'Monkeypox spreads through close skin-to-skin contact, which — in the case of children — could include hugging, cuddling, feeding, as well as through shared items such as towels, bedding, cups and utensils.'
Bullshit. If it was highly contagious, it wouldn't be spreading through buttfucking. If all it took to catch it was a "hug", it wouldn't be a faggot disease.
The reason the disease has stayed pretty much exclusive to fags, is that it ONLY spreads through faggotry. If it spread any other way, it would have jumped from fags to straights and then exploded from there. It hasn't, which is proof that it's similar to HIV in being difficult to transmit except through buttfucking.
It spreads by skin to skin contact, you moron. It is as contagious as contact is. We know how it spreads. Guess what, gay men engaging in pet-play counts as a super-spreader event. This is because they were petting each other.
It hasn't, which is proof that it's similar to HIV in being difficult to transmit except through buttfucking.
Again, HIV is transmitted by body fluids you moron. This is why drug addicts get HIV from dirty needles. It's why cops who get spit on by HIV positive addicts have to get tested. It's one of the reasons spitting on someone is classified as an assault. Your claim is so stupid, you've actually managed to eliminate oral sex as a mechanism for infection from HIV.
Yes, if you swallow an HIV positive man's cum, or eat out HIV infected woman's pussy, you will still very much get HIV.
Viruses don't give a shit about who you fuck. They have broad mechanisms of spreading. Engaging in any of them allows you to spread disease.
Great, so you're telling me that there's never been a new study that claimed masks worked, because I've seen a fucking shit ton of them, even though their wrong... which is my god damned point you idiot.
Swallowing cum won't transmit HIV (unless you have sores in the mouth or throat). Eating out pussy won't transmit HIV (unless you have sores in the mouth or throat):
It is extremely unlikely for a man to get HIV from having vaginal sex with an HIV-positive woman (most likely only occurs when there are sores on the penis):
HIV is transmitted through needles, gay and bisexual men buttfucking, and bisexual men transmitting it to heterosexual women. If you're a hetero dude who doesn't do anal, you have almost no chance of getting HIV. If you're a woman who doesn't fuck bisexual guys, you have almost no chance of getting HIV.
Individuals can further reduce the already low risk of HIV transmission from oral sex by keeping their male partners from ejaculating in their mouth.
I stand by my statement.
It is extremely unlikely for a man to get HIV from having vaginal sex with an HIV-positive woman (most likely only occurs when there are sores on the penis):
Seems like it's only half as unlikely as male to female transmission. Considering it's a death sentence, I'd still consider it plenty dangerous.
I'm not saying people should have vaginal sex with and and perform oral on HIV-positive people for fun. But saying oral sex is a mechanism for transmission is somewhat misleading: It would require one to have a wound or sore in the mouth or throat to occur. I can't find numbers on it, but as the CDC points out in regards to HIV and oral sex, "for transmission to occur, something very unusual would have to happen."
The point re: vaginal sex is that the driver of transmission of the disease is obviously anal sex, which is 35 times more likely to transmit the disease than vaginal sex. Looking at their promiscuity and focus on anal, it's quite obvious why HIV spread was driven by gay and bisexual men.
Your initial post is simply wrong. Yes, viruses do care about who you fuck. Or at least, HOW you fuck (which ends up being the same thing).
Yes, viruses do care about who you fuck. Or at least, HOW you fuck (which ends up being the same thing).
They don't because how and who are entirely different issues. Another assumption being made by yourself and others is that heterosexuals will not be engaging in anal sex. That's part of the problem here.
Looking at their promiscuity and focus on anal, it's quite obvious why HIV spread was driven by gay and bisexual men.
Frankly, I'd say the promiscuity is the single largest contributing factor more than anything else. The number of sex partners, especially in the promiscuous parts of (frankly) Queer communities is absolutely extreme by comparison.
They don't because how and who are entirely different issues. Another assumption being made by yourself and others is that heterosexuals will not be engaging in anal sex. That's part of the problem here.
The problem with this is the main way a woman gets HIV through this method would be having unprotected anal with a man, who 99% would've gotten it from having unprotected anal with another man. That's why "it ends up being the same thing".
