Several outcomes. The functional elimination of the black race from North America is probably the most assured of them. They have no goodwill remaining with just about anybody except the white left(who they will probably attack early and often), despite the brazen attempts to bundle them all together as "bipoc", the single stupidest acronym ever devised by humans. The Hispanics absolutely hate them, outnumber them three to one, are more adept at violence, and would delight in being able to take over the urban zones.
As for the Hispanics, they would most likely carve out huge swathes of the Southwest as new portions of Mexico(which they basically already are anyway), fight internecine small scale conflicts among themselves(again, what else is new), while being eliminated from majority white areas across the Midwest as a matter of principle.
The white left would find themselves assailed from all fronts, and regardless of any systemic control they might have in some areas, would be destroyed. They produce nothing, they contribute nothing, and for the most part lack any skills that would be useful in a long term civil conflict.
Most rural areas would clean up their towns in the short term, and likely form loose federations of mutual defense against attacks from the cities. The cities themselves will have massive power, water and food issues, resulting in them having to attempt to occupy rural food producing areas. Some more heavily rural states will have their centers of government taken over and purged of leftists, but for the most part the white right would not occupy too many large population centers.
Towards the end of Obama's second term, he had a study conducted to see what would happen if he started a civil war by sending federal troops to seize control of several Southern states.
The gist of it is that fully a third of the military would outright desert and join the white right, along with their equipment. The remaining groups would be paralyzed by inefficiency and indecision and barely able to hold onto the cities let alone maintain their gear.
The United States military relies on a massive logistics web, which will be disrupted if not outright destroyed by a civil war. Their efficacy to stop a determined campaign of armed citizens will drop off more and more the longer it continues.
But you're missing what happens with other countries.
China would support the minorities because the longer America is in chaos the more of the world's economy they can take over.
Europe would support liberal whites and blacks because of Critical Racism.
Russia would support normal whites because they will need strong white countries to side with them against China - easier to rebuild America than to teach Germans not to be pussies.
If the United States falls to civil war the Europeans will not do a damn thing. With the complete loss of most of NATO's military power, the EU would be largely helpless, with the Russians able to demand and do whatever they felt like it.
The EU would hem and haw and sputter, but they wouldn't do much.
The Chinese will take the opportunity to begin devouring outlying regions of Asia and Chinese-ifying them by main force. They will probably attempt to support the West Coast leftist groups with funding and supplies, but most likely covertly because doing so would be considered an act of war if the right wing actually wins and takes control. They will definitely take over their half of the Pacific Ocean, either uncontested as the Navy moves to support the West Coast or else by sinking several of our carriers by ramming them with cruise liners and claiming an accident.
The Russians will probably take the opportunity to sink the bulk of the NATO forces in the North Atlantic. They'll also ramp up an unprecedented cyber campaign against the Canadians, knowing that no retaliation will be forthcoming at all.
I doubt any of them will attempt to bring in troops. Both Jinping and Putin are smart enough to realize that the collapse of the United States very likely means a world war, and they aren't going to waste their own troops and reveal their own capabilities too early.
Explicitly homosexual forces such as the U.S. Navy can be really strong under certain circumstances, so I say they will become the dreaded Sea Spartans after throwing every feminine tranny or overly limphand type overboard and turning to hardcore global piracy.
So, in the event of a civil war a logistics breakdown is inevitable. Food, medicine, fuel, and especially clean water.
Navy vessels, particularly aircraft carriers, can purify literally tons of water every single day. Meaning that whatever side can get ahold of one gains a massive resource advantage, one that is conventionally difficult to assail what's more.
The Navy is also our foremost forward deployed force in the world. Thus begs the question, if the country devolved into war on August 1st and the chain of command breaks down, what are they going to do?
They can cause the most damage and would be the most difficult to counter attack, out of any potential belligerent in such a theoretical conflict. Civil wars are for the most part ground wars, but the United States has two enormous coastlines wherein Navy ships can project force.
Three most power men in the world: the president of the United States, the president of the Russian Federation, and the captain of a Ballistic Missile Submarine.
Six weeks after the incidents, the Kitty Hawk returned to San Diego, where 27 black sailors were arrested and charged. No white sailors were arrested.[2][10] Twenty-one of those charged requested a court-martial trial.
At my university the joke was there were 30 blacks on campus. Half played basketball the other half were actually from Africa. And I always enjoyed working in groups with the Africans. They worked hard on their parts and always brought an interesting perspective.
Today as I say I friends with many blacks, they just all happen to be Africans.
Where I live near St. Louis is interesting. It goes inner city, very wealthy old money democrat neighborhoods, then the middle class suburbs. They have to get through the Ladues, Kirkwoods, and Clayton before they get to Manchester, Ballwin and if you want to get to St Charles you have to cross a big ass river with 4 choke points (bridges).
They have no goodwill remaining with just about anybody except the white left
Not sure where you're getting that from. It seems to me that the sacralization of blacks has proceeded for all political factions. Everyone genuflects to the the idol of blackness.
despite the brazen attempts to bundle them all together as "bipoc", the single stupidest acronym ever devised by humans
I love it, and think it should be introduced in Europe. The fact that the 'indigenous' people are less important in Europe shows their bad faith.
The white left would find themselves assailed from all fronts, and regardless of any systemic control they might have in some areas, would be destroyed. They produce nothing, they contribute nothing, and for the most part lack any skills that would be useful in a long term civil conflict.
That's a shame. In that hypothetical situation, preservationists need to at least save a few so we can put them in a zoo somewhere.
I don't think you realize just how fast the zeitgeist will turn on them once the power structures that have been protecting them for the last half century fall apart.
I don't consider that very likely or predictable.
they are a plague.
Welp, I thought I was talking to a serious person. But seems like you're just engaging in wishful thinking. This is why your country is a wreck. Because apparently the only two permissible positions are "blacks are Gods [as long as they agree with us]" or "fuck blacks".
The built up resentment is legitimate and it is genuine, and it isn't going to just disappear once the fight starts in earnest.
Yeah, I'm sure this is very likely and not just your wishful thinking race war porn.
Welp, I thought I was talking to a serious person.
I know exactly who I was talking to. I'm talking to someone who actually thinks that the "One day, for no reason whatsoever" meme is actually real.
We are living in the Weimar Germany of the 21st century. You however refuse to acknowledge the writing on the wall for no better reason than that the people pointing it out refuse to bow to your sacred cows.
