I got really excited for a minute there.
No joy. This topic is boring. No explosives at all!
Whatever. Carry on.
I don't know about King Charles, but there is no way that Trump would have been caught on tape.
Trump has spent his whole adult life treating every sexual encounter like it is probably a blackmail sting. I am not exaggerating.
The absolute score of an IQ test is less significant than an individual’s ranking within the tested group, and its predictive power depends on the context of the test.
IQ tests measure performance relative to a specific cohort, not an absolute measure of intelligence. Their results are meaningful only within the context of the group and the test’s design. For example, a test administered in Dutch might assess language fluency and problem-solving skills relevant to daily life in a Dutch-speaking society. If someone like Mohamed, who is not fluent in Dutch, takes this test, his score may reflect his language limitations rather than his overall cognitive ability. However, the same test could still predict his potential productivity in a Dutch-speaking environment, as it measures skills relevant to that context.
IQ remains the strongest single predictor of economic success across contexts, as it correlates with skills like problem-solving and adaptability that contribute to earning potential.
Comparing scores across cultures is challenging.
Watch this.
Midnight' s Edge have been a reliable scooper for years.
This is what actually happened.
If you want to go on and believe every lie on TV, then knock yourself out, but you are better than that. Even if I am the only one who thinks so.
Tony, our major disagreement seems to be that you think that broadcast TV should be without standards or enforcement.
I disagree.
Twitter isn't governed by the FCC. It isn't broadcast over the airwaves.
A government monopoly is granted by broadcast licences, and that comes with conditions.
The enforcement of those conditions has been entirely absent for a long time. Lying over the airwaves, radio or TV should have consequences. This was as clear-cut as it gets.
This isn't Twitter. As unethical as that was, I don't think it was strictly prohibited by federal law.
Your argument is that the director of the FCC threatened to enforce the law? Well fuck him. How dare he do his job, amIrite?
This isn't censorship. If it was there would be actual consequences for discussing this on the Internet, which there are not.
The The left leaning media was going to try to spin this with a lie no matter what happened. They are mobilizing their useful idiots to try to neutralize any kind of enforcement.
The sick, sad joke is that private broadcast companies are reflecting public opinion and preemptively canceling the airing of this shitty, unpopular show, not the US government.
This isn't censorship. It would be fucking great if the FCC actually did it's fucking job and enforced the law. Do it impartially.
The lie that this is politically motivated censorship will die off, because it will lose steam or stop working. This is just like Russia Collision or any other lie that was a useful lever to pull.
If I were Trump I'd push to have laws passed to break up media ownership, but I am not.
It is fucking hilarious that you think that enforcing a very reasonable law is mustach twirling evil. How unexpected.
Tony, your "Jimmy Kimmel is not news" deflection crumbles on contact with reality.
By the time Kimmel made his statements, the facts about Robinson's left-leaning politics were emerging and available to anyone consuming news seriously. Kimmel's production team has resources that dwarf most newsrooms; they knew better. The YouGov poll data proves exactly why this matters: 41% of Democrats incorrectly believed the shooter was Republican. Kimmel chose to reinforce that false narrative when accurate information was available to him. This wasn't premature commentary; it was calculated disinformation disguised as entertainment.
Your "we can do this the easy way or the hard way" is actually a threat argument falls flat. That's textbook regulatory language signaling consequences for broadcast licensees. Carr was doing his job: preventing influential media figures from exploiting public confusion with deliberate falsehoods during major national events.
Your strategic argument is backwards. Preemptively surrendering to bad-faith "martyrdom" narratives guarantees the complete erosion of broadcast standards. The proper response to deliberate misinformation isn't to avoid accountability out of fear of political theater: it's to consistently enforce basic accuracy requirements regardless of partisan whining.
Kimmel had the facts, ignored them, and chose to spread disinformation that aligned with politically convenient public misconceptions. That's exactly when regulatory oversight should kick in.
