12
Grumman 12 points ago +12 / -0

Based on what I had read since the last post here, calling it an attack is false. Only one of the seven charges actually applies if there was no intent to cause grievous bodily harm, and getting spooked because the crowd was getting rowdy after you negligently drove into a cordoned-off area is not malice.

7
Grumman 7 points ago +7 / -0

America is losing because your standards for victory are absurd. In Afghanistan, defeat means not turning the non-Taliban Afghans into a stable, self-sufficient government. In Ukraine, defeat means failing to secure control of a thousand miles of Soviet homeland. If the objective in Afghanistan was "kill those who wronged us" America could have done that in an afternoon.

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

If the timeline is correct it's the retards who spooked the driver who deserve to be charged for this incident. There's no excuse for opening the car door before anything else has happened, and it's inevitably going to put the driver in fear of a carjacking or worse.

4
Grumman 4 points ago +5 / -1

You will not. Something like an endless runner would be plausible for an AI, but GTA requires object permanence. An AI that could create GTA-like moment-to-moment mechanics would be a curse to play if it's impossible to actually navigate from point A to point B.

-10
Grumman -10 points ago +5 / -15

It sure is great that you're here to defend the socialists' good name from this horrible slander. We wouldn't want to exploit this bulletproof excuse to purge Western civilisation's enemies when we could instead condemn Israel for killing seventy thousand Muslims, would we?

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you're not allowed to say what is needed, say nothing. Don't be complicit in enemy propaganda.

6
Grumman 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Assault weapon," not "assault rifle" - "assault rifle" actually has a real meaning, "assault weapon" means it's a gun leftists want to ban first.

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nothing to worry about there, he's great. Apart from thinking his consumer rights advocacy goes too far in precisely one place (because I see merit in preventing stingy people from setting their houses on fire with Chinesium batteries) I can't recall any time when I thought he was on the wrong side of the argument.

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even without the receipts for her older tweets, putting the Palestinian flag in her display name already tells you this applies to her.

2
Grumman 2 points ago +3 / -1

Judging by the thumbnail, they're selling not just ships but ship upgrades for real money.

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

They love insurrections. It's why they're all Ukrainian nationalists now - because they don't want their previous regime change being reverted.

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Bali bombings were one year, one month and one day after the September 11 attack, which is an odd coincidence if it is one.

11
Grumman 11 points ago +11 / -0

That's my take on the situation. If you can build an orbital launch vehicle you can build a suborbital intercontinental ballistic missile.

22
Grumman 22 points ago +22 / -0

Yes, because you can draw a clear line between the people making South Africa a hellhole - the people singing "Kill the Boer" - and the Boers. If you can't tell the difference between a fox and a hen you don't have a henhouse.

6
Grumman 6 points ago +7 / -1

I wouldn't call it hideous. It's a well executed statue of an undeserving subject, like Andy Worhol's soup cans.

13
Grumman 13 points ago +15 / -2

I don't give a shit what the Book of Revelation says. The Japanese spent almost a decade committing non-stop atrocities because their interpretation of Bushido was fundamentally incompatible with the concept of mercy.

5
Grumman 5 points ago +11 / -6

It's fine - "Milquetoast" was a comic character who got the name because he had the soft inoffensiveness of milk toast.

On the other hand, Telia continues to be a retard for the rest of their argument. A Japanese conservative who mourns the defeat of their demonic death cult and blames Roosevelt because he didn't treat a promise of non-involvement as a suicide pact and responded to a military attack on American soil with military force is not "our guy."

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'd have bigger fish to fry. I would ban Gacha mechanics - it should always be possible to find out what you're buying before you buy it - but enabling non-subversive video games would just be a possible benefit from cleaning up the financial industry.

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

I would. Allowing an armed felon the opportunity to regroup is not justified, as it's an easy way to walk into an ambush or a hostage situation.

37
deleted 37 points ago +38 / -1
view more: Next ›