2
freespeechsquid 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't see why it needs strict movement control and state allocated resources. I see it - the ideal version at least - as having everything within 15 minutes to eliminate the need for most inter-district travel. It doesn't have to involve the sort of hard control that these cunts want to take. Incentivize it, make it logistically convenient, and let people decide for themselves. I think it'd provide a lot of benefits.

Just because criminals and tyrants want to implement a warped and twisted version of something, doesn't mean a good version of that thing is impossible to achieve if it's voluntary and realistic in scale. And if it's built fresh instead of rammed into existing cities.

5
freespeechsquid 5 points ago +5 / -0

This isn't literally saying humanity will be wiped out in 5 years, it's that 'point of no return' thing they always fearmonger about. Of course, I have no doubt the 'point of no return' has changed to (Current Year+5), because it's not a worthwhile grift if there's no longer anything that can be done

9
freespeechsquid 9 points ago +9 / -0

Wait they actually were charged with a hate crime for beating up a white man?

'Hate crimes' are a fucking joke but having them enforced equally is good news.

7
freespeechsquid 7 points ago +7 / -0

Do I even need to ask if there's a quota for men on all boards too? Or is it completely fine to have boards made up completely of women?

1
freespeechsquid 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's never voluntary, though. And it can't be if you're turning existing cities into "15 minute cities."

No, they would need to be built from the ground up and we all know these fucks can't or don't want to build anything, only subvert and destroy.

1
freespeechsquid 1 point ago +1 / -0

In theory, having everything you need close by (including work) so you don't have to drive everywhere isn't a bad idea. In theory, it could ease the stress and time pressures of commuting and ease the financial pressures of owning and maintaining a car. In theory, it could help foster a strong sense of community identity.

I do not trust the globalist cunts to deliver this version of 15 minutes cities. They will of course be introducing the commie blocks you mention, with the bare minimum of living arrangements that keep the peasants oppressed and the elite rich and powerful.

But it's not a terrible idea if it's strictly voluntary and it's implemented by people who are intelligent and good.

4
freespeechsquid 4 points ago +4 / -0

I know this is for humor, not an actual indictment of 15 minute cities, but to play devil's advocate anyway:

A 15 minute city frankensteined together in a game that isn't designed or programmed to accommodate it says nothing about the validity of the real thing.

15 minute cities have downsides but they also have potential. They're a cool idea - if they're voluntary.

12
freespeechsquid 12 points ago +12 / -0

So obviously their next step will be to make child porn legal or create a loophole to prevent prosecution of the wrong people. Possibly a threshold where they can legally possess an amount of child porn, so the FBI can still frame inconvenient people with large amounts.

Then we'll be one horrible step closer to sex with children becoming legal.

1
freespeechsquid 1 point ago +1 / -0

“They’ll learn once they get to the real world.”

I used to think this before I saw what lengths they will go to to construct a false reality. We're dealing with a destructive, potential society-ending delusion that exists only to reinforce itself and be unquestionable. Many of its proponents are the stupidest, least competent people to ever exist, but I no longer underestimate them.

They are dangerous because they are stupid and they think their stupidity is the highest virtue. Intelligence, on the other hand, is a crime that must be eradicated at all costs.

2
freespeechsquid 2 points ago +2 / -0

“They’ll learn once they get to the real world.”

I used to think this before I saw what lengths they will go to to construct a false reality. We're dealing with a destructive, potential society-ending delusion that exists only to reinforce itself and be unquestionable. Many of its proponents are the stupidest, least competent people to ever exist, but I no longer underestimate them.

They are dangerous because they are stupid and they think their stupidity is the highest virtue. Intelligence, on the other hand, is a crime that must be eradicated at all costs.

3
freespeechsquid 3 points ago +3 / -0

“They’ll learn once they get to the real world.”

I used to think this before I saw what lengths they will go to to construct a false reality. We're dealing with a destructive, potential society-ending delusion that exists only to reinforce itself and be unquestionable. Many of its proponents are the stupidest, least competent people to ever exist, but I no longer underestimate them.

They are dangerous because they are stupid and they think their stupidity is the highest virtue. Intelligence, on the other hand, is a crime that must be eradicated at all costs.

12
freespeechsquid 12 points ago +12 / -0

Thank you. Yes, their behavior has been more disgusting than usual

3
freespeechsquid 3 points ago +3 / -0

maybe just make complete games to start with and you won't have to update them

1
freespeechsquid 1 point ago +1 / -0

well yes, it's been obvious capeshit theater from the start. Nice of them to admit it

9
freespeechsquid 9 points ago +9 / -0

He always said he supports free speech within the bounds of the law. He's only doing what he always said he would.

It's still disgusting.

21
freespeechsquid 21 points ago +21 / -0

The only way forward for the heritage peoples of the west is the Jewish way of ultra nepotistic tribalism.

I never wanted to, but if other groups are doing it you have to adapt or die.

8
freespeechsquid 8 points ago +8 / -0

translation: they both see women as enemies, but excif acknowledges other enemies too. Imp has trouble doing that.

1
freespeechsquid 1 point ago +1 / -0

How many of those old Japanese people supported the very governments that fucked things up and were against the opposing parties that tried to fix things?

I don't know as much about Japan, but I know in the west propaganda has a huge role in this. The ruling class always do everything they can to establish the idea of their legitimacy and competence. These are everyday people, without a mind for politics and economics, that have been promised if they support society, society will support them. It's a contract of sorts and they've fulfilled their part of it, which is part of what makes it hard to change even if competent people were in charge.

15
freespeechsquid 15 points ago +15 / -0

Charity should be entirely voluntary, yes, but that doesn't mean I agree that old people should just die if they don't have resources. Maybe if the government didn't rob us of our income, tax us for our land, burden us with endless fees, devalue what we have left through inflation and otherwise meddle and make everything worse, private aged care would be affordable without handouts.

1
freespeechsquid 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can at least understand someone playing it out of spite or because they don't care, but playing it because they can't resist the allure of "newly released game" is so pathetic to me.

unprincipled consumerism IS pathetic, but their problems with this game are entirely made up and they're just trying to throw their weight around and prevent people from playing it to validate their delicate feelings. If they actually had a real concern, they'd also have a real point. As it stands they don't.

20
freespeechsquid 20 points ago +20 / -0

Taking care of the elderly might not be directly beneficial, but it's important for society's morale. Nobody wants to see someone benefit society for 40-50 years and then get tossed aside like garbage the second they're infirm. Why would anyone want to spend their best years working if that was the case?

It also shows a respect for elders and a willingness to learn from them, which is good for preserving a society's values. It's something which western society is sorely lacking right now.

4
freespeechsquid 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's not even a real plight. It's literally a woman who doesn't think they're actually women and that their encroachment on language and women's spaces is hurting real women. She's not trying to have them oppressed or locked up or genocided or anything.

You could argue that a streamer endorsing a game made by someone who is openly trying to hurt you, you might have a reason to be upset. But this is fake nonsense, they worked themselves into a frenzy over it and they're pulling the 'genocide' card unironically. Completely unhinged.

10
freespeechsquid 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm beginning to think it's true that they decide what behavior is harassment or not based entirely on how attractive a man is to them.

11
freespeechsquid 11 points ago +11 / -0

They don't want to have coherent rules for men to follow. They want to be able to decide what's good and bad, right and wrong, or safe and unsafe, on a whim. Because that is ultimate power.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›