It's more than a little sus that he hasn't even been banned from Youtube when far more moderate figures have faced far worse deplatforming.
Case and point. Alex Jones was hit with nearly a billion dollar lawsuit for denying the Sandy Hook shootings (which, there were some strange things about it, nothing on the level of the Vegas shooting but still very odd) while Nick remains untouched for full-fledged Holocaust denial. Both are 1A protected speech but the latter would seem to be a much bigger deal especially since it's outright illegal in several countries.
In Alex's case, the prosecutor was aiming for greater than the GDP of France. They settled for the largest fine in US legal history, surpassing even the one that JP Morgan Chase got for seven years of manipulating the precious metals market and criminal convictions.
And that was on a summary judgement for claiming he hadn't provided enough evidence for discovery, when they provided more evidence than has ever been provided in all of US legal history, including literally millions of pages worth of documentation, policies, and financial records; as well as his entire personal cellphone by accident.
Nick, on the other hand, was allowed to give written testimony, and wasn't even dragged before congress. Which, you would think, would be really useful if the Left wanted to claim that the insurrection was a literally white supremacist coup.
Steve Banon went to prison because he refused to testify against Trump while having legal protections not to disclose his statements to Trump. Rudy Giuliani was disbarred. Enrique Torrio was convicted of sedition for allegedly organizing the operation while never stepping foot in DC. The QAnon Shaman plead guilty, was forced in the plea deal to condemn Trump politically, offer an official apology, and he would serve 21 months in a federal prison. His guilty plea was accepted, then the plea deal itself was denied, and he was sentenced to 45 months in prison to "set an example". thousands of people were placed in 24/7 solitary confinement during the Covid period for over 6 months, which is normally considered torture. Another man was convicted of contempt of court for not appearing in court while in prison after the government refused to tell the judge or his attorney which prison he was in. Attorneys were threatened with disbarment if they raised appeals. J6 prisoners were kept in federal prison, without conviction, and without trial for sometimes all 4 years of the Biden regime. Some people were kept in federal prison (not jail) without charge. For as long as 3 years. The list of crimes goes on and on. And the man who shot Ashley Babbitt in the throat was given a fucking parade.
It's more than a little sus that he hasn't even been banned from Youtube when far more moderate figures have faced far worse deplatforming.
I thought he was banned, but it's not necessarily suspicious. If I were a leftist and in charge of deplatforming, I'd help the most extreme elements (see also how they help Richard Spencer) because they are no threat to ever get anything done.
while Nick remains untouched for full-fledged Holocaust denial. Both are 1A protected speech but the latter would seem to be a much bigger deal especially since it's outright illegal in several countries.
Not in the US. Only retarded countries criminalize historical revisionism (but not all do, hence the US), even when it's not done in good faith.
Disclaimer: from what little I know about the AJ case, seems very wrong to me, especially the draconian judgment. But if you started to accuse actual Holcaoust victims of being crisis actors and paid by the deep state, and then they got inundated by death threats (as people in the AJ case claim they are), then you would have a comparable situation.
I do think that NF is a fed. However, "they're not deplatforming X so X must be a fed" is a recipe to be manipulated by the powers that be, who can just cynically decide to ostentatiously allow some people to speak to make it appear that they are feds.
I do think that NF is a fed. However, "they're not deplatforming X so X must be a fed" is a recipe to be manipulated by the powers that be, who can just cynically decide to ostentatiously allow some people to speak to make it appear that they are feds.
That's called fedjacketing.
I think Nick's a fed too, but it might not even matter at this point. Endorsing Gavin Newsom really crossed the line, it's unjustifiable.
His Newsom thing is stupid. Even if he’s trolling, save it for the anonymous X account, don’t muddy the waters because your groupies will hang on your every word.
Alex Jones was hit with nearly a billion dollar lawsuit for denying the Sandy Hook shootings ...
Alex didn't actually deny the shootings.
