Japan VS Europe
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (77)
sorted by:
first off i've seen theimpossible1 for a while now, he's not smart enough to know like half the words you just said.
second off, if all that can be neatly attributed to women... could they not be attributed to men, too? men, too, destroy families, religion, work, government, social media, dating, marriage and society.
the blame, if analyzed, is a neat 50/50.
would that not then signify the issue is not really gender-based, but rather some other force acting on both equally yet manifesting differently? from the modern whoring of women today, yes, you as a man suffer, but do you think they, as forever unfulfilled women, do not also suffer?
i'm not saying "oh my god Stacy's life is so hard" don't take me for a retard simp, please, don't insult my intelligence. no, i mean that on a technical level, if the goal is fulfillment (biological and otherwise) for both genders, then both genders are currently suffering equally, which indicates the presence of a gender-neutral force rather than blaming either men or women specifically. to get hung up on whores and feminism today is to see the symptom but not the cause, the trees but not the forest, etc.
if you just keep blaming half the world population without trying to look past and see the real issue, you will just end up a schizoid like theimpossible1, because there's no way in fuck you'll get anything useful out of that.
Yes, there were/are absolutely outside forces pushing feminism (I'm sure most here know), but women embraced it, to the continued destruction of all I mentioned. Sure, some men destroy stuff, but I'm talking about wholesale fuckery that goes far beyond incidental stuff. Men can be blamed for certain widespread behaviors that are destroying society, like rampant porn and gaming addictions, but to a lesser degree than what women have done. We have completely upended our traditions and society to cater to women being put into positions they should never have, and it's destroying everything. I'm not saying this because I hate women or think them inferior. I'm saying it because men and women are biologically different, physically and mentally, and fulfill different roles. This gets into evolutionary biology and philosophy, but it shows how things should be set up, and why things turn to shit when we stray from it.
Specialization of roles between the sexes increases efficiency of the species. Men fulfill the role of protector and provider, doing the dangerous tasks, wandering further from home, and men evolved to do it better than women. Men are bigger, stronger, and most importantly, prioritize truth, logic, and reason. Men that are better at divining truth via logic and reason, are better able to attract a mate, fulfill their role, pass on their genetics, and increase the survivability of themselves, their family, and their tribe. Women fulfill the role of procreator, homemaker, and care giver, doing the less dangerous tasks, staying close to home, and women evolved to do it better than men. Women are cable of bearing children, feeding them, and most importantly, prioritize life, emotion, and empathy. Women that are better able to prioritize such things are better able to attract a mate, fulfill their role, pass on their genetics, and increase the survivability of themselves, their family, and their tribe.
The two core priorities of men and women, truth and life, aren't equal. One must hold apex over the other, and hopefully most here can figure out that truth must hold priority over life. When you prioritize life over truth, the first casualty is truth, and inevitably the 2nd is life. This error has repeated throughout history in individuals and groups (regardless of size), and every time it's been done it's been destructive. Furthermore, just as truth must hold priority over life, so must those that prioritize truth hold position over those that prioritize life. This is why every stable family, community, and society is patriarchal, and whenever it embraces the feminine over the masculine, it begins to decay, leading to sure destruction. This does not mean women are inferior to men, but simply that they prioritize and specialize different things than men, and can do those things better than men.
If you can extrapolate this at all, you should be able to figure out why a great many things occur in society. Further, if you're unfamiliar with the men's rights movement, look up some of their members and what they're saying. It will show a lot of the effects of upending what I mentioned above.
Are you in for a surprise.
It's pretty much the opposite. You're more likely to see a career criminal have a partner than someone of actual value.
You're confusing the world as it is today for what it would/should normally be without all the subversion and fuckery.
The only reason we're seeing idiots propagate more than the intelligent is because of the various fuckery forces at play upon society, because as I briefly mentioned, society is fucking fucked. Almost every hard won tradition and philosophical foundation has been inverted. Idiots don't care about resource accrual, especially with all the welfare programs enabling people like that to survive, despite their idiocy, enabling them to just fuck and make kids. The intelligent are pushed into college and careers, men and women, which takes a lot of time away from finding a mate and making a family, thus reducing the number of kids they have. Welfare is a dysgenics program, taking resources away from the intelligent and giving them to the stupid, making it harder for the former to have kids, and easier for the latter.
Men that are better at prioritizing truth, logic, and reason are better able to fulfill their role as protector and provider. Most people don't see this because they're looking at things how they are, not what it took to get here and understand why. In the past, mother nature would kill off the horrifically stupid (lets go pet that hungry looking bear, lets not store food for winter, lets go jump off that cliff it looks fun, I don't know how to hunt, now I'm starving), meaning only the intelligent would pass on their genetics, improving the stock of the tribe, and molding the species over time. This also highlights another problem with modern society, which coddles people too much, becoming too far removed from nature, insulating the idiots from the necessary consequences of their mistakes, weakening all of us over time.
Men that are smarter are better able to accrue resources, farming, hunting, planning ahead, storing food for winter, learning what is healthy versus poisonous, what plant can be used for what, what animals can be hunted where, and how, and when, and so on ad infinitum. The more resources a man can gather, the better a provider he can be, and the better he'll be able to attract and keep a mate, and raise a family. This also affects the tribes/communities we're a part of. If a tribe is made up of idiots, the tribe will fail/die, or will be defeated/enslaved/killed/etc. by a tribe that's stronger, usually meaning they're smarter (in larger scales this becomes more muddied by other factors).
Women seek out men that are bigger and stronger, because it means they'll be a better protector. Women also seek out men that are good at accruing resources, because it means they'll be a better provider. In modern times, this plays out as women seeking a man that makes more money than them. This is confirmed by modern dating stats, even in the hell 2.0 society we're currently living in.
are you a LITERAL incel? not even a joke one, a literal incel?
You're wrong. You didn't fully think through what I said. I tried to be as terse as possible given the scale of the topics being discussed, hoping that those reading it could figure out the rest and make the necessary connections.
Men that are better able at divining truth, better able to use logic and reason, are better able to fulfill their role as provider and protector, meaning they're able to accrue more resources, via hunting, farming, avoiding threats, planning ahead for winter, etc. This is proven over and over, even in the modern dating world. Women prefer men that are big and strong, so they can protect them. Women also prefer men that make more money than them, so they can provide for them.
This is also why pushing women into the workforce and competing with men for jobs is a huge mistake, because it uses women's evolutionary biology and separation of roles against both sexes, to the benefit of those who wish to control us. The more money women make the smaller their dating pool, and the more women that are working the fewer men that can attract a mate. It also, essentially, doubles the workforce without doubling the number of jobs, thereby decreasing everyone's wages, where now 2 people need to work to earn the same income as 1 did before. This is one of the reasons why dads back in the 50s could work 1 job and support the entire family, whereas now both parents need to work to do the same thing. It also gives benefit to our enemy, because it provides them with extra labor, while making everyone easier to control, because it destroys the family and social cohesion, by all mentioned above, and the effects of it, like forcing men to compete with women for work, when men are hardwired to protect women, not fight them. Another example, is that with both parents working, means the kids are being taught by outside/insidious forces, thus making them easier to control.
You are wrong. Yes, women prefer men who are big and strong, and yes, women prefer men with more resources. But women do not care about how have you acquired those resources. Whether you got them through your intelligence, hard work, inheritance or stole from another, it does not matter to women.
Okay, now I know you're a shill. Fuck off.