I didn't say women cared how the resources were accrued, and that doesn't negate what I said. I'm not wrong, but you're free to think whatever you want.

If you understood Kant's categorical imperative (act such that you wish that action becomes universal maxim, meaning everyone acts that way) and applied it society wide, it would show you what is moral and what works (meaning society is improved or remains stable), and what is immoral and doesn't work (meaning it hurts society as a whole). Society can't exist if all men gain their resources by stealing it from others. There's a reason why people have come up with moral codes, religious or not, to prevent societal decay. It appears you're trying to disprove what is moral, righteous, true, and logical by pointing out that some people have succeeded by not being those things, which is a logically fallacious argument.