The Truth About Nick Fuentes
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
I know some people in the dissident right who are convinced Nick is a fed, and they are incapable of being convinced otherwise. What they don't understand is that Nick is just an avatar of a large, and rapidly growing, cohort of young men who demand answers to questions that no one on the right is willing to answer, because so-called mainstream right wing commentators know with absolute certainty that everything they have gets taken away instantly if they do.
That is what Jewish influence over American politics has done, made everyone afraid of crossing them, because no one gets money or power except through them.
January 6th the guy was openly advocating for violence. Gets no charges unlike the rest of them.
Publicly endorses every Democrat candidate.
Says some of the most insane nonsense.
Constantly fed posts.
And you want to convince me he doesn't glow like the fucking sun?
This and Ray Epps is why anyone whining about J6 being an "insurrection" cannot be taken seriously whatsoever. Anyone blatantly calling for violence gets a magical pass while FBI resources were spent doxxing/harassing grannies waving a flag on a guided tour.
That's fine, just don't hitch your wagon to a retarded homosexual virgin. Or do and don't expect to be taken seriously by anyone.
I don't know if he's a fed or not, I just think he's a worthless parasite. Even when he's argued for my side of the argument (in his debate with Destiny on Ukraine), his arguments were terrible.
I liked a lot of things nick says and said, but all of a sudden I'm being nonstop recommended Fuentes content from various posters on all the mainstream platforms.
I'm cautious of this guy, and I'm cautious especially considering his growing embrace of colorblind populism based on Catholicism over nation.
A growing cohort of men who fall for anything a tranny loving fag tells them?
Checks out
Can hardly be called men.
Well, we have plenty of examples of the soyboy fag type here for everyone to judge. It's interesting how they back a tranny loving degenerate fag, despite claiming to be against it.
Like there's some sort of pattern here, to destroy legit right wing spaces.
It's something they screech about when you notice.
Fuentes is either a fed himself or an unwilling participant in a giant honeypot. Clips of him are thriving on a bunch of major social media sites. Many of his new followers have legit grievances against the system, but I don’t trust their rabid loyalty to Fuentes and I really don’t trust Fuentes himself.
I'm about 1/3 through this video but I'm going to say right now that I like Fuentes and I think he has largely been on point with his world views. He like everyone else (of merit) has gone through a process of learning and adjusting. Some people may not like any particular view of his but so be it, we are all in a continual state of learning and adjusting.
I heard - and this is not fishing, I'm just saying that I didn't verify this myself - that he was at Jan 6, called for people to commit violence, and yet got the Ray Epps treatment.
Makes it sound to me that he is a Ray Epps himself.
It's funny that none of the people who called for violence and illegal activity got prosecuted.
Are you cutting Fuentes slack because he'd suck your dick if you put on cat ears?
I mean, that is fine if you are. You should just be honest with yourself about it.
If you wanted to actually simp for a guy who has had a genuine red-pill moment you could go and stroke yourself to Russel Brand. Not only has he had a meaningful journey informed by actual facts, he has shared that publicly and is about half way to being based.
I guess Russel won't ever want to have gay sex with you? That doesn't work for you huh?
I don't care how much he's done, I still don't like him because Stonetoss made a comic that showed me he was a faggot who dated a cat boy once.
Edit: I think too, how come he gets to be a streamer with a whole groyper army, but I have to work a real job everyday? Why does he get to sit at his computer, and say that white people are great, but I have to construction jobs?
What the fuck is this faggot shit?
Way to avoid the Community Filter. I forgot if this community had one.
Is this really what we've become
Stonetoss is Puerto Rican?
Gypsy Crusader maybe?
Yep, and he's got Asian fever.
Nick is a fed who never even came close to being charged with a crime despite actively calling to attack police officers on the day, and having been warned about investigations by people he claimed were on the inside.
He has never faced de-banking efforts, instead he was legitimately investigated by a $250,000 gift form a foreign national that would have sent up red flags at every bank.
Nick has successfully, exclusively, targeted the populist right at every opportunity, and has actively supported Kamala Harris, and now Gavin Newsom.
Most glaringly, his shit is now being actively recommended to me by YouTube.
His biggest failure is that he is a whiny narcissist who yells at his own audience when his fucking merchandise fails to arrive on time because he fucked up shipping, and his faggots take a pledge to rape and murder for him.
Robert Barnes and Owen Benjamin is right about Nick Fuentes.
It's more than a little sus that he hasn't even been banned from Youtube when far more moderate figures have faced far worse deplatforming.
