Hollywood deserves the destruction and so does anyone else who comes along to pump poison into the west.

Yeah, maybe we will eventually figure out how to make that a reality. I hope we do, it would be incredibly frustrating if we can't get ourselves to other inhabitable planets after fantasizing about the prospect for so long.

I agree that the opinion is based on current understandings but as for now it isn't looking good for us. You need fundamental rewrites of what we supposedly know to get past the problems.

At bare minimum we likely need to be able to advance to the point where we can resource harvest space borne objects besides just Earth. I don't think that is going to be feasible without figuring out how to manipulate gravity on whim. The means that we have now in regards to that are very crude in comparison to what is needed.

I personally doubt it, AI machines require a high functioning society to create and support which is by my estimation only going to make such things even more rare. I think it more likely to find organic compounds like what has been claimed about findings on Mars and even there I am not so sure that I trust the report.

Not because I think that Mars never produced rudimentary life or better but because I am a bit skeptical about NASA's claims at times. It would make sense to me that if Mars ever held a viable atmosphere for a long enough time that life would develop on it.

https://www.nasa.gov/missions/mars-science-laboratory/curiosity-rover/nasas-curiosity-finds-organic-molecules-never-seen-before-on-mars/

I used a translator.

Dutch police officers are politely informing the public that protests against the conversion of a former school in Apeldoorn into an asylum center for 240 male illegal migrants are not permitted.

If you don't figure out that you are enslaved at that point and that the gloves are now completely off, you are a retard.

Every serious examination I have seen on interstellar travel has revealed that it is not possible without great amounts of time involved. If we can't travel at speeds much faster than the speed of light then we aren't going anywhere which is pretty depressing to think about. Even getting humans to Mars and back is calculated to be impossible.

If they are well informed how can they be an egalitarian?

With the broad feminization of men that will only buy you so much sanity back into the system.

They still aren't going to vote for him.

(PS: Neither would I..)

According to a well established historical trend line this all ends up very badly unless there is hard correction. The Jews will simply not stop their pattern of wanton destruction via infiltration, subversion and takeover of any society that doesn't want to submit to innate Jewish hostility against anyone who is not them which first starts out as covert and friendly and gets to the point that we see in this clip. It obviously doesn't stop here.

And yes I don't think that is all Jews who are in league with this Jewish dominance paradigm but that is meaningless as even the ones who are not in league with it will still capitulate and go along with a system that has benefits for them. Benefits like not being persecuted and punished for just existing.

Technical boomer here but I'm actually GenX in mindset by life experiences/observations. You are correct, WWII enabled (and probably was constructed for..) the great brainwashing of America. I grew up with that propaganda but for whatever reason it failed to get into the marrow of my being. At this point I've seen nothing but a life time of of deceptions and lies by the media and American government, those observations have given me nothing but a white hot hatred for them.

Agreed.

I hope I live to see the day when every single person who votes for this is exposed, convicted of treason and sentenced accordingly.

But yet the UK will continue to allow itself to collapse under the weight of a third world invasion.

Thank you.

Is it safe to assume white flight from hostile demographics? I only skimmed the article but it seemed like it was written by an egalitarian who was largely avoiding certain topic facets.

Other states should deny reciprocity.

Not by choice, it's by deceit and collusion.

Hmm, this might turn into an interesting case of testing "law" versus constitutional principles. In any event there is chilling of speech going here and a lesson in giving yourself margins of safety if you just don't want the hassle of fighting a rigged system. Depending on the person it may or may not be a good fight to have.

What are they going to guilt Chinese with?

Do white people even watch TV anymore? I stopped watching around the turn the century.

He's crashing out. Seriously.

Nah dog, they start out that way.

I've been using Yandex exclusively for a few years now.

You're always going to find people who pick a nuanced position of a argument that is at odds with a core component of their own platform. I'll explain from my libertarian leaning position. (I'm a life long registered (at 18 yo) independent of about 45 years who has never belonged to any political party. Not belonging to a political party frees up your head space a lot...)

The D.C. beltway libertarians / open border libertarians are frauds. How do you know? Because of property ownership. You can't claim that property ownership is a core of your belief system and at the same time claim that you have no care about ownership over your borders or home and nor should other people.

These are obviously mutually exclusive beliefs and a purely politically contrived schizophrenic position that doesn't hold up to even a mere surface scratching of the issue. So don't blame libertarians for this, blame frauds and people who don't even understand a core component of their own belief system, or are at least selectively editing out what they don't like when it suits them.