That's just not a good enough excuse. Firstly, this entirely assumes that the primary way women get HIV isn't dirty needles, and I'd bet that's probably the dominant way all HIV infections are spread. Secondly, the methodology of transmission remains. When someone is reductive and just tosses out that it's only a disease that gay people can get, this intentionally promotes people into stupid and reductive thinking that makes them assume shit like "I'm straight, I can't get HIV."
As someone else mentioned yesterday, during the AIDS panic that Fauci helped to create, a father was arrested and interrogated when it was discovered that his daughter had HIV. She got it from a blood transfusion, but just constantly re-enforcing a thought-terminating cliche like "it's a gay disease" allows for mistakes like that to happen.
Frankly, considering Fauci's involvement, the same shit happened during Covid.
While we're all standing here saying, "The vaccines are not vaccines, they are theraputics. The CDC changed the definition of a vaccine to approve the drugs. These are not well tested. There's a large number of reported side effects. Why are we injecting children when we know they aren't a risk group? The theraputics are only going to work for about 6 months without another injection. The theraputics only reduce viral load, they don't prevent tranmission."
All the media did was retort with their own thought terminating cliches:
Wear a mask
Take the jab
Trust the science
Pandemic of the unvaccinated
And that was justification for Andrew Cuomo to kill 50,000 people, and have governors across the country rescind the 4th and 5th amendment, and have the media call for violence, and the closure of our bank accounts because "the unvaccinated were spreading the disease".
Comment Approved: Again, the post is closer to harassment than this is. If the problem were about saying 'you moron' I'd have to remove probably 1/3rd of our comments.
You know what’s awful? I bet these same faggots would be more than happy to demonize the fucking Catholic Church, YMCA, evangelicals, etc, for the “kiddy diddling”, and yet, when these fuckheads do the same thing, with obvious, tangible, epidemic consequences, they scream, and shout and do everything they can to discount responsibility…
No it hasn't been. Again, that's why the super-spreader event in Europe was at a pet play convention. Surprise, surprise, a place where people are engaging in petting spreads a virus that transmits by skin-to-skin contact.
How many gay people who commit heavy petting in public have gay orgies after? You’re making the same argument that every fag denier did for aids. You scream skin to skin and yet lesbians aren’t at the same rate as gay men for monkeypox. Do lesbians not heavy pet?
Is that why it has been spreading rapidly through all communities and not just gay, because if it was simply by touch or through shared materials then more people, not just gay men, would simply have it by now.
People looking at you and going "GAH! Sir, please step back." is excellent way to prevent further transmission. Western societies typically don't engage in skin to skin contact ... outside of degenerate communities that are okay with skin-to-skin contact.
Seriously, when was the last time you had skin-to-skin contact with a co-worker without having HR called?
You don't shake hands with co-workers, you don't have friends that you hug, shake hands or share things with? you don't have family members?
Hell no! What are you, Italian? Sit down Governor Cuomo.
I reserve the right to stand and glare stoically at my close family and that is absolutely all the intimacy I will tolerate from them.
... but no seriously,
Most westerners don't engage in physical contact (except Italians, and maybe greeks) most of the time. Again, the lesions are gonna be wherever you are had contact, so if you're shaking your hands and have monkey pox, it's not likely you're gonna shake hands. On top of that, they're not just saying some over-the-shoulder-one-arm-hug with clothing on. They are talking about two people with no shirts fully embracing each other. More-over, I've got to emphasize petting was the fetish here that led to the outbreak. This means putting your hands all over someone.
That's the reason you are saying it spreads like an STD. The only time you would engage in that level of skin contact in a western society is if you were with a romantic partner. You're not going to give you're a hug when neither of you are wearing shirts. Not even if you're Italian.
I think that is the kind of convention where the participants may be doing a lot more in their hotel rooms. But this kind of leads into an argument about comparing different types of gatherings that revolve around abnormal behavior and how many orgies are occurring at each type (behind closed doors). I do not want to have such an argument; I just wanted to suggest you may be granting too much charity to weirdos.