This is why your country is a wreck
Our country is a wreck because of people who are dumb enough to believe that there is, or ever was, a middle ground between civilization and barbarity. Every single step to the left is a step towards a child molesting Satanic hellscape.
Yeah, I'm sure this is very likely and not just your wishful thinking race war porn.
We are living in the Weimar Germany of the 21st century.
Oh dear, another guy whose knowledge of 1870-1933 Germany is limited to the name 'Weimar'. You did know that the army, bureaucracy and judiciary in Weimar Germany was dominated by the right-wing, which was what allowed to collapse so easily? No, of course you didn't.
Our country is a wreck because of people who are dumb enough to believe that there is, or ever was, a middle ground between civilization and barbarity.
And your race war nonsense somehow represents civilization? Don't think so, buddy.
Keep telling yourself that, leftist.
You sound like the stereotypical KKK-member who is absolutely sure that the Huwhite race is about to rise up, and that anyone making sense is a 'leftist'. No.
You did know that the army, bureaucracy and judiciary in Weimar Germany was dominated by the right-wing
Yeah that's why the KDP was allowed to conduct a ten year campaign of terrorism across the nation, twice attempting a coup de ta in the city of Munich and trying to secede the city to the Soviets, right? Because it was just SO right wing that they allowed a violent, foreign leftist terrorist group to rampage across the nation victimizing the people of Germany for a decade.
You're a fuckin' moron. Even if damn near every policy detail of Weimar Germany wasn't objectively the opposite of right wing politics(the inflation policies alone prove you a liar), what you just said still makes you look like an idiot.
You sound like the stereotypical KKK-member
Every leftist, every time. Refuse to bow to their sacred cows? Oh well then you must be a Klansman or a Nazi.
This spelling of coup d'etat really shows someone who knows what he's talking about. Not to mention the fact that you ignore the Kapp putsch, the Beer Hall putsch and that your Nazis were able to come to power legally.
Doesn't sound like your country at all, as someone only 95% committed to the establishment like Trump was sabotaged all the way.
Because it was just SO right wing that they allowed a violent, foreign leftist terrorist group to rampage across the nation victimizing the people of Germany for a decade.
And they also allowed the reign of terror by your Nazis, dumbass. Not to mention that Hitler spent a grand total of 1 year in prison for his coup, or putsch as you should call it as it is Germany.
You're a fuckin' moron.
Yes, I am the moron here.
Even if damn near every policy detail of Weimar Germany wasn't objectively the opposite of right wing politics(the inflation policies alone prove you a liar),
See, you can't even read properly. I specified three powerful bodies. You shifted the goalposts because you could not refute what I pointed out. And you seem to have no idea what caused the hyperinflation.
Every leftist, every time. Refuse to bow to their sacred cows? Oh well then you must be a Klansman or a Nazi.
Seeing that you are day-dreaming about a race war, how exactly do you differ from a Klansman?
Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Mark "These guys are Nazis" Milley controls the US military.
President Joe "you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons" Biden has F-15s and nukes.
What do you think will happen.
https://archive.ph/mfuV8
https:// www. cnn. com/2021/07/14/politics/donald-trump-election-coup-new-book-excerpt/index. html
'They're not going to f**king succeed': Top generals feared Trump would attempt a coup after election, according to new book
By Jamie Gangel, Jeremy Herb, Marshall Cohen and Elizabeth Stuart, CNN
Updated 9:03 PM ET, Wed July 14, 2021
In the days leading up to January 6, Leonnig and Rucker write, Milley was worried about Trump's call to action. "Milley told his staff that he believed Trump was stoking unrest, possibly in hopes of an excuse to invoke the Insurrection Act and call out the military."
Milley viewed Trump as "the classic authoritarian leader with nothing to lose," the authors write, and he saw parallels between Adolf Hitler's rhetoric as a victim and savior and Trump's false claims of election fraud.
"This is a Reichstag moment," Milley told aides, according to the book. "The gospel of the Führer."
Ahead of a November pro-Trump "Million MAGA March" to protest the election results, Milley told aides he feared it "could be the modern American equivalent of 'brownshirts in the streets,'" referring to the pro-Nazi militia that fueled Hitler's rise to power.
Milley told a group of senior leaders, "Here's the deal, guys: These guys are Nazis, they're boogaloo boys, they're Proud Boys. These are the same people we fought in World War II. We're going to put a ring of steel around this city and the Nazis aren't getting in."
PANTS ON FIRE: Biden Repeats Lie That Americans Could Never Own Cannons As He Muses About Nuking ‘Patriots’
"While the tree of liberty is not watered by the blood of patriots, what's happens is [sic], that their never been, if you wanted to think you need to have weapons to take on the government . . ."
capitol taught that medias "violent protest" is non-violent, and "non-violent" protests have buildings and cars burning and every passerby beaten ...sometimes to death
Listen, you fantastically retarded motherfucker. I'm going to try and explain this so you can understand it.
You cannot control an entire country and its people with tanks, jets, battleships and drones or any of these things that you so stupidly believe trumps citizen ownership of firearms.
A fighter jet, tank, drone, battleship or whatever cannot stand on street corners. And enforce "no assembly" edicts. A fighter jet cannot kick down your door at 3AM and search your house for contraband.
None of these things can maintain the needed police state to completely subjugate and enslave the people of a nation. Those weapons are for decimating, flattening and glassing large areas and many people at once and fighting other state militaries. The government does not want to kill all of its people and blow up its own infrastructure. These are the very things they need to be tyrannical assholes in the first place. If they decided to turn everything outside of Washington D.C. into glowing green glass they would be the absolute rulers of a big, worthless, radioactive pile of shit.
Police are needed to maintain a police state, boots on the ground. And no matter how many police you have on the ground they will always be vastly outnumbered by civilians which is why in a police state it is vital that your police have automatic weapons while the people have nothing but their limp dicks.
BUT when every random pedestrian could have a Glock in their waistband and every random homeowner an AR-15 all of that goes out the fucking window because now the police are out numbered and face the reality of bullets coming back at them.
If you want living examples of this look at every insurgency the the U.S. military has tried to destroy. They're all still kicking with nothing but AK-47s, pick up trucks and improvised explosives because these big scary military monsters you keep alluding to are all but fucking useless for dealing with them.
I've posted this pasta many times all across the internet and I think it's a pretty fair summation of the situation. Except as the days go by I start to question the
Those weapons are for decimating, flattening and glassing large areas and many people at once and fighting other state militaries. The government does not want to kill all of its people and blow up its own infrastructure.
part.
