The Truth About Nick Fuentes
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Nick is a fed who never even came close to being charged with a crime despite actively calling to attack police officers on the day, and having been warned about investigations by people he claimed were on the inside.
He has never faced de-banking efforts, instead he was legitimately investigated by a $250,000 gift form a foreign national that would have sent up red flags at every bank.
Nick has successfully, exclusively, targeted the populist right at every opportunity, and has actively supported Kamala Harris, and now Gavin Newsom.
Most glaringly, his shit is now being actively recommended to me by YouTube.
His biggest failure is that he is a whiny narcissist who yells at his own audience when his fucking merchandise fails to arrive on time because he fucked up shipping, and his faggots take a pledge to rape and murder for him.
Robert Barnes and Owen Benjamin is right about Nick Fuentes.
It's more than a little sus that he hasn't even been banned from Youtube when far more moderate figures have faced far worse deplatforming.
Case and point. Alex Jones was hit with nearly a billion dollar lawsuit for denying the Sandy Hook shootings (which, there were some strange things about it, nothing on the level of the Vegas shooting but still very odd) while Nick remains untouched for full-fledged Holocaust denial. Both are 1A protected speech but the latter would seem to be a much bigger deal especially since it's outright illegal in several countries.
Alex didn't actually deny the shootings.
He postulated that there were 'crisis actors' staging or managing the event, and then after he asked some questions Alex concluded (on air) that the shooting was genuine. He entertained and then discarded the idea that the Sandy Hook shootings were an operation during a single show.
The defamation lawsuit against him is genuinely without substance.