This is actual election interference
(twitter.com)
Comments (20)
sorted by:
Yes it is election interference, and they will never be held properly accountable for it.
If Trump, as President, with the full weight of the executive, the courts and both houses of Congress, goes after Google, my money is still on Google.
Just calling it how it is. This enemy is probably too big for even the US government to vanquish.
Google is an arm of the state. It is subject to a part of the us government, just not a part that pretends to be accountable to the people.
Organizations like the CIA have nore power than any elected or "elected" officials, even the president. Eisenhower was right.
Trump 47 will definitely get impeached and removed.
Only question is when and over what bullshit reason.
I'm not so sure about that, but I also don't think he's going to be the scorched-earth Revenge of the Persecuted that everyone thinks he will. He'll improve the economy. He'll do something about the border, even if it's not perfect. He'll complete the MAGA takeover of the GOP, he'll stay out of foreign wars and force the Chinese and other enemies to blink. All good things, but don't expect Andrew Jackson 2.0.
Staying out of foreign wars is why they'll remove him. If you hadn't noticed, they're desperate to keep laundering money through Ukraine (and killing white people on both sides).
Of course the actual reason given in the impeachment will be something else. I'd bet on an AI Trump saying sounds-like 'vinegar' and being removed because 'America can't have a racist President'.
Not sure the percentage.. but isnt a large part of the russian force in ukraine non white? Like those weird looking mongo looking fellas from the east and south russia.
Muslim Chechens too.
They've passed that square on the gameboard and moved on to "Assassination".
This will age like milk.
See you in 6-12 months.
Hey, I hope you’re right.
This is likely the result of putting a thumb on the scale of a neural network driven system. They want to boost her, so they just up the weights on nodes that respond to "Kamala Harris". They're hoping to get a seamless, undetectable increase in results, but what they don't realize is that closely adjacent queries are going to be effected more strongly than the generic queries.
The killer app for AI is generating bullshit and lies, and we're seeing it in action right here. They'll probably learn from this and refine their lie machine even more.
Kinda unrelated, but I'm kinda sick of this buzzword that leftists started to push about private entities engaging in "election interference" because ultimately it comes with the implicit baggage that therefore Something™ needs to be done about this and that the entity to do this Something™ is always some government agency. And I'm just sick of the endless growth of the state, as if it will ever turn out to be anything less than a tool to help further reinforce the establishment and never let anyone else in.
Don't like this shit? Sure, expose it and call it out. But don't fucking expect the government to fix it. Stop using these companies, stop giving them your business, and look for alternatives that don't pull this shit. We need more situations like the Digg Exodus and less situations where people shrug their shoulders and behave like it's all pointless and powerless.
At what point should a service or collection of services run by American corporate entities be considered a defacto public square subject to the bill of rights or at least some kind of transparency and expectations of how they run? What if all the actual streets in the country were private and owned by one corporation, say, Amazon. Would it be ok to say "No you're not allowed to protest except on the 20% of streets not owned by Amazon. Yes they can selectively prevent competitors from driving over 20mph. We don't want big government."? Exposing it is good, but then what's the solution? I already don't use Google.
There shouldn't be any companies that dominant because of trust busting. But when's the last time the government exercised that responsibility?
Counterpoint: There shouldn't be any companies that dominant because government programs are what build these companies up. Just look at how many benefits, tax breaks, incentive programs and more Amazon alone get. Look at how cities have literally tried to throw money at Amazon to get them to open a warehouse in their city (the rationale being that they provide jobs). And it's not limited to a handful of companies. The entire aviation industry is BUILT upon this system. How many times have airline companies been bailed out? What about the pharma industry that is, yet again, propped up by government market interference?
These companies become dominant because of market interference. They become dominant through literally uneven ground. The idea of a free market doesn't exist when bailouts, tax breaks and financial incentives are as common as they are. Is the market "free-er" than other markets out there? Absolutely. But an argument in relativity means nothing when discussing objective measures. And the reality is that growing economic divide and a lack of economic mobility are directly caused through government market forces, not a lack-there-of.
Trust busting is a result of government losing control of what they themselves created. It's got nothing to do with protecting the public.
Make elon the social media czar. :p.
They must have changed it back cause it shows me nothing but trump when I Google it