I will bet every single cent to my name that there will never be an organization level push for whites to have more children so long as the tribe is in control.
Africa won't prop up the world's birth rates forever.
You seem to be under the mistaken idea that a high population is a necessity. It is not now, nor has it ever really been. The only time a larger than normal population is required is when a nation wants to engage in explorative expansionism, populating a new frontier.
We no longer require this and are far past the minimum population requirements.
The Africans and other "minority" groups are being artificially propped up to serve a certain agenda.
First, they exist as a constant drain on the resources of western nations through a system of forced charity.
Second, as the flimsy charade of "national sovereignty" is given the Africans occupy and render unusable an entire continent's worth of resources to white nations.
Third, the "minority" groups, specifically Africans, can be easily directed to swarm white countries and overwhelm the white populations through sheer numbers over time.
Finally, these disparate groups hold no greater intelligence and as soon as support is pulled almost immediately regress to a tribal state and can be swiftly crushed and disposed of if necessary.
This is one of the areas where your intense hatred of women blinds you. You look only at the progressing effect through a clouded lens and don't consider alternative causes nor ends.
If, say, gold was discovered in Honduras and the nation became rich and immigrants started flocking to Honduras because an uneducated person could feed his family there, then the lack of white people having kids would be something the media would be SCREAMING about.
I've been trying to come up with a similar analogy.
I wouldn't even say they'd be screaming about it - I bet if people having kids suddenly became immensely profitable, they'd flip a switch on what we see in the media and within a couple of months women would suddenly be horny and aggressively seeking out men to have kids with.
There's something in humans that cause/diminishes desire for sex based on messages from the social group. Probably tribes of people survived who didn't have kids when famine was coming and did have kids when prosperity was on the horizon.
If it was beneficial for themselves for people to have kids I'd bet they know exactly how to change the messaging to accomplish that.
There's no way it's a money thing, or at least not in the conventional sense. People can afford to have kids, they just can't afford the other consequence of having them - a messy divorce within 5 years at best with a loss of 50% of all assets followed by heavily garnished wages.
Yes, but it's not just that. Feminism has fucked up all the stages of the gender dynamic, not just the endgame. Even approaching a woman is harassment if she doesn't find you attractive, and the socio-legal environment governing gender relations takes any benefit out of relationship for the man from beginning to end. Then there's the fact that the modern woman isn't worth chase, thanks to the sexual liberation movement making them all fat and entitled.
The spike in housing, education, and medical costs have absolutely destroyed Millennials’ ability to start & raise families. They missed the boat in the late 00s and all the 2010s. Divorce, feminism, immigration, hedonism, all have a part to play, but the root cause is economic.
They aren't going to start pushing men to have kids. You may see that on a grassroots level as women start getting buyer's remorse, but the media narrative is going to push hard for mass immigration. That's been the end goal of pushing feminism on white countries for decades now. Subvert white women against white men to drive white populations down, then brown the place out.
Yeah, I saw that and was going to post it. They throw out solutions that boil down to a leftist wish list, even though the article itself admits those solutions have proven ineffective when they've been tried elsewhere.
The funny thing is that they're right that our society and political system is anti-family, but for reasons this writer and the rest of the left (and many on the right for that matter) don't want to talk about. More and more men are realizing that having kids gives the woman almost life and death power over you, so they stay away to avoid the abusive family courts. Whites aren't all that interested in bringing kids into a world that considers them Untermenschen, especially if they're male. The usual suspects relentlessly push gay and tranny shit, and that doesn't result in children. And of course men are avoiding women all together now since feminism has fucked up all stages of male-female relationships, making the whole thing a high risk and low reward enterprise for men.
But let's not talk about any of that. Let's just offer more free shit, import more third world trash, and force people into high density housing so they can listen to the diverse animals the leftists imported make all kinds of racket at all hours of the day and night because they're living there on the public dime and don't have work. It won't improve the birth rate problem, but at least the native population is miserable, so the leftists have something to be happy about.
Excellent post. Yeah, it's all just more communism. They're searching for a way to force men to provide for women. They have no intention of going back to a patriarchal society. They know it would work but they would much prefer to just enslave men instead.
"The curse of a civilization. It was neither war nor pestilence that wiped out the race who built the great city lying around us. It was their reverence for this lovely flower."
It's feminists fault. White women in particular have done nothing more but make themselves more and more unbearable to just be around. Much less be in a relationship and have a kid with.
No, Population Collapse has been talked about since Thomas Malthus, and they've been wrong for well over 100 years.
They always talk about population collapse and they have been consistently wrong. Even Malthus himself was discredited while he was still alive and it made no difference.
Who's ready for the media to pivot to begging men to have kids?
Why would they do that when, for a globalist, the answer is simply to import a new population to replace the one that is dying out?
With the added bonus of this new population they're importing being considerably more amenable to the kind of feudalism that our lords and masters wish to return to.
Those in power want whites to have a population crisis.
They will NEVER beg whites to have kids.
You dont understand.
These "people" dont care about the future of humanity.
They are the children of Satan. They want to destroy humanity.
Yes.
I will bet every single cent to my name that there will never be an organization level push for whites to have more children so long as the tribe is in control.
