The punishment for framing or bearing false witness with malicious intent should carry the same sentence as the crime that would be inflicted upon the victim. Hope that bitch rots.
In this case, it will, because she had to be in possession of illegal material in order to try planting it on his computer. Motivation doesn't matter when it comes to CP: having images of child abuse is still victimizing children, regardless of why you have them.
Which is why large numbers of FBI agents and other law enforcement should all be in prison.
How do you handle cases where the victim is also the perpetrator? There are plenty of immature literal children who should not be having smartphones making their own CP and sharing it with the class.
Yes and most jurisdictions now have laws protecting them from prosecution for that, which is a good thing. Doesn't change the fact that you're right and they shouldn't have smart phones.
You have to wonder how much online pornography on public and moderated sites are of underage girls because of this. Browsing places like porn hub you would have no idea if a fully developed 17 year old was legal or not. It's going to make the future CP laws very interesting to see. How many people have unknowingly downloaded a 17 year old girl's videos? No way to tell she's illegal, site left the video up and yet she filmed it for her boyfriend and he leaked it so CP in the open and undetectable
At one point in time one of the most popular porn actresses in the world was under age. She used a fake ID to get hired and starred in loads of video tapes. Only for it later to be discovered she was underage and all those tapes had to be destroyed. There's probably loads of people owning those tapes none the wiser, who never intentionally purchased CP, but thanks to a main stream porn company selling it they own it.
I'm sure a lot of gonewild girls are underage. Teenagers with cameras can post anything and teenage girls are very good at making themselves look older than they are. Has Reddit ever been held accountable for that before?
Lack of fathers in the house causes women to hit puberty faster and various hormones in the food are making them go through it quicker. There are stacked teenagers due to a bad environment so that's not a safety net any more.
One of the main problems 4chan had years ago when it was rising in popularity. Probably still happens now but occasional browsing of boards where self posting happens has turned up the occasional returning camwhore who says "oh btw, I'm now 18" or some other number that with simple math means they very much were under age whenever they started.
Random/casual browsers who don't stick around to learn anything likely will never know what they were looking at from a legal POV since the eventual admission happening is likely a rare enough thing.
Wasn't that also the thing with "The guy game" where one girl was 17 so they had to destroy all copies of the game? Kinda crazy but I see why the stuff has to be destroyed. How would you proof you didn't know, ignorance does not protect from punishment but in those cases you bought something legally from a store. Is the store that might not even exist anymore liable for it? We don't know, there really needs to be some cases to know for sure.
All this makes me think is just go for milfs, lol.
Considering the soviet CP import companies that ran right up until the union collapsed (then they all moved to the US or Israel) buying in a store is hardly a defense. There used to be mail order magazines full of that stuff, known to the alphabets and totally ignored. William Pierce has an entire episode of his show on it. Should be on archive.org if you want the full story.
Oh, what was the wrong thing wasn't the action, it was the "getting caught" part. Remember, "no bad tactics, only bad targets" is a motto of these types of people. The only sin to them is harming their evil crusade.
He rejoices when a woman breaks her leg. I think we can all agree that this woman is beneath contempt and that she deserves to locked up for life (SHE WON'T BE!!! MATRIARCHY!!!)
I really hope you are wrong but knowing the track record of some judgments she might just get some mandatory psychologist visits to "fix" her and she will be done or at max a very light sentence not even behind bars.
It makes sense to punish someone less if he is (demonstrably) not into it
No, same punishment for everyone. The reason why it is procured doesn't detract from the demand, it still fuels the supply. The only time CP shouldn't have a punishment for possession is by accident/framing or if the "criminal" is also similarly underage.
Was it 900 actual screenshots or frames of footage? Because the latter has been used as a means of charging and reporting things of this nature in the past. That's as short as a 15 seconds of a 60fps video.
The reason the bigger number gets used is precisely because of the response you and others likely have: seeing a large number and having your opinion influenced.
As a second point, apps exist to take screenshots from vids so depending on settings this sort of thing can be easily automated.
I cannot even access the article, so I will assume. Is this the number of items that fall into that category? I assume that if someone is an actual pedophile, he'll not just have one bit of that stuff, but a lot.
This is the sort of thing that happens when you make simple possession a crime. Manufacture, sale, purchase, distribution, those can be criminalized and will damn all but the innocent, but possession is simply inviting abuses of power.
Now if only the FBI would get caught and charged for doing this.
The way CP is handled is absolutely terrifying. Something that can be easily planted on your computer by malicious actors should not be grounds to have your life destroyed. Instead CP should be targeted at the root, namely those who create and distribute it.
The punishment for framing or bearing false witness with malicious intent should carry the same sentence as the crime that would be inflicted upon the victim. Hope that bitch rots.
In this case, it will, because she had to be in possession of illegal material in order to try planting it on his computer. Motivation doesn't matter when it comes to CP: having images of child abuse is still victimizing children, regardless of why you have them.
Which is why large numbers of FBI agents and other law enforcement should all be in prison.
How do you handle cases where the victim is also the perpetrator? There are plenty of immature literal children who should not be having smartphones making their own CP and sharing it with the class.
Yes and most jurisdictions now have laws protecting them from prosecution for that, which is a good thing. Doesn't change the fact that you're right and they shouldn't have smart phones.
You have to wonder how much online pornography on public and moderated sites are of underage girls because of this. Browsing places like porn hub you would have no idea if a fully developed 17 year old was legal or not. It's going to make the future CP laws very interesting to see. How many people have unknowingly downloaded a 17 year old girl's videos? No way to tell she's illegal, site left the video up and yet she filmed it for her boyfriend and he leaked it so CP in the open and undetectable
At one point in time one of the most popular porn actresses in the world was under age. She used a fake ID to get hired and starred in loads of video tapes. Only for it later to be discovered she was underage and all those tapes had to be destroyed. There's probably loads of people owning those tapes none the wiser, who never intentionally purchased CP, but thanks to a main stream porn company selling it they own it.
