-2
You_Are_Based -2 points ago +4 / -6

You dont think your pride in our race has anything to do with the things that hold us back? How well do you love the average european descendant, knowing full well we havent and wont chimp out like you want?

Are YOU violent? Do you hate yourself for being peaceful? Does it make you a traitor? Does the difference between traitor and BASED come down to idle talk?

I think it is historically ignorant to suppose there is no other solution than for disorganized malcontents to commit random and belligerent violence. That is a symptom and a perpetuation of a cycle of societal disease, and not a solution. If violence worked, you would not need to tell me I should be violent right now; we have been violent, everyone has for thousands of years; and look at this shit. Do you see a SOLVED world?

-2
You_Are_Based -2 points ago +7 / -9

I challenge you to back up this vaguely threatening comment in a way that prevents you from sounding like you are the lovechild of Keir Starmer and Angela Merckle.

Idk if that's how you meant it, though. Maybe, rather, are saying think I'm a traitor for speaking against direct violence. In which case all I have to say is that you are awfully badass for making vague, unfulfillable personal threats on an internet forum. Big scary man!

1
You_Are_Based 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was a moment of autism. But the moment continues in little after-waves: I don't think Trump removed enough swamp to meaningfully justify the word "restocked", which is OP's word choice right after referencing a promise. It inherently implies the promise was fulfilled and then reneged on, which is NOT the case.

Replacing cabinet and key positions as quite literally every single President does and always has done... doesn't count as draining the swamp. Or even "removing stock and then afterward restocking". In the spirit of the base word "stock" I would say that "rotating stock" is the correct phrase.

The closest we got was idle "btfo the libs on twitter" talk about firing govt workers who were gone during the government "shutdown" budget snafu, since the govt was fulfilling nearly all its basic function without those workers. Never went anywhere.

2
You_Are_Based 2 points ago +2 / -0

I did notice that after my diatribe but I didnt correct myself because the second part of the title mechanically implies the swamp had been meaningfully un-stocked.

Please don't mind my autism too much. The fact that you read and understood what I had to say without being offended is all I could want from the post.

-1
You_Are_Based -1 points ago +7 / -8

This title is so fellatiatory. Where in the post does it say "Donald Trump drained the swamp"?Where is it even suggested, either in the post or in real life? One person? One person counted as draining the swamp? One swamp creature is the difference between swamp and drained-swamp? It's like you were searching for something to cover/excuse the fact that you are ultimately criticizing him for not having done his job. But why search at all? He didnt drain shit... if you wanna complain about that in the midst of the 2024 you are FULLY justified. Never be afraid you are not being fair or that people will dislike you. People dislike worms.

Never be afraid to walk into a pro kamala room and mention that she is lying about her race to pander to black people because she doesnt expect them to look things up.

Never be afraid to walk up to a jew and tell him blowing up pagers is terrorism and that israel is a terrorist state and that by contrast Hezbolla et al seem to have failed to terrify billions of electronic device consumers.

Never be afraid to go into a Trump forum and yell from the treetops that the fucker didn't drain the swamp, and then roped thousands of protesters into it and the threw them under the bus after the undrained swamp fiddled with the election.

26
You_Are_Based 26 points ago +29 / -3

One million "illiterates".... does Sweden not have a population of, like, less than six million total?

I checked, 10 million. Point stands. Its incredible the treason a politician can get away with in the western world without being corrected. It's important to remember, as a racist, that if our race were to be more violent and impulsive so as to resolve political treason the way some other races might, then everything we are now wouldnt exist, just as sure as if it had been removed from the Earth by our enemy. There is a solution within us that is different than the solutions of lesser people and we need to get to the point of doscovering so.

0
You_Are_Based 0 points ago +1 / -1

The man has stated in very direct terms that it is our duty to save israel, that isreal will be destroyed if we don't save it i.e. there is urgency, and that anti-semites should be censored and arrested.

his own terms

Have you heard him bragging lately about how he never started a war?