The current federal executive administration obviously does not care about, or straight-up hates, at least 50% of the population. I could see them going full scorched earth on large areas of the country. Tyrannical assholes are not always rational tyrannical assholes. They want a lot of people dead, now, and aren't really thinking about the consequences of that.
The "BUT when every random pedestrian could have a Glock in their waistband..." part is very important.
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago
Blacks would strike first and get slaughtered. The Asians would join whichever side seemed to be winning. The Hispanics would take over California and New Mexico. Whites would win in the end.
The asians would side with the whites but only as long as they are winning. If the whites appear to be losing, the asians would join the other side in a heartbeat. Pretty much all races can live side by side except for most blacks who can't live side by side with anyone, even other blacks.
My response is going to diverge a bit from what the OP requested. However, to understand how this will play out, you must first understand the forces involved, why communities and civilization arise in the first place, what works and what doesn't, and why, for all manner of things spanning from traditions to economies to businesses to governments to philosophies, the multitude of human motivations, logistics, and so on. The more you understand the foundations of things, the greater and more accurate predictions you can make. Fully discussed this could easily be a large volume of books (of which I'm currently writing 2). For brevity, I'll only discuss a little bit (even though this will be long), so those reading will understand what will take place when the collapse happens, and explaining one of the forces which will cause it.
One of the most destructive forces in western civilization today is the enforced push of altruism on its people, through governments and (I believe) indoctrination of the people into it by globohomo and all of its arms (education, media, news, etc.). Altruism is a self destructive philosophy for all who practice it, on all levels of scale, from individual to country. Why?
Altruism is the practice of giving to others regardless if they help you or not. This does several things. First, it assumes that the other(s) that you help are more deserving of your time, which in turn suggests an unwritten and unsaid position that you are not equal, that they are superior, no matter how small it could be applied. Second, it assumes that you are less deserving of your time, which again, suggests an unwritten and unsaid position that you are not equal, that you are inferior, in essence a slave, no matter how small it could be applied. Third, it gives resources/time to those who, on average, aren't deserving of it (which I will explain why later), which puts them into an advantageous position. Over time this point slowly turns into a counter active force, because giving to people that don't work for it and don't deserve it weakens them, making them lazy. Fourth, it takes resources/time away from you, when you are just as deserving of your time, often moreso, which puts you into a disadvantageous position.
When you are altruistic to others, at first they are happy and thankful, then they get used to it, then they expect it, and if you try to stop, they usually become hateful of your rescindment, and can often force you back into the altruistic subservient position. This is a natural behavior of humans in this situation, due to our imperfect memory, in combination with wanting to stay in our current state (movement or rest, i.e. Newton's first law of motion). Almost universally, altruists give more than they receive in return.
The one exception is in strong naturally formed communities of people. Natural communities form when individuals bind together for mutual assistance, on a wide range of things, starting with things like survival, security, increased likelihood of passing on genetics and survival of children, building things that would be too difficult to build on our own or would take too long, and moving on to more refined and less serious endeavors as basic needs are met. The more fundamental/serious and greater the bond, the stronger the community. The closer the proximity, the stronger the bond. The more alike the people (language, religion, traditions, race, area, stories, etc.), the stronger the bond. This partly explains why homogeneous communities are stronger than heterogeneous communities, because the latter have fewer binding forces. This also explains why communities are based on distance (the inverse square law applied to the real world), with the strongest communities being closest together, and the farther out and more populace the community, the less in common and weaker it gets. Strong homogeneous communities can exhibit altruism to limited degree and remain stable, however, once altruism takes hold, it will destroy itself.
Strong communities aren't formed on altruism, it's (what I call) constructive selfishness. It's when you help yourself so you can in turn help others (eating, sleeping, exercise, owning things that help in survival and productivity, etc.), or you help others who in turn help you (exchanging favors, bartering, building mutually beneficial things like churches and schools, the Amish tradition of raising barns, etc.). It's a state of being where all sides are equal and deserving, a balance between the individual and the community, that builds bonds through interaction and favors, where both sides gain in the exchange. A society can only remain stable in this state. All other states are destructive, which are, in order by definition: self destructive altruism, altruism, constructive selfishness (the only stable position), neutrality, destructive selfishness, evil, and self destructive evil. Self destructive altruism is helping others even when they hurt you. Altruism and constructive selfishness were described above. Destructive selfishness is helping yourself to hurt others, or hurting others which in turn helps you, which involves things like theft, extortion, rape, slavery, murder of adversaries, etc, which is the most common state of the string pullers of globohomo. Evil is hurting others regardless if it helps you, which in this context isn't widely held by many except sadists, even though those who are destructively selfish could (outside of this discussion) be accurately described as evil. Self destructive evil is hurting others even when it hurts you, and also isn't a widely held state beyond terrorists or the insane.
Hopefully to those reading you'll also notice that western civilization isn't just employing altruism, but self destructive altruism, and we're being ruled over by people that are destructively selfish. All forms of taxes and welfare are government enforced altruisms (even if they're started by people and communities that are constructively selfish). We're also being brainwashed to be altruistic, perpetually weakening the bonds of our natural communities, through supporting things like mass immigration, open borders, affirmative action, diversity quotas, all forms of taxes and welfare, encouraging men that it's fine to support a single mother's kids, all Covid restrictions, our militaries and intelligence apparatuses being used to enforce globohomo's mandates (poppy fields in Afghanistan, Arab Spring in Egypt, Lybia, and Syria, Viet Nam, all manner of psyops and false flags, etc.) rather than protect the people, and every law and edict passed that infringes upon the people's liberties in the name of safety or empathy. If anyone resists these enforced altruisms, they are pressured by either the government that imprisons them or by the brainwashed masses that berate and ostracize them, claiming they don't care about others, which is gaslighting. It's also a perversion, pushing for stronger bonds with people far away and that are unlike us (globalism) rather than those that are close and similar (community and nationalism).
Western civilization is destroying itself with altruism. As time goes on, there are fewer and fewer altruists (net producers), and more and more leeches/takers (net drains). Giving people the power to vote themselves handouts with other people's money, and bloating government to enable this, are all forms of altruism. This can't last forever. It will absolutely collapse when the critical point is reached, when there aren't enough producers/altruists anymore. It's not an all or nothing thing, past a certain point society begins to degrade, and the further down we slide the quicker we'll accelerate to total collapse.
