Japan VS Europe
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (77)
sorted by:
i know, right? women this women that. not only is he factually wrong and retarded for being so, but his ideology is advocating either for that shitty book The Handmaid's Tale or actual genuine extinction, both of which are equally stupid.
it's so, so hard to decide whether people like him with these nonsensical, well-poisoning, pants-on-head-retarded ideas are just that fucking dumb, or genuinely one of those millions of paid trolls trying to lead people here astray. seriously, i can't tell anymore. how can a man with a brain be that stupid without being on a payroll?
Not really. Taking women's rights away is the appropriate solution to a lot of the problems he identifies, but instead of advocating for that he just spins in a circle calling everyone who doesn't want extinction a "tradcuck".
He's too sincere to be a paid actor. Say what you will, the opinions he expresses are genuine.
I'm just waiting for him to start advocating for political homosexuality as the male equivalent to political lesbianism.
Kek.
I'm not gay though.
Impossible, I do want you to know that I appreciate that you call out the stormfront people.
Yeah, because you're too dumb to realize that taking their rights away would put them back where they were before this. They effectively get to keep all the material gains they made in the last decades, which means we'll be back here in 40-50 years having the same conversation again, because it's not a fucking deterrent.
Not to mention you're effectively punishing men for what women did, because men get stuck with the bill for the women you decided shouldn't be allowed to work. Or are you going to pay us to take them?
lol, imagine thinking women get to keep all their material gains when they can't legally own property.
Men are always going to be stuck with supporting women. It's the nature of the human animal. Your inability to accept this is what marks you as genuinely insane.
I might have missed something that would have spurred on your comment.
Since when is pointing out women's role in the destruction of men, families, religion, work, government, social media, dating, marriage, and society suddenly make the observer turn into a straw man advocating for a false dichotomy of "Handmaid's Tale or actual genuine extinction"? There is a huge middle ground between those 2 options, and a lot of other options not between them that at the very least could help stymie the blood gushing wound to civilization that feminism has caused.
His extremism isn't realistic. That's why people attack at him.
Women exist, they will always exist, and will always be necessary for existence to continue. Unless we are willing to render them breeding slaves with zero deviation, we will end up having to compromise with them on some parts.
I'm a misogynist the same as him, but he makes the "undoing feminism" movement harder by advocating a position so far off the side that nobody could want it but him. Its not that his reasoning and foundation is wrong, its where he takes it that it is.
What extremism? Has he made other comments beyond what started this thread?
He is on almost every thread on this .win talking about women and feminism and his extreme views on them. Its actually almost a running gag how he can turn any random topic into somehow being caused by the feminist overlords who run society.
Compromise on what?
"How about you only kill 10% of us, is that okay? And we'll let you keep psychologically abusing kids to turn them into perfect simps to milk for cash."
What possible compromise can you have with people who wish to see a totalitarian world with their biological trait making them a permanent upper caste?
The only way forward I see is to treat feminism exactly like Nazism was treated after the Second World War.
You treat feminism as another word for woman, not as an ideology seperate. The same way the Left treats "white" as another word for Nazi, or racist, or whatever. You even said it just now when you blamed their biology for it, meaning there is no innocence among any of them.
As such, you don't rail against feminists you want to stomp all women into mud and dirt.
Here's the thing. I don't disagree with you. But, I said it already:
Your mindset will accomplish nothing because nobody else will ever agree with it. Women will need to exist or we will go extinct. Men are empathetic creatures, so we will never enslave them into birthing machines. Men will always want sex, so women will always have a leg up on us.
The compromise isn't on what they deserve you screaming loon. Its do I want to accomplish anything or scream into the wind forever because nobody will ever see my side.
I spent most of my undergrad drumming up support and studies for helping men with therapy, which is a real problem because its designed almost entirely for women (one reason why male suicide is such a problem is there is ZERO help that matters). I recieved pushback constantly from women, but I still managed to convince a lot of people and even a professor was inspired to do their own studies. That minor step of compromised working with them probably did more for helping men than 40000 words of your essays on it.
first off i've seen theimpossible1 for a while now, he's not smart enough to know like half the words you just said.
second off, if all that can be neatly attributed to women... could they not be attributed to men, too? men, too, destroy families, religion, work, government, social media, dating, marriage and society.
the blame, if analyzed, is a neat 50/50.
would that not then signify the issue is not really gender-based, but rather some other force acting on both equally yet manifesting differently? from the modern whoring of women today, yes, you as a man suffer, but do you think they, as forever unfulfilled women, do not also suffer?
i'm not saying "oh my god Stacy's life is so hard" don't take me for a retard simp, please, don't insult my intelligence. no, i mean that on a technical level, if the goal is fulfillment (biological and otherwise) for both genders, then both genders are currently suffering equally, which indicates the presence of a gender-neutral force rather than blaming either men or women specifically. to get hung up on whores and feminism today is to see the symptom but not the cause, the trees but not the forest, etc.
if you just keep blaming half the world population without trying to look past and see the real issue, you will just end up a schizoid like theimpossible1, because there's no way in fuck you'll get anything useful out of that.
Yes, there were/are absolutely outside forces pushing feminism (I'm sure most here know), but women embraced it, to the continued destruction of all I mentioned. Sure, some men destroy stuff, but I'm talking about wholesale fuckery that goes far beyond incidental stuff. Men can be blamed for certain widespread behaviors that are destroying society, like rampant porn and gaming addictions, but to a lesser degree than what women have done. We have completely upended our traditions and society to cater to women being put into positions they should never have, and it's destroying everything. I'm not saying this because I hate women or think them inferior. I'm saying it because men and women are biologically different, physically and mentally, and fulfill different roles. This gets into evolutionary biology and philosophy, but it shows how things should be set up, and why things turn to shit when we stray from it.
Specialization of roles between the sexes increases efficiency of the species. Men fulfill the role of protector and provider, doing the dangerous tasks, wandering further from home, and men evolved to do it better than women. Men are bigger, stronger, and most importantly, prioritize truth, logic, and reason. Men that are better at divining truth via logic and reason, are better able to attract a mate, fulfill their role, pass on their genetics, and increase the survivability of themselves, their family, and their tribe. Women fulfill the role of procreator, homemaker, and care giver, doing the less dangerous tasks, staying close to home, and women evolved to do it better than men. Women are cable of bearing children, feeding them, and most importantly, prioritize life, emotion, and empathy. Women that are better able to prioritize such things are better able to attract a mate, fulfill their role, pass on their genetics, and increase the survivability of themselves, their family, and their tribe.
The two core priorities of men and women, truth and life, aren't equal. One must hold apex over the other, and hopefully most here can figure out that truth must hold priority over life. When you prioritize life over truth, the first casualty is truth, and inevitably the 2nd is life. This error has repeated throughout history in individuals and groups (regardless of size), and every time it's been done it's been destructive. Furthermore, just as truth must hold priority over life, so must those that prioritize truth hold position over those that prioritize life. This is why every stable family, community, and society is patriarchal, and whenever it embraces the feminine over the masculine, it begins to decay, leading to sure destruction. This does not mean women are inferior to men, but simply that they prioritize and specialize different things than men, and can do those things better than men.
If you can extrapolate this at all, you should be able to figure out why a great many things occur in society. Further, if you're unfamiliar with the men's rights movement, look up some of their members and what they're saying. It will show a lot of the effects of upending what I mentioned above.
Are you in for a surprise.
Okay, now I know you're a shill. Fuck off.