They'll easily shoehorn this back into a way that supports Leftist narratives as they do with practically everything else.
Men are also harmed by gender roles, not just women, and therefore men should also be feminists and work towards destroying the 'patriarchy'. There. Something that should, to any independent thinker, clearly work against these Redditard morons now just as clearly works in their favour.
I noticed the same thing recently with academic takes on low birth rates in countries like Japan and South Korea. Instead of simply admitting that it's the fault of Leftism/liberalism, they simply reinterpret it as consequent of the persistence of a supposed 'gender pay gap', traditional views and on a few other things that I can't remember and which aren't really worth entertaining.
Anyone possessing of reasonable intelligence must see this as transparently false. For if the Left-wing narrative on low birth rates were correct, surely the birth rate should have much lower in the past (due to these factors supposedly reducing fertility being much more pronounced back then) rather than much higher, as they actually were. If 'traditional views' were responsible for low fertility, humans would indubitably have been extinct long ago. Ergo, Leftists are as full of kak there as anywhere else, and have nothing to offer as a 'solution' but more of the problem.
The moral of the Reddit thread is abundantly clear: it doesn't matter how much of an indictment of late-modern Left-liberal 'progressivism' a problem is, they'll find a way to twist it in their favour, leading to nothing more than a worsening of said problem.
So Musk replies to a comment in which the word '88 million' is used... and somehow, by simply repeating what the original said, he's a neon-Nahrtzee?
Let's face it, it's extremely unlikely that Musk has any idea that 88 is used by neon-Nahrtzees as shorthand for 'Heil Hitler': notice that the vast majority of people, including some of the commenters of this thread, have no idea about it.
Being a 'brave' 'anti-fascist' would make little sense if not for the existence of fascists. However, given the extreme lack of actual fascists in the current year, their 'solution' is to simply shoehorn all sorts of other people ('TERFs', 'tankies', libertarians, &c.) into that role. These people are obsessed with finding Nahrtzees for that reason at the very least.
Only the small number of neon-Nahrtzees and the much larger number of extreme Left-liberal 'anti-fascists' (usually adherents of anarcho-communism and other crazy ideologies) have any idea of it. The latter live in existential fear of something largely non-existent.
One of Tesla's new vehicles will be called the 'Model H'. Wait! H must be for 'Heil' or 'Hitler', so therefore I have uncovered another new proof of Elon Musk being a neon-Nahrtzee! He could have chosen any letter of the alphabet... but he chose H. This is intentional signalling to neon-Nahrtzees!!!
(Model H, i.e. Model Hydrogen).
Also, 'Elon Musk' consists of eight letters. You can't write '88' or 'eighty-eight' without '8' or 'eight'... therefore his name is a neon-Nahrtzee dogwhistle!
I can't believe it! Musk is Hitler incarnate!
Funny how you seem to have it ass-backwards.
Firstly, look at the polls for the Republican Primaries. Trump is by far outpolling DeSantis, and usually outpolls all other candidates combined (i.e. over 50%). If Trump doesn't get the nomination, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if millions of Republicans did not vote simply because the 'deep state' cheated Trump out of a win. Furthermore, Trump can just, as he has in the past, spitefully threaten to run third-party, easily preventing any Republican win.
Secondly, Biden is now polling lower than Trump has been at this stage in his Presidency, despite the mass media endlessly shielding Biden in the same way that they launched a 24/7 barrage against Trump. The idea that Biden would win an election against Trump seems totally baseless. If anything, the Democrats have got to remove Biden to clearly win in 2024. I could only picture Trump losing against someone other than Biden.
Now, I don't picture the Republicans winning in 2024 no matter what happens, and I believe that the mid-terms will be far less decisive than this 'red wave' nonsense I keep hearing about. But so long as the Democrats don't stand Biden, they'll be fine; furthermore, I don't think it is implausible that they will firmly win every Federal election from here. For example, the Republicans haven't won the popular vote since 1988. Without the Electoral College, the Democrats possibly would have won every election since 1992 (i.e. if the popular vote determined the election outcome in every election, and they received it in all of them). Republicans have no idea how unpopular they actually are.
Thirdly, DeSantis is no better than Youngkin or any of these other characters that have popped up in recent times. They played up to Trump when it suited them and distanced themselves from him when it did not. Just like that Mehmet Oz character in recent weeks. They care about CRT because it's a pet issue of America's pseudo-Right; they couldn't care less about it if it wasn't. I don't see how Trump is worse than them.
I have no idea how anyone could be thick enough to think that this will only go up to a point after which it cannot go further. Social decline simply doesn't work that way.