Relevant to OP's topic, this will affect the outcome of the coming civil war. Cities are for the most part net takers, and the countryside are for the most part net producers. Notice also that all the cities are lefty controlled, and the countryside is righty. When the civil war happens, the people in the cities will eat themselves. They can't grow enough food to survive. The rural folks will stop exporting goods into the cities, either by choice or by fear (from being ambushed by the city folk or terrorized by the righty militias who would embargo the cities). The cities would also become massive criminal centers, costing the establishment/globalist government massive resources to quell unrest and keep the city people from starving.
After that, the most likely outcome would be balkanization, to reinforce strongholds, which would allow the rightside forces to push out from positions of strength, and if a strong enough leader arose, reconquest of lost territory would occur. If this happens, genocide or mass deportation/displacement of the left's remaining population would occur.
Foreign intervention, which just makes everything worse. If it's the EU, we just get infected with similar political instability in the west. If it's China, they get clapped unless they bring in heavy guns or act amazingly stealthily, or they get a puppet. The only power I trust to try some sincere foreign intervention that might not go bad horribly and actually work out for both sides, might be India. They got the least stake and serious chance of abusing the situation whilst still being powerful enough to make a positive impact.
I think China would just sit back and let the US destory itself to the maximum extent possible. I can see them arming and internationally propagandising for whichever side was losing at that moment to make the fire burn as long and hot as possible.
China does not overtly act since it's not their style. But they already have a lot of influence in California and Hawaii. I could see them propping up a communist puppet state however. You'd have a clown like Ted Lieu as the new chairman of the California communist party and doing Xi's bidding.
The Euros would voice their support for the "liberals" and/or whatever remains of government but that would be as far as they go. As someone else rightly points out the collapse of the US implies a collapse of their military and thus a collapse of NATO. The remaining NATO states would be scrambling to ensure their own security after any period of uncertainty. Heck, Trump's bluster alone got them to start budgeting for the 2% minimum they are supposed to spend on military according to the treaty.
That is assuming it devolves quick enough that there isn't time to send "peacekeepers" before they are needed at home.
That is assuming it devolves quick enough that there isn't time to send "peacekeepers" before they are needed at home.
Doubtful this would be a problem, let's be honest if it does go tits up in the US it will go from "Cop shoots wrong guy and city is outraged" to a total shit storm overnight, and sending in blue hats won't be an option.
I only wonder who or what is going to be that trigger. My current bet is the audit.
The eventual outcome would depend on three factors: 1) Is this just a sudden mental switch in all people? Like, suddenly, best friends for years, arbitrary hate? How great a hatred? Or is it just a formalized declaration from up top somehow?
Does this war extend outwards? Regardless of the answer to the first question, is it "all Chinese must die", or is it "Chinese-Americans must die, those who are in Canada are fine."?
Are all the Oasis-class cruise ships out at sea?
The third answer is actually the most important one, because on the micro and short term, the other two matter, but long-term, the USA would nuke itself and trigger a nuclear winter. Auto-response firings would cause the rest of the world to also ravage most of the world's arable farmlands. To live, you would need a powerful greenhouse capable of feeding hundreds, powered by nuclear energy to make the light and heat since no light would reach Earth... Like that found on the Oasis-class cruise ships. They cannot be destroyed or lost in the missile fight, so at-sea they would be safe. There are other such things, but they would not have enough scale to repopulate humanity. If they're at dock, humanity goes extinct, however slowly as genetic inbreeding allows with restricted genetic stock. If they're at sea and full, and majority one "race" so the early "race war" aspect doesn't eliminate too many of them, humanity will eventually repopulate.
Short-term, though, it would lead to world war 3, and likely the crash of all markets and stability in the entire world.
You can test your hypothesis very simply with a thought experiment:
Get a big news or magazine publisher to publish a picture threatening and insulting the religions, cultures, and habits of western white people. Then do the same for middle-eastern brown.
Then, thought experiment still, consider what the results would be. What side is more likely willing to defend their way of life, their beliefs, their ideologies, their cultures? Which side is more likely going to shrug and go "yup, that [religious prophet/leader name] guy can be a real idiot sometimes."
I think that the actual outcome of such an event would be something other than what we could realistically predict. We can speculate, but if everything goes hot then the outcome is going to be something we didn't predict because of a myriad of variables we didn't even think to include, much less account for.
I dunno, I get punched in the face pretty regularly during sparring. It's only really a problem if it's a solid strike that you don't defend against. Sloppy punches are pretty easy to shrug off.
The cause of a race war is tribalistic factions battling for cultural/political/financial domination.
I feel it’s hard to speculate exactly how it would go down, but I can say for certain the end result would be a fractured nation of independent bodies whose purposes would be to protect their respective values from the “other”.
My biggest fear would be the weakened position the US would sit in. China and Russia would be free to do whatever they want should the US devolve to tribal factions.
I can't imagine a race war happening. I can see the government turning against whites. Putting them in reeducation centers and allow BIPOC to be violent against them without consequences. But that is the worse case scenario that I think it is possible.
The main problem is that asians do not want to get involved as well as a lot of hispanics, there still are a lot of white hispanics so they would not get involved since they still see themselves as white.
White leftists are ready to die to their black overloards to make up for their "sins", bunch of brainwashed, soy drinking morons the lot of them.
The dynamics are to mixed in terms of race and interests that a race war to spawn.
It would be the result of a complete breakdown of federal control and the inevitable results of that.
What I think is the most likely scenario is a states' rights coalition forming to ignore the federal government. It's already happening on a small scale with things like sanctuary cities, legalized marijuana and 2nd Amendment sanctuaries. Or possibly damning evidence from the election audits. How it sparks is outside the scope of this question though.
Once that happens then you'll see the cities go up in flames first. It'll be the Floyd riots on steroids in any city that has a large black presence. Without the threat of the federal government to keep them in check militias will form and start going to work. I don't think you'll see much wholesale slaughter as most people in the US just don't have the stomach for it. You'll see massive refugee populations fleeing from the central part of the US to the coasts and Canada.
Mexico might move on the SW states in order to 'protect Mexican nationals living in the US' but I doubt it since they can't even keep their own shit together. Canada will send troops South who will try to do anything to assist the feds in restoring peace. Other NATO countries might also.
