Lotus Eaters - De-trans Stories are Harrowing
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (54)
sorted by:
We went from what you do in the bedroom is your business to mutilating and sterilizing kids in the blink of an eye.
some of us were dumbasses and believed them when they said "we just want to be treated normally"
there is a reason open sodomy was socially sanctioned in every meaningful civilization in recorded history
Fred Phelps was ahead of his time
And the ones who wanted to be treated normally went on with their lives. This idea that the mainstream opinion of Pride Month is acceptance is total hookum considering the growing backlash year over year. Xbox's twitter gets roasted of it's hidious banner, FIFA getting grilled while hosting in Qutar, Bethesda getting broiled over it's Middle East divisions apparently not needing to rainbow up. More and more people are waking up to the reality that this is something else.
Leftism is a totalitarian force. Wherever leftism is in a position of power it tends to invade every private corner and force every thought into a leftist mold. In part this is because of the quasi-religious character of leftism; everything contrary to leftist beliefs represents Sin. More importantly, leftism is a totalitarian force because of the leftists' drive for power. The leftist seeks to satisfy his need for power through identification with a social movement and he tries to go through the power process by helping to pursue and attain the goals of the movement (see paragraph 83). But no matter how far the movement has gone in attaining its goals the leftist is never satisfied, because his activism is a surrogate activity (see paragraph 41). That is, the leftist's real motive is not to attain the ostensible goals of leftism; in reality he is motivated by the sense of power he gets from struggling for and then reaching a social goal. [35] Consequently the leftist is never satisfied with the goals he has already attained; his need for the power process leads him always to pursue some new goal. The leftist wants equal opportunities for minorities. When that is attained he insists on statistical equality of achievement by minorities. And as long as anyone harbors in some corner of his mind a negative attitude toward some minority, the leftist has to re-educated him. And ethnic minorities are not enough; no one can be allowed to have a negative attitude toward homosexuals, disabled people, fat people, old people, ugly people, and on and on and on. It's not enough that the public should be informed about the hazards of smoking; a warning has to be stamped on every package of cigarettes. Then cigarette advertising has to be restricted if not banned. The activists will never be satisfied until tobacco is outlawed, and after that it will be alcohol, then junk food, etc. Activists have fought gross child abuse, which is reasonable. But now they want to stop all spanking. When they have done that they will want to ban something else they consider unwholesome, then another thing and then another. They will never be satisfied until they have complete control over all child rearing practices. And then they will move on to another cause.
Suppose you asked leftists to make a list of ALL the things that were wrong with society, and then suppose you instituted EVERY social change that they demanded. It is safe to say that within a couple of years the majority of leftists would find something new to complain about, some new social “evil” to correct; because, once again, the leftist is motivated less by distress at society’s ills than by the need to satisfy his drive for power by imposing his solutions on society.
He wrote this in 1995. Nothing has changed. You're just noticing it.
It seems the older gays are the only ones who actually did that, probably because they lived through a time where they could actually get arrested for buggering each other. They see things now and realize how good they have it, so they just enjoy their lives. They must be looking on in horror as the younger generation teams up with the gender ideology lunatics and does everything in their power to make straight people hate them again.
a lot of young people are likely pissed the gay community was destroyed by extremist freaks who slander and ostracize you if you call them out.
🙏✉️💣
Dr. Kaczynski dropping truth-bombs again.
Or just didn't fully think through what we were signing up for. If "treated normally" implies "make no moral distinction", then wouldn't one implication of that be that society wouldn't be able to preference heterosexual relationships over homosexual ones in the public discourse?
You hear this all the time from these teachers when they say things like "If I'm straight and talk about going to dinner with my husband, why can't I do do the same thing if I'm gay?" Because they see no moral difference, therefore to preference one over the other in any way is to stigmatize.
Meanwhile us stupid rubes interpreted "treated normally" as something more like "be polite around them and don't try to throw them off of rooftops or get them fired from their jobs if they seem otherwise normal and well-adjusted."
Since I believe there should be a moral distinction between the two -- if for no other reason than heterosexual relationships are rooted in nature and are the basis for the continuation of the species -- then I'm now forced to reject the premise that the gays should be "treated normally". Make it illegal, bring back the social stigma, etc...
That's just it. We achieved respect for the gays, but they were still uncomfortable. Whether it was just weakness of character or it being too soon since they were persecuted, they decided it wasn't enough until they were considered normal. Until, despite being a small percentage of the population, being gay was considered as common as being a dude or chick.
