'Heed these words, literally nobody told thee to get whitegirl wasted on mead and thence straddle Chadwicke Von Thundershaft. A little prudence goes a long way towards personal "greatness". Verily, now thine "greatness" art the wonders of motherhood, thou ungrateful retard.'
And ye child were borne and Lord VonThundershaft doth nameth hym Woodbert, after his great grandfather. But lo, thine hoe cried out, “Didst thou assume theys gender?”
Cuthbert slappeth his owne forehead, distraught. “What manner of bewitched whore did I bed? She may be touched in the head. Though she may be mine son's mother, truly I can no longer bear the presence of lady Karen of SanFran Sisco.”
I sometimes love liberals, they are a walking NPC meme:
@Wanderers_hut
This is exactly the point...I'm astounded seeing how many people are fighting over this issue without even understanding the point.
Having a child is a beutiful blessing and normal biologically for a woman. However it has to be ON CHOICE.
Jun 25, 2022 · 4:52 AM UTC · Twitter for Android
@Wanderers_hut
Correction : ....for anyone capable of carrying a child...(after seeing the issues with language regarding the trans, non-binary etc)
The Twitter thread is, like most things on Twitter, a black pill: overly dramatic, narcissistic whores incapable of closing their legs and shamelessly admitting they don't give a damn about others and have no desire to take self-responsibility.
Also, each and every one of them or people they know, is a current or future rape victim...
Sex with a condom on is, at best, maybe 1% as good as unprotected sex. When the difference is that stark, it's no wonder that guys are insistent. Mind you, I've never had a 'one night stand', so I'm not sure of the dynamics of the situation.
I'm willing to accept that, but you can't tell me you can't think of any other fun things to get everyone off. You gotta be more imaginative at some point. Yes, I'm sure it feels better, but it's probably worse to kill a baby?
And if good sex is that important, why not try improving everyone's skills at it instead?
Yea I had to stay off social media. Some women act like there is nothing you can do if you don’t want to become pregnant. And they can simply go to a state that allows it. People don’t understand that it is a state issue now
My personal favorite take of today is "well we know how men react when you tell them no." With the implication being that they are having sex constantly because they just can't tell men no for safety, so the abortions are a necessity from there.
Thank god for feminism. Made sure to root that paranoia so deep that it self sustains every issue for them.
My favorite take on the issue is always any lefty comparison between abortion and murder, because they always, always miss the point, and in a fucking glorious fashion.
"It's now illegal for women to engage in health care, but men can kill as many kids as they want with guns."
Yeah, no, bitch. Murder is illegal. And abortion isn't. And there are almost always carveouts for actual healthcare, even if it were banned. You absolute retard.
But yeah, the guns:abortion comparison gets me every single time. Murder. Is. Already. Illegal. And these morons vote.
Murder. Is. Already. Illegal. And these morons vote.
It helps to remind me that the 19th amendment was a mistake. Women shouldn't be allowed to vote for the same reason children shouldn't. They're far too easy to manipulate into going along with any thing the party wants.
Yep, and many corporations will literally pay their transportation costs as part of medical plan coverage just so they can cross state lines to terminate the 'human parasite' growing in their bodies.
That's not even counting the inevitable 'charities' that will prop up to help cover those without such medical benefits. Modern day American women are really repressed...
The horrible truth is that previous societies wouldn't have tolerated children out-of-wedlock. The mother and the child would both be considered worthless.
No one would force them to bear children. They would see the woman as a threat to other families and women by being a drain on society and a home-wrecker.
The 'bastards are completely worthless scum with no rights and their mothers are degenerate whores with zero redeeming features' dealio was more-so a feature of the Early Modern period (with its attendant rise of Puritanism and other similarly hardline sects of Protestantism) than the actual Middle Ages, like most other things George RR Martin wrote down for edginess' sake and then tried to pass off as 'realistic'.
Well, but my point is the Church is the actual bulwark against that. The Christian Church asserts that all life has inherent value, even bastards. But generally, bastards & whores/home-wreckers seem to be seen as a plague on society by older societies.
I was kind of referring to non-western societies (which is not exactly appropriate given the context, so my bad on that, I didn't really elaborate any of that well). I know it was kind of a shock for soldiers going to Afghanistan to realize that if the father of a family died, the woman and her children were basically considered socially worthless, sometimes cast out, and forced to live in the mountains (American soldiers are western). Then you have the history of Indians (of the Indus Sub-Continent) burning their widows alive with their dead husbands. Again, the western Protestant British soldiers decreed they'd execute anyone caught doing that.
No wonder they don't want to raise a child; they're still children themselves. It's like watching a 5 year old hold his breath when he can't eat all the cookies in the jar.
As fun as that phrase is, I wouldn't go quite that far, personally.
I'd say greatness is incredibly rare to begin with, and women trend toward it even less than men do, by a significant margin. There are few great men, and fewer great women.