Your Führerbunker comparison remains ridiculous hyperbole that undermines serious discussion of media accountability.
Why is it not surprising that your chief recommendation seems to be: "Just bend over and let the Left owned media have their way."
Tony, you massive faggot, your claim about an FCC official "bragging" to take down Jimmy Kimmel is flat-out wrong, and here’s why.
Brendan Carr, an FCC commissioner, appeared on a YouTube podcast and noted that broadcast license holders have a duty to avoid distorting major news stories, which can be illegal under FCC rules (47 CFR § 73.1217). He suggested accountability, not a personal vendetta against Kimmel. No threats were made to ABC, and Carr later clarified at the 2025 Concordia Summit that he wasn’t targeting licenses—just flagging a potential complaint. Your "brag" narrative doesn’t hold up.
Compare this to 1994, when KPRC-TV in Houston dropped Late Night with Conan O'Brien due to abysmal ratings, lower than infomercials. No FCC involvement, just a business call by an affiliate. Similarly, Sinclair and Nexstar are preempting Kimmel’s show in 2025—not because of government pressure, but because advertisers are pulling out, forcing refunds and unsold ad slots. ABC suspended Kimmel briefly on September 17, 2025, to manage the fallout, not due to direct FCC action.
Your points unravel:
- Enforcing FCC rules isn’t a free speech violation; it’s about public accountability.
- Carr didn’t brag about “taking Kimmel down”—he discussed legal standards.
- The “backlash” is overblown, driven by partisan spin, not evidence of censorship.
- Network executives know the real issue: Kimmel’s comments tanked ad revenue, prompting preemption.
And here you are unable to recognize a manufactured moral panic as the Democrat Party and their loyalists within broadcast media download new instructions to their useful idiot NPCs.
I guess it is totally in character for massive faggot like you?
I ... don't think so. At least not in the way you are thinking.
Seducing and fucking pubescent boys is a tried and true technique for brainwashing them. It leads to more subtle developmental damage rather than overt trauma.
For example it is one of methods used by ISIS, with the "Isis brides' that were passed around as recruiting bonuses and rewards. The Isis brides were deeply, willingly involved in breaking the minds of teenage boys in just the right way that they would become child soldiers and suicide bombers.
I am sure that aforementioned rancid old hag used rampant hormones and sex as a reward to perform operand conditioning on a callow youth. I would bet a shiny dollar that Macron is a sexual submissive with several paraphilias.
If he betrays the French people like a good boy he gets treats.
We have seen on video the hideous hag slapping Macron in the face moments before he walks off a jet into the cameras.
I am quite sure that Macron was picked for the top job because his handler is a true believer and he is a brainwashed simp that makes the perfect patsy. I bet he even likes it.
To sum up, Macron is less a traumatized and scarred man than he is a little bonsai mind that has been carefully grown to be a spineless simp and like it.
No, it really isn't
Retarded or 4D chess?
The battle will be fought in a US court and the conclusion will be that:
A) There is a definition of female, and it doesn't include men in dresses
B) That you can basically say what you want about public figures; because they are, you know, public figures
Candice is nuttier than squirrel shit, but even if she loses in court she still wins.
Fucking lol.
Then stage-managed his career to the highest level of politics in France, where he is the gold standard of globalist stooge.
I estimate that he has something like a 5% approval rating right now, yet he will hang on to the bitter end to help complete the destruction of France.
That boy was groomed and raped, and he grows up to be a submissive little bitch who does what he is told by his abusive wife.
Just be aware that it is entirely possible to never allow discussion of a major social event like this.
For an example see the Spanish abuses under the fascist dictatorship under Franco.
It was quietly decided across Spain that discussing the abuses and holding people accountable would rip Spain apart and cause endless recriminations. So they just didn't talk about it. Ever. People who had committed the most gut wrenching crimes and most horrific abuses under Franco's government ... just skated. They are dying of old age without consequences.
To be clear, I don't think that this is good for anyone, but it is exactly what the elite are aiming for.