Has he said lately, "vote for me if ypu want to avoid war"/"my opponent will send us to war and a vote for me will prevent it"? He was yelling this from high heaven to all who could hear in 2015.

This year he opens up his rip-off twitter (which exclusively censors racism and anti-semitism) and sends all caps messages (prayers to jews and their disproportionate influence) about how doomed israel is if Kamala wins i.e. how UNLIKELY she is to enter a war for them. He thinks this is a talking point. He has taken the exact opposite stance he used to have on starting a new war.

"If you vote for me there will be no war" -2016

"If you vote for Kamala there will be no war for israel specifically ohnoo :( :( :(" -2024

What phrase has he uttered that suggests he is less likely to send us to war for israel than kamabamla is? What are his own terms that I should find reassuring? I want to read it. I want to see the quote where the man suggests he is the anti-war candidate for the 2024 election in the context of the current war being discussed.

4
You_Are_Based 4 points ago +6 / -2

I say this affectionately: if you step back and look at the last 20 years of internet you can actually see the development of weeb culture growing from "my uncle who works at nintendo" levels to "my Japanese wife who I live with here in Japan" levels.

2
You_Are_Based 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like any trust based system, if no one bothers to verify then hold those who do wrong accountable, the system eventually becomes corrupted.

1
You_Are_Based 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's my point, you koala people are all hypocrites.

:P

8
You_Are_Based 8 points ago +8 / -0

I hate how they throw the word girlfriend out there and then just cancel the word girlfriend in the same sentence. The word has a meaning, if you are using another word that means the literal opposite meaning RIGHT after it then maybe you chose the first word a little fucking poorly lol

1
You_Are_Based 1 point ago +1 / -0

If fame means living for free off of everyone's backs in return for nothing while loudly denouncing my rights and voting for the state to steal from me, then I love celebrities about as much as I love black people.

The fun part is that they get to choose what fame means, and this is what they choose. Maybe there's even a bit of meta-freudian begging-the-question going on for their part; "when will plebs rise up and murder me in accordance to my own beliefs?" (And the other side of the coin: "if dont, then they deserve to be slaves and therefore my lifestyle is justified").

I take issue to celebrity hatred being cast as left wing in this thread. Any right winger who slobs on the nob is a cuck in right wing terms. I don't even know the left wing term. Bootlicker, maybe? What terminology do you hear most often, when a person is being rebuked for loving a celebrity out loud? See cuck, retard, redditor i.e... as it happens, the insults directed at celebrity lovers are the same as the insults directed to leftists in any case.

3
You_Are_Based 3 points ago +3 / -0

That'd be quite ironic since the post was about someone who know's it's true mistreating and attempting to censor people who are willing to say out loud that it's true.

Funny how it comes to censoring and punishing the very question of censorship and punishment. There was a group in Russia who made that effect quite famous in the 20th century. Little men with no real power in the 21st century emulate them and engage in that behavior within whatever impotent little scope they can, to bask in the dream of the real thing (not unlike a man watching porn because he's alone, dreaming of having actual having sex as his sucessfully married grandparents would've been doing at his age).

8
You_Are_Based 8 points ago +8 / -0

Its funny how he claims to hate counter semites for our wild and wacky theories about jewish power while basically praying to "the jews" and israel every night on his twitter knock-off.

2% of the population, less than 25% of which is projected to vote for him... but see, he insists anti-semitism is a rising problem, and if even 5% of the country-at-large is counter semitic, then that is massively more votes than he could ever receive from jews.

So by begging "the jews" for support and stressing the vital importance of it, he reveals that he professionally agrees with anti-semites about disproportionate jewish power. Which means he disparages good people for saying something he personally knows to be true.

This, to me, is a million times worse than an actual jew supporting israel, scamming the goyim, and disparaging anti-semites for the sake of defending their own. Said jew is doing what is right or at least what is advantageous by his own people and family.

