Why Islamic countries aren't susceptible to liberal BS
(twitter.com)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
While I don't like their religion or values, they are good at teaching their kids and gatekeeping their society. If the Western world had taken this same approach with Christianity, family values, or something as simple as just being a decent person we wouldn't be in this mess we are in now.
Yeah, but that's racist and anti-semitic.
Oh no! Anyways…
Or something as simple as sex/gender. "Women and men are different, you dolt" would have solved a shit ton of the problems we currently have. Not all, but a ton.
This video is just a microcosm of East v. West, of collectivism/communitarianism v. individualism/liberalism. The conflict between the two ways of life when they collide.
The empowered, emancipated, enlightened liberal woman expects to be included, only to be excluded by those kids who are preserving a clear friend-enemy distinction and asabiyyah (group solidarity) against the obvious ideological enemy and out-group member. I've never seen kids more based than these.
The average kid of that age where I am is just some disobedient, undisciplined, pampered little turd, who in a few years will be even worse than many of the current set of late modern scum. The kids in this video will beat those kids in any fair fight. They are simply smarter and stronger. They are about we and not I.
Now, the soy Twitter comments are hilarious. 'Me so smart, religion of peace is not really religion of peace!' level of discourse. Of course, the general Twittard is somebody radically Western to the point of often hating the West for not going far enough: extreme hyper-individualists wish to rid of the world of a large number of immutable things including entire emotions such as fear (muh phobias), hate (muh hate speech, hate group, etc.) and shame. They are simply at war with that which is innate, with nature. The same mindset leads them to attack race, anthropocentrism and, more recently, even the male-female distinction.
They really are at war with nature. It's especially obvious if you look at the links between trannsgenderism and transhumanism.
Yes, they feel enslaved by reality and/or nature and see it as something to be liberated from.
It started when they rebelled against the idea of a Creator God or Gods as a sort of authoritarian dictator(s) who did not create the cosmos in any democratic way—not consulting any of His creations as to what they wanted—and then it snowballed over the centuries into rebelling against biological distinctions and their own human limitations. They think, for example, that because real-life doesn't have a Character Creation screen like Fallout or Mass Effect, and that your real-life player character is essentially predetermined; well, even that is essentially authoritarianism.
You notice that both transsexualism and transhumanism are part of Man's attempt to edit his own self, exactly like player characters can after reaching certain points in games like Fallout: New Vegas. Same thing with the growing transracial and transspecies trends.
See, for example, this 'trans-Korean' Brit named 'Oli London': https://nypost.com/2021/06/28/oli-london-identifies-as-korean-after-surgeries-to-look-like-bts-jimin/
Also see this 'trans-Filipino' White male who now calls himself 'Ja Du' (I'm sure that no Filipino person even has a name like that, which makes his choice of name even stranger): https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/11/13/transracial-man-born-white-says-he-feels-filipino/858043001/
The Metaverse also relates to this. People want to withdraw ever-further into the extreme freedom offered by fantasy, virtual worlds because they feel enslaved by their essentially ascribed, immutable characteristics.
Persons bereft of personal qualities can roleplay as someone who has said qualities in abundance in virtual reality: where you can make an avatar that you find very handsome or strong or whatever you desire that a Creator God would have made you if He didn't make the 'mistakes' that late modern people think they are rectifying.
Indeed, that has practically become the purpose of late modern life: to 'find' or 'reveal' the 'real' self, a DIY project of perfecting the imperfect 'work in progress' that one begins life as.
And I know this isn't filmed in an islamic country, but it's a good case study on why muslim countries don't succumb to commie propaganda.
The Future of Sweden is looking up
It's because they aren't preoccupied with "liberating" the individual from the society he inhabits.
Its because the society they live in is a war torn shithole. Cant be an individual when every day is a fight for survival. This is not a society any sane person wants to emulate.
Western society once had strict gender roles, and strict dress codes were also more common. It seemed better in a lot of ways. No one played the knockout game at school. There weren't any pride parades, etc.
