Kirby Air Ride: Item Bounce
Is it wrong to still like stuffed crust, knowing that it was a government plant?
They were creating pony porn right next to regular pony art that was in official channels, flooding Youtube with so much questionable material
So, uh. What were you searching for to do that to your algorithm?
Funny that that's the only sexual issue you provide too. Going by the rest of your post, it seems like you're complaining that bronies were influential and visible moreso than that they were sexual.
To be fair, and speaking as a brony who looks back on the (early) show fondly, furries gonna furry. There were definitely untoward elements in the fandom. But that's true for every fandom in existence. It's literally a rule of the internet. And it's directly proportional to the popularity of the media in question too. So ponies got popular, ponies suffered the consequences, male fans totally to blame. Go figure.
It's interesting. Media can pander directly to female pervs and nobody bats an eye. But male pervs make their own smut for media they're interested in and suddenly it's completely degenerate to like that thing. Once again, go figure.
I've been rewatching it lately. It's a lot of fun. I do enjoy the slightly different take on the characters.
This is the kind of stuff we should be throwing Tea Parties over.
Movie: The Batman Show: The Batman
See, here's the sad thing. Why should Trump align with his base? What are we gonna do? Not vote for him next time?
It was a mistake to humanize fantasy monsters. And I say this as a personal fan of the "Friendly monsters trying to be good people." trope.
It still amuses me that the pokemon Cofagrigus was banned from trading if un-nicknamed, because it's standard name tripped the censorship flags.
Patrick went from a self-confident, well-meaning moron, to a complete retard who might actually be using his idiocy as an excuse to be a jerk to people.
It really is interesting, seeing how smart writers create a stupid character, versus how stupid writers make a stupid character.
I was thinking of The Spectacular Spiderman. He and Harry were ginger in that.
Ol' Norm was a redhead originally, wasn't he?
We live in a society of people who are too used to silver bullet solutions. They think everything can be solved with a computer, or a little pill, or a simple medical procedure, etc. Nobody is conditioned to think about where their food and water come from. Nobody thinks about the side effects of chemically inducing things. Nobody thinks about all the natural tradeoffs that we have to make in order to survive Everybody is conditioned to think that they can get something for nothing. They've never had a moment where they've had to question the reality of "Equivalent Exchange." And when the ugly truth comes looming over them, showing all the expenses and swindles and even fair exchanges that they're paying for in one way or another, they bundle them all up into "capitalism" and demonize it all. As though the tradeoffs of existence were just a bad dream they can safely ignore....
May have gone slightly off topic, but that's what comes to mind when you ask this. Nobody is asking the question in the first place, because they all think that there is no cost to anything. To them, it's all profit with no downsides.
It's not even a cool fantasy. It's just a motorized wheelchair, but "bigger." Why do these people have such atrophied imaginations? If I was gonna be stuck in a fantasy wheelchair, I'd be flying a modular hovercraft like all the great vidya villains.
I've been playing the new Mario Party with my little nephew lately. I don't go out of my way to antagonize him, but I also give no quarter when the minigames roll around. I think it's helping him be a better loser. He celebrates me winning almost as much as we celebrate his wins. (Though he does like to celebrate "You didn't win!" at me sometimes, which is kind of hilarious.)
This is just like how it turned out the ozone hole was a natural, seasonal thing that constantly repaired itself. Oopsie doodles. Hope you weren't too attached to using those Flurocarbons, because those bans ain't NEVER lifting.
It would have had to. They couldn't have been so funny otherwise.
Honestly, people need to be willing to cut creators off too, when they go off the deep end and start vandalizing their past work with retcons and sequels.
You drink water? HITLER DRANK WATER!
Canon is such a joke. As long as people treat "Owners" as the lorekeepers rather than the creators, it's only going to keep going downhill.
It still blows my mind that some people will admit that certain sequels are garbage and bad, but insist "It still happened though." As though it's not all made up at the end of the day.
I think what I'm most offended by is how absolutely unsubtle it is. Even Totally Spies had a BIT of subtlety to its rampant fetishes.
I wonder if the artist was into it, or if he had to suffer for his paycheck....
Kind of rude to take one guy's off the cuff thoughts in a field he clearly doesn't think hard on and treat them like the gospel.
As a "Christian Fundamentalist" I believe that God created the world. I believe He created it to grow and adapt, which is why we have so many variations of evolved creatures that clearly spring from the same mold.
The issue I have with "evolution" as it's presented, is that it's putting an awful, AWFUL lot of blind faith in random chance creating, from scratch, an incalculable number of incredibly complex and precise biological systems that work perfectly in tandem, over and over and over again without collapsing on its own chaotic entropy. You can't just win the lottery once and be done with it, because every system is so deeply intertwined with each other. I can buy a creature becoming fatter and furrier in response to cold. I can buy an environment encouraging stripes and spots to blend in. I cannot buy the incredibly complex and barely understood language that is DNA spawning from the aether and facilitating universal rules for all life on this planet without being destroyed by the inevitable unfavorable conditions.
They say infinite monkeys will write Shakespeare if given infinite time. Number one, nobody thinks we have infinite time. Number two, even entertaining the slight possibility that they could get close, there is going to be an impossible number of typos as they go, because a million monkeys don't care about unimportant little things like formatting and spelling and grammar. The very things that make the concept of language possible in the first place. They can't just get lucky once, they have to get lucky again, and again, and again, and again, ad nauseum, or else the whole thing has to be thrown out and started over.