There can be a great women but also you can win the lottery without buying a ticket by finding a winning ticket stuck to the bottom of your shoe.
The fact that the rules of the universe don't preclude an outcome doesn't mean we need to take into account every possibility, no matter how improbable, in our decision making.
The average women is inferior to the average man at every objectively measurable activity that has been tested (with a slight exception in color perception which is almost practically useless). This explains every sex "disparity" that the femicommies bitch about. Of course nobody can publicly state that fact under his real name and keep his job.
ending welfare would take care of the problem, of course that would require repealing the 19th, and that isn't happening as long as women can vote whether or not to keep it
so really we are stuck to preparing for a collapse because that is one of the few actions that is still legal
No motherfucker because the Supreme Court is not the legislative branch and I don't give a fuck about some deadbeat trying to skip out. I care about the kid being murdered. If you don't want kids with her don't stick your dick in her vagina because that'll always create a chance
Yall are some retarded sons of bitches. The answer to shitheads not being held responsible isn't a downward spiral of removing more responsibility. It's reasserting it. Also stop trying to shit on the constitution
There was a pause
'Heed these words, literally nobody told thee to get whitegirl wasted on mead and thence straddle Chadwicke Von Thundershaft. A little prudence goes a long way towards personal "greatness". Verily, now thine "greatness" art the wonders of motherhood, thou ungrateful retard.'
And verily did the hoe then seethe.
And ye child were borne and Lord VonThundershaft doth nameth hym Woodbert, after his great grandfather. But lo, thine hoe cried out, “Didst thou assume theys gender?”
Cuthbert slappeth his owne forehead, distraught. “What manner of bewitched whore did I bed? She may be touched in the head. Though she may be mine son's mother, truly I can no longer bear the presence of lady Karen of SanFran Sisco.”
And lo, the peasants of yon village gathered a great amount of fyrewood and lashed the lady Karen to a stake placed in the centre.
Indeed, there is meme material in this image just for how pretentious it is on its own.
Hmm ... if we're going olde-school would it be better to finish "thou ungrateful knave"?
I thought about it, but I like serving the dish cold to the kind of person projecting onto the character.
Yeah, I had to deduct a point for lack of "trollop" or "harlot."
Still, at least an 8.
If I could suggest one alteration ... make the guy Chadwick (or Chadwicke, if we're doing the olde school thing) von Thundershaft.
Yeah, Cuthbert the Cuckold is one to keep in the back pocket.
Chef kiss
I sometimes love liberals, they are a walking NPC meme:
The Twitter thread is, like most things on Twitter, a black pill: overly dramatic, narcissistic whores incapable of closing their legs and shamelessly admitting they don't give a damn about others and have no desire to take self-responsibility.
Also, each and every one of them or people they know, is a current or future rape victim...
Forget about closing legs. I want someone to explain to me why it is so hard for these women to tell their walking dildos to wear a god damned condom?
Yeah, sure, condoms aren't 100% effective (just 85%). But almost all of the remaining 15% is user error.
Why, in the holy hell, would you sleep with a man who is too stupid to a) wear a condom, b) put it on correctly, or c) put it back on if it slips off.
Aren't you fucking better than that?
Apparently they are not. They should be, but they're not.
If worn correctly. That's a tough ask for them.
Instructions unclear: penis wrapped in duct tape.
They want to feel a throbbing dick inside. Not plastic.
Well, we all gotta make sacrifices.
Sex with a condom on is, at best, maybe 1% as good as unprotected sex. When the difference is that stark, it's no wonder that guys are insistent. Mind you, I've never had a 'one night stand', so I'm not sure of the dynamics of the situation.
I'm willing to accept that, but you can't tell me you can't think of any other fun things to get everyone off. You gotta be more imaginative at some point. Yes, I'm sure it feels better, but it's probably worse to kill a baby?
And if good sex is that important, why not try improving everyone's skills at it instead?
Me personally? I couldn't care less about getting off.
I'm not quite "TheImp2", but I will say that I mostly hang around with deaf-mute girls these days. It makes conversation so much more pleasant.
Yea I had to stay off social media. Some women act like there is nothing you can do if you don’t want to become pregnant. And they can simply go to a state that allows it. People don’t understand that it is a state issue now
My personal favorite take of today is "well we know how men react when you tell them no." With the implication being that they are having sex constantly because they just can't tell men no for safety, so the abortions are a necessity from there.
Thank god for feminism. Made sure to root that paranoia so deep that it self sustains every issue for them.
My favorite take on the issue is always any lefty comparison between abortion and murder, because they always, always miss the point, and in a fucking glorious fashion.
"It's now illegal for women to engage in health care, but men can kill as many kids as they want with guns."
Yeah, no, bitch. Murder is illegal. And abortion isn't. And there are almost always carveouts for actual healthcare, even if it were banned. You absolute retard.
But yeah, the guns:abortion comparison gets me every single time. Murder. Is. Already. Illegal. And these morons vote.
