I imagine he’d still say this even if he knew what was going to happen. The guy, like many of us, understood very well that the American Project and its continued function is predicated on an armed populace. Using that quote in this way is not the ‘ha-ha’ or the ‘gotcha!’ or the heckin’ cosmic ironyrino that they’ve taken it for.
Oh you support.. er, property rights? I guess you are ok with getting murdered in someone's house when they say you were trespassing. Because that's what your precious 'property rights' gets you! Rip rip
If reddit's servers and user data were ever seized you'd have a ready list or every single traitor and pedophile on the continent. Just thinking out loud.
Charlie Kirk died, so I guess I should disarm myself so that you can shoot me in the throat without a fight?
Nah, I'm good. I like the idea of giving you a 2-way range when you decide someone's had too much to think.
Edit:
"But if we ban guns then no one will have guns!"
If you ban guns, it will be for me. It will not be for you. It will NOT be for party apparatchiks, enforcers, anarcho-tyrant criminals you set loose on the general public. So, again: see above.
I defend whites more than anyone here IRL, and the JQ is literally "how can jews exist in a Socialist society?". I don't want a socialist society. It's an invalid question.
As assuredly as Dole was sponsored by the CIA to overthrow the government of Guatemala and establish a puppet state to create a monopoly on cheap bananas!
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin
Charlie Kirk understood this. That it's retarded to give up your basic human rights just because there is a chance, you will get shot one day. The logic of these liberals is that if there is a 1% chance of being shot or even less, you just bend over and spread your ass cheeks for the people who have guns and will never ever give them up. So if he could come back to life, I don't think he'd change his mind on the 2nd amendment. Instead, he would just choose an indoor location with security checkpoints to speak to his supporters and those who want to debate him.
Liberals also don't understand that Americans living in rural parts of the country need easy access to firearms, just to survive. When are you living deep in the mountains or in the forest or in the desert and 5 meth heads want to murder you and take everything you own, what are you going to do? Call the police who are like 45 minutes driving distance away? LMAO. Try to fight off 5 grown men with just a knife or baseball bat? So liberals are pushing for policies that will make it so many rural Americans are robbed, murdered and/or raped by criminals.
Do you happen to have a link to what he was saying? All I saw was a 4-5 second clip that was cut off so I’m assuming it was another fine people hoax kind of thing.
Comes across as another failed breakfast type question. Defensive gun use? Doesn't exist. Criminals becoming more brazen against weaker people if magically guns disappeared? No chance. Backlash to the assassination? No way. Backlash to all the demonic gloating? See we knew you were Nazis the whole time
Have you noticed how this quote is being used by every media?
I've also seen bringing up something he said on a podcast about Nancie Pelosi's husband and the 2 democrat politicians from Mnnesota to show it is happening on both sides.
Cherry on top, no one mentions the assassination attempt on Trump as left-wing violence.
I've heard one guy yesterday saying that the right is responsible for polarizing by spreading stuff like the "war on Christimas". Calling anyone who voted for Trump nazi, homophobe, racist, fascist and the entire BLM summer did not cause polarization.
Even logical it made no sense. The right says that the left is trying to remove Christ from Christmas somehow causes the left to kill someone on the right? Why? If it was a huge issue wouldn't it make sense that it was the other way around?
I just can't stand this arguments and that leftiest smirk of superiority
it's always so easy to defeat Democrats in Intellectual debate
That Reddit post is one of those situations where they think they’re so clever, but none of them has put any thought into it. If you rolled into that thread and asked them to explain it to you, they would just downvote you and ban you.
That’s also why there’s no leftists going onto campuses and doing what Charlie did. They’re not capable of defending their beliefs.
Lets be crystal clear: The majority of annual "gun deaths" are male suicides'.
The left doesn't give a tiny fuck about men and their mental health, but they are super gleeful to shift the focus from mental health and tragic suicide rates to "ban the guns".
If we only count male homicides, we know who is responsible for 50% of those. Young, black men are shooting other young, black men.
Charlie's point is that "Helpless" is not the same as "Peaceful".
Whoever made this cartoon can go and get fucked with a cactus.
It's the same as mocking someone murdered by a deliberate vehicle hit-and-run if they previously told we should not ban cars and that it is worth to have some car deaths so we can drive.
Of course you have leftists unironically trying to ban private car ownership, so...
I imagine he’d still say this even if he knew what was going to happen. The guy, like many of us, understood very well that the American Project and its continued function is predicated on an armed populace. Using that quote in this way is not the ‘ha-ha’ or the ‘gotcha!’ or the heckin’ cosmic ironyrino that they’ve taken it for.
Seriously. May as well ban sharp objects and hammers because someone might use them to commit a crime.
I've got an idea, let's just ban crime?
Demoncrats everywhere: "YOU RACIST FACIST PIG!@!!!"
Oh you support.. er, property rights? I guess you are ok with getting murdered in someone's house when they say you were trespassing. Because that's what your precious 'property rights' gets you! Rip rip
Ya its like what's the answer, no freedom for anyone cause troons and blacks wanna be insane? Tired of being lumped in with these weirdos.
If reddit's servers and user data were ever seized you'd have a ready list or every single traitor and pedophile on the continent. Just thinking out loud.
And a lot of jeets in India
If Flesh Simulator is to be believed, a disproportionate chunk of users are based on US military installations.
Charlie Kirk died, so I guess I should disarm myself so that you can shoot me in the throat without a fight?
Nah, I'm good. I like the idea of giving you a 2-way range when you decide someone's had too much to think.
Edit:
"But if we ban guns then no one will have guns!"
