11
Grumman 11 points ago +11 / -0

He wasn't maimed to protect women, he was maimed to protect the revolutionary government. If they thought they could get away with it they'd be using the women as meat shields too.

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

They've still got Eric Gill's indecent image of a child over the front door of the BBC Broadcasting House.

by Lethn
7
Grumman 7 points ago +7 / -0

Mohammad, Mohammad Ahmed and Mohammad Mahmood. Gee, I wonder who gave them the idea that raping children was okay?

6
Grumman 6 points ago +6 / -0

Case in point, Starship Troopers the film is supposed to be making fun of the "space nazis" and pointing out that they are the bad guys, but people started identifying with them because of poor writing and they're fun so leftists are melting down over it.

That's the midwit reading of Starship Troopers. The actual meaning of Starship Troopers is "Verhoeven is an illiterate fuckwit who doesn't understand the book he's slandering."

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

I know. I still think she needs to be disqualified if that is the case, but I am sympathetic to someone who cannot compete fairly and safely due to a birth defect and not just because they're psychotic.

13
Grumman 13 points ago +13 / -0

Both Labour and the Tories are behind this shit, and both lost votes last election. First-Past-The-Post inertia no longer favours the Tories, so next time there's a good chance that they'll be replaced by a real right-wing party.

11
Grumman 11 points ago +11 / -0

He'd still be in Mexico, so no, it wouldn't.

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

The journalist isn't wrong. Even without considering communism, it's a horrific song: "Imagine there's nothing in life worth fighting for" is a dystopia, not a utopia.

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

If RDJ is playing Victor Von Doom, it's "You like RDJ, right? Have more RDJ! Please like our movies again!" But if RDJ is playing evil Tony Stark, it's part of the same anti-white male campaign as everything else.

Either way, I will not be watching it before it hits free-to-air TV. Even if it's the former and not inherently hostile, Disney as a company needs to wither and die.

15
Grumman 15 points ago +15 / -0

There is a clip from the Wounded Knee movie where Col. Miles and Sitting Bull are talking and Col Miles points out the tribes that his tribe slaughtered to take the land they were on.

I just saw that clip today. I'm not familiar with the battle, but Miles was making valid points. Leftists like to pretend that losing to Westerners makes you a victim, but plenty of them deserved what they got or worse.

17
Grumman 17 points ago +17 / -0

Apparently the CPU's internal software was requesting too high a voltage, which is what's doing the damage.

1
Grumman 1 point ago +1 / -0

The video has over half a million views on a 13k subscriber channel. That doesn't sound like shadowbanning to me.

10
Grumman 10 points ago +10 / -0

If it's anything like Friday Night Magic a non-Japanese speaker is going to cause issues just because of time constraints. It's nothing personal as long as you don't raise a stink about it, it's just not the place for a more casual game.

1
Grumman 1 point ago +1 / -0

There wouldn't have been a migrant crisis if you hanged the first traitor to offer their ships as landing craft for the invasion forces.

4
Grumman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Please understand how stupid it is to look at a problem caused by inadequate gatekeeping and think even less gatekeeping is the solution.

1
Grumman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Especially since the reason the Democrats want rid of Assad is to get rid of Putin.

11
Grumman 11 points ago +11 / -0

I don't think that logic applies when the accuser is both a stranger who means nothing to you, and standing right there. If you're going to shoot someone in that scenario, why not shoot the asshole who's trying to blackmail you?

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't watch his content, but I respect what he does. If a sponsor can spend their advertising budget on treating cataracts and still get their money's worth, that's a win-win.

7
Grumman 7 points ago +7 / -0

I can't criticise the Maori response... because I have no fucking clue what they're asking for.

4
Grumman 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think they're saying that by the time you're having your fourth kid, your first one is old enough to not need constant supervision.

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't find that at all surprising - the simplest explanation for why the finance sector encourages shortsighted behaviour in the companies they invest in is that the finance sector is full of shortsighted people.

10
Grumman 10 points ago +10 / -0

Labour didn't win, the Tories lost. With luck, proper conservatives will complete the pivot to Remain by next election and leave the husk of the Tory party to rot.

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

You've been given a blank cheque to purge every communist and Islamist from every position of power, and you're turning up your nose because you refuse to use Israel as an excuse.

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because you've got to pace yourself. APW admitting on their own website that the evidence is real while they try to downplay it and Blackrock admitting on their Twitter account that the evidence is real while they try to downplay it is far more convincing if you don't dilute it with tinfoil hat stuff or try to spread the blame to as many potential sacred cows as possible. Don't mention cryptic death threats or the Jews, and stick to the corporation trying to get rich by killing the mascot of the company they just shorted.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›