The biggest wild cards will be China and Russia. I don't think they'll make any major moves on the continental US but China will likely move on Taiwan and Russia might move on Ukraine. They will definitely send SPECOPS troops to train and supply anyone they can in the breakaway states. Russia has already promised that in the past.
I think the end result would be a splitting of the US into at least 3 parts. The East coast states, the West coast states and the central states. There just isn't enough manpower to fight a protracted insurgency in the interior of the US. I see it happening a lot like the breakup of the USSR, maybe a few small scale battles here and there but the end result will be a dissolution of the country.
Race war is very unlikely, as the race warriors are doing the bidding of the mostly non-black elites. It would be nice to see them get burned for playing with fire though.
Several outcomes. The functional elimination of the black race from North America is probably the most assured of them. They have no goodwill remaining with just about anybody except the white left(who they will probably attack early and often), despite the brazen attempts to bundle them all together as "bipoc", the single stupidest acronym ever devised by humans. The Hispanics absolutely hate them, outnumber them three to one, are more adept at violence, and would delight in being able to take over the urban zones.
As for the Hispanics, they would most likely carve out huge swathes of the Southwest as new portions of Mexico(which they basically already are anyway), fight internecine small scale conflicts among themselves(again, what else is new), while being eliminated from majority white areas across the Midwest as a matter of principle.
The white left would find themselves assailed from all fronts, and regardless of any systemic control they might have in some areas, would be destroyed. They produce nothing, they contribute nothing, and for the most part lack any skills that would be useful in a long term civil conflict.
Most rural areas would clean up their towns in the short term, and likely form loose federations of mutual defense against attacks from the cities. The cities themselves will have massive power, water and food issues, resulting in them having to attempt to occupy rural food producing areas. Some more heavily rural states will have their centers of government taken over and purged of leftists, but for the most part the white right would not occupy too many large population centers.
Towards the end of Obama's second term, he had a study conducted to see what would happen if he started a civil war by sending federal troops to seize control of several Southern states.
The gist of it is that fully a third of the military would outright desert and join the white right, along with their equipment. The remaining groups would be paralyzed by inefficiency and indecision and barely able to hold onto the cities let alone maintain their gear.
The United States military relies on a massive logistics web, which will be disrupted if not outright destroyed by a civil war. Their efficacy to stop a determined campaign of armed citizens will drop off more and more the longer it continues.
The Navy is the real wild card.
That is exactly why.
But you're missing what happens with other countries.
China would support the minorities because the longer America is in chaos the more of the world's economy they can take over.
Europe would support liberal whites and blacks because of Critical Racism.
Russia would support normal whites because they will need strong white countries to side with them against China - easier to rebuild America than to teach Germans not to be pussies.
If the United States falls to civil war the Europeans will not do a damn thing. With the complete loss of most of NATO's military power, the EU would be largely helpless, with the Russians able to demand and do whatever they felt like it.
The EU would hem and haw and sputter, but they wouldn't do much.
The Chinese will take the opportunity to begin devouring outlying regions of Asia and Chinese-ifying them by main force. They will probably attempt to support the West Coast leftist groups with funding and supplies, but most likely covertly because doing so would be considered an act of war if the right wing actually wins and takes control. They will definitely take over their half of the Pacific Ocean, either uncontested as the Navy moves to support the West Coast or else by sinking several of our carriers by ramming them with cruise liners and claiming an accident.
The Russians will probably take the opportunity to sink the bulk of the NATO forces in the North Atlantic. They'll also ramp up an unprecedented cyber campaign against the Canadians, knowing that no retaliation will be forthcoming at all.
I doubt any of them will attempt to bring in troops. Both Jinping and Putin are smart enough to realize that the collapse of the United States very likely means a world war, and they aren't going to waste their own troops and reveal their own capabilities too early.
Absolutely yeah. If the Germans or the French ever remember how to be proud of themselves again, woe betide the foreigners in their midst.
Explicitly homosexual forces such as the U.S. Navy can be really strong under certain circumstances, so I say they will become the dreaded Sea Spartans after throwing every feminine tranny or overly limphand type overboard and turning to hardcore global piracy.
So, in the event of a civil war a logistics breakdown is inevitable. Food, medicine, fuel, and especially clean water.
Navy vessels, particularly aircraft carriers, can purify literally tons of water every single day. Meaning that whatever side can get ahold of one gains a massive resource advantage, one that is conventionally difficult to assail what's more.
The Navy is also our foremost forward deployed force in the world. Thus begs the question, if the country devolved into war on August 1st and the chain of command breaks down, what are they going to do?
They can cause the most damage and would be the most difficult to counter attack, out of any potential belligerent in such a theoretical conflict. Civil wars are for the most part ground wars, but the United States has two enormous coastlines wherein Navy ships can project force.
Three most power men in the world: the president of the United States, the president of the Russian Federation, and the captain of a Ballistic Missile Submarine.
The ending of gangs of New York br0
Soros’s wet dream
TIL -
If they're smart, they flee. Most of them will have ties back home, and they'll see the writing on the walls.
At my university the joke was there were 30 blacks on campus. Half played basketball the other half were actually from Africa. And I always enjoyed working in groups with the Africans. They worked hard on their parts and always brought an interesting perspective.
Today as I say I friends with many blacks, they just all happen to be Africans.
Easy targets for flights on the Lolita express
So you’re saying a lot of white leftists would get killed by angry blacks?
🤔 💭 🤔
I'm saying that if a race war kicks off, blacks will begin lashing out at whatever is in reach in short order.
Guess what's in reach? White leftists.
Where I live near St. Louis is interesting. It goes inner city, very wealthy old money democrat neighborhoods, then the middle class suburbs. They have to get through the Ladues, Kirkwoods, and Clayton before they get to Manchester, Ballwin and if you want to get to St Charles you have to cross a big ass river with 4 choke points (bridges).
Not sure where you're getting that from. It seems to me that the sacralization of blacks has proceeded for all political factions. Everyone genuflects to the the idol of blackness.
I love it, and think it should be introduced in Europe. The fact that the 'indigenous' people are less important in Europe shows their bad faith.
That's a shame. In that hypothetical situation, preservationists need to at least save a few so we can put them in a zoo somewhere.
I don't consider that very likely or predictable.
Welp, I thought I was talking to a serious person. But seems like you're just engaging in wishful thinking. This is why your country is a wreck. Because apparently the only two permissible positions are "blacks are Gods [as long as they agree with us]" or "fuck blacks".
