics and consistently hostile to pro-white American idpol so you are wrong.
The French, Germans, and Polish are all white gentiles. What are white Americans then? I think this is the third time I've asked you about us. Keep dodging. It really helps your credibility.
I just did.
Nah, you love to spin the term 'identity politics'.
They're something beyond that. Their countries are not based on being white gentiles, but on being French, German and Polish.
Mutts without a culture.
No offense.
There's nothing to dodge. America was multiracial from the very beginning. Just like other new world countries.
Are the Republican Jewish Congress, AIPAC, etc. not identity politics? They seek to specifically advance the interests of Jews, an identity, and Israel, a state built around a Jewish identity. Is the belief that Jews are God's chose people not identity politics? It's a claim to supremacy based upon ancestry. It's "we wuz kangz" for Jews. You're just playing shell games with the definition of identity politics.
Sure, and conservative and Republicans would not be supportive of efforts to maintain the respective majorities of those countries either.
No worries, a dune coon could never offend me. What's the implication of white Americans being "mutts" ? Flesh this out. The function of your behavior is support of our dispossession and disenfranchisement via promotion of the idea that we aren't a legitimate group and therefore cannot express a group-level self-interest.
I'm also curious as to how you arrived at the conclusion that white Americans are mutts but Jews aren't. Jews include mixtures of everything from European to Ethiopian ancestry. Within America, according to your logic, a gentile of French and German mixed ancestry is a mutt, but adding Jewish ancestry somehow would make them less of a mutt. Weird.
It's been around 80% white until recently and even had immigration restrictions to maintain that until the 1960s. It's really strange how you are using America's history to argue in favor of deviating from its historical demographic make up and immigration laws. I also don't see why I should care that much about America's history anyway. It doesn't preclude us from doing what's in our interest. Again, you need to flesh this out. "America has a history of being multi-racial therefore..." what exactly?
Look in joels tweets in the op where he wants Whites genocided through forced race mixing while saying he wants israel protected from that.
Obviously, that is not serious.