Centuries of emigration and war taking all the best of the english out and leaving the dregs and willing serfs.
He was in on the scam, yes.
Look at his history - he's made the most of campaigning, never intending to win. The campaign is what gets him attention and money.
This is why they push the "quotas were RACIST" narrative so hard. They were not. Immigration quotas are NECESSARY for the host nation's health. All immigration should be kept to rates lower than the replacement rate of the host population, to force assimilation. When this isn't done, they build enclaves instead, which is unacceptable.
If only both sides of this could simultaneously cease existing.
I have no tolerance for lefty sjw moralizing bullshit, but gacha hellscapes are fucking cancer and the "people" that play them are foolish children at best.
The revolution took 3%. The horde of fence sitting moralizers crying abiut racism today would have been the pro-crown bystanders of that day - irrelevant and forgotten by history.
Worse, he didn't even read it. He threw a faggoty hissyfit before getting through the second chapter.
Google is an arm of the state. It is subject to a part of the us government, just not a part that pretends to be accountable to the people.
Organizations like the CIA have nore power than any elected or "elected" officials, even the president. Eisenhower was right.
You mean the soccer team? I haven't even heard of a female football team.
All the billions we spent in the sandbox could have been spent eradicating the cartels and we would have actually benefited as a nation. But the CIA profits from the drug trade, so that will never be allowed.
People not wanting to be invaded is "propaganda". The narrative the media mouthpieces all unite to push is "truth". Water is dry, up is down and evil is good.
"Your platform is being used as an open platform and not censoring content and publishing my narrative, it's YOUR fault!"
Except that's exactly how a platform is SUPPOSED to work to be able to deny liability for content posted on it. Fucking backwards maggots.
Did you reply to the wrong post on accident? Your reply doesn't seem to actually have a connection to the post you replied to, unless you actually think nationalism is a synonym for fascism, which it is not.
Nationalism is not tied to communism or fascism. It is an independent cultural element. A society can be nationalist regardless of left or right wing political framework.
Nationalism is not left or right. Anti-gay sentiment is cultural ideology, not political framework. Authoritarianism and socialism, strong centralized government, these are leftist tenets. Black block vs brown shirts was leftist power struggle. The nazis allied with the soviets at the start of WW2. The communists, the "national" socialists and the fascists were all on the same side at the outset, against more socialists (brits) and a socialist president later (FDR).
You think leftist groups won't fight eachother? Or that one leftist group opposing another makes them right wing, or tolerable to the right?
You don't understand political systems at all.
The only way for communists to protect my nation is for them to bleed, this is true. In death they become good communists.
They hate the nation that isn't ruled by them. Then when they rule, they demand nationalistic sentiment to their new nation. See the CCP and Soviets as an example.
One thing you will not find is a humble leftist.
And in that same post, directly after, I said I knew. Again, reading comprehension clearly not your strong suit. You attempt to twist and misrepresent my posts and flail like a faggot when called out.
You call me a jew but you act like the quote from your idol hitler about arguing with one - ironic.
Stay in your containment board with the rest of the socialists, fag.
Again, faggot - I don't care. Britfag reporter hanging out with scum irrelevant to both the thread topic (UK corruption) and this comment chain. This comment chain is me calling out the faggot actually simping for "PATRIOT" FRONT, the most obvious fed larp in US history.
I know reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, because you're pretty dim yourself, but if you can't follow a simple reply chain just don't even reply. Or is it that you're deliberately trying to shift things because I called one of your forum slider fellows out?
Nationalism cannot be used as a synonym for authoritarian leftism. That is not what it is.
Nationalism is a cultural element not tied to left or right wing ideologies.
Fuckin who? Oh, the autistic argument your alt, buttbuddy, gay lover or whatever was having about the UK dude? Not what this conversation is about, faggot. I never investigated that dude's background and frankly the UK is so far beyond the event horizon of national death I find the details irrelevant.
Cato literally simping for the most incompetently blatant fed op is the topic.
That puts anyone fully into the "thinks the entire board is full of retards" or "is incredibly retarded" category. Even normies can easily ID the larping front as feds.
You cannot be here simping for "Patriot Front" and actually believe anyone will fall for your shit. They even use leftist name structure.
Even brainlets can tell they're a fed op. Anyone who simps for the fucking feds larping as socialists larping as a CNN caster's ideal image of "far right", is a forum sliding fed.
Fuck off back to your masters and tell them you failed and need to be decommissioned, goblin. You are obvious.
And? Legal immigration status automatically selects for individuals of higher value to society and ability to adapt to functional societies.
It should be even stricter, but that has little relevance to your position here. You're being retarded. An individual is not the statistics of their background. Immigration restrictions exist to filter out the trash from those who would actually bring value, and to limit the rates of immigration to under the native population replacement rate, to force assimilation.
Given we actually have standards for legal immigrants and it takes actual years to become one, most likely.
This mongrel almost certainly wouldn't have made it in, and if we did have more permissive laws the legality of his presence wouldn't have fixed him. But that is why we have laws to prevent this kind of trash from entering.
People that would make good citizens don't tend to hop borders illegally. Flagrant disrespect for our law extends past that first offense.
Google's parent company is called Alphabet. They are an extension of the CIA's operation Mockingbird, controlling media context.
They have been doing this for a long time.
That and the removal of platform protections for places that abuse the requirements and act as publishers. You want to censor? Enjoy liability for the content you allow (and tacitly promote).
That would force them to either allow free speech or die.
It's britcucks. 400 + years of wars and mass emigration draining their society of nearly every drop of will to liberty, leaving only the husks behind, serfs that welcome the boot. They could be getting put to walls and some would be cheering, while the strongest reaction you'd get from 99% of their populace is shock and cowering.
Humans as individuals are not necessarily dependent on religion to behave in a moral fashion. Humanity as a whole and human societies require a religion.
Leftists that have abandoned traditional religion, replace it with modern dogma.