My response is going to diverge a bit from what the OP requested. However, to understand how this will play out, you must first understand the forces involved, why communities and civilization arise in the first place, what works and what doesn't, and why, for all manner of things spanning from traditions to economies to businesses to governments to philosophies, the multitude of human motivations, logistics, and so on. The more you understand the foundations of things, the greater and more accurate predictions you can make. Fully discussed this could easily be a large volume of books (of which I'm currently writing 2). For brevity, I'll only discuss a little bit (even though this will be long), so those reading will understand what will take place when the collapse happens, and explaining one of the forces which will cause it.
One of the most destructive forces in western civilization today is the enforced push of altruism on its people, through governments and (I believe) indoctrination of the people into it by globohomo and all of its arms (education, media, news, etc.). Altruism is a self destructive philosophy for all who practice it, on all levels of scale, from individual to country. Why?
Altruism is the practice of giving to others regardless if they help you or not. This does several things. First, it assumes that the other(s) that you help are more deserving of your time, which in turn suggests an unwritten and unsaid position that you are not equal, that they are superior, no matter how small it could be applied. Second, it assumes that you are less deserving of your time, which again, suggests an unwritten and unsaid position that you are not equal, that you are inferior, in essence a slave, no matter how small it could be applied. Third, it gives resources/time to those who, on average, aren't deserving of it (which I will explain why later), which puts them into an advantageous position. Over time this point slowly turns into a counter active force, because giving to people that don't work for it and don't deserve it weakens them, making them lazy. Fourth, it takes resources/time away from you, when you are just as deserving of your time, often moreso, which puts you into a disadvantageous position.
When you are altruistic to others, at first they are happy and thankful, then they get used to it, then they expect it, and if you try to stop, they usually become hateful of your rescindment, and can often force you back into the altruistic subservient position. This is a natural behavior of humans in this situation, due to our imperfect memory, in combination with wanting to stay in our current state (movement or rest, i.e. Newton's first law of motion). Almost universally, altruists give more than they receive in return.
The one exception is in strong naturally formed communities of people. Natural communities form when individuals bind together for mutual assistance, on a wide range of things, starting with things like survival, security, increased likelihood of passing on genetics and survival of children, building things that would be too difficult to build on our own or would take too long, and moving on to more refined and less serious endeavors as basic needs are met. The more fundamental/serious and greater the bond, the stronger the community. The closer the proximity, the stronger the bond. The more alike the people (language, religion, traditions, race, area, stories, etc.), the stronger the bond. This partly explains why homogeneous communities are stronger than heterogeneous communities, because the latter have fewer binding forces. This also explains why communities are based on distance (the inverse square law applied to the real world), with the strongest communities being closest together, and the farther out and more populace the community, the less in common and weaker it gets. Strong homogeneous communities can exhibit altruism to limited degree and remain stable, however, once altruism takes hold, it will destroy itself.
Strong communities aren't formed on altruism, it's (what I call) constructive selfishness. It's when you help yourself so you can in turn help others (eating, sleeping, exercise, owning things that help in survival and productivity, etc.), or you help others who in turn help you (exchanging favors, bartering, building mutually beneficial things like churches and schools, the Amish tradition of raising barns, etc.). It's a state of being where all sides are equal and deserving, a balance between the individual and the community, that builds bonds through interaction and favors, where both sides gain in the exchange. A society can only remain stable in this state. All other states are destructive, which are, in order by definition: self destructive altruism, altruism, constructive selfishness (the only stable position), neutrality, destructive selfishness, evil, and self destructive evil. Self destructive altruism is helping others even when they hurt you. Altruism and constructive selfishness were described above. Destructive selfishness is helping yourself to hurt others, or hurting others which in turn helps you, which involves things like theft, extortion, rape, slavery, murder of adversaries, etc, which is the most common state of the string pullers of globohomo. Evil is hurting others regardless if it helps you, which in this context isn't widely held by many except sadists, even though those who are destructively selfish could (outside of this discussion) be accurately described as evil. Self destructive evil is hurting others even when it hurts you, and also isn't a widely held state beyond terrorists or the insane.