Yeah, I'm sure this is very likely and not just your wishful thinking race war porn.
I know exactly who I was talking to. I'm talking to someone who actually thinks that the "One day, for no reason whatsoever" meme is actually real.
We are living in the Weimar Germany of the 21st century. You however refuse to acknowledge the writing on the wall for no better reason than that the people pointing it out refuse to bow to your sacred cows.
Our country is a wreck because of people who are dumb enough to believe that there is, or ever was, a middle ground between civilization and barbarity. Every single step to the left is a step towards a child molesting Satanic hellscape.
Keep telling yourself that, leftist.
Oh dear, another guy whose knowledge of 1870-1933 Germany is limited to the name 'Weimar'. You did know that the army, bureaucracy and judiciary in Weimar Germany was dominated by the right-wing, which was what allowed to collapse so easily? No, of course you didn't.
And your race war nonsense somehow represents civilization? Don't think so, buddy.
You sound like the stereotypical KKK-member who is absolutely sure that the Huwhite race is about to rise up, and that anyone making sense is a 'leftist'. No.
Yeah that's why the KDP was allowed to conduct a ten year campaign of terrorism across the nation, twice attempting a coup de ta in the city of Munich and trying to secede the city to the Soviets, right? Because it was just SO right wing that they allowed a violent, foreign leftist terrorist group to rampage across the nation victimizing the people of Germany for a decade.
You're a fuckin' moron. Even if damn near every policy detail of Weimar Germany wasn't objectively the opposite of right wing politics(the inflation policies alone prove you a liar), what you just said still makes you look like an idiot.
Every leftist, every time. Refuse to bow to their sacred cows? Oh well then you must be a Klansman or a Nazi.
This spelling of coup d'etat really shows someone who knows what he's talking about. Not to mention the fact that you ignore the Kapp putsch, the Beer Hall putsch and that your Nazis were able to come to power legally.
Doesn't sound like your country at all, as someone only 95% committed to the establishment like Trump was sabotaged all the way.
And they also allowed the reign of terror by your Nazis, dumbass. Not to mention that Hitler spent a grand total of 1 year in prison for his coup, or putsch as you should call it as it is Germany.
Yes, I am the moron here.
See, you can't even read properly. I specified three powerful bodies. You shifted the goalposts because you could not refute what I pointed out. And you seem to have no idea what caused the hyperinflation.
Seeing that you are day-dreaming about a race war, how exactly do you differ from a Klansman?
Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Mark "These guys are Nazis" Milley controls the US military.
President Joe "you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons" Biden has F-15s and nukes.
What do you think will happen.
https://archive.ph/mfuV8 https:// www. cnn. com/2021/07/14/politics/donald-trump-election-coup-new-book-excerpt/index. html
https://archive.ph/IvviG https:// nationalfile. com/pants-on-fire-biden-repeats-lie-that-americans-could-never-own-cannons-as-he-muses-about-nuking-patriots/
https://archive.ph/OpCnN https:// www. businessinsider. com/biden-mocks-gun-right-advocates-who-say-assault-weapons-needed-fight-government-2021-6
capitol taught that medias "violent protest" is non-violent, and "non-violent" protests have buildings and cars burning and every passerby beaten ...sometimes to death
Listen, you fantastically retarded motherfucker. I'm going to try and explain this so you can understand it.
You cannot control an entire country and its people with tanks, jets, battleships and drones or any of these things that you so stupidly believe trumps citizen ownership of firearms.
A fighter jet, tank, drone, battleship or whatever cannot stand on street corners. And enforce "no assembly" edicts. A fighter jet cannot kick down your door at 3AM and search your house for contraband.
None of these things can maintain the needed police state to completely subjugate and enslave the people of a nation. Those weapons are for decimating, flattening and glassing large areas and many people at once and fighting other state militaries. The government does not want to kill all of its people and blow up its own infrastructure. These are the very things they need to be tyrannical assholes in the first place. If they decided to turn everything outside of Washington D.C. into glowing green glass they would be the absolute rulers of a big, worthless, radioactive pile of shit.
Police are needed to maintain a police state, boots on the ground. And no matter how many police you have on the ground they will always be vastly outnumbered by civilians which is why in a police state it is vital that your police have automatic weapons while the people have nothing but their limp dicks.
BUT when every random pedestrian could have a Glock in their waistband and every random homeowner an AR-15 all of that goes out the fucking window because now the police are out numbered and face the reality of bullets coming back at them.
If you want living examples of this look at every insurgency the the U.S. military has tried to destroy. They're all still kicking with nothing but AK-47s, pick up trucks and improvised explosives because these big scary military monsters you keep alluding to are all but fucking useless for dealing with them.
Dumb. Fuck.
-Anonymous, February 19th 2017
I've posted this pasta many times all across the internet and I think it's a pretty fair summation of the situation. Except as the days go by I start to question the
part.
The current federal executive administration obviously does not care about, or straight-up hates, at least 50% of the population. I could see them going full scorched earth on large areas of the country. Tyrannical assholes are not always rational tyrannical assholes. They want a lot of people dead, now, and aren't really thinking about the consequences of that.
The "BUT when every random pedestrian could have a Glock in their waistband..." part is very important.
This pasta is so dumb it glows.
Why would the state preach to their potential extermination targets they only need small arms.
Compare "shall not be infringed" and the NFA.
Is this a pasta?
Delicious, delicious pasta
Where's the US death camps and execution squads and nerve gas.
Excellent pasta, glows in the dark.
Blacks would strike first and get slaughtered. The Asians would join whichever side seemed to be winning. The Hispanics would take over California and New Mexico. Whites would win in the end.
The asians would side with the whites but only as long as they are winning. If the whites appear to be losing, the asians would join the other side in a heartbeat. Pretty much all races can live side by side except for most blacks who can't live side by side with anyone, even other blacks.
Indians have a surprising hatred of their neighboring muslim countries.
with good reason
My great grandfather would watch the news and the tell this "joke":
3 little boys are sitting on a fence looking at a pasture, one is black, one is whie, and one is indian.
The indian child looks out in the distance and says,"Once this land was ours we were plenty and multiply easily. Now we are few and weak."
Little black boy says, " Once we were few and weak, now we are meny and multiply easily, we plan to make this land ours."
Little white boy says, "Yeah, maybe. But we ain't played Cowboys and Niggers yet."
He said the PTB wanted a race war back in the 70s
This is the only real answer you can give. If the US descends into chaos, China becomes the dominant global power, simple as that.
