And this is WORSE than you can imagine as it can define absence of vaginal hair and absence of visible and shaply breasts. It also doesn't HAVE to be porn, as they put an 'eye of the beholder' statute on it.
So if you don't like bush or you have a woman with a flat chest, you could get arrested by this law. Huh, is it just me or is all these 'Anti pedo/loli' policies and law HEAVILY racist towards Asians? Like think about it, there's a lot of Asians that fit both those definitions, so Asians represent that in their art and now we have the West saying it's all pedophilic when the West literally ran Lolita air and Epstein island.
Just admit you hate Asians at this point than trying to project on them as they don't have open child grooming known as the LGBT+ movement..
And this is WORSE than you can imagine as it can define absence of vaginal hair and absence of visible and shaply breasts.
So, theoretical, what if your (adult) girlfriend who has small tits and shaves, sends you nudes?
It also doesn't HAVE to be porn, as they put an 'eye of the beholder' statute on it.
Okay, even more ridiculous theoretical, what if you take a picture of your fully clothed girlfriend who has small tits?
Now, I know most of those wouldn't get enforced, but it's still absolute peak retardation, and it only takes one time it does get enforced to ruin someone's life. And that does happen. Whenever you see these laws, someone is going to get ruined undeservedly. Maybe it won't happen on a large scale, but some innocent people are going to get wrecked with some truly heinous accusations or criminal records.
Also, "small tits" is such a fucking stupid legislative move. We saw this shit in Australia, too.
The reason we protect children is because they can't consent. Whether you have giant mommy milkers or itty bitty titties has no relevance on whether you can consent though. If you're underage, you can't. If you're of legal age and sound mind, you can. Boobies don't enter into it.
Worse, I fear the British style for this law. Like with their communications act.
Get a law on the books but don't enforce it for years, just allow it to remain until you can use the fact it hasn't been challenged for years (because it wasn't enforced from the get go) as grounds to why it has standing to be used in massive crackdowns later.
They want control over all forms of media, including anime. The anime market has largely escaped their control, and this pisses them off....and thus you get bills like this which are ostensibly "for defense of the children!" when its just a broad hammer designed to smash an entity they lack control of.
The scary part is...think about how shit US institutions/systems/governments are. Now realize, by and large, we still have it better than most other places. They've tried similar stuff in the US, on the small scale, but Europe just loves their sweeping retarded regulations. There's no competition.
I would expect if it is sexual images etc it will always be 18. You would have the creepy weirdos make porn with that age demographic in countries with low age of consent ages otherwise. Thankfully seems to not be the case. So yes, receiving a drawn image of an anime girl in sexual poses will probably land you in hot water. Yoko Litner fans beware.
What child got hurt by a drawing? IF you used real life references like shadman did a while ago that is 100% woodchipper worthy though. Honestly wtf was he thinking... Otherwise though? Aka stuff that ISN'T using humans as reference? It's not even real, same as any drawing.
Again, that's actually a huge part of the problem. It's in the "eye of the beholder."
It's fucking art. It doesn't have an age. If it's something you or I would look at and think "adult," but the author or artist has said is a seventeen year old, are you really saying that's pedophilia?
Look, there's plenty of disgusting art out there. For the sake of argument, lets even say maybe some of it even should be illegal. This law still blows chunks. It's imprecise, which is the hallmark of a bad law.
Adult-presenting art where the writer has said the character is perhaps slightly younger than eighteen is not pedophilia , or even pedophile-adjacent. You can think it's distasteful, but this isn't even an "anti-loli" law, because it goes so far beyond that.
For example, anime has plenty of "waifus," many are technically (in universe) underage, but you wouldn't know that looking at their art. It's insane to say that just because a character may be stated to be a seventeen year old, or even a fifteen year old, but you'd think they were and adult with how they were drawn, that possessing an image of them is equivalent to child porn. That's insane, that's bad law. Drawings don't have age of consent, and getting vague and "eye of the beholder" stuff just makes it worse.
Sure, as the white Christians aren't going to be back in charge any time soon, I'm not for handing the enemies more tools to use against us. True anarchy is preferable than whatever system we currently have.
They'll continue to go after drawings while whore benefactors like OF, etc. will remain intact. The elites still need the plebs to not reproduce (until they need more slaves if AI doesn't take off)
Having the gooberment telling you to stop consuming porn is the worst way to reduce porn consumption. It'll have a similar effect as the BS food pyramids of yore that were advertised to encourage "healthy" eating.