Hopefully to those reading you'll also notice that western civilization isn't just employing altruism, but self destructive altruism, and we're being ruled over by people that are destructively selfish. All forms of taxes and welfare are government enforced altruisms (even if they're started by people and communities that are constructively selfish). We're also being brainwashed to be altruistic, perpetually weakening the bonds of our natural communities, through supporting things like mass immigration, open borders, affirmative action, diversity quotas, all forms of taxes and welfare, encouraging men that it's fine to support a single mother's kids, all Covid restrictions, our militaries and intelligence apparatuses being used to enforce globohomo's mandates (poppy fields in Afghanistan, Arab Spring in Egypt, Lybia, and Syria, Viet Nam, all manner of psyops and false flags, etc.) rather than protect the people, and every law and edict passed that infringes upon the people's liberties in the name of safety or empathy. If anyone resists these enforced altruisms, they are pressured by either the government that imprisons them or by the brainwashed masses that berate and ostracize them, claiming they don't care about others, which is gaslighting. It's also a perversion, pushing for stronger bonds with people far away and that are unlike us (globalism) rather than those that are close and similar (community and nationalism).
Western civilization is destroying itself with altruism. As time goes on, there are fewer and fewer altruists (net producers), and more and more leeches/takers (net drains). Giving people the power to vote themselves handouts with other people's money, and bloating government to enable this, are all forms of altruism. This can't last forever. It will absolutely collapse when the critical point is reached, when there aren't enough producers/altruists anymore. It's not an all or nothing thing, past a certain point society begins to degrade, and the further down we slide the quicker we'll accelerate to total collapse.
Relevant to OP's topic, this will affect the outcome of the coming civil war. Cities are for the most part net takers, and the countryside are for the most part net producers. Notice also that all the cities are lefty controlled, and the countryside is righty. When the civil war happens, the people in the cities will eat themselves. They can't grow enough food to survive. The rural folks will stop exporting goods into the cities, either by choice or by fear (from being ambushed by the city folk or terrorized by the righty militias who would embargo the cities). The cities would also become massive criminal centers, costing the establishment/globalist government massive resources to quell unrest and keep the city people from starving.
After that, the most likely outcome would be balkanization, to reinforce strongholds, which would allow the rightside forces to push out from positions of strength, and if a strong enough leader arose, reconquest of lost territory would occur. If this happens, genocide or mass deportation/displacement of the left's remaining population would occur.
My response is going to diverge a bit from what the OP requested. However, to understand how this will play out, you must first understand the forces involved, why communities and civilization arise in the first place, what works and what doesn't, and why, for all manner of things spanning from traditions to economies to businesses to governments to philosophies, the multitude of human motivations, logistics, and so on. The more you understand the foundations of things, the greater and more accurate predictions you can make. Fully discussed this could easily be a large volume of books (of which I'm currently writing 2). For brevity, I'll only discuss a little bit (even though this will be long), so those reading will understand what will take place when the collapse happens, and explaining one of the forces which will cause it.
One of the most destructive forces in western civilization today is the enforced push of altruism on its people, through governments and (I believe) indoctrination of the people into it by globohomo and all of its arms (education, media, news, etc.). Altruism is a self destructive philosophy for all who practice it, on all levels of scale, from individual to country. Why?
Altruism is the practice of giving to others regardless if they help you or not. This does several things. First, it assumes that the other(s) that you help are more deserving of your time, which in turn suggests an unwritten and unsaid position that you are not equal, that they are superior, no matter how small it could be applied. Second, it assumes that you are less deserving of your time, which again, suggests an unwritten and unsaid position that you are not equal, that you are inferior, in essence a slave, no matter how small it could be applied. Third, it gives resources/time to those who, on average, aren't deserving of it (which I will explain why later), which puts them into an advantageous position. Over time this point slowly turns into a counter active force, because giving to people that don't work for it and don't deserve it weakens them, making them lazy. Fourth, it takes resources/time away from you, when you are just as deserving of your time, often moreso, which puts you into a disadvantageous position.
When you are altruistic to others, at first they are happy and thankful, then they get used to it, then they expect it, and if you try to stop, they usually become hateful of your rescindment, and can often force you back into the altruistic subservient position. This is a natural behavior of humans in this situation, due to our imperfect memory, in combination with wanting to stay in our current state (movement or rest, i.e. Newton's first law of motion). Almost universally, altruists give more than they receive in return.