Trump, by contrast, threw in with them against his own and has carefully strung along racist whites as best as he can while genuinely hating them and throwing them under the bus. It goes as far as marrying his children off to jews, man turned the entire legacy of his life and body into a dowry for jews because he believes jews dispense power like an ATM, and he's right, and yet he will support legislation to ban you and 300 million other souls from even talking about it.

4
You_Are_Based 4 points ago +4 / -0

If I were a real high IQ fella I would reduce this truly excellent post into a sort of catchphrase that communicates what you've said in only a few words. But just saying "they lied, people died" doesnt seem to communicate it well enough. They deliberately lied for the intended purpose of causing terror and then the cover of terror was used to transfer unfathomable wealth away from the working class of the country and defraud US elections.

13
You_Are_Based 13 points ago +13 / -0

That sounds like something a fuckin anti-pandite koala might say.

18
You_Are_Based 18 points ago +18 / -0

I live in a socialist country that hates me for my gender, skin color and political views.

Sorry sir but you're going to have to be more specific

:P

6
You_Are_Based 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Our"

In 2020 she was wheeling out "Im black now not indian", which has always been a delicate thing due to her time as a prosecutor building an entire career off of arresting brown people almost exclusively for petty offensives.

But it worked great. Trump and diehards can hardly talk shit about it because in his dogma, it's based and redpilled when a zogbot prosecutes a lawbreaker.

The result is a vacuum where the people who WOULD and SHOULD be bitching about the hypocrisy of her past are quiet about it because they are (a) supposed to support the things she was doing despite being against her, or are (b) totally in the bag for her because Trump symbolizes the Great White Hope for them and they hate themselves/whites for existing more than they could ever hate a stronk powerful female racial minority for being a shapeshifting hu-demon.

5
You_Are_Based 5 points ago +6 / -1

The way she made every colored line a different color reminds me of MS Excel girls at the office, coloring individual boxes in big spreadsheets for pReSeNTaTiOn vAlUe, making as much money as I did actually working each hour to increase revenues and decrease losses while subject to actual performance tracking.

9
You_Are_Based 9 points ago +10 / -1

made me smile in the middle of my doomscroll

2
You_Are_Based 2 points ago +2 / -0

I realize this implication is baked in, but it stands to reason that appealing to jews is not about good honest competition, since jews account for about 2% of the American population and well fewer than 25% of them voted for Trump in either 2016 or 2020, which is about 1.75m votes. If even 1% of the general population is anti-semitic that is approximately 3.5m votes (but it could be 35m+ votes at 10%+ and such).

2
You_Are_Based 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well I hope that canadians don't get trojan horsed over one good foreign policy stance lol. To that end I hope that the opposing candidates lack "lets go to war for israel" stances.

Every time Trump says "if I'm not elected israel will be destroyed! Kamala is not up to the task of protecting israel"(sic) I experience a little moment of internal panic. Like, bro, you are in a good position... maybe discuss ANYTHING ELSE for like 60 days. 60 days of radio silence would be better than that. Every time Trump opens his mouth to blow some more israeli cock, every American's likelihood of future prosperity dips.

Whatever it is in the collective left wing mind that wants amerisraeli dollars diverted away from bombing browns, it has been a thorn in my side forever. I can't help but feel if leftists supported genocide the republicans would be rabidly anti-genocidal maniacs, jealously guarding their ownership of the anti-genocide position by doing things like, oh, not feeding bombs directly into the "let's destroy an entire people" pipeline, and I would have 90% of all my desired economic and social stances covered by 1 party.

I know in reality these stances are not owned, that doing what's right in the middle east is not inherently right wing or left wing, and I am just frustrated by my fellows for occasionally being so weak minded, slow, and ignorant; all the traits of a non-jewish supporter of israel.

1
You_Are_Based 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Time to go jog, for my health, to a mcdonalds, to ROB IT"

Roller coaster sentence

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›