Just yesterday I commented that it seemed suspicious that this shooting clearly attracted less attention compared to the Gendron and Ramos ones. And that the media tries to reframe every shooter as White—if not White ethnonationalists—or at least White-passing mixed where possible.
I suspected that Sapirman was being downplayed simply because of the risk that trying to reframe him as White would be very difficult to do without also potentially arousing 'anti-Semitism'. After all, his Jewishness can't really be hidden once everyone knows the name 'Sapirman', and most of these outlets like the NYTimes are riddled with Jews from top to bottom who surely know it.
But now it suddenly looks as though they're going for this narrative anyway, based on some 4chan posts? So they're aiming for what looks like an incredulous Jewish neo-Nazi narrative?
He's been doing a whole lot of manhole drilling then. Enough to infect most of the 16,216 officially confirmed cases.
On a serious note, if he didn't use that stupid Leftist terminology, he would have been fine... go woke, become a literal joke.
In response to:
Huh? How does “rest” “room” create problems. Stop overthinking crap!
Is this comment:
What about people with ADHD or a methamphetamine addiction that literally cannot rest? How do you think that ableist term makes them feel you fucking bigot?!
Lmao.
I've never played any of the games in that series before. I think I've seen a few screenshots here and there, that's all.
I'm just going to imagine what the average game of 'The Sims 4' will be like.
Player begins in xir... house? Immediately across the road, an M2F tranny character has spawned. It is the only NPC, and a notification immediately warns that if you ignore the plight of the tranny for too long, you will get 'Game Over' for committing an act of transphobia. You take your player character and go to the spawned character to engage in dialogue. The player is then asked whether xe is open to dating the M2F tranny. The only options available are 'I don't know' and 'Yes'. But 'Yes' is locked behind a DLC. That forces the average player to choose 'I don't know'. The tranny then accuses you of transphobia because you have not answered 'Yes'. You then receive the 'Game Over' screen.
Suddenly, you're brought back into reality as you receive a notification on your 'smart' phone and find that you've lost 50% of all of your Social Credit score for committing a transphobic act in the game. Your profile has now been demoted to the status of 'Transphobic Bigot'. You realize that means that you're now unemployable. Next, you find that your Origin account has been banned and that EA has also taken a large sum of money from your bank account, with the intent of donating your money to a nearby trans association to 'own the transphobe'. And, finally, you hear the sirens in the distance... as your phone begins to play, quite mysteriously, the song 'They're Coming to Take me Away' by Napoleon XIV. You've never heard it before, and you know they're just rubbing salt into the wound. You know you've screwed up, real bad. The Transtifa are coming for you. You power off the computer... and patiently wait to be taken to the reeducation camp.
He's still right up at the very top in the humanities and social sciences. I suppose that he was in the right place at the right time, intellectualizing things that the academe wanted to hear. I do not see his 'contributions' as being of value.
Everyone knows that he was a homosexual. Hence him contracting AIDS in San Francisco, from which he died.
He was certainly a drug user. There is a story about how he first tried LSD in Arizona and claimed that it was as though he was born again.
He also advocated for pedophilia.
But I've never heard of anyone claiming that he was personally engaged in it: that's a first for me.
This is a great example of how some of those most het up about abortion 'rights' are among those least likely to have them. Fat, ugly landwhales who only a blind or retarded man might impregnate; people in deep blue states; old women; literal men... and now literal faggots.
'I love gay porn'
'I love penis'
'The gayest ride in town'
'Driver is gay'
So, not only is 'Ramsey' a classic inhabitant of Clown World; he obviously isn't going to be impregnating anyone.
You just know that everything is flat-out bonkers when people have a bigger problem with the language that someone uses within a video game than the very violent content of said game itself.
I don't even know what is even remotely 'racist' about most of that video: does the person who says 'what the fuck' or 'your mother doesn't love you' know that you're 'melanated' when he said that? I doubt it, in which case he could have said it to a person of any race. Nor do I think that there is anything intrinsically 'racist' about those words. So that just leaves 'nigger' in the last part. So what?
Shoot multiple people to death in exceedingly convincing and realistic ways = 100% okay.
But someone says 'nigger' in that game = 0% okay?
Even more farcical is when people complain about 'racism' on gore websites:
A real person gets decapitated on camera = 100% okay.
But someone comments 'nigger' on that very same video = 0% okay?
How does that even make the remotest sense?
Seems to me like a bunch of 'melanated' attention-seeking losers making mountains out of molehills just to have their very lame fifteen minutes of fame or whatever. Yep, being the self-appointed 'Hope Not Hate', ADL or SPLC of video games is plain and simply lame.
