This title is so fellatiatory. Where in the post does it say "Donald Trump drained the swamp"?Where is it even suggested, either in the post or in real life? One person? One person counted as draining the swamp? One swamp creature is the difference between swamp and drained-swamp? It's like you were searching for something to cover/excuse the fact that you are ultimately criticizing him for not having done his job. But why search at all? He didnt drain shit... if you wanna complain about that in the midst of the 2024 you are FULLY justified. Never be afraid you are not being fair or that people will dislike you. People dislike worms.
Never be afraid to walk into a pro kamala room and mention that she is lying about her race to pander to black people because she doesnt expect them to look things up.
Never be afraid to walk up to a jew and tell him blowing up pagers is terrorism and that israel is a terrorist state and that by contrast Hezbolla et al seem to have failed to terrify billions of electronic device consumers.
Never be afraid to go into a Trump forum and yell from the treetops that the fucker didn't drain the swamp, and then roped thousands of protesters into it and the threw them under the bus after the undrained swamp fiddled with the election.
I was a moment of autism. But the moment continues in little after-waves: I don't think Trump removed enough swamp to meaningfully justify the word "restocked", which is OP's word choice right after referencing a promise. It inherently implies the promise was fulfilled and then reneged on, which is NOT the case.
Replacing cabinet and key positions as quite literally every single President does and always has done... doesn't count as draining the swamp. Or even "removing stock and then afterward restocking". In the spirit of the base word "stock" I would say that "rotating stock" is the correct phrase.
The closest we got was idle "btfo the libs on twitter" talk about firing govt workers who were gone during the government "shutdown" budget snafu, since the govt was fulfilling nearly all its basic function without those workers. Never went anywhere.
You might want to go back and reread that title. Which clearly says he promised to drain the swamp, not that he did. Rather, it strongly implies he made it worse with his appointments.
I did notice that after my diatribe but I didnt correct myself because the second part of the title mechanically implies the swamp had been meaningfully un-stocked.
Please don't mind my autism too much. The fact that you read and understood what I had to say without being offended is all I could want from the post.
This title is so fellatiatory. Where in the post does it say "Donald Trump drained the swamp"?Where is it even suggested, either in the post or in real life? One person? One person counted as draining the swamp? One swamp creature is the difference between swamp and drained-swamp? It's like you were searching for something to cover/excuse the fact that you are ultimately criticizing him for not having done his job. But why search at all? He didnt drain shit... if you wanna complain about that in the midst of the 2024 you are FULLY justified. Never be afraid you are not being fair or that people will dislike you. People dislike worms.
Never be afraid to walk into a pro kamala room and mention that she is lying about her race to pander to black people because she doesnt expect them to look things up.
Never be afraid to walk up to a jew and tell him blowing up pagers is terrorism and that israel is a terrorist state and that by contrast Hezbolla et al seem to have failed to terrify billions of electronic device consumers.
Never be afraid to go into a Trump forum and yell from the treetops that the fucker didn't drain the swamp, and then roped thousands of protesters into it and the threw them under the bus after the undrained swamp fiddled with the election.
I’m not sure we’re reading the same title. It says that he promised he would, and didn’t.
I was a moment of autism. But the moment continues in little after-waves: I don't think Trump removed enough swamp to meaningfully justify the word "restocked", which is OP's word choice right after referencing a promise. It inherently implies the promise was fulfilled and then reneged on, which is NOT the case.
Replacing cabinet and key positions as quite literally every single President does and always has done... doesn't count as draining the swamp. Or even "removing stock and then afterward restocking". In the spirit of the base word "stock" I would say that "rotating stock" is the correct phrase.
The closest we got was idle "btfo the libs on twitter" talk about firing govt workers who were gone during the government "shutdown" budget snafu, since the govt was fulfilling nearly all its basic function without those workers. Never went anywhere.
You might want to go back and reread that title. Which clearly says he promised to drain the swamp, not that he did. Rather, it strongly implies he made it worse with his appointments.
I did notice that after my diatribe but I didnt correct myself because the second part of the title mechanically implies the swamp had been meaningfully un-stocked.
Please don't mind my autism too much. The fact that you read and understood what I had to say without being offended is all I could want from the post.