Japan VS Europe
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (77)
sorted by:
Yeah but can the robots rape children or throw acid in a woman’s face?
You don't want to know the addon-functionality available for japanese robots.
Robots will never replace humans at throwing acid in women's faces. Sure they got the motion right, but they lack the human touch.
Check-mate nationalists.
No, but they can shove 30 bad dragon up your ass at once then call you oni-chan.
Being called a cute ogre by a robot dom... The future is now.
I guess they could if you really wanted them to.
Japan has their own share of cultural problems. But at least its not a future caliphate
Really wish their right-wingers (and based foreign expats) would encourage them to stop importing the west. Cultural exchange was good to a point but they've done enough already.
Problem is that most foreigners who live there are usually leftists fleeing their own totalitarian multiculty countries, specifically Aussies and Canada cucks. Luckily they can't vote unless they become full citizens which is a hard process and can be revoked at anytime so they usually just get work visas that range from 1-5 years or reup on tourist visas.
That involves faking birth documents. No one can become a full citizen of Japan unless they're Japanese or born of Japanese, last I checked. The most one can hope for is a Permanent Resident status. They make sure you know you're never fully welcome as an outsider.
True. I looked it up and even marriage doesn't even grant citizenship anymore, now it's a spouse visa, which can be revoked at will. Guess they learned their lesson from the Nigerians setting up their own mafia or working as hitters for the Yakuza.
Yet.
Why do people make posts like this assuming Japan is some kind of safe haven when it’s under attack from all sides because of posts like this?
Exactly, thats what i was thinking
I mean, I’m not trying to be mean but you can’t declare mocking victory when you:
A. Have almost no knowledge of the culture outside of your media/social media.
B. HAVE SEEN how these posts just agitate people to try and get them to change things.
Good lord people, this nonsense doesn’t help anyone. I’m disappointed in how many upvotes this is getting.
Pushback against attacks by the woke/antis but don’t actively seek out fights, because you will be at a huge disadvantage against the crazies.
I don't think it hurts. They will be attacked regardless, especially now that they've won in the west.
So since your side lost, just give up and show your destroyers other places to conquer? That’s horrible, and you know from all the recent bannings/outrage that these posts DOES hurt.
I thought we had all learned from those experiences, and adapted to not seek out conflicts we have bad odds in. This is very disappointing.
Oh, but see, that big, juicy Boomer Bubble will need replacing soon (despite all the fear and tears over who is going to pay their pensions forever because they're immortal, you know) and robots don't really need money.
Gods forbid we enter a steady-state population after the aberration of the boomers is gone. Like the sort Man demands of every other species. Fucking monkeypigs.
No need to pay pensions. They showed us last year that they will just murder the elderly and the media will cover it up
Looks like I'm about to get put in FB jail.
Yes but they are not racists so definitely worth it.
Both look pretty bad tbh.
That does seem to be absurdly accurate and truthful.
Instead of old people America would be pocks and fats
I think a Crusade will happen before then. Pope Francis has only a few more years before he ceases to sully the seat of Peter.
Cuck.
... that all you got?
don't you have a sex doll to beat up? don't forget the makeup so it looks like your bitch mommy, who wouldn't give you your nuggies. you're an MGTOW! bitch mommy!
Stop sperging out, autist
You're talking about sperging out? God this must be so embarrassing for you.
Why would I be embarrassed for anything on an anonymous platform?
hahahaha, oh, man, you're rich.
Comment Reported for: there should be a 17. called "not having enough braincells"
Jannies have no right to determine competence.
We're here because reddit censors everything and now people want to censor the comments here as well.
In conclusion: hoes mad
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Harassment
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent speech
i know, right? women this women that. not only is he factually wrong and retarded for being so, but his ideology is advocating either for that shitty book The Handmaid's Tale or actual genuine extinction, both of which are equally stupid.
it's so, so hard to decide whether people like him with these nonsensical, well-poisoning, pants-on-head-retarded ideas are just that fucking dumb, or genuinely one of those millions of paid trolls trying to lead people here astray. seriously, i can't tell anymore. how can a man with a brain be that stupid without being on a payroll?
Not really. Taking women's rights away is the appropriate solution to a lot of the problems he identifies, but instead of advocating for that he just spins in a circle calling everyone who doesn't want extinction a "tradcuck".
He's too sincere to be a paid actor. Say what you will, the opinions he expresses are genuine.
I'm just waiting for him to start advocating for political homosexuality as the male equivalent to political lesbianism.
Impossible, I do want you to know that I appreciate that you call out the stormfront people.
lol, imagine thinking women get to keep all their material gains when they can't legally own property.
Men are always going to be stuck with supporting women. It's the nature of the human animal. Your inability to accept this is what marks you as genuinely insane.
I might have missed something that would have spurred on your comment.
