OnlyFans continues to grow as others falter
(archive.ph)
Comments (76)
sorted by:
The owners of OnlyFans are the greatest pimps the world has ever seen, and it's totally legal. I don't know why people hate on Andrew Tate he's got nothing compared to them.
Leonid Radvinsky
And there it is. The reason why. Onlyfans is owned by agents of the matrix.
The matrix yah
Tate likes to use that reference a lot.
People hate on Andrew Tate because he's:
an arrogant asshole who purposely says outrageous things to get attention (of course then he walks it back like a bitch when called on it)
hugely insecure and overcompensating, he reeks of it
he actually looks like a bitch. if he looked like a gigachad a lot more people would respect him even if they disagreed. if Henry Cavill was doing all the same shit, women would be too busy creaming their panties to stay mad at him, but Tate looks kindof goofy and honestly isn't particularly attractive.
Tate is a perfect storm of attracting negative attention, probably 90% of the attention he gets is negative. But he uses the negative attention as free advertising so he can grift a small following of dudes who are reactionary against modern feminist culture.
Anyone who gives money to an OnlyThot deserves to be beat up and their bank account taken like their lunch money used to be.
Seriously. Imagine paying money to see one slut when there's endless free content out there lol
I don't see any reason we can't have both.
The OF database of names on both sides will be invaluable for the coming cleansing.
Coomers are being EXPLOITED by women! How is this any different from the BLM looting???
This is GENOCIDE! #MoreFeminineLooting
Both parties to an OnlyThots transaction are wrong. The "man" is wrong for esimping and the ethot is wrong for running a grift that requires no work on her part.
There are three parties. Don't let the owner off the hook.
"Men don't know any better" than to act in a vile manner?
You'd make a great feminist scriptwriter.
Men should be able to break out of their programming, even if women are almost never able to.
LEAVE THE COOMERS AND PAYPIGS ALONE!
You know how I know you are not sincere about anything you say?
If you actually wanted the Onlyfan thots not to get money, you'd mercilessly shame coomers and paypigs. But you don't. You're interested in excusing their behavior.
According to you, women are damaged from birth. Certainly never stopped you from hating on them 24/7.
But yeah, one establishes behavioral standards so that people behave themselves. You're not interested in that, you just want to be a victim.
Yeah, cause of Rule 16.
You're not denying that you think women are damaged. And yet you bash on them 24/7.
Look at this fucking mess you made Tony.
coomers are going to buy a porn one way or another. I prefer all the methods were 100% human trafficking free, but so long as an e-thought is a consenting adult doing her work on her own free will, there really isn't anything to complain about.
Have you looked at some OF rips though? I don't mind people buying porn to consume (and share it to the rest of us).
But OF is basically just a few pics (the same you can find on IG) and 30sec clips. The "real" full time length vids are behind another paywall. The monthly OF fee is basically being allowed to see what the woman is selling.
Any clipstore is better than that.
Microtransactions are cancer regardless of where they happen.
Even the "real" videos are second tier compared to the custom content whaling. Most of these girls are getting the lion's share of their money from a few dudes paying them triple digit subs just for things like "send a few texts a day" with special pictures taken just for them.
No, its done by random bitches. I know these things about them because, unlike you, I go outside and interact with women. I know three OF whores, of varying levels of success, and all of them have roughly that same setup.
When there's live porn involved, there's almost always human trafficking. Especially with "independent" content.
Many claim to be, despite later behaviour where they might even go back to making more.
Lana Rhodes, Jessie Rogers, Raven Leigh, Dolly Leigh, Stoya, Joanna Angel, Yhivi, Bobbi Starr, and various others have all at one point whined about the porn industry to different effects and results.
Lana Rhodes was one of the most popular pornstars of her time but now speaks out about how she was forced into it and had no agency at any point. Despite there also being stories where she flaked on contracts then fled the country in the middle of the night.
Jessie Rogers similarly complained the porn industry was horrible and essentially threw everyone she worked with under the bus. She resumed making porn last year or something. Anyone sane would leave her on her isolated island surrounded by burned bridges.
Raven Leigh complained of racial abuse at the hands of a guy she was making porn with on the set, only for everything she said to turn out to be a lie because of the footage from the 'nanny cam' which records everything that happens specifically to deal with situations like this where anything that happens in non released content or off camera is recorded just in case. I think she's now an "independent content producer" because everyone saw how toxic she was and wanted nothing to do with her or her wife. With perhaps the exceptions of the next set of names.
Dolly Leigh. One of several pornstars who has complained about James Deen. Stoya and Joanna Angel are also part of this group and their significance will be brought up shortly. Dolly jumped on the 'cancel culture' bandwagon and made various claims about Deen on social media which would later contradict future behavior by Dolly.
Stoya made similar claims about Deen. The weak he was moving in with his new girlfriend having broken up with Stoya previously.
Joanna Angel is another of his exes from before Stoya, both of them played the frail waif card and lamented how they didn't see any of this coming or that they had played some part in enabling the various behaviours social media was murmuring about.
Yhivi claims to have originally left porn, she's back making it again ofc, after a scene with Deen where he punched her in the stomach. AFAIK this scene is out there so people can watch it to check these claims. From what I've read it was an intended rough scene however punching was something specific that Yhivi requested not happen. I don't know if there is bts/nanny cam footage of this agreement as without it it is little more than a he said/she said situation.
Deen remains not arrested or charged for any of these accusations but many still think otherwise because of "How they feel about him". The frequency alone can raise questions in many and if nothing else he's possibly lucky he doesn't live in other parts of the world where multiple similar accusations like this are considered legitimate enough to be taken as collaborating evidence to ensure a charge like the Moorov Doctrine in Scotland. I'm sure you'll love learning about that.
Bobbi Starr was one of the most popular pornstars of the 2000s along with some others like Dana DeArmand and the two would frequently work together. Bobbi is now an activist for feminist rallies despite only having any degree of presence because of her porn work, similar to Mia Khalifa who people only know because of porn. AFAIK Dana still makes porn while Bobbi is the stereotypical post porn mother who claims her previous activities were not her choice and that she had no agency at times, etc.
None of this is really anything new it's just examples of the same poor arguments set in a particular business and I gave you those detailed examples in part because simply providing the names wouldn't explain anything.
The famous named porn stars, likely not. The faceless nobodies that you'll scroll past on places like PornHub, I guarantee at least 10% of them are not there of their free will.
I hate these women more than the simps since they know they are exploiting mentally ill people and don't care. Nobody in their right mind would pay for a parasocial/sexual relationship with a whore. And that's exactly why they're paying them make no mistake. This isn't just about some nude pics.
Look, with statements like that first claim about women (conscience), you're going to get yourself banned under R16 again, and then I'll be robbed of the entertainment you provide me. You can't do that to me.
You mongrels enforcing your dumbass thought and speech policing.
You manage that on your own.
To be fair, Rule 16 is bullshit and it only serves to suppress discussion of taboo subjects.
R16 is necessary, but it should be used with mildness on curiosities like the Imp.
They don't go around saying stuff like "Jews don't have a conscience". Maybe learn from them about how to be subtle in your hatred.
Either you edited your original post, or I misread it originally. Now it says "women who do this". That's fine. "Women don't have a conscience" is not.
And obviously, people don't have a conscience when it comes to earning money. If you had no problem taking your clothes off, and homosexuals were willing to pay you millions to do it, you would do it. Guaranteed.