We see the same thing from trannies. They aren't comfortable with themselves until enough people around them are like them. Thus the child grooming, and they won't stop untill the entire world looks like the fucking castro. If they just just grow a spine and accept themselves, truly, we wouldn't be in this mess.
It's not even necessarily a numbers game: they just don't think there's a moral difference, therefore treating one as "normal" and one as "abnormal" (even if that's objectively true based on statistics) is equivalent to making a moral judgment against the "abnormal" case. Society is still treating the gays differently (even if they're being polite about it), therefore society is acting immorally and will continue to act immorally until both lifestyles are treated as equally valid.
It's also why we have to go around pretending that we're all at equal risk of contracting AIDS instead of taking the Norm MacDonald approach of "we already have a cure for AIDS: don't fuck other dudes in the ass".
Trannies will be the same way: you will not be allowed to express a preference for normal people or trannies, because expressing that preference will be considered immoral.
I don't advocate discrimination against the LGB's myself, with the caveat that I do advocate discrimination against assholes, protected class or not. The Christians were right about gay marriage being a bad idea, but then I consider straight marriage to be an anti-male scam so I don't really see marriage in its current form to be a benefit.
The T's on the other hand deserve everything they get and more. That's all I can really say since last time I advocated my preferred solution to the troon problem I got rule 2'ed.
Straight marriage is only an anti-male scam since the leftists started destroying it.
No fault divorce laws, unqualified alimony, the complete destruction of marriage contracts, child custody/child support, workplace laws forcing companies to hire women, the deluth model of domestic violence, social welfare programs, etc.. They cut out all protections to men and amped up all benefits to women, then wonder why marriage rates have been collapsing.
When crazy conservatives said that leftists were trying to destroy marriage, they were right, but Gay Marriage was just one in a long line of changes to do so.
Absolutely. I will say that the Christians could have done with better messaging on the gay marriage issue though. It's kind of hard to give a shit about "the sanctity of marriage" when thots looking for a payday destroyed that decades before anyone gave a shit about the gays.
Christian messaging on gay marriage was made more difficult due to the fact they caved on things like women's suffrage. The left (justifiably, based on their past experience) sees Christian opposition to the latest social fad as temporary.
They didn't destroy anything. God's order involves being married, the sacred union between a man and a woman. There is no "other way". The fact that many women have been destroyed and turned into horrible sluts that will never properly obey a man doesn't change that.
All those things that we thought were just people being cruel and hateful throughout history for no good reason...turns out there were good reasons for a lot of them.
What is the lubricated slope?
It's a public health risk for one. That should in theory be less of a problem now that we know how disease spreads, but of course it isn't because the fags can't control themselves. Monkeypox is just their latest gift to the world.
If the shit "transitioners" did to their bodies was done to characters in a film it'd be a torture porn horror movie.
When children that were abused like this finally get out from under their mentally ill parents, schools and "therapists" and realize how they've been mutilated and their lives destroyed things are going to get exciting.
Either lawyers are going to make huge amounts of money suing on their behalf or there's going to be a fracas that makes "the purge" look like a small town prom.
The recent Tulsa hospital shooting was a man targeting his doctor because he was unhappy with the spinal fusion surgery. I think that its only a matter of time before the gender bender surgeons get the same treatment.
these freaks should donate their breasts to women who had breast to get their breasts removed because of breast cancer.
We Casandras speak even early, to such ears as yours, unhearing.
Both are not reversible.
You shouldn't have kids either, so why not cut off your dick and replace it with a fake one? It allows a return to normality, too.
Aw man, I'm glad I skipped lunch.
What, is there a futa cum shortage? :)
Yeah, that's a vomit inducing abomination. So's this.
The bit about tits and legs is a complete non-sequitur. It's not one or the other. The girls brainwashed into getting their breasts cut off aren't paraplegic, and even if they were, the breast surgery wouldn't make them walk again.
If I wanted to insult your intelligence I'd call you a "cretinous half-retard." Breast implants installed under a square foot of scar tissue isn't the same as not being maimed in the first place.
Firstly it isn't reversed because you can't breast feed after a mastectomy. To this I assume you will say that intercourse and reproduction are more important than breast feeding because you can get formula, and yes this is true but we are talking about if mastectomies are reversible not whether mastectomies are as bad as castration which I don't think anyone would argue. Maybe no one should be maimed by satanic weirdos.
Having a limb cut off is called being an amputee. Paraplegic is when your spine doesn't work and won't send signals to your legs.
Now do the octave drops.