The one exception is in strong naturally formed communities of people. Natural communities form when individuals bind together for mutual assistance, on a wide range of things, starting with things like survival, security, increased likelihood of passing on genetics and survival of children, building things that would be too difficult to build on our own or would take too long, and moving on to more refined and less serious endeavors as basic needs are met. The more fundamental/serious and greater the bond, the stronger the community. The closer the proximity, the stronger the bond. The more alike the people (language, religion, traditions, race, area, stories, etc.), the stronger the bond. This partly explains why homogeneous communities are stronger than heterogeneous communities, because the latter have fewer binding forces. This also explains why communities are based on distance (the inverse square law applied to the real world), with the strongest communities being closest together, and the farther out and more populace the community, the less in common and weaker it gets. Strong homogeneous communities can exhibit altruism to limited degree and remain stable, however, once altruism takes hold, it will destroy itself.
Strong communities aren't formed on altruism, it's (what I call) constructive selfishness. It's when you help yourself so you can in turn help others (eating, sleeping, exercise, owning things that help in survival and productivity, etc.), or you help others who in turn help you (exchanging favors, bartering, building mutually beneficial things like churches and schools, the Amish tradition of raising barns, etc.). It's a state of being where all sides are equal and deserving, a balance between the individual and the community, that builds bonds through interaction and favors, where both sides gain in the exchange. A society can only remain stable in this state. All other states are destructive, which are, in order by definition: self destructive altruism, altruism, constructive selfishness (the only stable position), neutrality, destructive selfishness, evil, and self destructive evil. Self destructive altruism is helping others even when they hurt you. Altruism and constructive selfishness were described above. Destructive selfishness is helping yourself to hurt others, or hurting others which in turn helps you, which involves things like theft, extortion, rape, slavery, murder of adversaries, etc, which is the most common state of the string pullers of globohomo. Evil is hurting others regardless if it helps you, which in this context isn't widely held by many except sadists, even though those who are destructively selfish could (outside of this discussion) be accurately described as evil. Self destructive evil is hurting others even when it hurts you, and also isn't a widely held state beyond terrorists or the insane.
Hopefully to those reading you'll also notice that western civilization isn't just employing altruism, but self destructive altruism, and we're being ruled over by people that are destructively selfish. All forms of taxes and welfare are government enforced altruisms (even if they're started by people and communities that are constructively selfish). We're also being brainwashed to be altruistic, perpetually weakening the bonds of our natural communities, through supporting things like mass immigration, open borders, affirmative action, diversity quotas, all forms of taxes and welfare, encouraging men that it's fine to support a single mother's kids, all Covid restrictions, our militaries and intelligence apparatuses being used to enforce globohomo's mandates (poppy fields in Afghanistan, Arab Spring in Egypt, Lybia, and Syria, Viet Nam, all manner of psyops and false flags, etc.) rather than protect the people, and every law and edict passed that infringes upon the people's liberties in the name of safety or empathy. If anyone resists these enforced altruisms, they are pressured by either the government that imprisons them or by the brainwashed masses that berate and ostracize them, claiming they don't care about others, which is gaslighting. It's also a perversion, pushing for stronger bonds with people far away and that are unlike us (globalism) rather than those that are close and similar (community and nationalism).
Western civilization is destroying itself with altruism. As time goes on, there are fewer and fewer altruists (net producers), and more and more leeches/takers (net drains). Giving people the power to vote themselves handouts with other people's money, and bloating government to enable this, are all forms of altruism. This can't last forever. It will absolutely collapse when the critical point is reached, when there aren't enough producers/altruists anymore. It's not an all or nothing thing, past a certain point society begins to degrade, and the further down we slide the quicker we'll accelerate to total collapse.
Relevant to OP's topic, this will affect the outcome of the coming civil war. Cities are for the most part net takers, and the countryside are for the most part net producers. Notice also that all the cities are lefty controlled, and the countryside is righty. When the civil war happens, the people in the cities will eat themselves. They can't grow enough food to survive. The rural folks will stop exporting goods into the cities, either by choice or by fear (from being ambushed by the city folk or terrorized by the righty militias who would embargo the cities). The cities would also become massive criminal centers, costing the establishment/globalist government massive resources to quell unrest and keep the city people from starving.
After that, the most likely outcome would be balkanization, to reinforce strongholds, which would allow the rightside forces to push out from positions of strength, and if a strong enough leader arose, reconquest of lost territory would occur. If this happens, genocide or mass deportation/displacement of the left's remaining population would occur.