You seem to be under the mistaken idea that a high population is a necessity. It is not now, nor has it ever really been. The only time a larger than normal population is required is when a nation wants to engage in explorative expansionism, populating a new frontier.
We no longer require this and are far past the minimum population requirements.
The Africans and other "minority" groups are being artificially propped up to serve a certain agenda.
First, they exist as a constant drain on the resources of western nations through a system of forced charity.
Second, as the flimsy charade of "national sovereignty" is given the Africans occupy and render unusable an entire continent's worth of resources to white nations.
Third, the "minority" groups, specifically Africans, can be easily directed to swarm white countries and overwhelm the white populations through sheer numbers over time.
Finally, these disparate groups hold no greater intelligence and as soon as support is pulled almost immediately regress to a tribal state and can be swiftly crushed and disposed of if necessary.
This is one of the areas where your intense hatred of women blinds you. You look only at the progressing effect through a clouded lens and don't consider alternative causes nor ends.
That doesn't work when the only developed nations are developed nations because they were majority white
I've been trying to come up with a similar analogy.
I wouldn't even say they'd be screaming about it - I bet if people having kids suddenly became immensely profitable, they'd flip a switch on what we see in the media and within a couple of months women would suddenly be horny and aggressively seeking out men to have kids with.
There's something in humans that cause/diminishes desire for sex based on messages from the social group. Probably tribes of people survived who didn't have kids when famine was coming and did have kids when prosperity was on the horizon.
If it was beneficial for themselves for people to have kids I'd bet they know exactly how to change the messaging to accomplish that.
Problem is they could start it up but not turn it off when they wanted?
Yes, but it's not just that. Feminism has fucked up all the stages of the gender dynamic, not just the endgame. Even approaching a woman is harassment if she doesn't find you attractive, and the socio-legal environment governing gender relations takes any benefit out of relationship for the man from beginning to end. Then there's the fact that the modern woman isn't worth chase, thanks to the sexual liberation movement making them all fat and entitled.
The spike in housing, education, and medical costs have absolutely destroyed Millennials’ ability to start & raise families. They missed the boat in the late 00s and all the 2010s. Divorce, feminism, immigration, hedonism, all have a part to play, but the root cause is economic.
"It's the economy, stupid!"
In 40 years time, Millennials are either going to be labelled The Forgotten Generation or "The Lazy Generation" as a slur.
At every key milestone that previous generations also had, Millennials were skipped over, repressed or blamed for.
Agreed.
Source: Am Millenial.
They aren't going to start pushing men to have kids. You may see that on a grassroots level as women start getting buyer's remorse, but the media narrative is going to push hard for mass immigration. That's been the end goal of pushing feminism on white countries for decades now. Subvert white women against white men to drive white populations down, then brown the place out.
Mexico is just the portal. Africa is going to wash over Europe and North America.
Yeah, I saw that and was going to post it. They throw out solutions that boil down to a leftist wish list, even though the article itself admits those solutions have proven ineffective when they've been tried elsewhere.
The funny thing is that they're right that our society and political system is anti-family, but for reasons this writer and the rest of the left (and many on the right for that matter) don't want to talk about. More and more men are realizing that having kids gives the woman almost life and death power over you, so they stay away to avoid the abusive family courts. Whites aren't all that interested in bringing kids into a world that considers them Untermenschen, especially if they're male. The usual suspects relentlessly push gay and tranny shit, and that doesn't result in children. And of course men are avoiding women all together now since feminism has fucked up all stages of male-female relationships, making the whole thing a high risk and low reward enterprise for men.
But let's not talk about any of that. Let's just offer more free shit, import more third world trash, and force people into high density housing so they can listen to the diverse animals the leftists imported make all kinds of racket at all hours of the day and night because they're living there on the public dime and don't have work. It won't improve the birth rate problem, but at least the native population is miserable, so the leftists have something to be happy about.
Excellent post. Yeah, it's all just more communism. They're searching for a way to force men to provide for women. They have no intention of going back to a patriarchal society. They know it would work but they would much prefer to just enslave men instead.
I don’t think OP is asking this in good faith.
Nonsense. The media is going to use this to demand more immigration. It's what they do to Europe. It's what they've been doing for years.
"The curse of a civilization. It was neither war nor pestilence that wiped out the race who built the great city lying around us. It was their reverence for this lovely flower."
-Drax, Moonraker (1979)
Population collapse is the goal.
It's feminists fault. White women in particular have done nothing more but make themselves more and more unbearable to just be around. Much less be in a relationship and have a kid with.
No, Population Collapse has been talked about since Thomas Malthus, and they've been wrong for well over 100 years.
They always talk about population collapse and they have been consistently wrong. Even Malthus himself was discredited while he was still alive and it made no difference.
Why would they do that when, for a globalist, the answer is simply to import a new population to replace the one that is dying out?
With the added bonus of this new population they're importing being considerably more amenable to the kind of feudalism that our lords and masters wish to return to.
Eventually the countries that migrants come from are going to start running out of people, in about 40 years they'll start noticing.
Brown men, maybe.
They can suck my big dick on that one.
If they ever want more kids they will blame men not women. They'll never admit women are the problem.