Even if that happened it would take decades, if not a century or more, during which time China would cement its hold.
In South Africa only 1 million are legal gun owners out of 60 million I think.
Something tells me they are the only ones able to protect families
My response is going to diverge a bit from what the OP requested. However, to understand how this will play out, you must first understand the forces involved, why communities and civilization arise in the first place, what works and what doesn't, and why, for all manner of things spanning from traditions to economies to businesses to governments to philosophies, the multitude of human motivations, logistics, and so on. The more you understand the foundations of things, the greater and more accurate predictions you can make. Fully discussed this could easily be a large volume of books (of which I'm currently writing 2). For brevity, I'll only discuss a little bit (even though this will be long), so those reading will understand what will take place when the collapse happens, and explaining one of the forces which will cause it.
One of the most destructive forces in western civilization today is the enforced push of altruism on its people, through governments and (I believe) indoctrination of the people into it by globohomo and all of its arms (education, media, news, etc.). Altruism is a self destructive philosophy for all who practice it, on all levels of scale, from individual to country. Why?
Altruism is the practice of giving to others regardless if they help you or not. This does several things. First, it assumes that the other(s) that you help are more deserving of your time, which in turn suggests an unwritten and unsaid position that you are not equal, that they are superior, no matter how small it could be applied. Second, it assumes that you are less deserving of your time, which again, suggests an unwritten and unsaid position that you are not equal, that you are inferior, in essence a slave, no matter how small it could be applied. Third, it gives resources/time to those who, on average, aren't deserving of it (which I will explain why later), which puts them into an advantageous position. Over time this point slowly turns into a counter active force, because giving to people that don't work for it and don't deserve it weakens them, making them lazy. Fourth, it takes resources/time away from you, when you are just as deserving of your time, often moreso, which puts you into a disadvantageous position.
When you are altruistic to others, at first they are happy and thankful, then they get used to it, then they expect it, and if you try to stop, they usually become hateful of your rescindment, and can often force you back into the altruistic subservient position. This is a natural behavior of humans in this situation, due to our imperfect memory, in combination with wanting to stay in our current state (movement or rest, i.e. Newton's first law of motion). Almost universally, altruists give more than they receive in return.
The one exception is in strong naturally formed communities of people. Natural communities form when individuals bind together for mutual assistance, on a wide range of things, starting with things like survival, security, increased likelihood of passing on genetics and survival of children, building things that would be too difficult to build on our own or would take too long, and moving on to more refined and less serious endeavors as basic needs are met. The more fundamental/serious and greater the bond, the stronger the community. The closer the proximity, the stronger the bond. The more alike the people (language, religion, traditions, race, area, stories, etc.), the stronger the bond. This partly explains why homogeneous communities are stronger than heterogeneous communities, because the latter have fewer binding forces. This also explains why communities are based on distance (the inverse square law applied to the real world), with the strongest communities being closest together, and the farther out and more populace the community, the less in common and weaker it gets. Strong homogeneous communities can exhibit altruism to limited degree and remain stable, however, once altruism takes hold, it will destroy itself.
Strong communities aren't formed on altruism, it's (what I call) constructive selfishness. It's when you help yourself so you can in turn help others (eating, sleeping, exercise, owning things that help in survival and productivity, etc.), or you help others who in turn help you (exchanging favors, bartering, building mutually beneficial things like churches and schools, the Amish tradition of raising barns, etc.). It's a state of being where all sides are equal and deserving, a balance between the individual and the community, that builds bonds through interaction and favors, where both sides gain in the exchange. A society can only remain stable in this state. All other states are destructive, which are, in order by definition: self destructive altruism, altruism, constructive selfishness (the only stable position), neutrality, destructive selfishness, evil, and self destructive evil. Self destructive altruism is helping others even when they hurt you. Altruism and constructive selfishness were described above. Destructive selfishness is helping yourself to hurt others, or hurting others which in turn helps you, which involves things like theft, extortion, rape, slavery, murder of adversaries, etc, which is the most common state of the string pullers of globohomo. Evil is hurting others regardless if it helps you, which in this context isn't widely held by many except sadists, even though those who are destructively selfish could (outside of this discussion) be accurately described as evil. Self destructive evil is hurting others even when it hurts you, and also isn't a widely held state beyond terrorists or the insane.
Hopefully to those reading you'll also notice that western civilization isn't just employing altruism, but self destructive altruism, and we're being ruled over by people that are destructively selfish. All forms of taxes and welfare are government enforced altruisms (even if they're started by people and communities that are constructively selfish). We're also being brainwashed to be altruistic, perpetually weakening the bonds of our natural communities, through supporting things like mass immigration, open borders, affirmative action, diversity quotas, all forms of taxes and welfare, encouraging men that it's fine to support a single mother's kids, all Covid restrictions, our militaries and intelligence apparatuses being used to enforce globohomo's mandates (poppy fields in Afghanistan, Arab Spring in Egypt, Lybia, and Syria, Viet Nam, all manner of psyops and false flags, etc.) rather than protect the people, and every law and edict passed that infringes upon the people's liberties in the name of safety or empathy. If anyone resists these enforced altruisms, they are pressured by either the government that imprisons them or by the brainwashed masses that berate and ostracize them, claiming they don't care about others, which is gaslighting. It's also a perversion, pushing for stronger bonds with people far away and that are unlike us (globalism) rather than those that are close and similar (community and nationalism).
Western civilization is destroying itself with altruism. As time goes on, there are fewer and fewer altruists (net producers), and more and more leeches/takers (net drains). Giving people the power to vote themselves handouts with other people's money, and bloating government to enable this, are all forms of altruism. This can't last forever. It will absolutely collapse when the critical point is reached, when there aren't enough producers/altruists anymore. It's not an all or nothing thing, past a certain point society begins to degrade, and the further down we slide the quicker we'll accelerate to total collapse.
Relevant to OP's topic, this will affect the outcome of the coming civil war. Cities are for the most part net takers, and the countryside are for the most part net producers. Notice also that all the cities are lefty controlled, and the countryside is righty. When the civil war happens, the people in the cities will eat themselves. They can't grow enough food to survive. The rural folks will stop exporting goods into the cities, either by choice or by fear (from being ambushed by the city folk or terrorized by the righty militias who would embargo the cities). The cities would also become massive criminal centers, costing the establishment/globalist government massive resources to quell unrest and keep the city people from starving.