If that was the case then the media wouldn't even be saying that, they can't be both biased as fuck for the gay community yet report on the amount of gay cases this STD has.
These kids were raped by faggots.
Bullshit. If it was highly contagious, it wouldn't be spreading through buttfucking. If all it took to catch it was a "hug", it wouldn't be a faggot disease.
The reason the disease has stayed pretty much exclusive to fags, is that it ONLY spreads through faggotry. If it spread any other way, it would have jumped from fags to straights and then exploded from there. It hasn't, which is proof that it's similar to HIV in being difficult to transmit except through buttfucking.
I should note a little girl got infected with aids by a tainted blood transfusion and her father got wrongfully arrested and interrogated as a result.
As close comtact is required, washing the child could be enough to spread monkeypox.
No, that was what cleared him.
This was back when fauci denied blood transfusions spread aids.
Fauci Lied, People Died
Investigations into such cases are not "wrongful" arrests. They're investigations and thank god they happen so we catch the pedos.
It spreads by skin to skin contact, you moron. It is as contagious as contact is. We know how it spreads. Guess what, gay men engaging in pet-play counts as a super-spreader event. This is because they were petting each other.
Again, HIV is transmitted by body fluids you moron. This is why drug addicts get HIV from dirty needles. It's why cops who get spit on by HIV positive addicts have to get tested. It's one of the reasons spitting on someone is classified as an assault. Your claim is so stupid, you've actually managed to eliminate oral sex as a mechanism for infection from HIV.
Yes, if you swallow an HIV positive man's cum, or eat out HIV infected woman's pussy, you will still very much get HIV.
Viruses don't give a shit about who you fuck. They have broad mechanisms of spreading. Engaging in any of them allows you to spread disease.
A new study has shown 95% of monkeypox cases have been transmitted through sexual activity.
Genital herpes also spreads "through skin to skin contact". That doesn't mean you can catch it from a hug.
Keep calling me a moron, dumbfuck. I'll still be right, and you'll still be a faggot with monkeypox.
A new study also tells me facemasks work to protect me from covid.
also wrong: "I present the masking ‘body of evidence’ below (n=167 studies and pieces of evidence), comprised of comparative effectiveness research as well as related evidence and high-level reporting. To date, the evidence has been stable and clear that masks do not work to control the virus and they can be harmful and especially to children. "
Great, so you're telling me that there's never been a new study that claimed masks worked, because I've seen a fucking shit ton of them, even though their wrong... which is my god damned point you idiot.
Chicken pox is part of the same "family" of viruses as genital herpes, but they are different viruses and function very differently.
Then why is it a 98% gay disease?
Oh, right, because gay men are mostly whores who can't stop sticking their dicks in anything that looks like a hole, or bending over to get fucked.
Spit does not contain and spread HIV you absolute dipshit idiot of a Fauci lover.
It spreads through semen and blood contact. And that contact can't just be on the skin, it needs to be through mucus or open sores or tears.
IE : get blood splash in your eyes when you're beating the perp good and he squirts. Always wear your wrap around sunglasses when beating dirty perps.
Swallowing cum won't transmit HIV (unless you have sores in the mouth or throat). Eating out pussy won't transmit HIV (unless you have sores in the mouth or throat):
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/cdc-hiv-oral-sex-fact-sheet.pdf
It is extremely unlikely for a man to get HIV from having vaginal sex with an HIV-positive woman (most likely only occurs when there are sores on the penis):
https://www.hivlawandpolicy.org/resources/heterosexual-risk-hiv-1-infection-sexual-act-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis#:~:text=The%20authors%20found%20that%2C%20overall,male%2Dto%2Dfemale%20
HIV is transmitted through needles, gay and bisexual men buttfucking, and bisexual men transmitting it to heterosexual women. If you're a hetero dude who doesn't do anal, you have almost no chance of getting HIV. If you're a woman who doesn't fuck bisexual guys, you have almost no chance of getting HIV.
I stand by my statement.
Seems like it's only half as unlikely as male to female transmission. Considering it's a death sentence, I'd still consider it plenty dangerous.
