Men aren't getting married and are dating less, due to unrealistic standards that are set for them, and the fact that their lives can quickly and easily be ruined.
Especially in urban areas.
Funny how so many are surprised that when the rules are stacked so thoroughly against an individual, that they just might decide not to play the game.
Funny how so many are surprised that when the rules are stacked so thoroughly against an individual, that they just might decide not to play the game.
It's hoflation. We have to work 100 times harder than our great grandfathers to get women 100 times worse than our great grandmothers. That's even before you take into account the anti-male family courts and the reality of what feminist relationshits look like.
Abortion on demand and the pill have made men disposable.
It's a good thing some women still take to the idea of raising children with husbands, but it's no accident that birth rates in Western (read "white") countries are crashing.
I see chicks with multiple kids whining about how men aren't shit and how they need someone that can bring money to the table. Bitch you have 3 children from 3 different dudes stfu
They are fundamentally unable to process the idea of you not wanting them. That's a real problem most women have. I'd advise everyone to just outright say no to sex a few times, and watch their brains malfunction. Not "no because" just a straight "nah."
Especially as the media loved to perpetuate the "hard to get" angle as something men enjoy, when that's only true with a lot of factors in its favor. But they weren't smart enough to think about it beyond the surface level, so they are left dumbfounded when the dog gets tired of the empty bowl and leaves the porch.
They are fundamentally unable to process the idea of you not wanting them.
Correct. Every time they churn out another article about growing proportion of unpartnered males there's an underlying assumption that men are interested in the deal that's being offered, and that assumes facts not in evidence. Besides the fact that all the hoops they're trying to shame men into jumping through won't improve their dating prospects, they're not going to dance for something that they have no interest in. Feminist relationships don't add value to a man's life, they make it worse. More and more men are waking up to that fact.
Especially as the media loved to perpetuate the "hard to get" angle as something men enjoy, when that's only true with a lot of factors in its favor.
It's literally never true.
Every single woman would have a better success rate with "I think you're interesting, want to grab coffee sometime and see if we click?" than with "fuck off". Every. Single. One.
If there's varying success rates, it is because the source data isn't the same. An extremely attractive women will get more advances and passes made at her, making her more selective and standoffish, but she's still attractive. An open but ugly woman will get less passes made at her. The ugly one looks at the attractive one, and says "clearly, it isn't the physical appearance. It must be that she's acting like she's tired of getting all the attention, that gets her all the attention. It can't be that she's legit tired of it due to her attractiveness, because that implies I'm not attractive."
It can be, but it needs to be given considerable thoughtl. As in, she is creating artificial scarcity by not giving it for free in a controlled economy (as in one guy she is putting energy in, not literally every single one). Part of that requires still giving something to keep interest focused, which is the part they always fail.
Because its not about just getting sex, even they are smart enough to know that "you me, ooking" is more effective. Its about creating a larger value on having sex with them to create greater attachment. Sunken cost is another factor of that.
Its all basic marketing stuff, they just literally aren't smart enough to understand how to apply it.
and the fact that their lives can quickly and easily be ruined.
I remember when I was in high school, I was in our physics class near the end of the day. I was bored out of my mind being stuck in a room for hours on end. So being a teenager, naturally I zoned out. And being a hormonal fourteen year old, my eyes immediately gravitated to the cleavage of a nearby girl. Said girl immediately noticed and proceeded to loudly label me a creep and a pervert, and told the whole school as fast as she could.
All it took was 3 seconds of a lapse in concentration for the next four months to be hell on earth for me. I was forcibly separated and made to sit as far away from every girl as possible in just about every class, and everyone gave me dirty looks. What made it even more infuriating was how the other guys would talk in the locker room, and how I never said anything as vulgar as they did about those same girls, yet I was the one treated like some horny animal that couldn't control itself.
when the rules are stacked so thoroughly against an individual, that they just might decide not to play the game.