If you ban guns, it will be for me. It will not be for you. It will NOT be for party apparatchiks, enforcers, anarcho-tyrant criminals you set loose on the general public. So, again: see above.
Extremely rare Giz W
Giz is based about everything except white people and the jq.
I defend whites more than anyone here IRL, and the JQ is literally "how can jews exist in a Socialist society?". I don't want a socialist society. It's an invalid question.
See, except on those topics you're based. Thanks for commenting and proving my point so quickly.
Honestly not even rare. Dare I say he is reasonable and correct more often than not. It just makes his whacky takes even more bizarre.
What wacky takes?
My opinions on Pineapple Pizza are non-negotiable.
You like to Dole out truth?
As assuredly as Dole was sponsored by the CIA to overthrow the government of Guatemala and establish a puppet state to create a monopoly on cheap bananas!
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin
Charlie Kirk understood this. That it's retarded to give up your basic human rights just because there is a chance, you will get shot one day. The logic of these liberals is that if there is a 1% chance of being shot or even less, you just bend over and spread your ass cheeks for the people who have guns and will never ever give them up. So if he could come back to life, I don't think he'd change his mind on the 2nd amendment. Instead, he would just choose an indoor location with security checkpoints to speak to his supporters and those who want to debate him.
Liberals also don't understand that Americans living in rural parts of the country need easy access to firearms, just to survive. When are you living deep in the mountains or in the forest or in the desert and 5 meth heads want to murder you and take everything you own, what are you going to do? Call the police who are like 45 minutes driving distance away? LMAO. Try to fight off 5 grown men with just a knife or baseball bat? So liberals are pushing for policies that will make it so many rural Americans are robbed, murdered and/or raped by criminals.
They don't think there should be any rural Americans. They want to force you to move to a city.
And the police will still be 45 minutes away, if they bother to show up at all.
They'll show up to arrest you for surviving, if you're still alive.
They also keep misquoting his line about empathy
Do you happen to have a link to what he was saying? All I saw was a 4-5 second clip that was cut off so I’m assuming it was another fine people hoax kind of thing.
I can’t find it now but I saw the full quote just the other day. He preferred the term sympathy
its worth noting the gun the killer used is legal in all states, no amount of gun control was going to stop this.
Gun control will never curb our violence problem. But common sense leftist control might.
This person owns a business in Oakland, CA and has a contact link listed on their web page. If you wanted to express your disappointment of his work
Comes across as another failed breakfast type question. Defensive gun use? Doesn't exist. Criminals becoming more brazen against weaker people if magically guns disappeared? No chance. Backlash to the assassination? No way. Backlash to all the demonic gloating? See we knew you were Nazis the whole time
Have you noticed how this quote is being used by every media?
I've also seen bringing up something he said on a podcast about Nancie Pelosi's husband and the 2 democrat politicians from Mnnesota to show it is happening on both sides.
Cherry on top, no one mentions the assassination attempt on Trump as left-wing violence.
I've heard one guy yesterday saying that the right is responsible for polarizing by spreading stuff like the "war on Christimas". Calling anyone who voted for Trump nazi, homophobe, racist, fascist and the entire BLM summer did not cause polarization.
But War on Christmas was legit. Also they have some nerve calling us the most evil things and saying we are polarizing
Even logical it made no sense. The right says that the left is trying to remove Christ from Christmas somehow causes the left to kill someone on the right? Why? If it was a huge issue wouldn't it make sense that it was the other way around?
I just can't stand this arguments and that leftiest smirk of superiority
Yea I don’t get their logic and never will
I think it is worth it to have some automobile accidents every single year so we can drive cars
I think it is worth it to have some drownings every year so we can have swimming pools
I think it is worth trannies hanging themselves with ropes each year so that the rest of us can use rope to tie objects to trailers, boats, etc
Haha it's always so easy to defeat Democrats in Intellectual debate. Must be why they resort to violence
Not so fast, sweaty, I have the Left-perspective rebuttals to all these arguments:
Fuck you, cars ruin the planet, I'm going to run you over in one and we'll see how much you like cars
Fuck you, bourgeois pool owner, I'm going to drown you in your pool then what you said will look real funny on reddit
Fuck you that's trans genocide, just for that I'm going to troon out and try not to hang myself, then we'll see who's laughing.
Why can't you just be a better person?
Edit: thanks for the gold kind stranger
''You should not be allowed private pool ownership ( it's just a racist practice to avoid having to swim with poos of color ) anyway.
Swimming only allowed under government supervision at public-owned facilities for your safety.''
~Leftism.
That Reddit post is one of those situations where they think they’re so clever, but none of them has put any thought into it. If you rolled into that thread and asked them to explain it to you, they would just downvote you and ban you.
That’s also why there’s no leftists going onto campuses and doing what Charlie did. They’re not capable of defending their beliefs.
Lets be crystal clear: The majority of annual "gun deaths" are male suicides'.
The left doesn't give a tiny fuck about men and their mental health, but they are super gleeful to shift the focus from mental health and tragic suicide rates to "ban the guns".
If we only count male homicides, we know who is responsible for 50% of those. Young, black men are shooting other young, black men.
Charlie's point is that "Helpless" is not the same as "Peaceful".
Whoever made this cartoon can go and get fucked with a cactus.
I don't hate the left.
I can't even reliably identify it.
This is why I hate group projects.
"I think it's worth it to have several thousand people raped and murdered every year by illegal aliens so we can have diversity".
-Every liberal I know
It's the same as mocking someone murdered by a deliberate vehicle hit-and-run if they previously told we should not ban cars and that it is worth to have some car deaths so we can drive.
Of course you have leftists unironically trying to ban private car ownership, so...
Reddit is mostly bots replying to bots.