I personally doubt it, AI machines require a high functioning society to create and support which is by my estimation only going to make such things even more rare. I think it more likely to find organic compounds like what has been claimed about findings on Mars and even there I am not so sure that I trust the report.
Not because I think that Mars never produced rudimentary life or better but because I am a bit skeptical about NASA's claims at times. It would make sense to me that if Mars ever held a viable atmosphere for a long enough time that life would develop on it.
I personally doubt it, AI machines require a high functioning society to create and support which is by my estimation only going to make such things even more rare. I think it more likely to find organic compounds like what has been claimed about findings on Mars and even there I am not so sure that I trust the report.
Not because I think that Mars never produced rudimentary life or better but because I am a bit skeptical about NASA's claims at times. It would make sense to me that if Mars ever held a viable atmosphere for a long enough time that life would develop on it.
https://www.nasa.gov/missions/mars-science-laboratory/curiosity-rover/nasas-curiosity-finds-organic-molecules-never-seen-before-on-mars/
Just so everyone is clear "organic" molecules and compounds aren't even close to "life".
They're hydrocarbons; at least, everything but the most basic of basic hydrocarbons.
Methane, for example, which occurs all over the place without anything resembling life, is an organic molecule.