I'm sure a lot of gonewild girls are underage. Teenagers with cameras can post anything and teenage girls are very good at making themselves look older than they are. Has Reddit ever been held accountable for that before?
faggot
This implies that girls under 18 don't have D+ cups. Which is a very bold assumption.
Lack of fathers in the house causes women to hit puberty faster and various hormones in the food are making them go through it quicker. There are stacked teenagers due to a bad environment so that's not a safety net any more.
One of the main problems 4chan had years ago when it was rising in popularity. Probably still happens now but occasional browsing of boards where self posting happens has turned up the occasional returning camwhore who says "oh btw, I'm now 18" or some other number that with simple math means they very much were under age whenever they started.
Random/casual browsers who don't stick around to learn anything likely will never know what they were looking at from a legal POV since the eventual admission happening is likely a rare enough thing.
Wasn't that also the thing with "The guy game" where one girl was 17 so they had to destroy all copies of the game? Kinda crazy but I see why the stuff has to be destroyed. How would you proof you didn't know, ignorance does not protect from punishment but in those cases you bought something legally from a store. Is the store that might not even exist anymore liable for it? We don't know, there really needs to be some cases to know for sure.
All this makes me think is just go for milfs, lol.
Considering the soviet CP import companies that ran right up until the union collapsed (then they all moved to the US or Israel) buying in a store is hardly a defense. There used to be mail order magazines full of that stuff, known to the alphabets and totally ignored. William Pierce has an entire episode of his show on it. Should be on archive.org if you want the full story.
Yes.
By having them charged as adult and judging them for their actions, not their lack of bad intentions.
Cruel I know but there has to be a hard line set.
At a minimum it should be the same sentence but for something like this it should be even worse.
double
Under Sharia Law, theft is punishable by cutting off the criminal's hand. Now he will never steal again.
This horrible woman should be punished with a rusty hanger. Now she will never want to have sex again.
It's not as if this frigid bitch was enjoying sex to begin with. Not much of a punishment.
Maximum sentence the husband would have been able to be prosecuted IMHO. Need to send a message.
She should be publicly flogged at the bare minimum.
If she was involved in creating it, she should be flayed alive and then flogged further.
nah, double it.
Wow...astute observation there Sherlock!
I disagree. If you're framing someone, you know full well that you are doing somethnng wrong.
Pretty sure that many people have 0 sense of morality
Especially nowadays.
Oh, what was the wrong thing wasn't the action, it was the "getting caught" part. Remember, "no bad tactics, only bad targets" is a motto of these types of people. The only sin to them is harming their evil crusade.
TheImp1 rejoices?
Not just Impy.
He rejoices when a woman breaks her leg. I think we can all agree that this woman is beneath contempt and that she deserves to locked up for life (SHE WON'T BE!!! MATRIARCHY!!!)
I really hope you are wrong but knowing the track record of some judgments she might just get some mandatory psychologist visits to "fix" her and she will be done or at max a very light sentence not even behind bars.
I thought you had learned your lesson with Kim Potter and your 5 incorrect predictions, but be my guest.
It makes sense to punish someone less if he is (demonstrably) not into it. But trying to frame someone is a highly aggravating factor.
No, same punishment for everyone. The reason why it is procured doesn't detract from the demand, it still fuels the supply. The only time CP shouldn't have a punishment for possession is by accident/framing or if the "criminal" is also similarly underage.
It may fuel the supply, but someone who isn't into it is still less of a threat when not in prison.
I'd rather have them all locked up for good, but if I had to choose who is punished more, then the people who like it.
It's disturbingly common how often women will falsely accuse their ex of sexual or violent abuse to get the full costudy of children.
And they usually get Listened and Believed.
Those children will be better off with their father, and considerably more based as a result.
And alive.
Christ, 900 seems excessive. Almost like they got a little too into the collecting.....
Was it 900 actual screenshots or frames of footage? Because the latter has been used as a means of charging and reporting things of this nature in the past. That's as short as a 15 seconds of a 60fps video.
The reason the bigger number gets used is precisely because of the response you and others likely have: seeing a large number and having your opinion influenced.
As a second point, apps exist to take screenshots from vids so depending on settings this sort of thing can be easily automated.
I cannot even access the article, so I will assume. Is this the number of items that fall into that category? I assume that if someone is an actual pedophile, he'll not just have one bit of that stuff, but a lot.
Article says they took 900 screenshots of the subject matter with the victim's old phone.
TIL: Dan Olson is now a woman.
He was never a man to begin with.
Reddit Mod frames husband...
insert nelson here
A similar story from a few years ago: https://www.newser.com/story/192868/jury-woman-downloaded-child-porn-to-frame-hubby.html https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wife-who-used-child-porn-to-frame-spouse-gets-jail/
Taking a page out of the deep state playbook.
This is the sort of thing that happens when you make simple possession a crime. Manufacture, sale, purchase, distribution, those can be criminalized and will damn all but the innocent, but possession is simply inviting abuses of power.
Now if only the FBI would get caught and charged for doing this.
The way CP is handled is absolutely terrifying. Something that can be easily planted on your computer by malicious actors should not be grounds to have your life destroyed. Instead CP should be targeted at the root, namely those who create and distribute it.
I get the feeling she didn't just have access to it, but produced it as well. This is more than excessive.