I'm not saying people should have vaginal sex with and and perform oral on HIV-positive people for fun. But saying oral sex is a mechanism for transmission is somewhat misleading: It would require one to have a wound or sore in the mouth or throat to occur. I can't find numbers on it, but as the CDC points out in regards to HIV and oral sex, "for transmission to occur, something very unusual would have to happen."
The point re: vaginal sex is that the driver of transmission of the disease is obviously anal sex, which is 35 times more likely to transmit the disease than vaginal sex. Looking at their promiscuity and focus on anal, it's quite obvious why HIV spread was driven by gay and bisexual men.
Your initial post is simply wrong. Yes, viruses do care about who you fuck. Or at least, HOW you fuck (which ends up being the same thing).
They don't because how and who are entirely different issues. Another assumption being made by yourself and others is that heterosexuals will not be engaging in anal sex. That's part of the problem here.
Frankly, I'd say the promiscuity is the single largest contributing factor more than anything else. The number of sex partners, especially in the promiscuous parts of (frankly) Queer communities is absolutely extreme by comparison.
The problem with this is the main way a woman gets HIV through this method would be having unprotected anal with a man, who 99% would've gotten it from having unprotected anal with another man. That's why "it ends up being the same thing".
That's just not a good enough excuse. Firstly, this entirely assumes that the primary way women get HIV isn't dirty needles, and I'd bet that's probably the dominant way all HIV infections are spread. Secondly, the methodology of transmission remains. When someone is reductive and just tosses out that it's only a disease that gay people can get, this intentionally promotes people into stupid and reductive thinking that makes them assume shit like "I'm straight, I can't get HIV."
As someone else mentioned yesterday, during the AIDS panic that Fauci helped to create, a father was arrested and interrogated when it was discovered that his daughter had HIV. She got it from a blood transfusion, but just constantly re-enforcing a thought-terminating cliche like "it's a gay disease" allows for mistakes like that to happen.
Frankly, considering Fauci's involvement, the same shit happened during Covid.
While we're all standing here saying, "The vaccines are not vaccines, they are theraputics. The CDC changed the definition of a vaccine to approve the drugs. These are not well tested. There's a large number of reported side effects. Why are we injecting children when we know they aren't a risk group? The theraputics are only going to work for about 6 months without another injection. The theraputics only reduce viral load, they don't prevent tranmission."
All the media did was retort with their own thought terminating cliches:
And that was justification for Andrew Cuomo to kill 50,000 people, and have governors across the country rescind the 4th and 5th amendment, and have the media call for violence, and the closure of our bank accounts because "the unvaccinated were spreading the disease".
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Threaten harass, bully, defame
Comment Approved: Again, the post is closer to harassment than this is. If the problem were about saying 'you moron' I'd have to remove probably 1/3rd of our comments.
There have been cases of women getting it.
Imp got Monkeypox and is now trying to claim he's "totally not gay guys".
lmao. Cope.
All the way back in 1970. Playing the long game.
Honestly, if he said that he practiced political homosexuality, it'd be completely unsurprising.
Yes, it's exactly the same as the previous ones.
That's literally what Fauci said about HIV, until he was proven wrong. Why do you think you're right and they’re wrong?
You know what’s awful? I bet these same faggots would be more than happy to demonize the fucking Catholic Church, YMCA, evangelicals, etc, for the “kiddy diddling”, and yet, when these fuckheads do the same thing, with obvious, tangible, epidemic consequences, they scream, and shout and do everything they can to discount responsibility…
Eugh. Fuck “pride”, and all its consequences…
Get back in the closet, you fucking degenerates…
Pride is one of the Seven Deadly Sins.
Unfortunately, monkey pox isn't deadly. And we're all paying for the fags who spread hiv around because they were whores too
Well considering the main spread of monkey pox has been anal intercourse……….
No it hasn't been. Again, that's why the super-spreader event in Europe was at a pet play convention. Surprise, surprise, a place where people are engaging in petting spreads a virus that transmits by skin-to-skin contact.
Really? so what’s the non-gay spread rate then? It should be equal if not greater.
No it shouldn't. Just how many heterosexuals do you think engage in heavy petting with people in public?