It helps to remind me that the 19th amendment was a mistake. Women shouldn't be allowed to vote for the same reason children shouldn't. They're far too easy to manipulate into going along with any thing the party wants.
Repeal the 19th.
The progressive era has been a disaster for the American race.
The morons who thought Dankula was a justice also vote. Well, they are allowed to anyway.
Yep, and many corporations will literally pay their transportation costs as part of medical plan coverage just so they can cross state lines to terminate the 'human parasite' growing in their bodies.
That's not even counting the inevitable 'charities' that will prop up to help cover those without such medical benefits. Modern day American women are really repressed...
I guess that's what happens when you lose. The US federal government has been an occupation government since then.
"If you don't allow me to kill this baby I WILL KILL MYSELF REEEE."
Textbook "suicide threat as abusive manipulation."
The answer to that is psychiatric care, not killing a baby.
Also, there's a joke about Ginger Genocide somewhere in there.
The horrible truth is that previous societies wouldn't have tolerated children out-of-wedlock. The mother and the child would both be considered worthless.
No one would force them to bear children. They would see the woman as a threat to other families and women by being a drain on society and a home-wrecker.
Not necessarily, bastards could do reasonably well for themselves in medieval Europe for example. Obviously it helped if they were of noble or royal birth, but even commoners weren't treated as worthless and could get help from the Church (up to and including getting a primitive form of child support from the father, if identified). And of course, most famously one bastard conquered England while another took over Castile (central Spain), three hundred years apart.
The 'bastards are completely worthless scum with no rights and their mothers are degenerate whores with zero redeeming features' dealio was more-so a feature of the Early Modern period (with its attendant rise of Puritanism and other similarly hardline sects of Protestantism) than the actual Middle Ages, like most other things George RR Martin wrote down for edginess' sake and then tried to pass off as 'realistic'.
Well, but my point is the Church is the actual bulwark against that. The Christian Church asserts that all life has inherent value, even bastards. But generally, bastards & whores/home-wreckers seem to be seen as a plague on society by older societies.
I was kind of referring to non-western societies (which is not exactly appropriate given the context, so my bad on that, I didn't really elaborate any of that well). I know it was kind of a shock for soldiers going to Afghanistan to realize that if the father of a family died, the woman and her children were basically considered socially worthless, sometimes cast out, and forced to live in the mountains (American soldiers are western). Then you have the history of Indians (of the Indus Sub-Continent) burning their widows alive with their dead husbands. Again, the western Protestant British soldiers decreed they'd execute anyone caught doing that.
No wonder they don't want to raise a child; they're still children themselves. It's like watching a 5 year old hold his breath when he can't eat all the cookies in the jar.
There is no greatness in women. That fundamental reality will never be accepted until after our civilization collapses.
As fun as that phrase is, I wouldn't go quite that far, personally.
I'd say greatness is incredibly rare to begin with, and women trend toward it even less than men do, by a significant margin. There are few great men, and fewer great women.
There can be a great women but also you can win the lottery without buying a ticket by finding a winning ticket stuck to the bottom of your shoe.
The fact that the rules of the universe don't preclude an outcome doesn't mean we need to take into account every possibility, no matter how improbable, in our decision making.
The average women is inferior to the average man at every objectively measurable activity that has been tested (with a slight exception in color perception which is almost practically useless). This explains every sex "disparity" that the femicommies bitch about. Of course nobody can publicly state that fact under his real name and keep his job.
It's always about themselves. Self-centered narcissism.
Well? You got your answer? Sandwiches make. Dishes wash. Stop crying whore.
Instead of "banning' abortions SCOTUS should have made fathers able to renounce their fatherhood.
abortion still kills a child, who is "responsible" for the child existing is less important than the child's continued existence
stop killing the children first, figure out the other parts after
ending welfare would take care of the problem, of course that would require repealing the 19th, and that isn't happening as long as women can vote whether or not to keep it
so really we are stuck to preparing for a collapse because that is one of the few actions that is still legal
I mean the welfare enables savagery. They would either cease being savages or just cease being without the government teat.
No motherfucker because the Supreme Court is not the legislative branch and I don't give a fuck about some deadbeat trying to skip out. I care about the kid being murdered. If you don't want kids with her don't stick your dick in her vagina because that'll always create a chance
Yall are some retarded sons of bitches. The answer to shitheads not being held responsible isn't a downward spiral of removing more responsibility. It's reasserting it. Also stop trying to shit on the constitution
Looking at his clothing and being able to have a pin-point style knife, she isn’t destined for greatness but already has it.
I remember when parenthood was a greatness.
You were never meant to be great then
This would never happen.
The conversation would go: "No bastard child can be destined for greatness as he is the son of a whore. Leave, and do not return."
Honestly, the whole "forced to bear children" thing is something that's never really happened. You were far more likely to be exiled.
They know they're worthless if they don't have children lmao
These wretches disgust me.