The Truth About Nick Fuentes
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Nick is a fed who never even came close to being charged with a crime despite actively calling to attack police officers on the day, and having been warned about investigations by people he claimed were on the inside.
He has never faced de-banking efforts, instead he was legitimately investigated by a $250,000 gift form a foreign national that would have sent up red flags at every bank.
Nick has successfully, exclusively, targeted the populist right at every opportunity, and has actively supported Kamala Harris, and now Gavin Newsom.
Most glaringly, his shit is now being actively recommended to me by YouTube.
His biggest failure is that he is a whiny narcissist who yells at his own audience when his fucking merchandise fails to arrive on time because he fucked up shipping, and his faggots take a pledge to rape and murder for him.
Robert Barnes and Owen Benjamin is right about Nick Fuentes.
It's more than a little sus that he hasn't even been banned from Youtube when far more moderate figures have faced far worse deplatforming.
Case and point. Alex Jones was hit with nearly a billion dollar lawsuit for denying the Sandy Hook shootings (which, there were some strange things about it, nothing on the level of the Vegas shooting but still very odd) while Nick remains untouched for full-fledged Holocaust denial. Both are 1A protected speech but the latter would seem to be a much bigger deal especially since it's outright illegal in several countries.
I thought he was banned, but it's not necessarily suspicious. If I were a leftist and in charge of deplatforming, I'd help the most extreme elements (see also how they help Richard Spencer) because they are no threat to ever get anything done.
Not in the US. Only retarded countries criminalize historical revisionism (but not all do, hence the US), even when it's not done in good faith.
Disclaimer: from what little I know about the AJ case, seems very wrong to me, especially the draconian judgment. But if you started to accuse actual Holcaoust victims of being crisis actors and paid by the deep state, and then they got inundated by death threats (as people in the AJ case claim they are), then you would have a comparable situation.
I do think that NF is a fed. However, "they're not deplatforming X so X must be a fed" is a recipe to be manipulated by the powers that be, who can just cynically decide to ostentatiously allow some people to speak to make it appear that they are feds.
That's called fedjacketing.
I think Nick's a fed too, but it might not even matter at this point. Endorsing Gavin Newsom really crossed the line, it's unjustifiable.
His Newsom thing is stupid. Even if he’s trolling, save it for the anonymous X account, don’t muddy the waters because your groupies will hang on your every word.
He glows like the sun at this point.