Absolutely no chance at all those are real cutting scars. Ambercrombie would hire a semi-attractive clean person and then use make up to add them on.
All the scars are nice and clear and uniform, rather than completely jagged and off angled from each other. Since we all know that people cutting themselves are entirely in a mental state to have full control over their motor functions.
Scars are in "attention" zones, aka high visible places that people could see but not at all in a location on the body that could cause any type of real damage, because clearly people who are at the point of self-destructive actions are thinking, "Well I got to make sure I don't hurt myself".
And as we all know 'suicidal' people are always so active to want to be plastered everywhere for fucking pep brands and these types are also always going on and wanting everyone to know they are suicidal. Bet her parents are super stoked to have had someone they know show them the add for their daughter with her 'suicide scars' for everyone to see. Bet that's something we'll totally see.
Fake as shit advertising. Probably a dozen more reasons it's fake to beyond this.
Missed details.
Carrie Kelley, the last Robin as she came about during The Dark Knight Returns comic run, is a red headed girl. So of course she's been dyslexiaed from a Ginger to a Gamer Word.
Batman is dead, but at no point does this prompt any of the many "contingencies" batman would have that everyone screeches about "muh prep time".
Turner Hayes is some 'new' character likely because the CW was told by Warner Brothers that they aren't allowed to use any of the characters that might make them money, so no Dick Grayson, Tim Drake, Jason Todd, or Damian Wayne. It's all awkward because Carrie Kelley introduces herself to the group of the little shits as Robin, meaning she was working with Bruce already, so Turner should know who she is because he too would be a Robin as Bruce tends to put the kids in costume.
Honestly it's just more poorly written fanfiction about their little gay group who are totally related to big named characters.
Fucking one of them is the Joker's daughter. That alone should tell you the level of fucks you have to give about this shit writing. That the total psychopath who cared about nothing but causing pain and suffering had a kid.
Oh sweetie, there wouldn't ever be a denial, after step 9, step 10 is celebration not denial.
The idea of a Dungeons and Dragons movie only works if you make it a meta commentary on the game itself from the inside, otherwise you are essentially just making a fantasy film, unless you only use the most well known dnd characters which is a total crapshoot because even most people who play them don't know official dnd character names. Paizo tried that with Pathfinder for having each class having a default character but nobody uses them outside of Adventure League and they barely get touched on.
But you could do a DnD movie where a character gets killed off and when they arrive at the next town the actor is there in a different costume. "Barry, no I'm Larry, Barry's Twin Brother, he was a fighter, I'm a ranger." then later die and you meet the same actor in a wig and dress doing a bad woman's voice. "No I'm Marry, Larry and Barry's triplet sister, I'm a cleric because the party apparently doesn't have any healing."
Put in a point where the story fades to black and come back and the actors have bears and are dirty because the session got put on hold for like a month because nobody could get together and now they are picking it back up but their goal has changed because the DM forgot what they were doing and seeing if the audience realizes that's what happened when the group had originally set off to get a chalice but are not getting a necklace at the end.
Isn't this the one where they add time travel? Because if so my guess is that we are introduced to a new woman archeologist who knows so much more about history than Indy because all of it was done by black women who had all the credit stolen by white nazis and then she goes back in time and sets everything up so that young Indy can finish the early movies to the point that every success is really her success. And then they defeat "herr drumpf" or some shit like that.
Harry is the main protag, so what. He was never shown to be incompetent. Dumbledore being retconned into a gay means that he prioritized his gay lover over stopping him which in the book series directly leads to the start of WW2, meaning Rowling said the gays were the true cause of WW2. Hagrid is only treated as a buffoon by Malfoy, a main antagonist of the series, for Harry and the other characters, they respect him as a kind man who loves his job as keeper of keys and grounds before becoming an excellent care teacher, who routinely helped the school and Harry throughout the series up through the battle of Hogwarts. Flitwick is the charms teacher, he has a role in most of the books and in the movies is the one who puts up the barrier that keeps out the entire army of death eaters until Voldemort has to be the one to take it down.
But if we still keep up with your incessant whining about how unfair the male characters are treated. Let's look at the female ones.