Case and point. Alex Jones was hit with nearly a billion dollar lawsuit for denying the Sandy Hook shootings (which, there were some strange things about it, nothing on the level of the Vegas shooting but still very odd) while Nick remains untouched for full-fledged Holocaust denial. Both are 1A protected speech but the latter would seem to be a much bigger deal especially since it's outright illegal in several countries.
In Alex's case, the prosecutor was aiming for greater than the GDP of France. They settled for the largest fine in US legal history, surpassing even the one that JP Morgan Chase got for seven years of manipulating the precious metals market and criminal convictions.
And that was on a summary judgement for claiming he hadn't provided enough evidence for discovery, when they provided more evidence than has ever been provided in all of US legal history, including literally millions of pages worth of documentation, policies, and financial records; as well as his entire personal cellphone by accident.
Nick, on the other hand, was allowed to give written testimony, and wasn't even dragged before congress. Which, you would think, would be really useful if the Left wanted to claim that the insurrection was a literally white supremacist coup.
Steve Banon went to prison because he refused to testify against Trump while having legal protections not to disclose his statements to Trump. Rudy Giuliani was disbarred. Enrique Torrio was convicted of sedition for allegedly organizing the operation while never stepping foot in DC. The QAnon Shaman plead guilty, was forced in the plea deal to condemn Trump politically, offer an official apology, and he would serve 21 months in a federal prison. His guilty plea was accepted, then the plea deal itself was denied, and he was sentenced to 45 months in prison to "set an example". thousands of people were placed in 24/7 solitary confinement during the Covid period for over 6 months, which is normally considered torture. Another man was convicted of contempt of court for not appearing in court while in prison after the government refused to tell the judge or his attorney which prison he was in. Attorneys were threatened with disbarment if they raised appeals. J6 prisoners were kept in federal prison, without conviction, and without trial for sometimes all 4 years of the Biden regime. Some people were kept in federal prison (not jail) without charge. For as long as 3 years. The list of crimes goes on and on. And the man who shot Ashley Babbitt in the throat was given a fucking parade.
The three people who were fucking ignored?
I thought he was banned, but it's not necessarily suspicious. If I were a leftist and in charge of deplatforming, I'd help the most extreme elements (see also how they help Richard Spencer) because they are no threat to ever get anything done.
Not in the US. Only retarded countries criminalize historical revisionism (but not all do, hence the US), even when it's not done in good faith.
Disclaimer: from what little I know about the AJ case, seems very wrong to me, especially the draconian judgment. But if you started to accuse actual Holcaoust victims of being crisis actors and paid by the deep state, and then they got inundated by death threats (as people in the AJ case claim they are), then you would have a comparable situation.
I do think that NF is a fed. However, "they're not deplatforming X so X must be a fed" is a recipe to be manipulated by the powers that be, who can just cynically decide to ostentatiously allow some people to speak to make it appear that they are feds.
That's called fedjacketing.
I think Nick's a fed too, but it might not even matter at this point. Endorsing Gavin Newsom really crossed the line, it's unjustifiable.
His Newsom thing is stupid. Even if he’s trolling, save it for the anonymous X account, don’t muddy the waters because your groupies will hang on your every word.
He glows like the sun at this point.
There's only two reasons I could see him endorsing Newsom
"muh accelerationism" (larp) and
sheer, retarded cutting-off-your-nose degree of spite
I agree wholeheartedly.
Endemic problem with the online RW in general. It's a good thing that they're moving away from the old boomer zionist paradigm, but a very bad thing that this kind of sphere really appeals to the worst kind of terminally online autist with absolutely no sense for people.
You end up with almost caricatured "perfect is the enemy of good" line of thinking.
Like, seriously people, take the W and plan for tomorrow. I'd be more than happy to revert to 1950s or even 1980s America at this point. Fixing immigration is a HUGE step in the right direction and we're going to need to prioritize if we want to gain ground against nearly a century of subversion. Ragequitting is not the answer.
Yet there are people in this thread lining up to suck Nick's cock in this thread for his shitty luke-warm.takes.
If Nick wasn't a darling of the algorithm, he would not be relevant in any way.
Alex didn't actually deny the shootings.
He postulated that there were 'crisis actors' staging or managing the event, and then after he asked some questions Alex concluded (on air) that the shooting was genuine. He entertained and then discarded the idea that the Sandy Hook shootings were an operation during a single show.
The defamation lawsuit against him is genuinely without substance.
What's the list of presidential candidates that Nick has endorsed?
Did he not also call for violence on J6 while there?
Nick, Myron, Tate are all feds.