He postulated that there were 'crisis actors' staging or managing the event, and then after he asked some questions Alex concluded (on air) that the shooting was genuine. He entertained and then discarded the idea that the Sandy Hook shootings were an operation during a single show.
The defamation lawsuit against him is genuinely without substance.
It's more than a little sus that he hasn't even been banned from Youtube when far more moderate figures have faced far worse deplatforming.
Case and point. Alex Jones was hit with nearly a billion dollar lawsuit for denying the Sandy Hook shootings (which, there were some strange things about it, nothing on the level of the Vegas shooting but still very odd) while Nick remains untouched for full-fledged Holocaust denial. Both are 1A protected speech but the latter would seem to be a much bigger deal especially since it's outright illegal in several countries.
In Alex's case, the prosecutor was aiming for greater than the GDP of France. They settled for the largest fine in US legal history, surpassing even the one that JP Morgan Chase got for seven years of manipulating the precious metals market and criminal convictions.
And that was on a summary judgement for claiming he hadn't provided enough evidence for discovery, when they provided more evidence than has ever been provided in all of US legal history, including literally millions of pages worth of documentation, policies, and financial records; as well as his entire personal cellphone by accident.
Nick, on the other hand, was allowed to give written testimony, and wasn't even dragged before congress. Which, you would think, would be really useful if the Left wanted to claim that the insurrection was a literally white supremacist coup.
Steve Banon went to prison because he refused to testify against Trump while having legal protections not to disclose his statements to Trump. Rudy Giuliani was disbarred. Enrique Torrio was convicted of sedition for allegedly organizing the operation while never stepping foot in DC. The QAnon Shaman plead guilty, was forced in the plea deal to condemn Trump politically, offer an official apology, and he would serve 21 months in a federal prison. His guilty plea was accepted, then the plea deal itself was denied, and he was sentenced to 45 months in prison to "set an example". thousands of people were placed in 24/7 solitary confinement during the Covid period for over 6 months, which is normally considered torture. Another man was convicted of contempt of court for not appearing in court while in prison after the government refused to tell the judge or his attorney which prison he was in. Attorneys were threatened with disbarment if they raised appeals. J6 prisoners were kept in federal prison, without conviction, and without trial for sometimes all 4 years of the Biden regime. Some people were kept in federal prison (not jail) without charge. For as long as 3 years. The list of crimes goes on and on. And the man who shot Ashley Babbitt in the throat was given a fucking parade.
The three people who were fucking ignored?
I thought he was banned, but it's not necessarily suspicious. If I were a leftist and in charge of deplatforming, I'd help the most extreme elements (see also how they help Richard Spencer) because they are no threat to ever get anything done.
Not in the US. Only retarded countries criminalize historical revisionism (but not all do, hence the US), even when it's not done in good faith.
Disclaimer: from what little I know about the AJ case, seems very wrong to me, especially the draconian judgment. But if you started to accuse actual Holcaoust victims of being crisis actors and paid by the deep state, and then they got inundated by death threats (as people in the AJ case claim they are), then you would have a comparable situation.
I do think that NF is a fed. However, "they're not deplatforming X so X must be a fed" is a recipe to be manipulated by the powers that be, who can just cynically decide to ostentatiously allow some people to speak to make it appear that they are feds.
That's called fedjacketing.
I think Nick's a fed too, but it might not even matter at this point. Endorsing Gavin Newsom really crossed the line, it's unjustifiable.
His Newsom thing is stupid. Even if he’s trolling, save it for the anonymous X account, don’t muddy the waters because your groupies will hang on your every word.
He glows like the sun at this point.
There's only two reasons I could see him endorsing Newsom
"muh accelerationism" (larp) and
sheer, retarded cutting-off-your-nose degree of spite
Alex didn't actually deny the shootings.
He postulated that there were 'crisis actors' staging or managing the event, and then after he asked some questions Alex concluded (on air) that the shooting was genuine. He entertained and then discarded the idea that the Sandy Hook shootings were an operation during a single show.
The defamation lawsuit against him is genuinely without substance.