I don't know who you are, but my comment doesn't depend on knowing who you are. If you would like to talk about your motivations I would be interested in hearing it; from where I stand it seems like you are a little bit mad at TI1.
This is exactly the same "stop gatekeeping so we can gatekeep" they've been doing in comics and gaming.
The Internet is primarily a medium for nerds who believe in free speech.
All the normies rush in and demand that things be made easier and more accessible so everyone can participate.
Normies (along with their best friend The Corporation) start bringing in politically correct speech guidelines, creating safe spaces, banning words that offend people, and treating those us who believe in free speech as deplorables.
Finally they institute ID to keep the deplorables off the Internet.
Of course, from the same retarded crowd who says social media can do whatever they want. Or that social media shouldn't be the new public square or that it shouldn't be classed as public utility.
I wish this was done. ID for media accounts like twitter and facebook and please do that with reddit. Can you imagine r/politics without all the bots?
Those sites would be dead as soon as it was implemented.
Also small sites like this one would easily survive so I see 0 downsides.
Yep, this is the most likely result. Reddit admins (and other sites) will just blanket verify their friendly bot accounts and then use the verified IDs to blacklist those that they disagree with. IDs for all only works if you assume that everyone will be treated fairly and equally, and only those that have been living under a rock these past few years can still think that.
That's not due to the Euro, it says at the bottom that the deadline is Sep 5 and all petitions run for 6 months, so it started in March. Which is worse, it's not one event that provoked overly emotional retards to demand everyone's freedoms to be taken away even more, it's just how Bongs are in general.
It would hurt feminists as well. Think about it, women have been grabbing power all over, they are already shifting to protect their power. A lot of women are going to be removed from manager position by other women based on the vitriol they can't help themselves to spew.
Do not underestimate how backstabbing some women can be. I do not share your views, I actually trust most women, however the worst people I've ever met, the most manipulative and self serving have been women. There is a reason why comradery seems to be male oriented, does not seem to come natural to women (I've not verified this so take it as a weak theory)
There is a reason why comradery seems to be male oriented, does not seem to come natural to women (I've not verified this so take it as a weak theory)
That's probably why "girl power", "girls have to stick together", and "believe all women" became such powerful memes, when it would be totally laughable to guys. They overcompensate and shout that all women must be allies to all other women, because they know it's not true. Women fake it until they make it.
A lot of women are going to be removed from manager position by other women based on the vitriol they can't help themselves to spew.
But feminism doesn't say "You must hire this specific woman to a manager position", it says "You must have at least half of all managers be women, (even if far less than half of the qualified applicants are women)". So maybe there would be infighting, but the women who get booted out would just be replaced by other women, and the women forced out would just find employment elsewhere, for the same reason.
Firing 15 women and 5 men and hiring back 15 men and 5 women from high positions in your company would get you articles written about how sexist you are, regardless of why those women were fired or how much you have to scrape the bottom of the bucket to find other women to replace them. So yes, maybe some specific women will lose out and screw up so badly they won't get rehired by some other company desperate to find even vaguely qualified women to hire, but women as a whole just can't lose.
But still no IDs for voting, right?
Let's be fair.
The UK gov is slowly moving towards voter ID. And they've already responded to this and said no.
Bear in mind - Twitter ALREADY gives you the option of restricting what you see to “people who verify via telephone” or “verified users”
These people want to restrict what OTHER people can read.
It's sad how the left has sold out all their values.
Just scream "-ism" and they rally behind the most authoritarian measures , the same measures they used to protest a few years ago.
The left never had any values other than seize power, steal resources, and punish enemies.
Anything that might have looked like a value was just a trick to get you to give them what they want.
Much like when they rush women to the front lines when anyone dare fights back against the black bloc, they're still just a means to an end.
Any feminist is capable of learning about what happens to their rights under communism, they just don't care because they are leftists first.
No, it was the destruction of White men.
You are booty blasted so hard that you made a parody account. This is peak fanny frustration.