That's me right here. I realized it when I was at a party in college. There was one of my classmates, a guy so good looking he could be in movies, who was essentially just standing around. At least 5 different girls tried to get with him that night. That dude had more women desire him in a span of five hours than I have in my entire life, and he wasn't even pursuing them. He practically had to shove them away. That's when I realized the game was rigged against me and it wasn't worth playing.
That's not even getting into the short stick I drew for the genetic lottery, nor my dismal career trajectory, or my consistently declining finances, or my recently declining health. I haven't been laid in 10 years, because I decided that it just isn't worth the herculean effort needed to try.
Now instead of wasting the few dollars I have on women, I waste it on a 93 Miata that's slowly falling apart because I'm broke, but it's the only thing that gives me any happiness anymore since everything else I like is being systematically destroyed by the left.
You should watch more of his videos if you believe that, he has never claimed to be a Christian. Even if his lectures cover biblical stories does not mean he himself is a Christian. Me reading and teaching a class on Norse mythology doesn’t make me a practicing believer of Odin.
not to mention he has a very limited understanding of the Bible and has admitted to not even reading it fully. He also promotes the Jesus is Horus theory which even most atheist historians acknowledge as false.
The 19th is literally the only reason Democrats have any power right now. Just think of how many Senators, Representatives, and Presidents wouldn't have been able to fuck us over if not for women's brain dead political takes.
FDR, LBJ, Carter, Clinton, Obama, Biden, all those terrible presidents gone.
Feinstein, Sanders, AOC, Pelosi, Warren, etc. Gone.
First thing you need to understand, is that not everyone wants the human race to go extinct. There are other things you clearly can't wrap your head around, but I suggest you start with that.
He’s repeatedly stated his alternative multiple times and while it might not be realistic NOW, it’s at least something. I think the way Imp thinks is heavily flawed, but I at least know he doesn’t believe this
It's also important for human survival that you eat the bugs. The WEF said. Go do that, it's just as bad as marriage.
Nice strawman, but it's so far off topic as to be a non-sequitur. It's a biological fact that women are required for the human species to continue. That you would apparently attempt to deny that fact, is proof as to how utterly out of touch you are.
Women don't need to be trusted, they need to be put in their place. There's a good reason why previous generations treated women the way they did.
It's not actually a violation of Rule 15, but it's also not exactly a violation of Rule 3. It's just a very mean comment.
However, Margarine, given your own fairly regular opinions, it is close to Rule 16 more than the others, because it suggests you see Impossible as a jew. I can't prove that to myself, so no removal, but don't start declaring users to be subhuman because you suspect them of being jews. Use a normal insult.
You're putting words in my mouth. I call him a subhuman because of his views regarding women and how his outlook, if adopted by the populace at large, would lead to the complete collapse of the human population. Part of being human is the drive to see the species (or at least one's own family line) propagated. A lack of that drive, or in his case an active aversion to it, marks him as fundamentally defective as a human being and lacking in the basic defining characteristics of what a human is, thus making him less than what we identify as human.
Peterson himself has acknowledged that women mate across and up hierarchically, mating with those of equal or greater income/social status. Men tend to mate across and down. I think he makes the evolutionary case for this. We've had the pill for like 60 years, but women still want men who will provide food, shelter, and social position to ensure healthy, socially mobile offspring, despite the lies of feminism.
When a woman is told for four years (at least) that men are your oppressors, good only for exploitation, it's no wonder they're mercenary twats.
Only white people seem to care so much about racial narratives
One faggot tells me White people care too much about race. Another faggot tells me Whites rejected caring about race. They don't challenge each other, though.
the "sanctity of marriage", I'm going to lose it. It was never good.
This is more true than people want to admit. At least in European and derivative cultures (America) since the renaissance, marriage has always been a romanticized notion based on women's wants and desires.
Men aren't getting married and are dating less, due to unrealistic standards that are set for them, and the fact that their lives can quickly and easily be ruined.
Especially in urban areas.
Funny how so many are surprised that when the rules are stacked so thoroughly against an individual, that they just might decide not to play the game.
It's hoflation. We have to work 100 times harder than our great grandfathers to get women 100 times worse than our great grandmothers. That's even before you take into account the anti-male family courts and the reality of what feminist relationshits look like.