Hermione is treated as a know it all bookworm that annoys everyone around her, in the movies the director's blatant favoritism towards Emma Watson, no doubt a sex pest, has actual caused more people to dislike Hermione's character for the amount of scenes stolen from other characters just to be given to her.
McGonagall, is said to be stern, but in the films she might as well be an idiot, how many times does Harry have to come to her with his belief that something is wrong before she actually listens to him? Especially after being right nearly all the time. She's shown to be completely ineffectual at stopping even someone like Draco from calling other people mudbloods and threatening them.
Molly Weasley, is show in the books and films to be an overbearing woman who in the fifth installment all but treats Sirius as an invalid in his own home and decided to enforce the "Don't talk to Harry rule" just because Dumbledore said so. About the only competent thing she did was blow up Bellatrix other than she contributed very little.
Ginny, in the films wasn't even a character for the few times she was relevant, in the second film after the introduction she dropped out of the film until the end, and in the later films Harry and Ginny had so little on screen time that most people who watched only the movies were genuinely surprised they got together while it infuriated the book readers because she stopped mattering.
Pretty much the only other female character to actually do anything in the films was Bellatrix and she was the main female villain.
Cho Chang was turned into a backstabber when in the films she was the one to turn on the Defense club Harry was running, not her friend as it was in the books. Fleur and Tonks pretty much vanished from the series, to where they were mentions in the films until you see Tonks dead and get told that Fleur married Bill.
And the only other female of note in the series is Dolores Umbridge, which everybody hates, so many people hate her more than Voldemort. Just some random bitch karen teacher is considered worse than their wizard hitler.
If you are going to whine about a series being "such and such theme" at least know what the fuck you are talking about.
There are plenty of leftist themes that hold back the story, but just as many unintentional right themes as well, such as the government will control the media, the schools will dumb down your education to make you not a threat, the (((goblins))) are just waiting for the fighting to die out to pick a side and will screw over good people for profit.
Let's make a list of "Competent males in the series" Harry - Was stated in the books to be good with his spellwork, and a match for Voldemort. Survives the series Dumbledore - Most powerful sorcerer in the world, who only died because he was cursed by Voldemort who placed a powerful compulsion charm on a ring that he might have known held a Deathly Hallow, something he among a small number of people Dumbledore was searching for. Filius Flitwick - one of the best professors in the school, survives Hagrid - competent with magical creatures, a great guy, survives
Let's see who dies though Snape - total prick, good at potions and a spy, but still dies to Voldemort Mad-Eye Moody, aged ex-auror, in the battle of the seven potters is killed by Voldemort Sirius Black - Harry's godfather, taken out by Bellatrix Remus Lupin - married to Tonks, he is taken out by Dolohov in a double battle with Bellatrix Lestrange killing Tonks
So of the competent males, the ones who actually expressed some level of proficiency in the series, of the 4 killed two were taken out by the main villain, another taken out by a psycho witch who was stated to be incredibly dangerous, while Remus lost to another wizard who was also a member of Voldemorts inner circle and thus considered dangerous.
Notice I didn't mention Ron or Neville, because they weren't written out of the story and had large parts to play in events.
Look you can be pissy all you want about the leftist writing in the HP franchise but in no way was the entire series "bumbling dad, smart graceful amazing mom commercial"
Of the families we do see on screen or mentioned in the books, the Potters, James fought off Voldemort to buy time for his wife and child to escape, Lily dies to protect Harry. The Weasleys are shown in the books to be a loving family and at worst Arthur is muggle obsessed but still good at his job.
About the only families that are shown to be bad are the Malfoys. Explicitly family, husband, wife and children.
It's more along the lines of, if you can dismiss a prosecutor because they do not share your beliefs, then why can't you dismiss a judge and jury of the same thing. And at least with a jury you'd have a stronger argument that those who are not of the same race and sex as you are not your peers than dismissing a judge and prosecutor.
Is there anyway to find a follow up because I would love to see how this plays out if he sues Reddit, his ex, the university and any news outlets who picked up this story and ran with it.
