Swallowing cum won't transmit HIV (unless you have sores in the mouth or throat). Eating out pussy won't transmit HIV (unless you have sores in the mouth or throat):
It is extremely unlikely for a man to get HIV from having vaginal sex with an HIV-positive woman (most likely only occurs when there are sores on the penis):
HIV is transmitted through needles, gay and bisexual men buttfucking, and bisexual men transmitting it to heterosexual women. If you're a hetero dude who doesn't do anal, you have almost no chance of getting HIV. If you're a woman who doesn't fuck bisexual guys, you have almost no chance of getting HIV.
Individuals can further reduce the already low risk of HIV transmission from oral sex by keeping their male partners from ejaculating in their mouth.
I stand by my statement.
It is extremely unlikely for a man to get HIV from having vaginal sex with an HIV-positive woman (most likely only occurs when there are sores on the penis):
Seems like it's only half as unlikely as male to female transmission. Considering it's a death sentence, I'd still consider it plenty dangerous.
I'm not saying people should have vaginal sex with and and perform oral on HIV-positive people for fun. But saying oral sex is a mechanism for transmission is somewhat misleading: It would require one to have a wound or sore in the mouth or throat to occur. I can't find numbers on it, but as the CDC points out in regards to HIV and oral sex, "for transmission to occur, something very unusual would have to happen."
The point re: vaginal sex is that the driver of transmission of the disease is obviously anal sex, which is 35 times more likely to transmit the disease than vaginal sex. Looking at their promiscuity and focus on anal, it's quite obvious why HIV spread was driven by gay and bisexual men.
Your initial post is simply wrong. Yes, viruses do care about who you fuck. Or at least, HOW you fuck (which ends up being the same thing).
Yes, viruses do care about who you fuck. Or at least, HOW you fuck (which ends up being the same thing).
They don't because how and who are entirely different issues. Another assumption being made by yourself and others is that heterosexuals will not be engaging in anal sex. That's part of the problem here.
Looking at their promiscuity and focus on anal, it's quite obvious why HIV spread was driven by gay and bisexual men.
Frankly, I'd say the promiscuity is the single largest contributing factor more than anything else. The number of sex partners, especially in the promiscuous parts of (frankly) Queer communities is absolutely extreme by comparison.
They don't because how and who are entirely different issues. Another assumption being made by yourself and others is that heterosexuals will not be engaging in anal sex. That's part of the problem here.
The problem with this is the main way a woman gets HIV through this method would be having unprotected anal with a man, who 99% would've gotten it from having unprotected anal with another man. That's why "it ends up being the same thing".
Swallowing cum won't transmit HIV (unless you have sores in the mouth or throat). Eating out pussy won't transmit HIV (unless you have sores in the mouth or throat):
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/cdc-hiv-oral-sex-fact-sheet.pdf
It is extremely unlikely for a man to get HIV from having vaginal sex with an HIV-positive woman (most likely only occurs when there are sores on the penis):
https://www.hivlawandpolicy.org/resources/heterosexual-risk-hiv-1-infection-sexual-act-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis#:~:text=The%20authors%20found%20that%2C%20overall,male%2Dto%2Dfemale%20
HIV is transmitted through needles, gay and bisexual men buttfucking, and bisexual men transmitting it to heterosexual women. If you're a hetero dude who doesn't do anal, you have almost no chance of getting HIV. If you're a woman who doesn't fuck bisexual guys, you have almost no chance of getting HIV.
I stand by my statement.
Seems like it's only half as unlikely as male to female transmission. Considering it's a death sentence, I'd still consider it plenty dangerous.
I'm not saying people should have vaginal sex with and and perform oral on HIV-positive people for fun. But saying oral sex is a mechanism for transmission is somewhat misleading: It would require one to have a wound or sore in the mouth or throat to occur. I can't find numbers on it, but as the CDC points out in regards to HIV and oral sex, "for transmission to occur, something very unusual would have to happen."
The point re: vaginal sex is that the driver of transmission of the disease is obviously anal sex, which is 35 times more likely to transmit the disease than vaginal sex. Looking at their promiscuity and focus on anal, it's quite obvious why HIV spread was driven by gay and bisexual men.
Your initial post is simply wrong. Yes, viruses do care about who you fuck. Or at least, HOW you fuck (which ends up being the same thing).
They don't because how and who are entirely different issues. Another assumption being made by yourself and others is that heterosexuals will not be engaging in anal sex. That's part of the problem here.
Frankly, I'd say the promiscuity is the single largest contributing factor more than anything else. The number of sex partners, especially in the promiscuous parts of (frankly) Queer communities is absolutely extreme by comparison.
The problem with this is the main way a woman gets HIV through this method would be having unprotected anal with a man, who 99% would've gotten it from having unprotected anal with another man. That's why "it ends up being the same thing".