Left completely demonizes heterosexuality and monogamy while promoting the highest levels of transgenderism and homosexuality possible even towards children.
There's that, but I'm also contrarian, so I'm pretty fully anti-sexualization at this point. There's a place for it in society, but we went way past it a long time ago.
I love that shit. They're so fucking braindead that they don't realize drag queens (even before tranny retardation became mainstream) are literally a female equivalent of a minstrel show.
They can't possibly comprehend an old era perspective where satirizing the appearance of black people could ever be acceptable, yet they're totally ok with the equivalent of a different biological group.
It really puts their programming on blast. They're incapable of making associations contradictory to it.
Sexuality has been used as a wedge by subversives to tear apart society, that's what the "sexual revolution" was all about. It was manufactured by the creators of Critical Theory, the Jewish Frankfurt school of western marxists.
Any kind of healthy sexuality would be attacked, because it's also used to bring down birthrates.
While that's true, they wouldn't have had nearly the success without the Vietnam War, where the media effectively turned the people against their government. Anti-establishment ideology had a perfect environment.
The media was always against the people. Those in education and the media didn't attack the Vietnam War because war was bad, but because it was a war explicitly against communism.
Yes, but this particular expansion of influence was mostly a matter of television adoption. Media gained a lot of power over the decade. They used it to destroy tradition and institutional trust.
The invention of "miracle drugs", the antibiotics that took the terror out of syphilis and the other VDs and
The passing of the last of the Victorian-era people.
I think the supposed prudishness of the Victorian age itself was a response to the spread of syphilis moreso than any character (or lack thereof) of the reigning monarch.
And even so, the so-called "liberated" women of the 1920s - the flappers, like my grandmother - did what the men were always supposed to do, too - stop with the drinking, smoking and carousing once they "settled down" and had kids. But the subversives started saying that no one should have to give anything up for the few years it takes to raise a few kids and boot 'em out of the house ...
The Rules of Engagement for sexual interactions have effectively been eliminated, so there are no longer clearly defined boundaries that if you stay within people feel respected and not used and abused.
As a result people are just "winging it" in a situation where no one's thinking rationally, and every situation has to be judged on a case-by-case basis using an ad hoc ruleset that no one agrees on and that is almost entirely based on a person's emotional state at the time.
That's because there's two different processes going on. On one hand, you have feminists who increasingly call anything with sexy women sexist, so you have society becoming more prudish, lest they be cancelled.
On the other hand, you have a process called "queering", defined as "to challenge the dominance of heterosexist discourses, according to New Discourses. So, anything sexy that involves LGBT people is perfectly acceptable.
One result of this is that people that I know wouldn't be caught dead in a Hooters due to the low cut uniform shirt are applauding a local restaurant that has begun hosting drag shows.
I’d say it has to do with this obsession to ignore the fact that the vast majority of people are heterosexual but they want to push the boundaries with anything that isn’t “normative”
Masculinity and sexuality for men is demonised while sexuality for women and LGBBQT are encouraged to an unlimited degree. This is why, for example, Progressives screech at a video game depicting a sexy woman thinly clad (this appeals to men - not allowed) but a woman dressed the same way in real life is celebrated (that's her expressing her sexuality).
Not really. The media have just been acting like sex didn't exist while trying to keep it a dirty secret they revel in 'private' since the victorian ages. There's always been someone going around the censors.
They’re trying to lower the birth rate as part of some global population herding.
The only sexuality they’re promoting is that which cannot lead readily to birthing - note they also want to confuse the entire concept of sexes which, again, is important to birthing.
Some cultures in the past had to explicitly train their children to have sex to procreate because it’s not, necessarily an innate act and I think certain forces have leveraged that as a means of global population control.
Things like "oh, that's objectification of women, NASCAR can't have race babes. And you can't have booth babes at video game conventions, that's too sexual!" You also see it in things like protesting Uzaki-chan or many other arts with the outcry of "but where are their ORGANS?!?! Their bodies cannot look like that and still have organs!"
They're very much anti sexuality as it pertains to things that heterosexuals might possibly like. Especially heterosexual males.
Funny. Game booth girls and grid girls, they out of a job cause some ugly bitch feminists decided that those jobs are sexists and bad. Rofl. Girls are a girl's worse enemy. Sabotaging each other cause of jealousy.
You ever see when a trans person comes out? Before they change their identity, they are normal people talking about the hobbies they like, but once they come out as trans, they ONLY talk about trans rights.
Mainstream Leftist ideology is all about equalizing outcomes. Anything that is good must be brought down, anything that is sub par must be raised up. Traditional marriage where both husband and wife live happily ever after with their 2.2 children and white picket fence is considered objectively good, so it must be destroyed. Any activity or designation that paints the individuals as deranged/weak/lesser inherently makes the individuals the underdog, the victim, therefore they must be celebrated and raised up.
What do you mean? Like how Leftists are going full bore While some Conservatives are getting more Conservative? Or do you mean the hypocrisy within in the Left. The former it's groups diverging, a schism widening that will cause a divorce and is due to genetics and has been a long time coming. As for the hypocrisy, that's because Leftism is meant to destroy, not make sense. So encouraging destructive groups while trying to control constructive ones helps their end goal of destruction.
Left completely demonizes heterosexuality and monogamy while promoting the highest levels of transgenderism and homosexuality possible even towards children.
The shortest answer I can give you.
That's basically plagarizing Brave New World.
It always comes back to the children.
Matthew 18:5-6
Sodom and Gomorrah...
There's that, but I'm also contrarian, so I'm pretty fully anti-sexualization at this point. There's a place for it in society, but we went way past it a long time ago.
I love that shit. They're so fucking braindead that they don't realize drag queens (even before tranny retardation became mainstream) are literally a female equivalent of a minstrel show.
