It's the belief that Jews are superior to gentiles or deserve preferential treatment and also actions that give preferential treatment to Jews.
Example: "The Republican party is a Jewish supremacist party because it expresses and provides support for an ethnostate for Jews and not white gentiles."
It's the belief that Jews are superior to gentiles or deserve preferential treatment
So no one.
Example: "The Republican party is a Jewish supremacist party because it expresses and provides support for an ethnostate for Jews and not white gentiles."
It supports no Jewish ethnostate, and 'white gentiles' are not a group. I don't support a state for 'white gentiles', but I do support one for the French, Germans, Polish, etc.
Republicans and conservatives such as Joel consistently are supportive of Jewish identity politics and consistently hostile to pro-white American idpol so you are wrong.
It supports no Jewish ethnostate, and 'white gentiles' are not a group. I don't support a state for 'white gentiles', but I do support one for the French, Germans, Polish, etc.
The French, Germans, and Polish are all white gentiles. What are white Americans then? I think this is the third time I've asked you about us. Keep dodging. It really helps your credibility.
Republicans and conservatives such as Joel consistently are supportive of Jewish identity politics and consistently hostile to pro-white American idpol so you are wrong.
Nah, you love to spin the term 'identity politics'.
The French, Germans, and Polish are all white gentiles.
They're something beyond that. Their countries are not based on being white gentiles, but on being French, German and Polish.
What are white Americans then?
Mutts without a culture.
No offense.
I think this is the third time I've asked you about us. Keep dodging. It really helps your credibility.
There's nothing to dodge. America was multiracial from the very beginning. Just like other new world countries.
Nah, you love to spin the term 'identity politics'.
Are the Republican Jewish Congress, AIPAC, etc. not identity politics? They seek to specifically advance the interests of Jews, an identity, and Israel, a state built around a Jewish identity. Is the belief that Jews are God's chose people not identity politics? It's a claim to supremacy based upon ancestry. It's "we wuz kangz" for Jews. You're just playing shell games with the definition of identity politics.
They're something beyond that. Their countries are not based on being white gentiles, but on being French, German and Polish.
Sure, and conservative and Republicans would not be supportive of efforts to maintain the respective majorities of those countries either.
Mutts without a culture. No offense.
No worries, a dune coon could never offend me. What's the implication of white Americans being "mutts" ? Flesh this out. The function of your behavior is support of our dispossession and disenfranchisement via promotion of the idea that we aren't a legitimate group and therefore cannot express a group-level self-interest.
I'm also curious as to how you arrived at the conclusion that white Americans are mutts but Jews aren't. Jews include mixtures of everything from European to Ethiopian ancestry. Within America, according to your logic, a gentile of French and German mixed ancestry is a mutt, but adding Jewish ancestry somehow would make them less of a mutt. Weird.
There's nothing to dodge. America was multiracial from the very beginning. Just like other new world countries.
It's been around 80% white until recently and even had immigration restrictions to maintain that until the 1960s. It's really strange how you are using America's history to argue in favor of deviating from its historical demographic make up and immigration laws. I also don't see why I should care that much about America's history anyway. It doesn't preclude us from doing what's in our interest. Again, you need to flesh this out. "America has a history of being multi-racial therefore..." what exactly?
It's the belief that Jews are superior to gentiles or deserve preferential treatment and also actions that give preferential treatment to Jews.
Example: "The Republican party is a Jewish supremacist party because it expresses and provides support for an ethnostate for Jews and not white gentiles."
Example2: Joel Berry
So no one.
It supports no Jewish ethnostate, and 'white gentiles' are not a group. I don't support a state for 'white gentiles', but I do support one for the French, Germans, Polish, etc.
Please explain.
Republicans and conservatives such as Joel consistently are supportive of Jewish identity politics and consistently hostile to pro-white American idpol so you are wrong.
The French, Germans, and Polish are all white gentiles. What are white Americans then? I think this is the third time I've asked you about us. Keep dodging. It really helps your credibility.
I just did.
Nah, you love to spin the term 'identity politics'.
They're something beyond that. Their countries are not based on being white gentiles, but on being French, German and Polish.
Mutts without a culture.
No offense.
There's nothing to dodge. America was multiracial from the very beginning. Just like other new world countries.
Are the Republican Jewish Congress, AIPAC, etc. not identity politics? They seek to specifically advance the interests of Jews, an identity, and Israel, a state built around a Jewish identity. Is the belief that Jews are God's chose people not identity politics? It's a claim to supremacy based upon ancestry. It's "we wuz kangz" for Jews. You're just playing shell games with the definition of identity politics.
Sure, and conservative and Republicans would not be supportive of efforts to maintain the respective majorities of those countries either.
No worries, a dune coon could never offend me. What's the implication of white Americans being "mutts" ? Flesh this out. The function of your behavior is support of our dispossession and disenfranchisement via promotion of the idea that we aren't a legitimate group and therefore cannot express a group-level self-interest.
I'm also curious as to how you arrived at the conclusion that white Americans are mutts but Jews aren't. Jews include mixtures of everything from European to Ethiopian ancestry. Within America, according to your logic, a gentile of French and German mixed ancestry is a mutt, but adding Jewish ancestry somehow would make them less of a mutt. Weird.
It's been around 80% white until recently and even had immigration restrictions to maintain that until the 1960s. It's really strange how you are using America's history to argue in favor of deviating from its historical demographic make up and immigration laws. I also don't see why I should care that much about America's history anyway. It doesn't preclude us from doing what's in our interest. Again, you need to flesh this out. "America has a history of being multi-racial therefore..." what exactly?