Ｔ Ｗ Ｏ
Ｗ Ｅ Ｅ Ｋ Ｓ
Yeah, using Brave. I don't care enough to test specifically what it is, but I'm guessing it's uBlock Origin. It works in a private window.
Not sounding the alarm was a calculated choice. This isn't like the carpet catching fire in a brick apartment, where everyone outside can stand around and watch. You do not want people going in the wrong direction in a wildifre. It can sit and smolder for hours, then one gust of wind and half a mile is burned out in a couple minutes. You wouldn't have a chance to run at that point. That's why most wildfire warnings have you prepped to evacuate on a known route long before you can even see the fire.
That's what the mute function does. It's already a feature. It has been for god knows how long.
It's old fashion sense. When you're trying to be more traditional, the men usually wear darker colors - notice that they're all wearing dark green. Somehow it highlights their masculinity. Most of the women are wearing bright red, to try to look more youthful. Darker colors on women either make them more sensual, or more maternal, and that uncertainty is why women were traditionally more careful with them.
I don't know why any of it works that way, but it does. The women who self-insert into these movies probably play at heterodoxy, but when it comes right down to it, it works on them. To quote RLM, "You may not have noticed, but your brain did." I'm certain whoever did the advertising was well aware of that.
It's just denial. Secular Christmas is obviously real or he wouldn't have a clue what you're talking about. Western Christians haven't figured out how to live on the cultural fringes yet, and obstinate pedantry is just a poor way of coping with it.
That's a given. The funny thing about the word "modder" is that it barely has anything to do with the word "moderator," yet the worst modders have the exact same disposition. The owner of Nexus himself isn't a modder, but he runs his site like a personal fiefdom, and is too much of a chickenshit to plainly lay out his rules, because if he did, he'd only be advertising just how much of a diva he is.
If nothing else it'll be a good test of ModDB. No doubt there'll be shrieking now that it's in a more publicly visible location.
I've heard this a lot but I really don't think it's true. It certainly doesn't explain the numbers. Even gen Xers weren't being dragged to church by their parents at anywhere near the rates the boomers were. As a millenial, growing up, I intellectually knew some families went to church, but I only met a handful of kids for whom that was a reality. None of those kids grew up to be anti-theists.
The fall of Christianity and the generation it was most noticable in are conflated, but you have to look a few generations back to find the actual beginning. Millenial anti-theism has its own mythology about the evils of Christianity, but none of them ever actually went to church to begin with, let alone experienced any kind of Christian "oppression" like they claimed to feel.
If you get your ass beat defending Lowes and their first response is to fire you for it, it wasn't a decent place to begin with. Especially since the ones who fired you don't suffer any consequences for it, and the ones who attacked you are gonna get a slap on the wrist. All you're left with in the end is a beating.
So, it should be obvious to anyone with a brain that they are deliberately overcharging and over sentencing the January 6th people to send a message that if you mess with the government like that they will destroy you.
They admitted that when they sentenced the shaman. "It's not about what you did, it's about what you represent" I think was the judge's quote.
Glad to see my old elementary school teachers have hobbies in their retirement, even if it's apparently writing slogans for feds.
Titles and special military privileges. It's a good thing they're useless cosmopolitans, otherwise Gates could dole out some land and round off this new generation of petty nobility.
If that were all it was, lefties wouldn't have cracked down as hard and as quickly as they did.
Superstraight revealed that trannies have a difficult relationship with consent. In the current culture, supposedly, anyone has any right to deny or revoke consent, for any reason, at any time. "Any reason" includes biological sex. That means there's at least one reasonable and completely unassailable context in which trannies could not punish you for denying them.
It forced them into a position where you can either side with trannies, or respect consent, but not both. And of course, every single non-leftist person, even the normies, are going to respect consent. The trannies threw fits, because they are entitled little predators, and for just a moment, that truth was undeniable. All leftists could do is shut it down as hard and as fast as possible.
At this point, the FBI should change their slogan to "We live to fish."
One is a suggestion, a line of inquiry. The other is a definitive statement. The headline does the latter, but the body repeatedly does the former twice right in the opening:
claiming the bug was a genetically engineered bioweapon that may have been “ethnically targeted” to spare Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people.
Kennedy floated the idea
The thing about "antisemitism" is that its loudest opponents are always the most deliberate liars. They have to be, because their schtick requires that any opposition to any bad behavior by any Jew, or to any special treatment of any Jew, is to be treated like genocide.
The key word here is "deliberate." In any other hit piece, the writer might just be a retard. But when it comes to antisemitism, that need to exaggerate harm to comical levels means that there's no room for the benefit of the doubt. The whole thing is already an act, so you can't treat any part of the smear as incidental.
Right, even if you consider the animal fuckers, I can't imagine there's a particularly high number of bear fuckers out there. They're just not popular animals in general. Furries seem to gravitate towards either what's culturally popular (so, wolves), or whatever animal is featured in their favored autistic obsession. There's a reason you never hear of duck furries. Unless I gravely misunderstood what a "gay bear" was, there's just no way it's fueled by an actual sexual interest.
It might be in 10 years because of this, but not right now, at least.
I get why people were concerned about it, but honestly, it's not a bad idea for a normie browser. Extensions have always been a malware minefield. Most browsers will already get in your way if you try to load a really sketchy page. This is just an extra layer of security.
I don't actually see them using this as trying to slip in browser-level censorship of wrongthink. It's too roundabout a way to do it, with too many ways it would fail, and not worth it for a browser as small as Firefox. Browser-level censorship would have to be a concerted effort from all the major browsers, and even then, it would still be the least likely way to do it. They've already successfully censored sites that ran counter to the mainstream, and they certainly didn't need to be this obtuse about it to accomplish it.
The browser having more control than the user is par for the course for a normie browser. It's necessary, really. We haven't come that far from the days of adware toolbars. If you want more control, or are a political dissident, you shouldn't be using Firefox to begin with.
Some days it sure feels like I do.
Modern tanks are close enough in battlefield performance that it's their use, not their individual strengths, that determine the outcome of the battle.
I remember in the first few months of the war seeing a video in which a bunch of infantry got blasted at point blank range by a tank. As in, literally standing next to the barrel, dead to muzzle blast range.
I wouldn't use this war as a metric for judging equipment. It all might as well multi-million dollar sharpened sticks for how it's used.
I'm relieved the strategy they employed with this didn't become too commonplace. This one they ran without any proof (the crime itself hadn't even been reported), waited a while for it to be called a hoax, and then decided to actually provide evidence. That all this happened while they knew the rapist was walking free is probably the only reason we haven't really seen it since. The media and the doctor were practically accessories to the rape. Turns out it's pretty difficult to have enough evidence of a crime to use it as a political cudgel while not implicating yourself.
When confronted, leftists often try to defend themselves by concealment. Usually it's done by rejecting a specific label ("wokeness doesn't exist", "Marxism can't be postmodern", etc), or that leftism exists at all, but there's really nothing stopping them from pretending the argument itself doesn't exist. Sure, it requires lying even harder, but for leftists, that's a benefit. The more unbelievable the lie they can get away with, the happier it makes them.
Useful and likeable can be very different things. Vengeful autists don't make good neighbors, and normies don't make good allies.
The hippo demon in the photo.
Maybe if we could convince self-hating whites that they aren't the "good ones," they'll finally rope themselves en masse and we'll be spared their endless faggotry.