One of the police officers says that “somebody has taken offense” to the image the man posted on Facebook, claims that the image is “homophobic,” and describes the man as “a suspect for a crime.”
How amazing. All it takes to have a political opponent arrested is to hold the "correct" political views and be offended.
The 2nd Amendment protects the 1st, but the 1st is a good first line of defense. The UK has no tradition of free speech, which is sort of why free speech exists to the extent that it does in America. They will claim to sign on to some globalist convention of human rights that pays lip service to free speech whilst being full of contradictory rights for special interest groups -- like the right to not be offended.
The image that the man was arrested for posting has been widely shared online by thousands of social media users, including Reclaim Party leader and free speech activist Laurence Fox, who was present when the man was arrested.
So they know that Laurence Fox also posted the same image, and he was standing right in front of them, but they didn't arrest him. Why?
Not only would Laurence Fox be politically empowered by such an arrest, but the inconsistent enforcement keeps people terrified of stepping out of line.
While I appreciate and understand the necessity of the term anarcho-tyranny, it is really just the traditional understanding of tyranny. The anarcho part is superfluous.
"But can we PROVE the swastika design was chosen to disparage minorities in-server, and not for efficiency? Guarez, Brooks, you'll make new accounts with female skins, get in with the suspect and see if we can catch a slip on the chat log for intent. Johnson, I need a more efficient redstone design on my desk by tomorrow morning, all right folks, TEAM WORK MAKES THE DREAM WORK, let's go!"
https://reclaimthenet.org/uk-police-lgbt-flag-arrest-social-media/
How amazing. All it takes to have a political opponent arrested is to hold the "correct" political views and be offended.
This also works if you are into raping children. When someone calls you out on it, scream that you are offended and watch them get arrested.
Three years ago I would have thought you were just being sarcastic or hyperbolic. How quickly things have gone downhill...
Seriously it was probably that officer who took offense.
Reason number 48338462 why giving up your guns is retarded
Nope. Diversity is destroying the west.
The 2nd Amendment protects the 1st, but the 1st is a good first line of defense. The UK has no tradition of free speech, which is sort of why free speech exists to the extent that it does in America. They will claim to sign on to some globalist convention of human rights that pays lip service to free speech whilst being full of contradictory rights for special interest groups -- like the right to not be offended.
Demolition Man was a documentary from the future
I just want to know ...
How the fuck do you use the damn seashells?
Teases seashells as a sanitation tool. Refuses to elaborate. Never comes up again in the movie.
You're not supposed to understand, they're not for you. Perfect allegory for today's "rules for thee" clown world.
So they know that Laurence Fox also posted the same image, and he was standing right in front of them, but they didn't arrest him. Why?
It's because Fox has fame and clout, isn't it?
Not only would Laurence Fox be politically empowered by such an arrest, but the inconsistent enforcement keeps people terrified of stepping out of line.
anarcho-tyranny my friend, a good term to get acquainted with
While I appreciate and understand the necessity of the term anarcho-tyranny, it is really just the traditional understanding of tyranny. The anarcho part is superfluous.
Look at this guy lording his fancy college words over us.
(not that you're wrong...)
Somewhere, a crying 11-year-old is being raped by a Muslim migrant because these clowns were too busy playing internet police.
Fucking 1984 nightmare.
All aside, it's funny how you can do that with the flag. Like a Frank Reynolds moment.
Yeah that was my first reaction to. Like, that's hilariously coincidental.
Do they not see the irony here?
There should be a loisence needed to own four LGBT flags, clearly. There's too much risk of genocide happening should they fall down corner-to-corner.
Not yet concentrating on actual crime as instructed by their own "college", I see...
Reget modernity, embrace the tradition of pitchforks as with this police you could probably take over the country with enough pitchforks.
lol Guarez
99% of redditors on UK subreddits support mass censorship and policing of jokes in the UK
Because most of the “UK redditors” are based in Islamabad and their main goal is blasphemy laws….
Most of the UK resembles Islamabad these days.
Obama started the same thing with minnesota
Honestly, the Civil War I want to see most from our generation is the Woke Trannies vs the /pol/tard traps.
You don't understand officer, this is just the Ukraine pride flag!
English police, somehow the weakest faggots ever running a dystopian totalitarian state.
I wonder how many UK normies agree with the phrase "right not to be offended". I am pretty sure a majority would.
What is even offensive or anti fag in that image? It's just a funny thing. At worst it's saying fags are nazis but what would that mean?
Goon/Enforcers of the coming English Caliphate.
Not with a bang . . .