Not to mention, the "eye of the beholder" part drags non-porn content into it and it's incredibly retarded.
I think criminalizing art is retarded. I think criminalizing art with the whole 'eye of the beholder' thing is even more retarded. Guess I must be a pedo.
Also, you're either so ideologically absorbed, you didn't read/look, or you're just trolling. They're assigning ages to fictional drawn characters, and applying age of consent laws. That's peak retardation. An image of a character that looks perfectly adult, but is "canonically" 17 or something, is now illegal to possess.
I hate pedos as much as the next person, but that is absolutely fucking retarded, and has no connections to pedophilia. Stop being a retard.
However, I am not in that group, if that's what you're implying. And I don't think people should get ovens/woodchippers based on the anime waifus they happen to look at. Touch children, get the woodchipper/oven. No argument here.
The problem is the image is not a person but the law seems to treat it as one. There's no victim but it's "child abuse," surely you can recognize that that's retarded.
I very, very much hate loli content. But this so beyond retarded. If you dont like it, dont seek it out. But this is also a gateway for further censorship. That's the real threat here.
Did literally every intelligent European flee to America and only the retards stayed behind breeding more retards. Why can't Europe get its fucking shit together?
is retarded.
Everybody who plays GTA is now getting arrested for murder.
I'm surprised this hasn't come earlier, Vee has been shouting about it for nearly a week now.
And this is WORSE than you can imagine as it can define absence of vaginal hair and absence of visible and shaply breasts. It also doesn't HAVE to be porn, as they put an 'eye of the beholder' statute on it.
So if you don't like bush or you have a woman with a flat chest, you could get arrested by this law. Huh, is it just me or is all these 'Anti pedo/loli' policies and law HEAVILY racist towards Asians? Like think about it, there's a lot of Asians that fit both those definitions, so Asians represent that in their art and now we have the West saying it's all pedophilic when the West literally ran Lolita air and Epstein island.
Just admit you hate Asians at this point than trying to project on them as they don't have open child grooming known as the LGBT+ movement..
So, theoretical, what if your (adult) girlfriend who has small tits and shaves, sends you nudes?
Okay, even more ridiculous theoretical, what if you take a picture of your fully clothed girlfriend who has small tits?
Now, I know most of those wouldn't get enforced, but it's still absolute peak retardation, and it only takes one time it does get enforced to ruin someone's life. And that does happen. Whenever you see these laws, someone is going to get ruined undeservedly. Maybe it won't happen on a large scale, but some innocent people are going to get wrecked with some truly heinous accusations or criminal records.
Also, "small tits" is such a fucking stupid legislative move. We saw this shit in Australia, too.
The reason we protect children is because they can't consent. Whether you have giant mommy milkers or itty bitty titties has no relevance on whether you can consent though. If you're underage, you can't. If you're of legal age and sound mind, you can. Boobies don't enter into it.
Worse, I fear the British style for this law. Like with their communications act.
Get a law on the books but don't enforce it for years, just allow it to remain until you can use the fact it hasn't been challenged for years (because it wasn't enforced from the get go) as grounds to why it has standing to be used in massive crackdowns later.
Meanwhile the migrants raping their women and children won't be punished
It's part of their Culture!
Well that's also retarded. Precedent and standing should only apply when a law has been used.
"Well it's been sitting here for 10 years even though its never been used so it has standing" is the exact opposite of logical.
They want control over all forms of media, including anime. The anime market has largely escaped their control, and this pisses them off....and thus you get bills like this which are ostensibly "for defense of the children!" when its just a broad hammer designed to smash an entity they lack control of.
The scary part is...think about how shit US institutions/systems/governments are. Now realize, by and large, we still have it better than most other places. They've tried similar stuff in the US, on the small scale, but Europe just loves their sweeping retarded regulations. There's no competition.
Europeans really just want to return to feudalism and be ruled over by a lord. It's ingrained in their peasant DNA.
These elites don’t care about the law or common sense.
But they do care about being called racist!
Vaginal hair would be a thing. I think you mean pubic hair.
/Sorry
I only put vaginal hair as in the video I linked that's what they called it.
Noice
Remember, elite political strategy is not about protecting people.
It's about controlling them.
Once you understand that, things start to make sense.
I would expect if it is sexual images etc it will always be 18. You would have the creepy weirdos make porn with that age demographic in countries with low age of consent ages otherwise. Thankfully seems to not be the case. So yes, receiving a drawn image of an anime girl in sexual poses will probably land you in hot water. Yoko Litner fans beware.