I don't know who you are, but my comment doesn't depend on knowing who you are. If you would like to talk about your motivations I would be interested in hearing it; from where I stand it seems like you are a little bit mad at TI1.
The only value most politicians have ever had is "Get elected/re-elected."
This is exactly the same "stop gatekeeping so we can gatekeep" they've been doing in comics and gaming.
The Internet is primarily a medium for nerds who believe in free speech.
All the normies rush in and demand that things be made easier and more accessible so everyone can participate.
Normies (along with their best friend The Corporation) start bringing in politically correct speech guidelines, creating safe spaces, banning words that offend people, and treating those us who believe in free speech as deplorables.
Finally they institute ID to keep the deplorables off the Internet.
Of course, from the same retarded crowd who says social media can do whatever they want. Or that social media shouldn't be the new public square or that it shouldn't be classed as public utility.
Solution: dont create SoMe account on platform that demands ID, or well, avoid twitter/fb/reddit etc cancerous platform is overall recommended way
well, can always go anon(no-login) there to report those who do; and be on platforms that do not require ID's
I wish this was done. ID for media accounts like twitter and facebook and please do that with reddit. Can you imagine r/politics without all the bots?
Those sites would be dead as soon as it was implemented.
Also small sites like this one would easily survive so I see 0 downsides.
I'm a bit black pilled, I'm more on the bandwagon of taking them down with us.
Use more effective weapons then them, then.
Yep, this is the most likely result. Reddit admins (and other sites) will just blanket verify their friendly bot accounts and then use the verified IDs to blacklist those that they disagree with. IDs for all only works if you assume that everyone will be treated fairly and equally, and only those that have been living under a rock these past few years can still think that.
Just a thought, wouldn't this also damage the Leftist bot farms?
Worth noting however that the UK gov has already looked at this and said no.
That's not due to the Euro, it says at the bottom that the deadline is Sep 5 and all petitions run for 6 months, so it started in March. Which is worse, it's not one event that provoked overly emotional retards to demand everyone's freedoms to be taken away even more, it's just how Bongs are in general.
I have a better idea. Go fuck yourself!
Can the lawsuit already be won now and twitter shutdown? It's not making money and is just a propaganda delivery network for the rich elites.
and why wouldn't internet id be just as racist as voter id?
Let's be honest. Anyone still using the mainstream sites is toeing the line of censorship anyway. Nothing is lost.
All this does is deprive twatter cuckbook and instafag of users and interaction and hastens their end and impact on people.
Shoot yourselves in the foot, faggots
It would hurt feminists as well. Think about it, women have been grabbing power all over, they are already shifting to protect their power. A lot of women are going to be removed from manager position by other women based on the vitriol they can't help themselves to spew.
Do not underestimate how backstabbing some women can be. I do not share your views, I actually trust most women, however the worst people I've ever met, the most manipulative and self serving have been women. There is a reason why comradery seems to be male oriented, does not seem to come natural to women (I've not verified this so take it as a weak theory)
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
That's probably why "girl power", "girls have to stick together", and "believe all women" became such powerful memes, when it would be totally laughable to guys. They overcompensate and shout that all women must be allies to all other women, because they know it's not true. Women fake it until they make it.
But feminism doesn't say "You must hire this specific woman to a manager position", it says "You must have at least half of all managers be women, (even if far less than half of the qualified applicants are women)". So maybe there would be infighting, but the women who get booted out would just be replaced by other women, and the women forced out would just find employment elsewhere, for the same reason.
Firing 15 women and 5 men and hiring back 15 men and 5 women from high positions in your company would get you articles written about how sexist you are, regardless of why those women were fired or how much you have to scrape the bottom of the bucket to find other women to replace them. So yes, maybe some specific women will lose out and screw up so badly they won't get rehired by some other company desperate to find even vaguely qualified women to hire, but women as a whole just can't lose.
Comment Removed: Rule 3
And you failed. But you're used to that, right?
Not even original content? Typical incel.