"I'm so fucking inbred, so fucking retarded, and so confident in same dipshit politicians that Mark Twain called idiots, fools, and fleas constantly, that I will resort to simply name-calling you"
All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a compassion for them, on account of personal experience and heredity.
- Mark Twain's Autobiography; also in Mark Twain in Eruption
As it turns out, being in denial does not make me wrong, it only makes you about as intelligent as the average German who believes that Kant can be correct about anything.
"Chapo speak". Have you ever actually analyzed a document before? It's quite clear that the exception is there because of diplomatic immunity, as ambassadors are traditionally the only people who are not subject to the laws of the state in which they reside, which is why ambassadors can be expelled but not prosecuted without having their immunity stripped by their home country.
You quite literally quote the same cases that are the basis of why I'm telling you that you are incorrect.
It is quite obvious that they were solely there because diplomatic immunity is such that they are effectively unable to be prosecuted by the home countries laws if they are an ambassador (if you don't want to piss the other country off).
It is, in fact, quite possible that the entire Lincoln and post-Lincoln administration is made up of retards and the denial of this is quite astonishing.
Important to note and specifically refute the lie that "Birthright citizenship" is guaranteed by the 14th amendment
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-14/
It is in fact possible for congresscritters in the 1860s to be incredibly short-sighted my dude.
So I guess what the judge was saying, as dumb as it sounds, is referring to how the 10th Amendment allows stipulations on other Amendments so the defense's argument of "but the 2nd Amendment lets us own guns" doesn't hold water since he failed the other half and failed to register his weapons since that's what the law is in New York.
This is New York City, gun licenses don't exist there. And if it isn't the state ensuring that, it's the city. You have to bribe one of two people at any given time (usually both) to get pistol permits or be the child of a police officer.
I am also looking for the transcript though, if you find it send it to me because I have a hard time seeing anyone actually saying that.
GrayJay, Louis Rossman's app is based af. Don't just be chained to youtube. https://grayjay.app/
It's already edited back in, seriously it's one dude.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rothschild_family&action=history and the talk page actively discusses that yes, keeping it is in fact good: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rothschild_family
In this case we can pretty clearly point to Boeing buying McDonald Douglas and not firing the management staff from McDonald Douglas, rookie mistake in acquisitions is to acquire someone and then not remove the people who actually caused the competing business to fail.
Because McDonald Douglas was run by bean counters, Boeing got fucked, fundamentally sad but expected.
Nah, the fundamentally issue is Boeing bought McDonald Douglas and then decided to keep McDonald Douglas's management thinking it would be a good idea instead of firing everyone above the level of junior/senior engineer.
Yhea, that's why conservatives blew up the shitstorm, but Harvard can weather some conservative dumbasses.
The president being a serial plagiarizer? That ruins the institutional credibility that is fundamentally the reason you put a school on your resume, because if you go to harvard it shows you're prestigious, ruin the credibility and you ruin job prospects and donors start to pull.
Tbf, it's more than that, Claudine Gay was a verified plagiarizer, and that's what really sunk her. To Harvard, having that as a scandal at all is a DEFCON 1 level shitstorm as it ruins the institutions credibility massively.
https://www.orwell.ru/library/articles/As_I_Please/english/efasc It was corrupted by commies on day 1.
and law of the state that the escaped slave currently resides in.
Barren v. Baltimore is patently up there as one of the singularly most retarded rulings the supreme court has ever made, next.
That isn't the justification of the Dredd Scott decision. The justification of the Dredd Scott decision was to resolve the arguments around the existence of slaver (each of which was a failure).
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/dred-scott-v-sandford
Now, as we have already said in an earlier part of this opinion, upon a different point, the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution. The right to traffic in it, like an ordinary article of merchandise and property. was guarantied to the citizens of the United States, in every State that might desire it, for twenty years. And the Government in express terms is pledged To protect it in all future time, if the slave escapes from his owner. This is done in plain words--too plain to be misunderstood. And no word can be found in the Constitution which gives Confess a greater power over slave property, or which entitles property of that kind to less protection than property of any other description. The only power conferred is the power coupled with the duty of guarding and protecting the owner in his rights.
Maybe stop being retarded against someone who actually reads supreme court rulings like an autistic magnet.
The United States is founded on Liberal Philosophy. The relevant point of which is that a man owns himself and endowed by God with inalienable rights. The very nature of a person being property of someone else is in contradiction to Liberalism. It does not fit even with public use, because a person is not public use. A person is not the private property of another, nor the public property of the state.
And the constitution is the document by which we are governed, which is not an idealistic item.
If we cared about Amendment 5, then the Fugitive Slave law would have to be revoked, since I don't see why a person's private property (food, shelter, or labor) can be deprived of him by deputized agents of the state, against his consent, and against the laws of the state he resides in. Again, patently unconstitutional.
Slaves were legally property and not citizens, are you unable to read or are you just the average mouthbreather?
Not to mention the Fugitive Slave Law and Dredd Scott decision were wholly unconstitutional and utterly invalidated States Rights & Sovereignty.
Neither of these are true fwiw. Fugitive slave act was justifiable under:
No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.
Art. 4 section 2. Fugitive slave act literally was upholding the constitution.
And as for dredd scott?
Amendment 5:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
That last line is its justification.
and me fielding 80,000 ton battleships with 16 16"/60 guns and radar.
Ah, a true Tillman connoisseur I see
Wait they're going to start airstriking CNN and AP reporters?
They already have.
To be fair though, in this case AP news directly invited hamas into the basement and Israel airstruck them because of it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug
Considering that major CPU errors make it to the end user as well, I don't doubt it.
Some errors are just subtle from these, and the ones I've seen could have easily made it past every check before someone finally realized something was wrong.
Compiler error?
You say that like they're rare. Many bugs can come out of compiler errors.
of course, I don't see it as likely but I've found quite a few when doing deep investigative dives on specific topics even when you're shilling out enterprise $$ on accuracy.
City Councillor
The NYC council has about 5 sane people on it, so not that unexpected.
A twitter random is not a source, do you have a link to where he's getting this data? I ain't making a twitter account for this.
This graph is great and all, but where the hell did you get it?
Thank you, but I've been here for quite some time, I just am more active now that I don't use reddit at all.
It's nice to get some news occasionally.
Because the people at the bottom are readily apparent at torpedoing people that go against them.
seealso: trump still likely winning the nomination.
Antonio, you should realize that the first words of someone's mouth when they go off script is usually the real thoughts.
The moment he said "That's not my concern" he should have been thrown out of the GOP because it shows his mentality.
It really isn't, I had huge issues with wifi drivers on a raspberry pi that were fixed by turning it off for 24 hours and coming back recently.