Since when is pointing out women's role in the destruction of men, families, religion, work, government, social media, dating, marriage, and society suddenly make the observer turn into a straw man advocating for a false dichotomy of "Handmaid's Tale or actual genuine extinction"? There is a huge middle ground between those 2 options, and a lot of other options not between them that at the very least could help stymie the blood gushing wound to civilization that feminism has caused.
first off i've seen theimpossible1 for a while now, he's not smart enough to know like half the words you just said.
second off, if all that can be neatly attributed to women... could they not be attributed to men, too? men, too, destroy families, religion, work, government, social media, dating, marriage and society.
the blame, if analyzed, is a neat 50/50.
would that not then signify the issue is not really gender-based, but rather some other force acting on both equally yet manifesting differently? from the modern whoring of women today, yes, you as a man suffer, but do you think they, as forever unfulfilled women, do not also suffer?
i'm not saying "oh my god Stacy's life is so hard" don't take me for a retard simp, please, don't insult my intelligence. no, i mean that on a technical level, if the goal is fulfillment (biological and otherwise) for both genders, then both genders are currently suffering equally, which indicates the presence of a gender-neutral force rather than blaming either men or women specifically. to get hung up on whores and feminism today is to see the symptom but not the cause, the trees but not the forest, etc.
if you just keep blaming half the world population without trying to look past and see the real issue, you will just end up a schizoid like theimpossible1, because there's no way in fuck you'll get anything useful out of that.
Yes, there were/are absolutely outside forces pushing feminism (I'm sure most here know), but women embraced it, to the continued destruction of all I mentioned. Sure, some men destroy stuff, but I'm talking about wholesale fuckery that goes far beyond incidental stuff. Men can be blamed for certain widespread behaviors that are destroying society, like rampant porn and gaming addictions, but to a lesser degree than what women have done. We have completely upended our traditions and society to cater to women being put into positions they should never have, and it's destroying everything. I'm not saying this because I hate women or think them inferior. I'm saying it because men and women are biologically different, physically and mentally, and fulfill different roles. This gets into evolutionary biology and philosophy, but it shows how things should be set up, and why things turn to shit when we stray from it.
Specialization of roles between the sexes increases efficiency of the species. Men fulfill the role of protector and provider, doing the dangerous tasks, wandering further from home, and men evolved to do it better than women. Men are bigger, stronger, and most importantly, prioritize truth, logic, and reason. Men that are better at divining truth via logic and reason, are better able to attract a mate, fulfill their role, pass on their genetics, and increase the survivability of themselves, their family, and their tribe. Women fulfill the role of procreator, homemaker, and care giver, doing the less dangerous tasks, staying close to home, and women evolved to do it better than men. Women are cable of bearing children, feeding them, and most importantly, prioritize life, emotion, and empathy. Women that are better able to prioritize such things are better able to attract a mate, fulfill their role, pass on their genetics, and increase the survivability of themselves, their family, and their tribe.
The two core priorities of men and women, truth and life, aren't equal. One must hold apex over the other, and hopefully most here can figure out that truth must hold priority over life. When you prioritize life over truth, the first casualty is truth, and inevitably the 2nd is life. This error has repeated throughout history in individuals and groups (regardless of size), and every time it's been done it's been destructive. Furthermore, just as truth must hold priority over life, so must those that prioritize truth hold position over those that prioritize life. This is why every stable family, community, and society is patriarchal, and whenever it embraces the feminine over the masculine, it begins to decay, leading to sure destruction. This does not mean women are inferior to men, but simply that they prioritize and specialize different things than men, and can do those things better than men.
If you can extrapolate this at all, you should be able to figure out why a great many things occur in society. Further, if you're unfamiliar with the men's rights movement, look up some of their members and what they're saying. It will show a lot of the effects of upending what I mentioned above.
Are you in for a surprise.
His extremism isn't realistic. That's why people attack at him.
Women exist, they will always exist, and will always be necessary for existence to continue. Unless we are willing to render them breeding slaves with zero deviation, we will end up having to compromise with them on some parts.
I'm a misogynist the same as him, but he makes the "undoing feminism" movement harder by advocating a position so far off the side that nobody could want it but him. Its not that his reasoning and foundation is wrong, its where he takes it that it is.
What extremism? Has he made other comments beyond what started this thread?
He is on almost every thread on this .win talking about women and feminism and his extreme views on them. Its actually almost a running gag how he can turn any random topic into somehow being caused by the feminist overlords who run society.
You treat feminism as another word for woman, not as an ideology seperate. The same way the Left treats "white" as another word for Nazi, or racist, or whatever. You even said it just now when you blamed their biology for it, meaning there is no innocence among any of them.
As such, you don't rail against feminists you want to stomp all women into mud and dirt.
Here's the thing. I don't disagree with you. But, I said it already:
Your mindset will accomplish nothing because nobody else will ever agree with it. Women will need to exist or we will go extinct. Men are empathetic creatures, so we will never enslave them into birthing machines. Men will always want sex, so women will always have a leg up on us.
The compromise isn't on what they deserve you screaming loon. Its do I want to accomplish anything or scream into the wind forever because nobody will ever see my side.
I spent most of my undergrad drumming up support and studies for helping men with therapy, which is a real problem because its designed almost entirely for women (one reason why male suicide is such a problem is there is ZERO help that matters). I recieved pushback constantly from women, but I still managed to convince a lot of people and even a professor was inspired to do their own studies. That minor step of compromised working with them probably did more for helping men than 40000 words of your essays on it.
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Harassment
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - violent speech