How many gay people who commit heavy petting in public have gay orgies after? You’re making the same argument that every fag denier did for aids. You scream skin to skin and yet lesbians aren’t at the same rate as gay men for monkeypox. Do lesbians not heavy pet?
If we define heavy petting as skin contact, then pretty much every person that goes to nightclubs engages in heavy petting with people in public.
Is that why it has been spreading rapidly through all communities and not just gay, because if it was simply by touch or through shared materials then more people, not just gay men, would simply have it by now.
Except it gives you pox.
People looking at you and going "GAH! Sir, please step back." is excellent way to prevent further transmission. Western societies typically don't engage in skin to skin contact ... outside of degenerate communities that are okay with skin-to-skin contact.
Seriously, when was the last time you had skin-to-skin contact with a co-worker without having HR called?
You don't shake hands with co-workers, you don't have friends that you hug, shake hands or share things with? you don't have family members?
Sad world you live in.
This is spread like an STD and that is it.
Hell no! What are you, Italian? Sit down Governor Cuomo.
I reserve the right to stand and glare stoically at my close family and that is absolutely all the intimacy I will tolerate from them.
... but no seriously,
Most westerners don't engage in physical contact (except Italians, and maybe greeks) most of the time. Again, the lesions are gonna be wherever you are had contact, so if you're shaking your hands and have monkey pox, it's not likely you're gonna shake hands. On top of that, they're not just saying some over-the-shoulder-one-arm-hug with clothing on. They are talking about two people with no shirts fully embracing each other. More-over, I've got to emphasize petting was the fetish here that led to the outbreak. This means putting your hands all over someone.
That's the reason you are saying it spreads like an STD. The only time you would engage in that level of skin contact in a western society is if you were with a romantic partner. You're not going to give you're a hug when neither of you are wearing shirts. Not even if you're Italian.
The fuck are you talking about lmao. Do you live isolated in fucking Tanzania and never seen a western city before ?
You'd have a hard time convincing most people a ton of gay sex doesnt happen at a thing like that.
I think most people understand that 'pet play' is just a specific type of foreplay for garden-variety faggotry.
Dude, if you really believe a "pet play" convention sticks to petting, I have prime waterfront moon property on the cheap to sell you.
Stop being an absolute moron.
I think that is the kind of convention where the participants may be doing a lot more in their hotel rooms. But this kind of leads into an argument about comparing different types of gatherings that revolve around abnormal behavior and how many orgies are occurring at each type (behind closed doors). I do not want to have such an argument; I just wanted to suggest you may be granting too much charity to weirdos.
My issue is that I'm not, I'm taking them at their explicit face value. That face value also happens to be wearing a puppy faced rubber mask and works for the department of energy.
Groomers gotta multiply somehow.
Groomed
Don't trust sluts!
Gay sluts?
Any sluts. All sluts are bad.
They had “contact” with gay men.
Archive - https://archive.ph/MnDxD
Each day is a new horror.
This is why fags must die.
Notice how all this grotesque shit is limited to California? The worst state, possibly one of the worst places on earth?
You have issues.
An STD that is exclusively in the gay community has spread to two kids.
Think for a second about that.
If that was the case then the media wouldn't even be saying that, they can't be both biased as fuck for the gay community yet report on the amount of gay cases this STD has.
If it was a woman you would have zero problems believing that explanation.
Gays are vastly over represented in child sexual abuse statistics. They're the 13-50 of pedos.
Much more likely than someone back in 1970 engineering a virus.
No, it was. Sorry, you're an idiot who did 0 research before waving your shitty mouth around, again.
Why would anyone go thru the trouble to create a virus that does not affect women if the virus is just an inconvenience. Is not AIDS
Dude, the first reported case was 1970.
Nineteen Seventy.
This thing ain't new.
Ah yes, a magical disease that simply appears in people magically.
It's always spread between people, since the first case in 1970.
Go be a dingbat elsewhere with your monkeypox.
You think they passed a rodent around ?
No, the humans caught it from the animal and then spread it amongst themselves you absolute zero IQ peg.
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Threaten harass, bully, defame
Comment Approved: This post is closer to harassment than this comment.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
Comment Approved: again this isn't really what this rule is for.