Now, you literally call yourself 'MelaninGamers'. Which, in addition to being one of the most idiotic clan names I've ever heard, sounds pretty black supremacist to me.
Prof. Ladwa isn't referring to a win for the Tories nor for the British government, people or nation, but simply referring to The Great Replacement and 'minorities'. He's gleefully rubbing salt into the wounds of the 'nationalists', 'racists' and 'xenophobes'. See, look at the 'changing face' of your country! We 'minorities' are displacing you and there's nothing you can do about it, we're so happy that it will soon all be ours! We will capture a land, one that we could not ourselves build and thus must take from others, all without firing a shot!
'We've already won!'. We ('ethnic minorities' in his own words) have got the top spot in your (once ethnic British) party no matter what. First, your political parties; next, your government and then your country!
When one considers the factors that actually get people out into the streets like in Sri Lanka, they're essentially only economic. People have a comparatively much higher tolerance threshold for sociocultural rot; but if they're economically suffering, their tolerance quickly wears thin, a la the Weimar.
Now, who is least likely to be economically suffering of the mentioned groups? I'd wager that 'Graduate Degree' greatest correlates with higher living standards. These are the people whose earnings are high enough that they can afford to take a hit, and thus can afford to preserve their Left or Far-Left beliefs in the unfortunately common event that they harbour them. But the '19-29' and 'No College' groups are, conversely, on the frontlines of the economic troubles.
I think the persisting black support is the one that raises questions, because that clearly doesn't correlate with higher living standards. In their case, however, I'd wager that it is because they are far greater beneficiaries of the current order of things compared to the other groups. The system is geared towards them—especially its deep opposition to the various structural, institutional -isms and -phobias of which they believe themselves to be victims—in a way that it simply isn't for the other groups. Notice that ageism (a term many probably haven't even heard of, much unlike 'racism') and discrimination against the less educated aren't considered anywhere near the issue that 'racism' is.
Yes, they feel enslaved by reality and/or nature and see it as something to be liberated from.
It started when they rebelled against the idea of a Creator God or Gods as a sort of authoritarian dictator(s) who did not create the cosmos in any democratic way—not consulting any of His creations as to what they wanted—and then it snowballed over the centuries into rebelling against biological distinctions and their own human limitations. They think, for example, that because real-life doesn't have a Character Creation screen like Fallout or Mass Effect, and that your real-life player character is essentially predetermined; well, even that is essentially authoritarianism.
You notice that both transsexualism and transhumanism are part of Man's attempt to edit his own self, exactly like player characters can after reaching certain points in games like Fallout: New Vegas. Same thing with the growing transracial and transspecies trends.
See, for example, this 'trans-Korean' Brit named 'Oli London': https://nypost.com/2021/06/28/oli-london-identifies-as-korean-after-surgeries-to-look-like-bts-jimin/
Also see this 'trans-Filipino' White male who now calls himself 'Ja Du' (I'm sure that no Filipino person even has a name like that, which makes his choice of name even stranger): https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/11/13/transracial-man-born-white-says-he-feels-filipino/858043001/
The Metaverse also relates to this. People want to withdraw ever-further into the extreme freedom offered by fantasy, virtual worlds because they feel enslaved by their essentially ascribed, immutable characteristics.
Persons bereft of personal qualities can roleplay as someone who has said qualities in abundance in virtual reality: where you can make an avatar that you find very handsome or strong or whatever you desire that a Creator God would have made you if He didn't make the 'mistakes' that late modern people think they are rectifying.
Indeed, that has practically become the purpose of late modern life: to 'find' or 'reveal' the 'real' self, a DIY project of perfecting the imperfect 'work in progress' that one begins life as.
This video is just a microcosm of East v. West, of collectivism/communitarianism v. individualism/liberalism. The conflict between the two ways of life when they collide.
The empowered, emancipated, enlightened liberal woman expects to be included, only to be excluded by those kids who are preserving a clear friend-enemy distinction and asabiyyah (group solidarity) against the obvious ideological enemy and out-group member. I've never seen kids more based than these.
The average kid of that age where I am is just some disobedient, undisciplined, pampered little turd, who in a few years will be even worse than many of the current set of late modern scum. The kids in this video will beat those kids in any fair fight. They are simply smarter and stronger. They are about we and not I.
