In this case, it will, because she had to be in possession of illegal material in order to try planting it on his computer. Motivation doesn't matter when it comes to CP: having images of child abuse is still victimizing children, regardless of why you have them.
Which is why large numbers of FBI agents and other law enforcement should all be in prison.
How do you handle cases where the victim is also the perpetrator? There are plenty of immature literal children who should not be having smartphones making their own CP and sharing it with the class.
Yes and most jurisdictions now have laws protecting them from prosecution for that, which is a good thing. Doesn't change the fact that you're right and they shouldn't have smart phones.
You have to wonder how much online pornography on public and moderated sites are of underage girls because of this. Browsing places like porn hub you would have no idea if a fully developed 17 year old was legal or not. It's going to make the future CP laws very interesting to see. How many people have unknowingly downloaded a 17 year old girl's videos? No way to tell she's illegal, site left the video up and yet she filmed it for her boyfriend and he leaked it so CP in the open and undetectable
At one point in time one of the most popular porn actresses in the world was under age. She used a fake ID to get hired and starred in loads of video tapes. Only for it later to be discovered she was underage and all those tapes had to be destroyed. There's probably loads of people owning those tapes none the wiser, who never intentionally purchased CP, but thanks to a main stream porn company selling it they own it.
I'm sure a lot of gonewild girls are underage. Teenagers with cameras can post anything and teenage girls are very good at making themselves look older than they are. Has Reddit ever been held accountable for that before?
One of the main problems 4chan had years ago when it was rising in popularity. Probably still happens now but occasional browsing of boards where self posting happens has turned up the occasional returning camwhore who says "oh btw, I'm now 18" or some other number that with simple math means they very much were under age whenever they started.
Random/casual browsers who don't stick around to learn anything likely will never know what they were looking at from a legal POV since the eventual admission happening is likely a rare enough thing.
Wasn't that also the thing with "The guy game" where one girl was 17 so they had to destroy all copies of the game? Kinda crazy but I see why the stuff has to be destroyed. How would you proof you didn't know, ignorance does not protect from punishment but in those cases you bought something legally from a store. Is the store that might not even exist anymore liable for it? We don't know, there really needs to be some cases to know for sure.
All this makes me think is just go for milfs, lol.
Considering the soviet CP import companies that ran right up until the union collapsed (then they all moved to the US or Israel) buying in a store is hardly a defense. There used to be mail order magazines full of that stuff, known to the alphabets and totally ignored. William Pierce has an entire episode of his show on it. Should be on archive.org if you want the full story.
In this case, it will, because she had to be in possession of illegal material in order to try planting it on his computer. Motivation doesn't matter when it comes to CP: having images of child abuse is still victimizing children, regardless of why you have them.
Which is why large numbers of FBI agents and other law enforcement should all be in prison.
How do you handle cases where the victim is also the perpetrator? There are plenty of immature literal children who should not be having smartphones making their own CP and sharing it with the class.
Yes and most jurisdictions now have laws protecting them from prosecution for that, which is a good thing. Doesn't change the fact that you're right and they shouldn't have smart phones.
You have to wonder how much online pornography on public and moderated sites are of underage girls because of this. Browsing places like porn hub you would have no idea if a fully developed 17 year old was legal or not. It's going to make the future CP laws very interesting to see. How many people have unknowingly downloaded a 17 year old girl's videos? No way to tell she's illegal, site left the video up and yet she filmed it for her boyfriend and he leaked it so CP in the open and undetectable
At one point in time one of the most popular porn actresses in the world was under age. She used a fake ID to get hired and starred in loads of video tapes. Only for it later to be discovered she was underage and all those tapes had to be destroyed. There's probably loads of people owning those tapes none the wiser, who never intentionally purchased CP, but thanks to a main stream porn company selling it they own it.
I'm sure a lot of gonewild girls are underage. Teenagers with cameras can post anything and teenage girls are very good at making themselves look older than they are. Has Reddit ever been held accountable for that before?
One of the main problems 4chan had years ago when it was rising in popularity. Probably still happens now but occasional browsing of boards where self posting happens has turned up the occasional returning camwhore who says "oh btw, I'm now 18" or some other number that with simple math means they very much were under age whenever they started.
Random/casual browsers who don't stick around to learn anything likely will never know what they were looking at from a legal POV since the eventual admission happening is likely a rare enough thing.
Wasn't that also the thing with "The guy game" where one girl was 17 so they had to destroy all copies of the game? Kinda crazy but I see why the stuff has to be destroyed. How would you proof you didn't know, ignorance does not protect from punishment but in those cases you bought something legally from a store. Is the store that might not even exist anymore liable for it? We don't know, there really needs to be some cases to know for sure.
All this makes me think is just go for milfs, lol.
Yes.
Considering the soviet CP import companies that ran right up until the union collapsed (then they all moved to the US or Israel) buying in a store is hardly a defense. There used to be mail order magazines full of that stuff, known to the alphabets and totally ignored. William Pierce has an entire episode of his show on it. Should be on archive.org if you want the full story.
By having them charged as adult and judging them for their actions, not their lack of bad intentions.
Cruel I know but there has to be a hard line set.