Abortion on demand and the pill have made men disposable.
It's a good thing some women still take to the idea of raising children with husbands, but it's no accident that birth rates in Western (read "white") countries are crashing.
Pretty much.
I see chicks with multiple kids whining about how men aren't shit and how they need someone that can bring money to the table. Bitch you have 3 children from 3 different dudes stfu
They are fundamentally unable to process the idea of you not wanting them. That's a real problem most women have. I'd advise everyone to just outright say no to sex a few times, and watch their brains malfunction. Not "no because" just a straight "nah."
Especially as the media loved to perpetuate the "hard to get" angle as something men enjoy, when that's only true with a lot of factors in its favor. But they weren't smart enough to think about it beyond the surface level, so they are left dumbfounded when the dog gets tired of the empty bowl and leaves the porch.
Correct. Every time they churn out another article about growing proportion of unpartnered males there's an underlying assumption that men are interested in the deal that's being offered, and that assumes facts not in evidence. Besides the fact that all the hoops they're trying to shame men into jumping through won't improve their dating prospects, they're not going to dance for something that they have no interest in. Feminist relationships don't add value to a man's life, they make it worse. More and more men are waking up to that fact.
It's literally never true.
Every single woman would have a better success rate with "I think you're interesting, want to grab coffee sometime and see if we click?" than with "fuck off". Every. Single. One.
If there's varying success rates, it is because the source data isn't the same. An extremely attractive women will get more advances and passes made at her, making her more selective and standoffish, but she's still attractive. An open but ugly woman will get less passes made at her. The ugly one looks at the attractive one, and says "clearly, it isn't the physical appearance. It must be that she's acting like she's tired of getting all the attention, that gets her all the attention. It can't be that she's legit tired of it due to her attractiveness, because that implies I'm not attractive."
It can be, but it needs to be given considerable thoughtl. As in, she is creating artificial scarcity by not giving it for free in a controlled economy (as in one guy she is putting energy in, not literally every single one). Part of that requires still giving something to keep interest focused, which is the part they always fail.
Because its not about just getting sex, even they are smart enough to know that "you me, ooking" is more effective. Its about creating a larger value on having sex with them to create greater attachment. Sunken cost is another factor of that.
Its all basic marketing stuff, they just literally aren't smart enough to understand how to apply it.
Yep, that cold douse of water can really affect the ol' ego for them.
honestly, just say no to sex until marriage.
I remember when I was in high school, I was in our physics class near the end of the day. I was bored out of my mind being stuck in a room for hours on end. So being a teenager, naturally I zoned out. And being a hormonal fourteen year old, my eyes immediately gravitated to the cleavage of a nearby girl. Said girl immediately noticed and proceeded to loudly label me a creep and a pervert, and told the whole school as fast as she could.
All it took was 3 seconds of a lapse in concentration for the next four months to be hell on earth for me. I was forcibly separated and made to sit as far away from every girl as possible in just about every class, and everyone gave me dirty looks. What made it even more infuriating was how the other guys would talk in the locker room, and how I never said anything as vulgar as they did about those same girls, yet I was the one treated like some horny animal that couldn't control itself.
That's me right here. I realized it when I was at a party in college. There was one of my classmates, a guy so good looking he could be in movies, who was essentially just standing around. At least 5 different girls tried to get with him that night. That dude had more women desire him in a span of five hours than I have in my entire life, and he wasn't even pursuing them. He practically had to shove them away. That's when I realized the game was rigged against me and it wasn't worth playing.
That's not even getting into the short stick I drew for the genetic lottery, nor my dismal career trajectory, or my consistently declining finances, or my recently declining health. I haven't been laid in 10 years, because I decided that it just isn't worth the herculean effort needed to try.
Now instead of wasting the few dollars I have on women, I waste it on a 93 Miata that's slowly falling apart because I'm broke, but it's the only thing that gives me any happiness anymore since everything else I like is being systematically destroyed by the left.
Sweet a 1st gen Miata, love those little go-karts, one of the most fun, slow cars ever made!