Now, the soy Twitter comments are hilarious. 'Me so smart, religion of peace is not really religion of peace!' level of discourse. Of course, the general Twittard is somebody radically Western to the point of often hating the West for not going far enough: extreme hyper-individualists wish to rid of the world of a large number of immutable things including entire emotions such as fear (muh phobias), hate (muh hate speech, hate group, etc.) and shame. They are simply at war with that which is innate, with nature. The same mindset leads them to attack race, anthropocentrism and, more recently, even the male-female distinction.
I have no sympathies with any of these people. They supported everything Left-liberalism did right up until the time that Left-liberals turned against them by associating being a normal 'cis woman' uncomfortable with men roleplaying as women, with being Right-wing. They supported, and largely still support, the wider Left harming the various people they view as privileged, concerned only with how Left-liberals hurt them.
Then, all of a sudden, these TERFs go around yapping: 'We didn't leave the Left, the Left left us'. That they've been othered by their former 'allies': you're not trans, won't date trans, won't accept trans as real women; well, you're a transphobe and aren't truly Left-wing.
Some even went as far as to support people like Maxime Bernier and Donald Trump in the hope that they could put the cat back in the bag. The truth of the matter is that feminism was only ever a transitional phase, a means, to transsexualism. It was never the 'end' like TERFs thought it was. There will be no equalization of the 'gender binary'; there will be abolition.
Now the TERFs are slowly realizing that women are being pummeled by male roleplayers in women's sports, and that their daughters are roleplaying as the men they hate instead of growing up to be the 'emancipated', 'empowered' women they were 'supposed' to be. That their sons, instead of being mired in self-hate as their mothers would have them, have chosen to embrace 'becoming' women because it is a path to redemption, through renouncing 'privilege' and joining the ranks of the 'oppressed'. Whilst many TERFs remain facing the 'patriarchy' and conservatism, their former allies on the Left have quietly drawn their blades and started stabbing the 'sisterhood' from behind.
Well, too bad, TERFs. You reap what you sow! Give up your stupid feminism and sincerely join the Right, or accept transsexualism and catch up with the Left. But there will be none of that 'have our cake and eat it too' nonsense, no 'Right-wing TERFism'. Fuck this stupid woman.
Bahaha... uproarious that the cartoon frog and cartoons of two people (the female of which originated in the Wojak meme?) are now on the same level as the swastika. I think they missed Kek, Happy Merchant, Grug, etc.
Yup. We need to get rid of these symbols because we want to outlaw a literal emotion!!!
Their own degenerate symbols need to be reappropriated for use as 'hate' symbols. Like this one made out of one version of the pride flag:
With enough creativity, they'll be forced to constantly change their symbols as each successive one gets tarnished by its association with 'hate' in some way.
Bolivia practically goes alongside your first three. Morales and Arce have created a Leftist dominant-party system similar to that in Venezuela.
Honduras also goes into your second group. The Honduran military were able to stave off these people for a while by forcibly ousting Zelaya. However, Zelaya's wife has since been elected President.
Brazil will also rejoin that group next election.
So you're correct in saying that the pink tide, despite seeing serious setbacks with the election of more conservative or at least classical liberal people, like Bolsonaro, Uruguay's Lacalle Pou and Ecuador's Lasso, is making serious gains.
Venezuela: The opposition under Juan Guaido are actually more Left/regressive than Maduro. They're only less Left-wing economically. There isn't really a 'Right' in Venezuela.
Mexico: AMLO/MORENA are actually regressives. Soft on crime and drugs, etc.
Brazil: There's a fast growing regressivism there. Lula will likely be reelected as Bolsonaro's successor.
Regressives have also seen victories in numerous elections. Chile's Boric, Colombia's Petro and Honduras' Castro all indicate a resurgent pink wave. Peru's Castillo is also somewhere between regressive and Bolivarian-Chavismo.
Taiwan: I'd characterize the ruling DPP as regressive, e.g. their legalization of same-sex marriage.
Japan: I suspect same-sex marriage will be legal there within the next five-ten years. The opposition DPJ is quite regressive despite being a big tent.
Malaysia: For now, regressivism is mostly only among ethnic minorities like younger Chinese-Malaysians.
I agree that regressivism hasn't made noticeable inroads into Indonesia or North Korea. It is, however, in the Philippines, albeit largely confined to smaller parties like Makabayan (explicitly regressive party) and Gabriela (explicitly feminist party).
Israel indeed has strong regressivism. You can see that there's a real tension between Likudniks (who are pretty regressive themselves) and Israel's own regressives (e.g. Labor and Meretz), who are seen as too chummy with the Arab parties by the former.