They can't possibly comprehend an old era perspective where satirizing the appearance of black people could ever be acceptable, yet they're totally ok with the equivalent of a different biological group.
It really puts their programming on blast. They're incapable of making associations contradictory to it.
“LOOK KAITLYN JENNER IS A REPUBLICAN! D-DEMOCRATS ARE THE REAL BIGOTS!”
We're going full Weimar up in this bitch: extremism and degeneracy as far as the eye can see.
Edit: Fun fact: the first transgender surgeries happened in Germany during the Weimar republic.
Here's a cheat sheet to navigate the confusing world of woke sexuality.
Normal human sexuality: Bad
Paraphilic sexuality: Good
Sexuality has been used as a wedge by subversives to tear apart society, that's what the "sexual revolution" was all about. It was manufactured by the creators of Critical Theory, the Jewish Frankfurt school of western marxists.
Any kind of healthy sexuality would be attacked, because it's also used to bring down birthrates.
While that's true, they wouldn't have had nearly the success without the Vietnam War, where the media effectively turned the people against their government. Anti-establishment ideology had a perfect environment.
The media was always against the people. Those in education and the media didn't attack the Vietnam War because war was bad, but because it was a war explicitly against communism.
Yes, but this particular expansion of influence was mostly a matter of television adoption. Media gained a lot of power over the decade. They used it to destroy tradition and institutional trust.
The sexual revolution was enabled by two things:
The invention of "miracle drugs", the antibiotics that took the terror out of syphilis and the other VDs and
The passing of the last of the Victorian-era people.
I think the supposed prudishness of the Victorian age itself was a response to the spread of syphilis moreso than any character (or lack thereof) of the reigning monarch.
And even so, the so-called "liberated" women of the 1920s - the flappers, like my grandmother - did what the men were always supposed to do, too - stop with the drinking, smoking and carousing once they "settled down" and had kids. But the subversives started saying that no one should have to give anything up for the few years it takes to raise a few kids and boot 'em out of the house ...
The Rules of Engagement for sexual interactions have effectively been eliminated, so there are no longer clearly defined boundaries that if you stay within people feel respected and not used and abused.
As a result people are just "winging it" in a situation where no one's thinking rationally, and every situation has to be judged on a case-by-case basis using an ad hoc ruleset that no one agrees on and that is almost entirely based on a person's emotional state at the time.
That's because there's two different processes going on. On one hand, you have feminists who increasingly call anything with sexy women sexist, so you have society becoming more prudish, lest they be cancelled.
On the other hand, you have a process called "queering", defined as "to challenge the dominance of heterosexist discourses, according to New Discourses. So, anything sexy that involves LGBT people is perfectly acceptable.
One result of this is that people that I know wouldn't be caught dead in a Hooters due to the low cut uniform shirt are applauding a local restaurant that has begun hosting drag shows.
I’d say it has to do with this obsession to ignore the fact that the vast majority of people are heterosexual but they want to push the boundaries with anything that isn’t “normative”
Stoner culture has just gotten cringe now that you have sitting US Senators pushing it.
Masculinity and sexuality for men is demonised while sexuality for women and LGBBQT are encouraged to an unlimited degree. This is why, for example, Progressives screech at a video game depicting a sexy woman thinly clad (this appeals to men - not allowed) but a woman dressed the same way in real life is celebrated (that's her expressing her sexuality).
Not really. The media have just been acting like sex didn't exist while trying to keep it a dirty secret they revel in 'private' since the victorian ages. There's always been someone going around the censors.
My personal thought?
They’re trying to lower the birth rate as part of some global population herding.
The only sexuality they’re promoting is that which cannot lead readily to birthing - note they also want to confuse the entire concept of sexes which, again, is important to birthing.
Some cultures in the past had to explicitly train their children to have sex to procreate because it’s not, necessarily an innate act and I think certain forces have leveraged that as a means of global population control.
I've noticed the degeneracy but I haven't noticed the prudishness... What do you mean?
Things like "oh, that's objectification of women, NASCAR can't have race babes. And you can't have booth babes at video game conventions, that's too sexual!" You also see it in things like protesting Uzaki-chan or many other arts with the outcry of "but where are their ORGANS?!?! Their bodies cannot look like that and still have organs!"
They're very much anti sexuality as it pertains to things that heterosexuals might possibly like. Especially heterosexual males.
Funny. Game booth girls and grid girls, they out of a job cause some ugly bitch feminists decided that those jobs are sexists and bad. Rofl. Girls are a girl's worse enemy. Sabotaging each other cause of jealousy.
Well, where did all the freaks go once the circuses were forced to shut down the freak shows?
Thanks for some good examples! I see now
Compare women in video games from 1996 and 2020, as an example.
Ahh gotcha. I see what you mean.
You ever see when a trans person comes out? Before they change their identity, they are normal people talking about the hobbies they like, but once they come out as trans, they ONLY talk about trans rights.
Mainstream Leftist ideology is all about equalizing outcomes. Anything that is good must be brought down, anything that is sub par must be raised up. Traditional marriage where both husband and wife live happily ever after with their 2.2 children and white picket fence is considered objectively good, so it must be destroyed. Any activity or designation that paints the individuals as deranged/weak/lesser inherently makes the individuals the underdog, the victim, therefore they must be celebrated and raised up.
What do you mean? Like how Leftists are going full bore While some Conservatives are getting more Conservative? Or do you mean the hypocrisy within in the Left. The former it's groups diverging, a schism widening that will cause a divorce and is due to genetics and has been a long time coming. As for the hypocrisy, that's because Leftism is meant to destroy, not make sense. So encouraging destructive groups while trying to control constructive ones helps their end goal of destruction.