I was waiting to see if Tifa would get a mention. I am not disappointed.
Lmao. Lol even.
Based, stop using porn
No wait, you can't arrest me for pedophilia. I'm being ideologically consistent! Nooooo!
What child got hurt by a drawing? IF you used real life references like shadman did a while ago that is 100% woodchipper worthy though. Honestly wtf was he thinking... Otherwise though? Aka stuff that ISN'T using humans as reference? It's not even real, same as any drawing.
What is it a drawing of?
Again, that's actually a huge part of the problem. It's in the "eye of the beholder."
It's fucking art. It doesn't have an age. If it's something you or I would look at and think "adult," but the author or artist has said is a seventeen year old, are you really saying that's pedophilia?
Look, there's plenty of disgusting art out there. For the sake of argument, lets even say maybe some of it even should be illegal. This law still blows chunks. It's imprecise, which is the hallmark of a bad law.
Adult-presenting art where the writer has said the character is perhaps slightly younger than eighteen is not pedophilia , or even pedophile-adjacent. You can think it's distasteful, but this isn't even an "anti-loli" law, because it goes so far beyond that.
For example, anime has plenty of "waifus," many are technically (in universe) underage, but you wouldn't know that looking at their art. It's insane to say that just because a character may be stated to be a seventeen year old, or even a fifteen year old, but you'd think they were and adult with how they were drawn, that possessing an image of them is equivalent to child porn. That's insane, that's bad law. Drawings don't have age of consent, and getting vague and "eye of the beholder" stuff just makes it worse.
All of those words and you didn't answer the question.
Is it a drawing of a flower? A puppy? A car?
A fictional character from the artist's imagination.
coughmarinkitagawacough
What drawing are you talking about? The shadman one? He drew iirc keemstars daughter, very messed up.
Morally correct, but it's your enemies in charge of what's porn and what's not, who gets punished and who doesn't.
That is an argument for anarchy. You can apply it to every law.
Sure, as the white Christians aren't going to be back in charge any time soon, I'm not for handing the enemies more tools to use against us. True anarchy is preferable than whatever system we currently have.
Porn is for incels
There's a middle ground. My spank bank can go toe-to-toe with anyone, but I still watch porn once or twice a week.
They'll continue to go after drawings while whore benefactors like OF, etc. will remain intact. The elites still need the plebs to not reproduce (until they need more slaves if AI doesn't take off)
Having the gooberment telling you to stop consuming porn is the worst way to reduce porn consumption. It'll have a similar effect as the BS food pyramids of yore that were advertised to encourage "healthy" eating.
Not to mention, the "eye of the beholder" part drags non-porn content into it and it's incredibly retarded.
Is this technically old news, and people just noticed it?
Can't wait to see all the pedos in this forum out themselves by crying about this. C'mon out chomos. Let's see who you are.
I think criminalizing art is retarded. I think criminalizing art with the whole 'eye of the beholder' thing is even more retarded. Guess I must be a pedo.
Also, you're either so ideologically absorbed, you didn't read/look, or you're just trolling. They're assigning ages to fictional drawn characters, and applying age of consent laws. That's peak retardation. An image of a character that looks perfectly adult, but is "canonically" 17 or something, is now illegal to possess.
I hate pedos as much as the next person, but that is absolutely fucking retarded, and has no connections to pedophilia. Stop being a retard.
Pizza lovers get the oven
I prefer woodchippers, but yes.
However, I am not in that group, if that's what you're implying. And I don't think people should get ovens/woodchippers based on the anime waifus they happen to look at. Touch children, get the woodchipper/oven. No argument here.
But you're still being retarded.
The problem is the image is not a person but the law seems to treat it as one. There's no victim but it's "child abuse," surely you can recognize that that's retarded.
I very, very much hate loli content. But this so beyond retarded. If you dont like it, dont seek it out. But this is also a gateway for further censorship. That's the real threat here.
Overwhelm the judges' email addresses with pictures of suggestive anime "8-year-olds." Turn these people into the worst "child abusers" of all time.
Lemme find my Monogatari folder, lol.
Jokes aside those rules will probably not count for them, as usual.
Did literally every intelligent European flee to America and only the retards stayed behind breeding more retards. Why can't Europe get its fucking shit together?
Anyone who followed the Amanda Knox saga knows Italy has a kangaroo justice system