Japan VS Europe
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (77)
sorted by:
You're wrong. You didn't fully think through what I said. I tried to be as terse as possible given the scale of the topics being discussed, hoping that those reading it could figure out the rest and make the necessary connections.
Men that are better able at divining truth, better able to use logic and reason, are better able to fulfill their role as provider and protector, meaning they're able to accrue more resources, via hunting, farming, avoiding threats, planning ahead for winter, etc. This is proven over and over, even in the modern dating world. Women prefer men that are big and strong, so they can protect them. Women also prefer men that make more money than them, so they can provide for them.
This is also why pushing women into the workforce and competing with men for jobs is a huge mistake, because it uses women's evolutionary biology and separation of roles against both sexes, to the benefit of those who wish to control us. The more money women make the smaller their dating pool, and the more women that are working the fewer men that can attract a mate. It also, essentially, doubles the workforce without doubling the number of jobs, thereby decreasing everyone's wages, where now 2 people need to work to earn the same income as 1 did before. This is one of the reasons why dads back in the 50s could work 1 job and support the entire family, whereas now both parents need to work to do the same thing. It also gives benefit to our enemy, because it provides them with extra labor, while making everyone easier to control, because it destroys the family and social cohesion, by all mentioned above, and the effects of it, like forcing men to compete with women for work, when men are hardwired to protect women, not fight them. Another example, is that with both parents working, means the kids are being taught by outside/insidious forces, thus making them easier to control.
You are wrong. Yes, women prefer men who are big and strong, and yes, women prefer men with more resources. But women do not care about how have you acquired those resources. Whether you got them through your intelligence, hard work, inheritance or stole from another, it does not matter to women.
I didn't say women cared how the resources were accrued, and that doesn't negate what I said. I'm not wrong, but you're free to think whatever you want.
If you understood Kant's categorical imperative (act such that you wish that action becomes universal maxim, meaning everyone acts that way) and applied it society wide, it would show you what is moral and what works (meaning society is improved or remains stable), and what is immoral and doesn't work (meaning it hurts society as a whole). Society can't exist if all men gain their resources by stealing it from others. There's a reason why people have come up with moral codes, religious or not, to prevent societal decay. It appears you're trying to disprove what is moral, righteous, true, and logical by pointing out that some people have succeeded by not being those things, which is a logically fallacious argument.