Someone who's AFK life has utterly atrophied. He has retreated into fantasy and and his new normal is porn subs, and ignoring the growing pile of bills that he can't afford to pay.
He can't go out because he doesn't even have money for gas, let alone anything else.
He doesn't have any friends left, because his wife took them all with the divorce. She will have painted him as a child molester (or something) to everyone she knows to justify her shitty behavior.
So he just doesn't care anymore.
I wonder how close he is to An Hero?
I have no idea about the specifics, but the key word in this sentence is: "continue"
So the question was probably something like: "Should we stop stuffing money into the pockets of the most corrupt government in Europe?"
The answer was: "No. Do not stop delivering truckloads of taxpayer cash to those corrupt fuckers who give us kickbacks."
Lets be crystal clear: The majority of annual "gun deaths" are male suicides'.
The left doesn't give a tiny fuck about men and their mental health, but they are super gleeful to shift the focus from mental health and tragic suicide rates to "ban the guns".
If we only count male homicides, we know who is responsible for 50% of those. Young, black men are shooting other young, black men.
Charlie's point is that "Helpless" is not the same as "Peaceful".
Whoever made this cartoon can go and get fucked with a cactus.
Furries are the cuddly gateway drug to sexual deviancy and child grooming.
In Australia being deemed incompetent and (demonstrably) dangerous results in a person getting confined to the forensic mental health wing of a prison forever.
So, locked up in the very same prison, and medicated to the eyeballs until they die.
ESG money is usually access to loans.
James Lindsey is operating under a couple of assumptions.
- That Academia can be saved; and if it is he'll have a place there.
- That accepting the woke dismantling of liberalism will lead fairly directly to a Conservative Christian Ethnostate.
Liberalism doesn't work. It never worked. The atomic (smallest, indivisible) state of humanity is the tribe, not the individual. Educating and empowering individuals immediately causes them to band together in smarter, more powerful tribes. There is no level of education or self-improvement that can change this.
Once it is accepted that humans inevitably form tribes, then law, immigration and everything else should be aimed at encouraging the right kind of tribe. That would mean accepting that certain genetic and social heritages can never be assimilated into the community.
If this view gains wider acceptance then conservatives white Christians will realize that this is an existential struggle and will react accordingly.
After that the outcome is inevitable.
Raja is on his own livestream talking about how he has been invited to participate, but he is going to go all out to hurt the guy.
There is no "reacting" about it; Raja planned his response, then carried out his plan.
Yet there are people in this thread lining up to suck Nick's cock in this thread for his shitty luke-warm.takes.
If Nick wasn't a darling of the algorithm, he would not be relevant in any way.
Alex Jones was hit with nearly a billion dollar lawsuit for denying the Sandy Hook shootings ...
Alex didn't actually deny the shootings.
He postulated that there were 'crisis actors' staging or managing the event, and then after he asked some questions Alex concluded (on air) that the shooting was genuine. He entertained and then discarded the idea that the Sandy Hook shootings were an operation during a single show.
The defamation lawsuit against him is genuinely without substance.
You are 100% correct.
The 'Critical' In CRT refers to a moral dimension to bring about change. That moral dimension is to bring about a Marxist revolution.
So you are right. CRT was designed from the ground up to disrupt a high trust society and see division. Truth, justice, fairness are all irrelevant.
Are you cutting Fuentes slack because he'd suck your dick if you put on cat ears?
I mean, that is fine if you are. You should just be honest with yourself about it.
If you wanted to actually simp for a guy who has had a genuine red-pill moment you could go and stroke yourself to Russel Brand. Not only has he had a meaningful journey informed by actual facts, he has shared that publicly and is about half way to being based.
I guess Russel won't ever want to have gay sex with you? That doesn't work for you huh?
Leo has now had several movies in a row that have opemed to less than 25 million.
There are flops and there are the unrepentant stinkers that are Leonardo DiCaprio movies.