And this is WORSE than you can imagine as it can define absence of vaginal hair and absence of visible and shaply breasts. It also doesn't HAVE to be porn, as they put an 'eye of the beholder' statute on it.
So if you don't like bush or you have a woman with a flat chest, you could get arrested by this law. Huh, is it just me or is all these 'Anti pedo/loli' policies and law HEAVILY racist towards Asians? Like think about it, there's a lot of Asians that fit both those definitions, so Asians represent that in their art and now we have the West saying it's all pedophilic when the West literally ran Lolita air and Epstein island.
Just admit you hate Asians at this point than trying to project on them as they don't have open child grooming known as the LGBT+ movement..
And this is WORSE than you can imagine as it can define absence of vaginal hair and absence of visible and shaply breasts.
So, theoretical, what if your (adult) girlfriend who has small tits and shaves, sends you nudes?
It also doesn't HAVE to be porn, as they put an 'eye of the beholder' statute on it.
Okay, even more ridiculous theoretical, what if you take a picture of your fully clothed girlfriend who has small tits?
Now, I know most of those wouldn't get enforced, but it's still absolute peak retardation, and it only takes one time it does get enforced to ruin someone's life. And that does happen. Whenever you see these laws, someone is going to get ruined undeservedly. Maybe it won't happen on a large scale, but some innocent people are going to get wrecked with some truly heinous accusations or criminal records.
Also, "small tits" is such a fucking stupid legislative move. We saw this shit in Australia, too.
The reason we protect children is because they can't consent. Whether you have giant mommy milkers or itty bitty titties has no relevance on whether you can consent though. If you're underage, you can't. If you're of legal age and sound mind, you can. Boobies don't enter into it.
Worse, I fear the British style for this law. Like with their communications act.
Get a law on the books but don't enforce it for years, just allow it to remain until you can use the fact it hasn't been challenged for years (because it wasn't enforced from the get go) as grounds to why it has standing to be used in massive crackdowns later.
They want control over all forms of media, including anime. The anime market has largely escaped their control, and this pisses them off....and thus you get bills like this which are ostensibly "for defense of the children!" when its just a broad hammer designed to smash an entity they lack control of.
The scary part is...think about how shit US institutions/systems/governments are. Now realize, by and large, we still have it better than most other places. They've tried similar stuff in the US, on the small scale, but Europe just loves their sweeping retarded regulations. There's no competition.
I'm surprised this hasn't come earlier, Vee has been shouting about it for nearly a week now.
And this is WORSE than you can imagine as it can define absence of vaginal hair and absence of visible and shaply breasts. It also doesn't HAVE to be porn, as they put an 'eye of the beholder' statute on it.
So if you don't like bush or you have a woman with a flat chest, you could get arrested by this law. Huh, is it just me or is all these 'Anti pedo/loli' policies and law HEAVILY racist towards Asians? Like think about it, there's a lot of Asians that fit both those definitions, so Asians represent that in their art and now we have the West saying it's all pedophilic when the West literally ran Lolita air and Epstein island.
Just admit you hate Asians at this point than trying to project on them as they don't have open child grooming known as the LGBT+ movement..
So, theoretical, what if your (adult) girlfriend who has small tits and shaves, sends you nudes?
Okay, even more ridiculous theoretical, what if you take a picture of your fully clothed girlfriend who has small tits?
Now, I know most of those wouldn't get enforced, but it's still absolute peak retardation, and it only takes one time it does get enforced to ruin someone's life. And that does happen. Whenever you see these laws, someone is going to get ruined undeservedly. Maybe it won't happen on a large scale, but some innocent people are going to get wrecked with some truly heinous accusations or criminal records.
Also, "small tits" is such a fucking stupid legislative move. We saw this shit in Australia, too.
The reason we protect children is because they can't consent. Whether you have giant mommy milkers or itty bitty titties has no relevance on whether you can consent though. If you're underage, you can't. If you're of legal age and sound mind, you can. Boobies don't enter into it.
Worse, I fear the British style for this law. Like with their communications act.
Get a law on the books but don't enforce it for years, just allow it to remain until you can use the fact it hasn't been challenged for years (because it wasn't enforced from the get go) as grounds to why it has standing to be used in massive crackdowns later.
Meanwhile the migrants raping their women and children won't be punished
It's part of their Culture!
Well that's also retarded. Precedent and standing should only apply when a law has been used.
"Well it's been sitting here for 10 years even though its never been used so it has standing" is the exact opposite of logical.
They want control over all forms of media, including anime. The anime market has largely escaped their control, and this pisses them off....and thus you get bills like this which are ostensibly "for defense of the children!" when its just a broad hammer designed to smash an entity they lack control of.
The scary part is...think about how shit US institutions/systems/governments are. Now realize, by and large, we still have it better than most other places. They've tried similar stuff in the US, on the small scale, but Europe just loves their sweeping retarded regulations. There's no competition.
Europeans really just want to return to feudalism and be ruled over by a lord. It's ingrained in their peasant DNA.
These elites don’t care about the law or common sense.
But they do care about being called racist!
Vaginal hair would be a thing. I think you mean pubic hair.
/Sorry
I only put vaginal hair as in the video I linked that's what they called it.
Noice