Why Islamic countries aren't susceptible to liberal BS
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Just to be clear: all the Westerners who went to the Middle East to murder Christians and Yezidis who had been living there for millennia, were doing that because "the Israel-run West" destroyed Belgium, Germany and England?
For that matter, if it is the supposed destruction of those countries that causes this, why are the native Christians not committing terrorist acts? Why are they not beheading their neighbors?
You know why.
The arrogance of ignorance. Someone sees a picture of a university campus in the richest district of the richest city, in a country that is 20% urbanized, and concludes that there were "no hijabs in sight" in the entire Arab world.
Truth is, the Arab world has always been very religious. Even when headscarves were less in vogue. And that's got nothing to do with your Jewish boogeyman.
Certainly Arab countries have always been religious. I never said otherwise. The current form of extremist Islam that is ruining these countries is a CIA fed subversion, and there's tons of proof of it, though im at work and cant find it now. The only reason the US gives a shit about the middle east to this degree is to benefit Israel. This is also undeniable, the vast majority of the original neocons were Jewish.
I think you have a case of 'first person' syndrome. Arabs have agency. Their beliefs are not a CIA plot, and anyway, this move started long before the CIA started paying attention to the Arab world anyway.
The governments in Arab countries cannot control religion - you think the CIA can? It's crazy.
Yeah, I'll look forward to you educating me about the Arab world.
You have 'tons of proof' for this as well?
The neocons were people who were leftists and then took a hardline stance in the Cold War. If they hadn't done that, you'd no doubt have said that they are Jewish subversives pushing communism.