Aus/NZ still have collective, institutionalized guilt. It's just that the perpetual victims are the Aborigines and Maoris in those respective countries. It's probably worse than in Germany: Germans don't believe that they unjustly stole the land from some indigenous, native group; whereas there is a strong belief that the civilizations sitting on Aus/NZ are in some way 'illegitimate'. And that White people should just hand over everything to these small minorities and return to Europe.
Notice, strangely, that nobody objects to all the Chinese, Indians and others in those countries despite the fact that they are not indigenous either, and that it was the illegitimate settler states that let them in the first place. I'm not sure how an illegitimate state can confer legitimacy onto immigrants, given that all of its decisions should also be illegitimate, but all this eludes the Left-wing morons who on one hand talk about justice for the indigenous whilst simultaneously flooding indigenous land with millions of people, all without their consent.
White Leftists in those countries basically declared their own people illegitimate whilst declaring absolutely everyone else (whether indigenous or people fresh off the boat) legitimate. The relationship between the Left-wing political classes and the indigenous is totally bizarre. My feeling that is that they don't even care about the indigenous except as a sort of justification for their ethnomasochism. They'd totally throw them under the bus given the right circumstances, since they're completely insignificant as a voter bloc and only other White Leftists (whose numbers are shrinking as a proportion of the electorate) really sympathize with their supposed plight.
People from Asia or wherever only really bring this stuff up when they have an issue with White people, but they don't live and breathe this collective guilt. Their view, I think, can be summarized as: 'Not my ancestors, not my problem.'
NZ is probably the worse of the two. The largest city probably went 'majority-minority' since the last census, whereas to my knowledge no Australian city has yet become 'majority-minority'. Of course, America in that respect is far worse, since many cities, like SF and LA, have long been 'majority-minority'.
I'd say that the degenerative processes we're seeing unfold in Canada ahead of everywhere else.
I heard a few years ago that babies aren't even assigned male or female at birth anymore in Canada? If so, then they're clearly ahead of the curve on that issue.
I don't even think that putting all children on puberty blockers till a certain age isn't off the table for these people. They really will go to those lengths to erase the immutable characteristics that they've declared war on.
Subtitles in plenty of video games that aren't even localized, like Fallout 4, are also rubbish.
You don't need subtitles to even be translated to get a rubbish result, full of missing or incorrect words, these days.
It isn't even just God. It's the whole of morality. The whole of common sense. And most of whatever intelligence they had. Culture is also practically wiped out in urban centres.
You look at these people in YouTube comment sections and they're far less intelligent and literate than the standard commenter here. Political discourse is as simple as 'cope harder', 'ok boomer' and muh Far-Right Nahtzee fascism everywhere. They make the average person on this site look like a genius in comparison.
They frame the current lack of extreme social policies such as abortion on demand or certain restrictions on 'transitioning' (much of which will probably be realized under the soon-to-be government) as a 'social issue' or even a 'medical issue'. Huh? The real 'social issue' is that people want to have abortions and become 'trans' in the first place. They call everything 'Far-Right', unaware that they only see things this way because they're Far-Left. They cry out about 'Right-wing media bias' even though almost the entirety of the media is on their side, endlessly regurgitating their own stupid views.
Take everything correct, twist it completely around, and you have some idea of what most of them believe. Some of the older people see something wrong, but the young people are fully braindead and proud to be a bunch of ignorant, immoral cretins.
He's even worse than 'Sleepy Joe'. He's a bog-standard globalist 'progressive'; Bernie Sanders would probably be his closest analogue in American politics.
The current PM has also been a disaster, and has done nothing to conserve anything. Instead, there have been mere half-hearted attempts to defend 'free speech' on university campuses and other performative stuff that amounted to practically nothing. He's even worse than Trump. More comparable to Britain's David Cameron or Boris Johnson. On top of what you've listed, there is also his voting record at:
https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/grayndler/anthony_albanese
He has 'voted consistently for':
'Increasing availability of abortion drugs'
'Reproductive bodily autonomy'
'Same-sex marriage equality'
He has 'voted consistently against':
'Civil celebrants having the right to refuse to marry same-sex couples'
'Increasing eligibility requirements for Australian citizenship'
'Stopping people who arrive by boat from ever coming to Australia'
'Turning back asylum boats when possible'
Isn't another amnesty for illegals practically a power grab at this point? If several million illegals receive voting rights... wouldn't that simply entrench the long-awaited Democratic supermajority in every American Federal election at last?
Republican'ts are utter morons. It's like they're doing everything in their power to commit political suicide and bring about a dominant-party system governed by their ostensible opponents.
Why can't Republican'ts support, at the very least, any of the following:
Most importantly:
Instead, they just keep doing on nothing to prevent the emergence of a Democratic dominant-party system.