That's not true for countries like Tunisia, for example, or countries where Islamism is successfully suppressed.
Not that we should emulate them regardless. The Christian West of yesteryear was far better. Even take me back to the 90s, where life could still be enjoyed!
This is who our governments mass-import to replace us.
The left thinks Christians want to turn society into the handmaids tale while at the same time telling us how we should be tolerant of Islam. It’s mind boggling.
Should nuke mecca 100 times and laugh at the sand people.
because their countries have been ravaged to shit by the israel-run west, and thus the population doesnt have the prosperity to do anything other than fight and survive.
Go look up Arab countries before the west meddled with them. No hijabs in sight, and looking like they were well on their way to joining the west economically. The current form of extremist Islamism is a cia plot to keep them stunted and poor. You dopes are falling for it.
I don't know why you're being downvoted lul, you can literally Google pics of pre-islam Iran and it almost looks like a generic American state/country but with brown people instead of white
It's BS. First of all, "pre-Islam Iran" was 13 centuries ago, so you definitely don't have pictures of that. You mean "pre-Islamic Revolution Iran". And like most such pictures in Islamic countries, they're taken at universities in the wealthiest district of the wealthiest city, and then simply assume that this is applicable to the entire country.
There's certainly been a religious revival in Islam. But the causes and consequences are rather complicated, not "Israel bad" or whatever.
Just to be clear: all the Westerners who went to the Middle East to murder Christians and Yezidis who had been living there for millennia, were doing that because "the Israel-run West" destroyed Belgium, Germany and England?
For that matter, if it is the supposed destruction of those countries that causes this, why are the native Christians not committing terrorist acts? Why are they not beheading their neighbors?
You know why.
The arrogance of ignorance. Someone sees a picture of a university campus in the richest district of the richest city, in a country that is 20% urbanized, and concludes that there were "no hijabs in sight" in the entire Arab world.
Truth is, the Arab world has always been very religious. Even when headscarves were less in vogue. And that's got nothing to do with your Jewish boogeyman.
Certainly Arab countries have always been religious. I never said otherwise. The current form of extremist Islam that is ruining these countries is a CIA fed subversion, and there's tons of proof of it, though im at work and cant find it now. The only reason the US gives a shit about the middle east to this degree is to benefit Israel. This is also undeniable, the vast majority of the original neocons were Jewish.
I think you have a case of 'first person' syndrome. Arabs have agency. Their beliefs are not a CIA plot, and anyway, this move started long before the CIA started paying attention to the Arab world anyway.
The governments in Arab countries cannot control religion - you think the CIA can? It's crazy.
Yeah, I'll look forward to you educating me about the Arab world.
You have 'tons of proof' for this as well?
The neocons were people who were leftists and then took a hardline stance in the Cold War. If they hadn't done that, you'd no doubt have said that they are Jewish subversives pushing communism.
At some point.. in 10-20 years, communism and islam will fight or they will become a monster if they combine. Imagine... communism and islam joining forces. They will definitely cut the world population by 80%.
Because if you come into their place (or rather, any place they've decided to occupy) whining about their lack of inclusion, diversity, and wimminz in psissinz of power, the Islamists will make damn certain that all those things will be the least of your problems in very swift order. If you're lucky, by cutting off your head immediately.
That woman should count her blessing the kids didn't stone her immediately (likely more out of lack of ammunition than anything).
Allahu Akbar
I wouldn't call this gatekeeping.
It's collectivism taken to the extreme, just with a religious bent instead of a communist one. Two sides of the same coin..
Allahu alam.
Its more to do with the fact that Islam & Oil dollars were and are used as a heavy cudgel. After that, the tin pot muslims diddlers just perpetuate, and the powers that be are too scared to do anything about it.
Clearly, you are not familiar with how Muslims behave when in someone else's country. They walk around like they own the place, and call native women 'whores'. Not to mention that vastly higher rates of rape.