Hey everyone,
I've been diving into critiques of Critical Race Theory (CRT) lately. I keep returning to earlier work of James Lindsay, before he became terrified of the inevitable organized Conservative Christian Nationalist response to the culture war which he has named "The Woke Right". It is a shame how far he has fallen as an attempt to salvage academia so he might have the respect of that cohort.
For those unfamiliar, Lindsay views CRT not as a benign academic theory but as a dangerous ideology rooted in Marxist principles, adapted to focus on race. He argues that CRT reframes the Marxist struggle through the lens of race and racial oppression, influencing academia, social programs, and legal systems.
According to Lindsay, CRT rejects individualism, meritocracy, and objective truth, instead framing society as inherently racist systems that oppress minorities while benefiting whites. He argues it promotes division, excuses individual accountability by blaming "systemic racism," and ultimately seeks to dismantle liberal democratic institutions.
One of the major accomplishments of CRT is to remove the agency and accountability of minority groups. If systemic racism is the underlying cause for crime and even the individual criminal act, it follows that the minority criminal is not responsible. This is why you get bullshit news coverage shifting the blame onto the SUV driven by the Jogger American, etc. A CRT proponent would argue that we need gun control, because we can't hold people holding the guns accountable for their actions.
One of his standout pieces on this is the 1-hour video lecture titled "How Critical Race Theory Operates" from his Resisting Critical Race Theory Workshop series. In it, Lindsay shifts from explaining what CRT is to how it works in practice—its "praxis," as he calls it. Here's a concise summary based on the key points:
Core Argument: Lindsay contends that CRT's primary (and only) real function is to create more Critical Race Theorists. It doesn't solve problems like racism; instead, it transforms society into a "programming machine" that indoctrinates people into its worldview. "Critical Race Theory is as Critical Race Theory does, and all Critical Race Theory does is take every pain to transform everything in society into a Critical Race Theorist programming machine" 1.
Mechanisms of Operation: He breaks down how CRT uses linguistic tricks (redefining words like "racism" to mean systemic power structures), social pressures (labeling dissent as "fragility" or complicity), and psychological manipulations (guilt-tripping or extorting agreement) to spread itself. This makes CRT self-reinforcing—once adopted, it interprets every event through its lens, generating more "evidence" for its claims.
Examples and Implications: Drawing from real-world applications, Lindsay illustrates how CRT infiltrates education, workplaces, and politics, turning neutral institutions into vehicles for its ideology. For instance, he critiques how CRT might frame social unrest or disparities not as complex issues needing nuanced solutions but as inevitable outcomes of oppression, potentially justifying disruptive actions while downplaying personal responsibility.
The lecture is eye-opening for anyone encountering CRT in daily life, emphasizing that understanding its operational tactics is key to resisting it. Lindsay ties this to his broader work, noting that these ideas form the basis for Chapter 3 in his book Race Marxism: The Truth About Critical Race Theory and Praxis.
CRT attributes criminality in minority groups to systemic racism, thereby shifting responsibility away from individuals and onto societal structures—or even objects like guns in policy responses. Lindsay argues this displaces genuine accountability, creating cycles of disadvantage while excusing behaviors under the guise of oppression. Here’s some supporting evidence and quotes from his other works:
In his article "Why Nobody is Systemically Racist" (July 11, 2020), Lindsay critiques CRT's broad application of systemic complicity, using analogies like "car culture" making everyone complicit in traffic deaths. He extends this to racial contexts: "Black neighborhoods start to look chaotic because of all the arrests. Even people living there are worried. So the government passes three-strikes laws and other no-tolerance policies; it begins to monitor neighborhoods more closely. More and more black people are arrested and have criminal records. They can’t find jobs after being released from jail or prison. They did commit crimes, but their children didn’t, and the children lose parents and family income..." He argues this systemic focus "does not encourage genuine responsibility; it displaces it," effectively excusing individual actions by blaming policies and structures for perpetuating crime cycles in minority communities.
In "What Is Critical Race Theory?" (January 10, 2021), Lindsay explains CRT's foundational assumption: "Critical Race Theory assumes that racism is present in everything under a doctrine known as ‘systemic racism.’ They assume racism is present in everything and look for it ‘Critically’ until they find it." This rejection of individual autonomy in favor of structural explanations can lead to policies that target "tools" of crime (e.g., gun control) rather than holding individuals accountable, as disparities in criminal justice are framed as evidence of inherent systemic bias, not personal choice.
