I challenge you to back up this vaguely threatening comment in a way that prevents you from sounding like you are the lovechild of Keir Starmer and Angela Merckle.
Idk if that's how you meant it, though. Maybe, rather, are saying think I'm a traitor for speaking against direct violence. In which case all I have to say is that you are awfully badass for making vague, unfulfillable personal threats on an internet forum. Big scary man!
You dont think your pride in our race has anything to do with the things that hold us back? How well do you love the average european descendant, knowing full well we havent and wont chimp out like you want?
Are YOU violent? Do you hate yourself for being peaceful? Does it make you a traitor? Does the difference between traitor and BASED come down to idle talk?
I think it is historically ignorant to suppose there is no other solution than for disorganized malcontents to commit random and belligerent violence. That is a symptom and a perpetuation of a cycle of societal disease, and not a solution. If violence worked, you would not need to tell me I should be violent right now; we have been violent, everyone has for thousands of years; and look at this shit. Do you see a SOLVED world?
Our ancestors were mostly peaceful and hardworking people who lived below layers of institution which commanded the vast majority of violence in an ordered fashion both within small communities and between warring principalities.
I am not well read or concise enough- or even free enough this afternoon- to follow through with a burden of proof on this claim. If you are interested in reading I can offer some antique fiction which touches on how peasants of some era/location handled threats, for what little that is worth, but I cant casually bust out a page number from an encyclopedia or whatever it is which might satisfy someone who vehemently disagrees.
If you've decided our ancestors were stupid, unmeek barbarians who jumped at the opportunity to answer a problem by personally murdering others, I am powerless to stop you. Just remember that is how a jew would describe us.
Glowies abound, both here and elsewhere. Only a prize moron would advocate violence in a public forum and then go on to make specific plans.
Perhaps your operational security is so catastrophicly poor as to make.you worse than useless to any movement or operation that you join. Perhaps.you are a troll, pretending to be something that you are not to encourage people to get into trouble. Perhaps you are a glowie.
In any case, anyone who actually listens to you are even more stupid than you appear to be.
Only a glowie would advocate against violence. After all, everyone knows that is the status quo is maintained you fuckers win, and whites cease existing.
I challenge you to back up this vaguely threatening comment in a way that prevents you from sounding like you are the lovechild of Keir Starmer and Angela Merckle.
Idk if that's how you meant it, though. Maybe, rather, are saying think I'm a traitor for speaking against direct violence. In which case all I have to say is that you are awfully badass for making vague, unfulfillable personal threats on an internet forum. Big scary man!
You are a coward for saying anything else.
You dont think your pride in our race has anything to do with the things that hold us back? How well do you love the average european descendant, knowing full well we havent and wont chimp out like you want?
Are YOU violent? Do you hate yourself for being peaceful? Does it make you a traitor? Does the difference between traitor and BASED come down to idle talk?
I think it is historically ignorant to suppose there is no other solution than for disorganized malcontents to commit random and belligerent violence. That is a symptom and a perpetuation of a cycle of societal disease, and not a solution. If violence worked, you would not need to tell me I should be violent right now; we have been violent, everyone has for thousands of years; and look at this shit. Do you see a SOLVED world?
For thousands of years violence worked. Then we stopped being violent, and now in less than two generations there will be no more whites.
Our ancestors were mostly peaceful and hardworking people who lived below layers of institution which commanded the vast majority of violence in an ordered fashion both within small communities and between warring principalities.
I am not well read or concise enough- or even free enough this afternoon- to follow through with a burden of proof on this claim. If you are interested in reading I can offer some antique fiction which touches on how peasants of some era/location handled threats, for what little that is worth, but I cant casually bust out a page number from an encyclopedia or whatever it is which might satisfy someone who vehemently disagrees.
If you've decided our ancestors were stupid, unmeek barbarians who jumped at the opportunity to answer a problem by personally murdering others, I am powerless to stop you. Just remember that is how a jew would describe us.
You may well be correct.
Glowies abound, both here and elsewhere. Only a prize moron would advocate violence in a public forum and then go on to make specific plans.
Perhaps your operational security is so catastrophicly poor as to make.you worse than useless to any movement or operation that you join. Perhaps.you are a troll, pretending to be something that you are not to encourage people to get into trouble. Perhaps you are a glowie.
In any case, anyone who actually listens to you are even more stupid than you appear to be.
Thanks for coming. See yourself out.
Only a glowie would advocate against violence. After all, everyone knows that is the status quo is maintained you fuckers win, and whites cease existing.