Don't worry, for that authentic experience they installed a robot that will spit on your food for you. However due to being as cheap as possible, it is using imitation spit made out of ground up chicken parts not used in the nuggets.
Yeah because a woman would have hit the nukes by now because her ego would have demanded that she show everyone what a girlboss she is.
First of all, we didn't outsource ALL of our manufacturing to China.
Second of all, I remember a certain man in a white house named Bill Clinton who signed off on letting any company move over for cheap. I could be wrong but I doubt it.
Thirdly, if we brought back the manufacturing it would be better because our environmental regulations actually exist so we could save probably more than 50% on the pollution produced because we have people who give a shit rather than just taking whatever bribe to skimp on everything they can.
Fourth, I support bringing back the jobs, better pay and it takes the jobs away from China, less money for them.
I can kind of see what the original tweet meant. Just because Chris-chan is a mentally fucked up man who did some fucked up stuff, the other trannies shouldn’t be trying to kick him out of the tribe.
You don’t see that happening with black criminals, black communities don’t come out and say the criminal wasn’t black to try and remove them from being black. But trannies will do that, instead of goimg, “Yeah that trannie committed a crime but they are still a tranny.” They try to boot them out and claim they aren’t a tranny anymore.
It’s a ploy to try and artificially make the trannys seem like they aren’t committing crimes.
And some trannys havent gotten the memo that they need to protect the collective over individuals so you have these tweets about how other trannys need to stick together
People were already making the jokes that Anakin slaughtered the Jedi and joined Palpatine because they molested him as a kid. But sure making Obi-Wan an alphabet person will surely stop those jokes.
That 41% is only an attempt, not a success. With your help and encouragement we can make winners out of each and every one of them.
Translation: "As soon as the protection I have from being lynched goes away I'm on the first plane out of here to a non-extradition country where I'll live in a gated building with armed security for the rest of my days."
Nazi Gender sounds badass.
Typically the funds gathered are used to fulfill the product orders and cover any issues that come up and thats hundreds of thousands of dollars needed to print all these comics and then ship them.
I dont have to make shit up to defend him, i just have to not be a bumbling idiot to realize that the money is needed for things related to actually doing business
Does an acorn count as an oak tree?
Because whether you want an apple tree, palm tree or a fir, that acorn will always grow into an oak tree. The only difference is if you kill it before it has that chance to grow. It doesn't matter how many people outside the acorn say that it's just a clump of cells, if you let it grow it becomes an oak tree.
Why on earth would you give legal protection to a fertilized egg after conception, which has no self-awareness, no brain, no heart, nothing at all that makes humans what they are.
Because if you don't as I said, there are millions of people who lack the ability to live on their own, so why should they be given legal protection if a fertilized egg doesn't?
Once he delivers the product, Paypal would have no reason to continue the hold.
So the money he was going to be paid to fulfill the orders and deliver the product is now going to be held by Paypal until he can complete the orders. All because they think he's going to scam them.
Are you actually too stupid to not see the problem here?
Why is something that is going to be a baby not still count as a baby? Where exactly do we draw the line for humans? Because I promise if it's not, conception, I can word that into letting me murder a whole lot of people.
Told that to a friend who stopped talking to me after Trump got elected, when he said that it can't take care of itself, and its life depends on another person. I reminded him that's most kids until about 5 years old, people with severe disabilities and most elderly since they need tons of constant care. So could I kill them with no repercussions?
Remember when the government told all the apartment complexes they weren’t allowed to evict, turns out when you lost your job working the gas station because you a broke nigga, and you stop paying your rent because they can’t kick you out for two years and all your other expenses are covered by food stamps and ebt, you can save a ton of money on unemployment with pretty much 0 other expenses.
Can they even do a mastectomy as a keyhole surgery now? I Would think that process hasn’t been refined enough so they still use a traditional surgery.
need to add in large piles of trash around every building and that all the trees are dead because the city doesn't do what's needed to keep them alive in that densely packed urban jungle.
If those are keloid scars then OP is a fag for claiming they are self-cutting which makes me right for pointing out those are not scars from self-cutting. Which makes you a fag for saying I'm wrong.
And again, those aren't from self-cutting.