Broader critiques in Lindsay's work, like in Race Marxism, tie this to CRT's Marxist roots, where systemic racism is the "underlying cause" of inequalities, including crime rates. This shifts blame from minority criminals to the system, potentially justifying lenient policies or bans on items like guns as "responsible" for violence, rather than addressing root behaviors. As he notes in related discussions, CRT views criminal justice systems as "wholly corrupted by systemic racism," leading to calls for dismantling rather than reforming based on individual accountability. In this context, it is easy to see how we get to "Defund The Police."
These ideas resonate with Lindsay's overall warning that CRT isn't just about recognizing racism but weaponizing it to erode personal responsibility and liberal values.
James is certainly building on the work of others. For me it was my first exposure to the philosophical basis for the views.
For example, James was the first time I was aware of the Marxist desire to tear down the institutions of the state and the connection to the Hegelian dialectic.
That desire predates Marx, he borrowed it from the proto-commie jacobins. Just like how commie retards today look back at all the death and destruction caused by marxist-lenninists and maoists and decide it's a really good idea that just needs someone like them running it, Marx looked back at the absolute custerfuck that was the first French revolution and decided he could do it better.
It's funny because Marxist tards dont know their own philosophy. Whenever I bring it up the average one has zero clue
Fuck James Lindsey.
Seems like I beat him to the punch by a few years. I've been pointing out that leftism/marxism/etc was always and inevitably going to become anti white since 2016. Because the ultimate inequality is genetics.
Joking aside, the guy you're talking about seems to have missed the whole Lysenkoism phase of the USSR. Leftists have been declaring that genetics don't real for more than half a century now. Metastasizing into race relations was unavoidable.
The most important thing to remember about CRT is that it's creators designed it intentionally to create problems. They tried to find racial issues in Law Theory, and while they found issues they weren't racial issues. That's who designed CRT. They couldn't find a problem, so they made one. Fuck that, and fuck them.
You are 100% correct.
The 'Critical' In CRT refers to a moral dimension to bring about change. That moral dimension is to bring about a Marxist revolution.
So you are right. CRT was designed from the ground up to disrupt a high trust society and see division. Truth, justice, fairness are all irrelevant.
CRT is true. We do live in a country explicitly founded on race, built for our race, and banning non whites from being a part of our country. Until 1965 basically.
And that was when our country was great. MARA. MAKE AMERICA RACIST AGAIN.
CRT correctly observes that race is massively important to social dynamics and if we had been honest about it, the Marxist CRT preachers wouldn't have a leg to stand on. You aren't going to get a bunch of blacks descended from slaves to forget their people's enslavement just because YOU don't see race.
Yep, our first immigration law, signed by President Washington, was very clear. They didn't intend for these United States to be a deracinated economic zone for transnational elites to loot.
Exactly. Marxist CRT just capitalizes on Americans turning their backs on their own race which pretends that Americans never cared about race, ethnicity, and ancestry.
See how most conservatives actually argue in favor of cultural and racial Marxism by upholding deracination and destroying the importance of shared ancestry to a common people.
You clearly had a "Common Core textbook that skipped, "Irish need not apply ".
If people don't want Irish to work for them that's called freedom of association. Irish were allowed to be citizens of the USA however as they were white. Some signers of the declaration of independence were Irish by blood, yet still founding Americans.
Common Core textbook theory proved correct.
Ya its an American thing, freedom of association.
You're stupid.
"Irish Need Not Apply" was removed from textbooks so the textbook could get away with," There's no such thing as racism to white people". Hard to teach kids that when the same book says otherwise.
But, keep defending that dumb shit. It's so very Common Core of you.
I'm not even talking about that so good job creating your own issue here and then arguing both sides of it to yourself.
You are, you just aren't paying attention to the killbox.
You know you are arguing with a woman, right? Don't bother.
I think James Lindsay is an important litmus test on who can be trusted and worked with towards actual concrete actions and who is just trolling or grifting. If someone dismisses lindsey out of hand, they can't be trusted or worked with.
He's a fucking idiot, but he's also incredibly important because of the work he's done.
The top comment at this time is basically diminishing his work because other people have said what he said. Which is true but you wouldn't have read those criticisms, you were never going to read marxist theory in depth to understand it.
The old body of New Discourses, while a slog, is incredibly important, and could definitely use a summary, even though it already is a summary.
We wouldn't know what critical race theory or what the frankfurt school is if it wasn't for james lindsay. What he is today isn't what he was or what his achievements are. He was a mathematician before so I genuinely think reading this much marxist theory made him crazy.
At his funeral, no-one will mention his woke right crazy period.
Speak for yourself.
Yeah, some of us were anticommunists well before that guy was.
James Lindsey didn't tell me shit
His analysis on CRT is basically correct.