I don’t think Jordan Peterson is Christian.
Its like his main personality.
You should watch more of his videos if you believe that, he has never claimed to be a Christian. Even if his lectures cover biblical stories does not mean he himself is a Christian. Me reading and teaching a class on Norse mythology doesn’t make me a practicing believer of Odin.
not to mention he has a very limited understanding of the Bible and has admitted to not even reading it fully. He also promotes the Jesus is Horus theory which even most atheist historians acknowledge as false.
What? Everyone knows him more for his Jungian based metaphors like the lobster or slaying the dragon of chaos.
saying Jordan Peterson is Christian is like saying Trump is pro white, they're stereotyped that way but their actions and beliefs say otherwise
This is why women shouldn't have rights. It destroys the capacity for actually building a family.
Repeal the 19th and our problems become way easier to solve.
The 19th is literally the only reason Democrats have any power right now. Just think of how many Senators, Representatives, and Presidents wouldn't have been able to fuck us over if not for women's brain dead political takes.
FDR, LBJ, Carter, Clinton, Obama, Biden, all those terrible presidents gone.
Feinstein, Sanders, AOC, Pelosi, Warren, etc. Gone.
First thing you need to understand, is that not everyone wants the human race to go extinct. There are other things you clearly can't wrap your head around, but I suggest you start with that.
He’s repeatedly stated his alternative multiple times and while it might not be realistic NOW, it’s at least something. I think the way Imp thinks is heavily flawed, but I at least know he doesn’t believe this
Nice strawman, but it's so far off topic as to be a non-sequitur. It's a biological fact that women are required for the human species to continue. That you would apparently attempt to deny that fact, is proof as to how utterly out of touch you are.
Women don't need to be trusted, they need to be put in their place. There's a good reason why previous generations treated women the way they did.
I wouldn't expect a subhuman to understand.
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Threaten harass, bully, defame
It's not actually a violation of Rule 15, but it's also not exactly a violation of Rule 3. It's just a very mean comment.
However, Margarine, given your own fairly regular opinions, it is close to Rule 16 more than the others, because it suggests you see Impossible as a jew. I can't prove that to myself, so no removal, but don't start declaring users to be subhuman because you suspect them of being jews. Use a normal insult.
You're putting words in my mouth. I call him a subhuman because of his views regarding women and how his outlook, if adopted by the populace at large, would lead to the complete collapse of the human population. Part of being human is the drive to see the species (or at least one's own family line) propagated. A lack of that drive, or in his case an active aversion to it, marks him as fundamentally defective as a human being and lacking in the basic defining characteristics of what a human is, thus making him less than what we identify as human.
I'll accept that explanation.
Please don't encourage Dom's tranny janny tendencies. The censorship here is bad enough as it is.
Peterson himself has acknowledged that women mate across and up hierarchically, mating with those of equal or greater income/social status. Men tend to mate across and down. I think he makes the evolutionary case for this. We've had the pill for like 60 years, but women still want men who will provide food, shelter, and social position to ensure healthy, socially mobile offspring, despite the lies of feminism.
When a woman is told for four years (at least) that men are your oppressors, good only for exploitation, it's no wonder they're mercenary twats.
Peterson's individualist worldview is inherently anti-marriage.
He's a socialist and has said numerous times he believes in societal enforced marriage standards. What part of that is "individualist"?
Huh?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvBm0ZUfe7I
His whole gayop is peddling individualism as an alternative to White Nationalism.
Is Islam controlled by women?
Actually ignorant of this: is marriage under Islam the same as marriage in other 'traditions?'
Is this a rhetorical question, or do you actually not know?
One faggot tells me White people care too much about race. Another faggot tells me Whites rejected caring about race. They don't challenge each other, though.
You can't make this up.
This is more true than people want to admit. At least in European and derivative cultures (America) since the renaissance, marriage has always been a romanticized notion based on women's wants and desires.
Jordan Peterson isn't a Christian you fucktard
This shit is the saddest cope of all time. He has described himself as such numerous times. Socialist too