After that, the most likely outcome would be balkanization, to reinforce strongholds, which would allow the rightside forces to push out from positions of strength, and if a strong enough leader arose, reconquest of lost territory would occur. If this happens, genocide or mass deportation/displacement of the left's remaining population would occur.
Foreign intervention, which just makes everything worse. If it's the EU, we just get infected with similar political instability in the west. If it's China, they get clapped unless they bring in heavy guns or act amazingly stealthily, or they get a puppet. The only power I trust to try some sincere foreign intervention that might not go bad horribly and actually work out for both sides, might be India. They got the least stake and serious chance of abusing the situation whilst still being powerful enough to make a positive impact.
China does not overtly act since it's not their style. But they already have a lot of influence in California and Hawaii. I could see them propping up a communist puppet state however. You'd have a clown like Ted Lieu as the new chairman of the California communist party and doing Xi's bidding.
The Euros would voice their support for the "liberals" and/or whatever remains of government but that would be as far as they go. As someone else rightly points out the collapse of the US implies a collapse of their military and thus a collapse of NATO. The remaining NATO states would be scrambling to ensure their own security after any period of uncertainty. Heck, Trump's bluster alone got them to start budgeting for the 2% minimum they are supposed to spend on military according to the treaty.
That is assuming it devolves quick enough that there isn't time to send "peacekeepers" before they are needed at home.
Doubtful this would be a problem, let's be honest if it does go tits up in the US it will go from "Cop shoots wrong guy and city is outraged" to a total shit storm overnight, and sending in blue hats won't be an option.
I only wonder who or what is going to be that trigger. My current bet is the audit.
The eventual outcome would depend on three factors: 1) Is this just a sudden mental switch in all people? Like, suddenly, best friends for years, arbitrary hate? How great a hatred? Or is it just a formalized declaration from up top somehow?
Does this war extend outwards? Regardless of the answer to the first question, is it "all Chinese must die", or is it "Chinese-Americans must die, those who are in Canada are fine."?
Are all the Oasis-class cruise ships out at sea?
The third answer is actually the most important one, because on the micro and short term, the other two matter, but long-term, the USA would nuke itself and trigger a nuclear winter. Auto-response firings would cause the rest of the world to also ravage most of the world's arable farmlands. To live, you would need a powerful greenhouse capable of feeding hundreds, powered by nuclear energy to make the light and heat since no light would reach Earth... Like that found on the Oasis-class cruise ships. They cannot be destroyed or lost in the missile fight, so at-sea they would be safe. There are other such things, but they would not have enough scale to repopulate humanity. If they're at dock, humanity goes extinct, however slowly as genetic inbreeding allows with restricted genetic stock. If they're at sea and full, and majority one "race" so the early "race war" aspect doesn't eliminate too many of them, humanity will eventually repopulate.
Short-term, though, it would lead to world war 3, and likely the crash of all markets and stability in the entire world.
You can test your hypothesis very simply with a thought experiment:
Get a big news or magazine publisher to publish a picture threatening and insulting the religions, cultures, and habits of western white people. Then do the same for middle-eastern brown.
Then, thought experiment still, consider what the results would be. What side is more likely willing to defend their way of life, their beliefs, their ideologies, their cultures? Which side is more likely going to shrug and go "yup, that [religious prophet/leader name] guy can be a real idiot sometimes."
I think that the actual outcome of such an event would be something other than what we could realistically predict. We can speculate, but if everything goes hot then the outcome is going to be something we didn't predict because of a myriad of variables we didn't even think to include, much less account for.
I dunno, I get punched in the face pretty regularly during sparring. It's only really a problem if it's a solid strike that you don't defend against. Sloppy punches are pretty easy to shrug off.
The right would rally and the left would devour itself trying to find out who their least racist warrior is
The cause of a race war is tribalistic factions battling for cultural/political/financial domination.
I feel it’s hard to speculate exactly how it would go down, but I can say for certain the end result would be a fractured nation of independent bodies whose purposes would be to protect their respective values from the “other”.
My biggest fear would be the weakened position the US would sit in. China and Russia would be free to do whatever they want should the US devolve to tribal factions.
I can't imagine a race war happening. I can see the government turning against whites. Putting them in reeducation centers and allow BIPOC to be violent against them without consequences. But that is the worse case scenario that I think it is possible.
The main problem is that asians do not want to get involved as well as a lot of hispanics, there still are a lot of white hispanics so they would not get involved since they still see themselves as white. White leftists are ready to die to their black overloards to make up for their "sins", bunch of brainwashed, soy drinking morons the lot of them.
The dynamics are to mixed in terms of race and interests that a race war to spawn.
I don't think a race war would happen on its own.
It would be the result of a complete breakdown of federal control and the inevitable results of that.
What I think is the most likely scenario is a states' rights coalition forming to ignore the federal government. It's already happening on a small scale with things like sanctuary cities, legalized marijuana and 2nd Amendment sanctuaries. Or possibly damning evidence from the election audits. How it sparks is outside the scope of this question though.
Once that happens then you'll see the cities go up in flames first. It'll be the Floyd riots on steroids in any city that has a large black presence. Without the threat of the federal government to keep them in check militias will form and start going to work. I don't think you'll see much wholesale slaughter as most people in the US just don't have the stomach for it. You'll see massive refugee populations fleeing from the central part of the US to the coasts and Canada.
Mexico might move on the SW states in order to 'protect Mexican nationals living in the US' but I doubt it since they can't even keep their own shit together. Canada will send troops South who will try to do anything to assist the feds in restoring peace. Other NATO countries might also.
The biggest wild cards will be China and Russia. I don't think they'll make any major moves on the continental US but China will likely move on Taiwan and Russia might move on Ukraine. They will definitely send SPECOPS troops to train and supply anyone they can in the breakaway states. Russia has already promised that in the past.
I think the end result would be a splitting of the US into at least 3 parts. The East coast states, the West coast states and the central states. There just isn't enough manpower to fight a protracted insurgency in the interior of the US. I see it happening a lot like the breakup of the USSR, maybe a few small scale battles here and there but the end result will be a dissolution of the country.
Everyone turns on white women. At least...that's what I hope for.
They create the divisions and expect us to fight each other to the death while they benefit.
I think a few decades of being taught to hate themselves would be karma for our "better halves".
Race war is very unlikely, as the race warriors are doing the bidding of the mostly non-black elites. It would be nice to see them get burned for playing with fire though.